Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2012 Elections => Topic started by: Tender Branson on January 19, 2012, 02:29:59 PM



Title: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Tender Branson on January 19, 2012, 02:29:59 PM
()

Gingrich, Romney, Paul & Santorum will debate.

Can you sticky this please ?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Tender Branson on January 19, 2012, 02:31:23 PM
Since it's on CNN, I can watch a debate again on my TV and will wake up at 2am to see it ... :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Simfan34 on January 19, 2012, 05:33:54 PM
8pm? Yes!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Oakvale on January 19, 2012, 05:59:54 PM
I do hope Gingrich doesn't make a complete ass of himself.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 06:02:03 PM
Seriously, Gingrich better not screw this up.

And Santorum better not spend all his time attacking Gingrich. We already know Paul will, because he's basically just Romney's sidekick in these things at this point.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Oakvale on January 19, 2012, 06:05:03 PM
Seriously, Gingrich better not screw this up.

And Santorum better not spend all his time attacking Gingrich. We already know Paul will, because he's basically just Romney's sidekick in these things at this point.

Yeah, Paul is Romney's Flava Flav. Notice that he's started wearing a giant nugget of gold on a chain around his neck and saying things like "yeaaah boyeee" after Romney speaks.



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 06:35:17 PM
Seriously, Gingrich better not screw this up.

And Santorum better not spend all his time attacking Gingrich. We already know Paul will, because he's basically just Romney's sidekick in these things at this point.

Yeah, Paul is Romney's Flava Flav. Notice that he's started wearing a giant nugget of gold on a chain around his neck and saying things like "yeaaah boyeee" after Romney speaks.



Guess who's who:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ose0R85rY4&feature=related


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Joe Republic on January 19, 2012, 06:55:55 PM
Guess who's who:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ose0R85rY4&feature=related

That 24 second video pretty much sums up the entire GOP campaign thus far.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 07:20:42 PM
Guess who's who:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ose0R85rY4&feature=related

That 24 second video pretty much sums up the entire GOP campaign thus far.

Here's the extended version featuring a resurgent Newt Gingrich and conniving Sarah Palin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r94AJzJZZaU&feature=related


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 07:27:55 PM
got some of Long Island's own Blue Point Toasted Lager for the debate, how bout yall?

http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/764/2318


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 07:30:35 PM
Guinness. Romney needs to crush Gingrich tonight, with Paul tag teaming him, and hope that Santorum follows suit.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 07:34:59 PM
speaking of crushing, there's no crushing Guinness.  I've disliked the stuff since I choked one down on August 8 2007.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 07:36:26 PM
Too bad Rick Perry won't be there to make us laugh, but I guess there's still a chance it can be funny (which is the only reason I'm following the GOP race).


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Frozen Sky Ever Why on January 19, 2012, 07:46:32 PM
Is this being streamed?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 07:49:09 PM

should be here http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/cvptve/cvpstream1


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 07:49:52 PM

should be here http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/cvptve/cvpstream1

ehh I just got prompted for my provider login..  I have one but the masses may not


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:01:20 PM
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1 (http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/cvplive/cvpstream1) is working for me.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:03:11 PM
4 podiums!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:04:21 PM
Ronnie's out.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:04:33 PM
Romney got the most tepid response after being introduced.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: greenforest32 on January 19, 2012, 08:05:12 PM
Oh god damnit not more of this anthem bullsh**t


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:05:34 PM
What did Santorum just do?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:05:57 PM
Oh god damnit not more of this anthem bullsh**t

Have some pride, man.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:06:04 PM
Oh god damnit not more of this anthem bullsh**t
Its actually really good. Usually its over dramatic and sucks. This is the way it should be sung!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:06:19 PM
Okay. We get it. You love America.

NOW SOMEONE BITE MITT'S HEAD OFF!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:06:29 PM

A really good impression of Rick Perry.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:06:35 PM
AMERICA F*** YEAH


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:07:06 PM
Wow, the anthem. I love this jingoistic nationalism.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:07:28 PM
Screw you King! GO RAVENS!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:07:37 PM
Seven kids? Jesus Rick.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Joe Biden 2020 on January 19, 2012, 08:08:03 PM
Santorum makes the first subtle jab... (THank you, Iowa!!)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:08:13 PM
Alot more time for everyone :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:08:24 PM
Mitt: And ten wives!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:08:44 PM
Santorum: I won Iowa.
Romney: I've been married consistently.
Gingrich: I'm a Southerner
Paul: I'm a veteran.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:08:48 PM
Romney's opening remarks: "I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!  I'm a family man!"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:08:53 PM
Did Paul just have a stroke? I have to admit that was very bad/


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:09:17 PM
OH sh**t HERE IT COMES...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:09:33 PM
Gingy's pissed.

Edit: Yay, first fight of the night! Go Newty.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:09:43 PM
Gingrich is going to kill this thing.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:09:51 PM
Here we go!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:10:02 PM
Wow, that was great by Newt. I am appalled as well.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:10:09 PM
Haha I love this


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:10:34 PM
NEWT HITS IT OUT OF THE PARK.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:10:37 PM
Newt is a dickhole.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 08:10:43 PM
Good old CNN...I start watching 10 minutes late and it just started.

Also, 1 minute in and newts already attacking the media!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dancing with Myself on January 19, 2012, 08:10:50 PM
Newt owned the hell out of the moderator, I agree with him!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:10:53 PM
Not as despicable as cheating on a wife who has cancer, but whatevsky.

F, Gingy is going to kill the CNN dude.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:11:32 PM
Newt, YOU ING GO MAN!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:11:47 PM
This is amazing. Newt's going to win in a landslide. Sorry folks.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:11:54 PM
My God, Newt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: greenforest32 on January 19, 2012, 08:11:59 PM
Newt looks nervous


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:11:59 PM
()


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:12:07 PM
Gingrich won the debate. It's over already. Wow.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:12:11 PM
The Republican Party is no longer the party of values if it nominates Newt Gingrich. Either his second ex-wife lied, or he said he wanted an "open marriage." He is not denying the latter. CNN ought to do their job and say, "did your second ex-wife lie? Are you accusing her of lying?"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:12:11 PM
Newt owned the hell out of the moderator, I agree with him!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:12:23 PM
For the GOP crowd, Newt is probably owning like never before with the faux anger stuff.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Volrath50 on January 19, 2012, 08:12:38 PM
I do not think Newt could have handled that better.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Tender Branson on January 19, 2012, 08:12:46 PM
Newt !

:)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:12:54 PM
Gingrich won the debate. It's over already. Wow.

He's won the debate and the primary. Go ahead and end it now.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:13:39 PM
Good one, Romney! Nice to see them all defend Newt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 08:13:48 PM
The Republican Party is no longer the party of values if it nominates Newt Gingrich. Either his second ex-wife lied, or he said he wanted an "open marriage." He is not denying the latter. CNN ought to do their job and say, "did your second ex-wife lie? Are you accusing her of lying?"

Politico going on the attack again: it's official, Newts back


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:13:56 PM
Ten minutes in, this is already the best debate in the season.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:14:20 PM
Good man, Paul. I have very little in common with him politically, but I find him very decent.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:14:33 PM
Santorum is on the receiving end of things a lot...;)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:14:39 PM
John King better get out of there before the crowd lynches him.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:15:23 PM
Tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:15:33 PM
Paul needs to STFU about malinvestment. Also, Gingrich owned. :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:15:53 PM
John King better get out of there before the crowd lynches him.
Hey; they didn't lynch Cain, so Kings safe ;)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:16:01 PM
Ron Paul is boring. Shut up and go screw a goat, old senile man.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:16:17 PM
Santorum sort of tried to level a backhanded attack on the ex-wife issue but it was too timid to even register.

Paul defended Newt, don't see that too often.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 08:16:17 PM
Romney gave a very good answer on the Gingrich thing.  Of course, Gingrich handled it well for the base of the Republicans, but that was smart by Mitt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:16:29 PM
I wonder if "get to the real issues" was Mitt's scripted response or if he audibled to that after Grinch killed it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:17:20 PM
Holy cow, Gingrich just had an excellently specific answer.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:18:30 PM
I wonder if "get to the real issues" was Mitt's scripted response or if he audibled to that after Grinch killed it.

Romney Vs. Obama is about Obama and talking about real issues.

Gingrich Vs. Obama is about Gingrich and his graveyard of skeletons.

If people want to talk about real issues and get real issues fixed, Romney's the one.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:19:13 PM
Romney's right-wing platitudes of the night: "open up markets", "crony capitalism", "labor stooges"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:19:36 PM
Here is the difference between Romney and Gingrich: Gingrich gets asked about his scandal and he goes all in to the crowd's pleasure.  Romney gets it and he bores them to tears with a non-sequitur


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:19:36 PM
Trust me, Obama can make the election about Romney just as much as Romney can make it about Obama.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:20:12 PM
We get it, Obama's a commie. Next platitude.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:20:32 PM
Romney's right-wing platitudes of the night: "open up markets", "crony capitalism", "labor stooges"

"free enterprise!"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:20:46 PM
why didn't Bain stuff come out in 2008?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:21:14 PM
why didn't Bain stuff come out in 2008?

Romney (wisely) wasn't running on Bain in 2008.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:21:39 PM
'I think Adam Smith was right'

Nobody knows who he is in Dixie, Moneybags.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:21:50 PM
why didn't Bain stuff come out in 2008?

Romney (wisely) wasn't running on Bain in 2008.

still I'd figure somebody would have oppo'd him on it


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:21:55 PM
CAPITALISM AND FREEDOM.

Go  yourself, Mitt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:21:55 PM
Has Mitt Romney weighed in on Motherhood or Apple Pie yet?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:22:01 PM
"Capitalism and freedom make America strong!"

thx mitt


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 08:22:35 PM
why didn't Bain stuff come out in 2008?

Romney (wisely) wasn't running on Bain in 2008.

still I'd figure somebody would have oppo'd him on it

They didn't need it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:22:42 PM
Yeah, Romney gets crushed in the Rustbelt in November.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:22:55 PM
'I think Adam Smith was right'

Nobody knows who he is in Dixie, Moneybags.

of course Adam Smith is far more complicated than the neolib patron st. version, but, neither here nor there!  I try to shut the critic in me off when I watch these football games.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:23:18 PM
Only two rounds of questions in, but it's quite obvious with Bachmann and Perry gone, Romney is the least intelligent candidate on the stage.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:23:32 PM
why didn't Bain stuff come out in 2008?

Romney (wisely) wasn't running on Bain in 2008.

still I'd figure somebody would have oppo'd him on it

They didn't need it.

you think McCain knew for certain he'd beat Romney in Florida?  let's come on now.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:23:39 PM
Romney's right-wing platitudes of the night: "open up markets", "crony capitalism", "labor stooges"

Romney is doing MUCH better than earlier in the week... he still sounds like a broken Reagan doll, but this crowd should like it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:23:43 PM
I get the sense that someone back and RomneyCoLabsTM analyzed the Sarah Palin Phenomenon and decided the key to popularity with conservatives is "More patriotic platitudes Mitt!"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:24:01 PM
Is it just me, or is Santorum the unbecessary candidate?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:24:13 PM
That's the winning message for Santorum right there.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:24:17 PM
Santorum thinks he can win over Democrats :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:24:25 PM
Santorum reminds me of Montebourg with this re-industrialization bullsh**t.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:24:35 PM
Only two rounds of questions in, but it's quite obvious with Bachmann and Perry gone, Romney is the least intelligent candidate on the stage.

Seriously. The only thing that masks that is the fact that he doesn't have a silly accent.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:25:11 PM
Wow, Santorum doesn't get being poor at all.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:25:45 PM
Santorum just gave Paul an excellent look. :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:25:50 PM
Um... I guess the GI Bill doesn't exist in Paultardia...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:26:07 PM
thought Paul was going to work inflation problems in the post-War into his point there somehow.  but as it turns out it would have cut against the current of what he was trying to say.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:26:22 PM
Um... I guess the GI Bill doesn't exist in Paultardia...

Of course it doesn't. :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:26:46 PM
Santorum just gave Paul an excellent look. :)
Your almost as bad as Phil :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:27:36 PM
Rick Santorum: Big Government Conservative?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 08:28:04 PM
Um... I guess the GI Bill doesn't exist in Paultardia...

In Paultardia, there exists no government programs which jack up the administrators to a level 15 times as high as the highest-paid faculty, so no one is faced with the harsh reality of having to pay 60 thousand dollars a year for an education that would cost 5 thousand dollars a year without government meddling.  


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:28:17 PM
Frothy bitches about Obamas spending, and yet he opposes any cuts made by him too.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:28:31 PM
Rick Santorum: Big Government Conservative?

He's a Big Government Democrat with socially conservative views.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:28:39 PM
Notice how Mitt never says Massachusetts, he says "in our state"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:28:57 PM
Rick Santorum: Big Government Conservative?

It's called "Reagan Conservative."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:29:09 PM
WTF... I'm sure Santorum had a point... but it was deeply confused.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The_Texas_Libertarian on January 19, 2012, 08:29:20 PM
Rick Santorum: Big Government Conservative?

It's called "Reagan Conservative."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:29:30 PM
Because bloating the military gets us out of debt, right, Mitt?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:29:51 PM
I like Newt's Sam Eagle face.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:29:51 PM
ROMNEY IS SO RICH HE CONFUSES THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS WITH BILLIONS.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:29:56 PM
Because bloating the military gets us out of debt, right, Mitt?
Neocon logic at work!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:30:09 PM
Romney platitude watch: "let's do it at the state level" x 3, "federal government tentacles", "federal govt thinks it knows how to do everything"

Also I guess Mitt forgot that most of those defense cuts were passed as part of the debt ceiling bill?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:30:12 PM
Tentacles?

()


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:30:38 PM
Ah, Mitt. It's ok to balance the budget on the poors, but definitely not the military, eh? :P

EDIT: Love how Newt thinks tax cuts apply in every economic scenario.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:30:58 PM
I feel like Paul is going to rip Gingrich for draft deferments soon...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:31:10 PM
Um... I guess the GI Bill doesn't exist in Paultardia...

But Newt knows.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:31:17 PM
Because bloating the military gets us out of debt, right, Mitt?

It's ok, we'll bloat the military, cut taxes and make sure the job creators feel safe and secure in keeping as much of their money as possible... and the economy will right itself!!! Huzzah!!!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:31:45 PM
I can't believe I agree with Newt, but I do! The GI bill is part of the military, which is a Federal level issue.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:32:43 PM
BREAKING: MITT WANTS TO COMPLETELY REPEAL ROMNEYCARE


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:32:57 PM
Um... I guess the GI Bill doesn't exist in Paultardia...

But Newt knows.

Newt's playing to his base, the Liefs.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:33:24 PM
sh**t John King just made me make the connection that a Romney victory may mean I can't stay on my dad's health care plan through age 26.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:33:31 PM
Ah, some vintage Mitt lies.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:33:56 PM
"He's wrong, we're right, that's why we're gonna win."

Classy.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:34:42 PM
"He's wrong, we're right, that's why we're gonna win."

Classy.

Typical elitist attitude of a 1%er.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:35:07 PM
The Grinch is on fire tonight. God damn.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:35:11 PM
One of Newt's tells: "Frankly,..."

He's not gonna be frank, to say the least, when he says that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:35:26 PM
NO SANTORUM, DON'T ATTACK NEWT, JUST FOCUS ON ROMNEY


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 08:36:03 PM
South Carolinians clap quite a bit.  Just about every response is followed by an applause.

If I ever have to give a stand-up routine, I hope it's in South Carolina.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:36:09 PM
NO SANTORUM, DON'T ATTACK NEWT, JUST FOCUS ON ROMNEY


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 08:36:21 PM
I think Gingrich is going to win South Carolina. By the time Super Tuesday is over with, he's going to wish he had just stayed down instead of getting back up.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:36:35 PM
LOL, Santorum is gonna take the GOP down with him.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:36:49 PM
NO SANTORUM NO.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:37:32 PM
Footsie?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:37:44 PM
Go Rick! :D


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:37:55 PM
Santorum attacked everyone but Paul? Thats differant.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:38:09 PM
Damn Frothy. What an effing moron.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:38:14 PM
IF ROMNEYCARE IS NOT GOVERNMENT INSURANCE THEN NEITHER IS OBAMACARE YOU LYING IDIOT


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on January 19, 2012, 08:38:27 PM
Mitt Romney now gets to explain why what he just said about Obamacare was ridiculous and ridden with lies.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:38:31 PM
Romney sounds like he's saying his own plan sucked...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:38:42 PM
Romney mentioned he has compassion

he just lost the nominatino


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:38:42 PM
twice mitt has tried to put himself on the side of Medicare


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:38:49 PM
LOL, Rick is shaking his head at Mitten's liiiieeess.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:39:48 PM
I really hate Mitt Romney's squinty angry grin.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:39:56 PM
Romney mentioned he has compassion

he just lost the nominatino

Another flip-flop.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:40:05 PM
Is there literally any one person on the forum who supports Santorum?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:40:23 PM
Oh... that Mitt laugh.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:40:32 PM
I really hate Mitt Romney's squinty angry grin.
Santorums arrogant laugh, Bachmanns cackle, and Pauls silent giggles are worse.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:40:42 PM
Is there literally any one person on the forum who supports Santorum?

Phil and I at least.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:40:57 PM
End Medicaid at the federal level?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:41:00 PM
A year ago everyone was saying that Romneycare would sink him and be the one big issue, and yet it has really only been on a low boil so far.

Why has it taken this long for things to get heated.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:41:04 PM
Is there literally any one person on the forum who supports Santorum?

Quite a few.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:41:10 PM
Is there literally any one person on the forum who supports Santorum?

Two...Keystone Phil, and RealisticIdealist.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:41:33 PM
hahah, Newt and his love of archaic debate formats.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Wow... Gingrich really is a pompous wind-bag...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:41:57 PM
Now it's time for the Newt sales pitch.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:42:07 PM
Frothy you f-ing moron. ATTACK MONEYBAGS.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:42:29 PM
JUMP IN WITH A JOKE ABOUT BEING IGNORED RON PAUL!!!1


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:42:43 PM
This is an awesome debate. LOL.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 08:42:47 PM
Newt, Rick, make up!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:43:18 PM
LOL @ Pauls "Thank You". I thought the same thing :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:43:50 PM
Paul tells the truth (repealing Obamacare is not going to happen in reality) and crowd goes silent


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 08:44:04 PM
Wow... Gingrich really is a pompous wind-bag...

This is breaking news?

If he wins SC you'll hear none of the "home field advantage" garbage you heard with Romney in NH.  Suddenly no one will realize that he's a politician from a neighboring state.  

But, yeah, I'm still gonna be surprised if he wins.  Even in SC they recognize pomposity and wind.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:44:11 PM
Haha. I really like Paul on healthcare. Paul for HHS!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:44:21 PM
Ron Paul's the best.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:44:27 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:44:33 PM
God, why couldn't Bachmann, Perry, and Huntsman have dropped out a month ago?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:44:41 PM
There were no poors in the 1960's?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:44:47 PM
I like how Paul actually tends to tell the truth in these things.

Can we repeal Obamacare? Meh, probably not.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:44:57 PM
Haha. I really like Paul on healthcare. Paul for HHS!
So he can ravage it from the inside ;)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:45:40 PM
Nice tease by John King.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:45:49 PM
Surely... as a Doctor, Paul should be making commentary about the expense of prescriptions... yes, the Bush plan was largely ineffective... but the answer to EVERYTHING is not "liberty".



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:46:08 PM
Paul, this is the South Carolina GOP. They love teh wars there.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:46:11 PM
GINGRICH RELEASES TAX RETURNS?!?! Am I watching a daytime talkshow or a presidential debate?



THIS IS AWESOMMMEEE


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:46:19 PM
I like how Paul actually tends to tell the truth in these things.

Can we repeal Obamacare? Meh, probably not.

Paul's plan is to basically wait until out of control inflation destroys the economy and then start things again from scratch.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:46:41 PM
Yeah, Mitt. What are you hiding?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:46:57 PM
I like how Paul actually tends to tell the truth in these things.

Can we repeal Obamacare? Meh, probably not.

Paul's plan is to basically wait until out of control inflation destroys the economy and then start things again from scratch.

Creative destruction, yo.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on January 19, 2012, 08:47:52 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....

These people have literally no connection with reality.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 08:47:59 PM
Santorum's attacks were weak this time, but naturally Romney still fell into it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:48:13 PM
I like how Paul actually tends to tell the truth in these things.

Can we repeal Obamacare? Meh, probably not.

Paul's plan is to basically wait until out of control inflation destroys the economy and then start things again from scratch.

Thats why he is so obsessed with gold!  Paul is really running to be the first post-Apocalypse President.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: greenforest32 on January 19, 2012, 08:48:35 PM
Needs more Romney-bashing and Newt-surges


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:48:55 PM
The problem with the CNN debate is that there are no crazy old men telling us why Mitt Romney is actually not doing terribly and ignoring Ron Paul, while some bimbo moderator acts like she understands what's happening during the commercial breaks.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 08:50:13 PM
Gotta say, Santorum is a great debater. Exciting to see him get time to shine.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:51:15 PM
I CAN'T WAIT FOR NEWTS RESPONSE>>>> AHHHHH


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:51:28 PM
Santorum is the best on his own feet of the 3.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 08:51:49 PM
Yeah, Santorum would never say something embarrassing as President


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:52:11 PM
No, you're by far the most flamboyant.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:52:16 PM
ATTACK NEWT, FROTHY! YEAH


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:52:28 PM
Newt beat Frothy by 16 votes in NH....So he got his facts wrong there.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:52:51 PM
Santorum: "I'm boring, elect me."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 08:52:55 PM
There's the Reagan mention.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:53:10 PM
1928? Gee... What happened in 1929?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:53:24 PM
Santorum wtf are you doing.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:53:33 PM
SANTORUM NOOOOO DON'T ATTACK GINGRICH YOU STUPID


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 08:54:19 PM
Newt beat Frothy by 16 votes in NH....So he got his facts wrong there.

Wrong. Check the certified results. Thanks for your ignorance though.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:54:27 PM
Newt beat Frothy by 16 votes in NH....So he got his facts wrong there.

I thought Santorum was ahead on the final count?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:54:35 PM
OK people, drinking game.

Every time Gingrich says 'Reagan' take a shot... see how long it takes to black out.

Plus those 16m jobs and the dissolution of the Soviet Bloc came about with a massive deficit...



Wow... Santorum


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 08:54:44 PM
Gotta say, Santorum is a great debater. Exciting to see him get time to shine.

I kinda thought so too.  I'm not sure why these guys are so hard on him.  Groupthink in action.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:54:54 PM
SANTORUM WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:55:02 PM
NEWT HAS NO COURAGE BECAUSE OF SOMETHING HE DIDNT HAVE THE GUTS TO DO 20 YEARS AGO


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:55:08 PM
Newt by Santorum: E'tu Bruti!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 08:55:19 PM
Santorum: "I'm boring, elect me."

was a key part of Hillary's strategy in 08.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:55:36 PM
Forget Lincoln-Douglas or Nixon-Kennedy debates, "Santorum-Romney-Newt-Paul" is going to be the new standard.  So awesome.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lincoln Republican on January 19, 2012, 08:56:05 PM
Oh my!  Splintering on the right!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 08:56:14 PM
You know, Mittens is standing off to the side with that smug grin, probably thinking "Excellent..."

LOL, Mitt gets Ron Paul's practice wrong. 

MITT, WTF. BAIN CAPITAL=/=GRASSROOTS


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 08:56:19 PM
Newt beat Frothy by 16 votes in NH....So he got his facts wrong there.

Wrong. Check the certified results. Thanks for your ignorance though.
https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

Sorry I dont frequently check the NH Secretary of States office and piss my pants over how awesome my candidate is.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:56:28 PM
Mittens lived in the real streets of America. Lol.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on January 19, 2012, 08:56:41 PM
"A man who lived on the real streets of America" - lmfao


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:56:46 PM
ROMNEY HAS LIVED IN THE REAL STREETS OF AMERICA GUYS


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 08:56:50 PM
Romney just said Paul hasn't spent his life in Washington. LO-freaking-L.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:56:59 PM
Romney's "Real Streets of America:"

()


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:57:18 PM
Poor Mittens looks so lost.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:57:29 PM
Romney from da' Streetz


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 08:57:36 PM
Newt beat Frothy by 16 votes in NH....So he got his facts wrong there.

Wrong. Check the certified results. Thanks for your ignorance though.
https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

Sorry I dont frequently check the NH Secretary of States office and piss my pants over how awesome my candidate is.

Awww I love the bitterness when your kind is wrong.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 08:57:49 PM
Romney just blew a kiss to Paul. It's so obvious what's going on here now. Gross.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 08:58:12 PM
"the free people of america pursuing their dreams make America strong."

FUKC YOU SO MUCH MITT ROMNEY.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 08:58:16 PM
Ooooh Reagan-based Gingrich smack-down...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 08:58:29 PM
Romney just blew a kiss to Paul. It's so obvious what's going on here now. Gross.

Hey, open marriages are now part of the Republican platform.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 08:58:44 PM
Page 123 of the Reagan diary. If you care.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 08:58:44 PM
()

DA REAL STREETS


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tpfkaw on January 19, 2012, 08:59:13 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....

These people have literally no connection with reality.

Let's play a game!

It's called, "Demonstrate Your Connection With Reality!"

It's very simple.  Provide a contemporary article from the early 60s by a reputable news organization, detailing the epidemic of people suffering on the streets with no medical care.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 08:59:39 PM

Doze is some mean streetz.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 08:59:48 PM
You know, if it wasn't for Santorum's protectionist streak I could definitely overlook his SoCon stuff and vote for him.

Also, nice Romney zinger.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:00:10 PM
AWESOME NEWT. TAKE CREDIT FOR ROMNEY'S SUCCESS.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:00:21 PM
Romney: "HAHAHAHAHA PAUL IS POOR."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 09:00:48 PM
Romney laughed hard at Paul's "you'd think I'm poor" comment: the first time I've felt a Romney reaction to be totally his own


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:00:57 PM
He's trying to embarrass Gingrich... it's amusing...

"Reagan didn't take you seriously..." "I don't owe you for my success..."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:01:16 PM
We gotta wait until April, Mitt?  No fair. :(


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:01:22 PM
Romney: if you want to see my tax returns, you are a Obama Socialist.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on January 19, 2012, 09:01:26 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....

These people have literally no connection with reality.

Let's play a game!

It's called, "Demonstrate Your Connection With Reality!"

It's very simple.  Provide a contemporary article from the early 60s by a reputable news organization, detailing the epidemic of people suffering on the streets with no medical care.

Are you autistic? I can think of no other explanation as to why you take things that literally.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:01:40 PM
HELL YEA PAUL. YOU'RE THE EVERYMAN IN THIS RACE.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:01:53 PM
"when I'm the nominee..."

Not "if I'm the nominee" but "when I'm the nominee..."

Put some stank on it, Mitt!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The_Texas_Libertarian on January 19, 2012, 09:02:12 PM
lol @ Ron Paul saying he doesn't want to be embarrassed if he releases his tax returns


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:02:19 PM
Moneybags ain't gonna show the tax returns.

My taxes are carefully managed. roflmao.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:02:39 PM
"WHY WON'T YOU RELEASE YOUR RETURNS?"

"BECAUSE I WANT TO WIN"

EPIC GAFFEE


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:02:54 PM
LAME DEFENSE, MITT.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:03:18 PM
"My dog ate my tax returns."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:03:37 PM
Santorum: My taxes are on my computer. LOL.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:04:07 PM
Mitt just got booed.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:04:12 PM
Romney just got owned by his dad.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:04:12 PM
God this taxes thing is killing Romney


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:04:18 PM
Wow, Mittens got booed.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:04:21 PM
MITT ROMNEY HAS BETRAYED HIS FATHER'S MEMORY


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:04:25 PM
Oh G-d, Mitt. Maybe? That's... bad. That could be very bad.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:04:36 PM
INVOKE THE FATHER, SHAME THE SON.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:05:02 PM
Mitt has a good moment with Newt, and then this...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:05:10 PM
Oh G-d, Mitt. Maybe? That's... bad. That could be very bad.

^^^ Terrible, terrible answer.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:05:22 PM
Mitt Romney cannot win this election. Jesus Christ, he's horrible.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 09:05:30 PM
Whats the heckling about?
Santorum: My taxes are on my computer. LOL.
All Mitt has is porn on his.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:05:37 PM
Noooooo, I want to see Mittens talk about his taxes.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:05:43 PM
The worst response by not-Rick Perry in US Debate history??!?!?!??!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:05:43 PM
Um... did Romney say he didn't inherit from his Dad?

He's setting himself up for a huge fall on that issue.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tpfkaw on January 19, 2012, 09:05:56 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....

These people have literally no connection with reality.

Let's play a game!

It's called, "Demonstrate Your Connection With Reality!"

It's very simple.  Provide a contemporary article from the early 60s by a reputable news organization, detailing the epidemic of people suffering on the streets with no medical care.

Are you autistic? I can think of no other explanation as to why you take things that literally.

Nope, though I'd have to say Mint's poor judgment continues if I were.  In any event, since you have clearly established a much firmer foothold on reality than whichever candidate said that (not watching), you obviouslly can provide evidence of such a newsworthy problem.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:06:12 PM
So basically the trick to beating Romney in a debate is to just keep asking about his taxes over and over again.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:06:26 PM
"Oops" is getting competition from the Moneybags.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:06:31 PM
LOL, Republicans think divisiveness is dangerous. How rich.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:06:47 PM
Mitt basically just insulted the audience. Christ, he's clueless.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:07:19 PM
Apple isn't using China to make ipads because of taxes Rick


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:07:35 PM
Mitt basically just insulted the audience. Christ, he's clueless.

What did he say?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Penelope on January 19, 2012, 09:07:42 PM
"Maybe."

()

Seriously, that might be my favorite new Mittgaffe.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:07:57 PM
SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SUCCESSFUL, MITT. GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY. I DESERVE IT, NOT YOU. ARRRGGHHH 1%er ARRRRGHHH


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on January 19, 2012, 09:08:09 PM
"There was nobody out in the street suffering with no medical care, back in the early 60s"

Uhh....

These people have literally no connection with reality.

Let's play a game!

It's called, "Demonstrate Your Connection With Reality!"

It's very simple.  Provide a contemporary article from the early 60s by a reputable news organization, detailing the epidemic of people suffering on the streets with no medical care.

Are you autistic? I can think of no other explanation as to why you take things that literally.

Nope, though I'd have to say Mint's poor judgment continues if I were.  In any event, since you have clearly established a much firmer foothold on reality than whichever candidate said that (not watching), you obviouslly can provide evidence of such a newsworthy problem.

http://glennrowe.net/BaronCohen/AutismSpectrumQuotient/AutismSpectrumQuotient.aspx


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 09:08:41 PM
Where does the 2.5 times greater thing come from?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:08:56 PM
Paul takes a page from Newt's book, attacking "the way the question was asked."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:08:56 PM
If Romney keeps this up, he'll be in single digits behind Gingrich, Santorum and Paul by the time Super Tuesday rolls around.

SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SUCCESSFUL, MITT. GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY. YOU DON'T NEED IT.

()


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Penelope on January 19, 2012, 09:09:07 PM
SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SUCCESSFUL, MITT. GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY. YOU DON'T NEED IT.

Hahahahahahahahahaha. God, you're quickly becoming my favorite poster.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:09:52 PM
I love you, Mittens. You're my favourite slimy capitalist :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:09:57 PM
Paul reminds me of Ross Perot. Frickin' nuts, and then sometimes he makes so much sense.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 09:10:05 PM
If Ron Paul was 10 years younger and could learn to not ramble on and just answer the question, he could win easily.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:10:13 PM
Opposing unions is incredibly un-libertarian.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:10:31 PM
Politco is getting frothed up over his boyfriend flailing. Oh god. Here comes a dozen repetitive spam posts about Romney godhood and Gingrich evil-ness


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:10:38 PM
Rick, Rick, Rick...

Standing up for corporate subsidies is not something that would help you in the general (not that you would ever make it...)

Also, Paul is making more sense tonight than Frothy..and then he said right-to-work. Ugh, they both suck.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: riceowl on January 19, 2012, 09:10:49 PM
SHAME ON YOU FOR BEING SUCCESSFUL, MITT. GIVE ME ALL YOUR MONEY. I DESERVE IT, NOT YOU. ARRRGGHHH 1%er ARRRRGHHH


lol.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:11:34 PM
Audience booing SOPA, awesome.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 09:12:21 PM
Newt opposes SOPA? Thats surprising.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:12:27 PM
Really looking forward to Romney's answer on this one.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:12:51 PM
Nice, Newt is anti-SOPA/PIPA.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:12:56 PM
Waaaaiiiitttt....

Aren't all of these Republicans about getting the Federal Government out of the economy... but they're going to impose a national right to work Act?

So it's fine for Washington to impose their own views on the economy if it's to protect the job creators and gut collective bargaining rights?... gotcha.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Penelope on January 19, 2012, 09:13:03 PM

Finally, GOP Primary audiences booing stuff that deserves booing.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:13:14 PM
NEWT FAVORS FREEDOM! DOWN WITH SOPA!

EDIT: Mitt is playing both sides again. Awesome.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:13:18 PM
As someone in socal, I just want to say FU Newt. Hollywood entertainment provides one of the greatest economic and cultural exports of the country and is something that cant be outsourced.

I dont support SOPA, but that kind of anti-Hollywood pandering is the worst.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 09:13:30 PM
NEWT!!!!

and MITT!!!!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:13:37 PM
I was talking about Romney-SOPA with a friend tonight. Interesting.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:14:13 PM
Romney decided to be anti-SOPA tonight because Newt got cheered for it...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:14:20 PM
God Bless Ron Paul


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:14:41 PM
Ironic comment from Frothy.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:14:42 PM

Finally, GOP Primary audiences booing stuff that deserves booing.

I think they were booing Time Warner.

Everyone has had to wait in their house for someone to arrive sometime between 9am and 2pm...and not show up


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:14:52 PM
Santorum's answer is predictably the worst.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: retromike22 on January 19, 2012, 09:15:01 PM
Rick Santorum: "The Internet is not a free zone"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:15:01 PM
As someone in socal, I just want to say FU Newt. Hollywood entertainment provides one of the greatest economic and cultural exports of the country and is something that cant be outsourced.

Other countries can't make movies about how the American military and American corporations are evil and are destroying the world? Sure they can. They might even be better at it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:15:10 PM
Santorum once again jumps away from the mainstream on the wrong issue.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:15:27 PM
Santorum: Authoritarian.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:15:43 PM
Santorum, you fascist.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:15:57 PM
screw you Rick Santorum.

Almost more offensive than his man-on-dog comment.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:16:05 PM
As someone in socal, I just want to say FU Newt. Hollywood entertainment provides one of the greatest economic and cultural exports of the country and is something that cant be outsourced.

Other countries can't make movies about how the American military and American corporations are evil and are destroying the world? Sure they can. They might even be better at it.
As someone in socal, I just want to say FU Newt. Hollywood entertainment provides one of the greatest economic and cultural exports of the country and is something that cant be outsourced.

Other countries can't make movies about how the American military and American corporations are evil and are destroying the world? Sure they can. They might even be better at it.


Oh.... please


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:16:10 PM
Uh, he came out against SOPA. What more do you guys want?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Hash on January 19, 2012, 09:16:22 PM
You kinda need to understand Frothy. His name is now a sexual neologism


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:16:31 PM
The CNN debate lineup is basically Most to Least Fascist.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:17:00 PM
Rick has the best answer, as usual. The dumbs here, like usual, don't believe in common sense (copyrights).


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:17:06 PM
You kinda need to understand Frothy. His name is now a sexual neologism

Yeah...the internet pretty much screwed him over for life.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:17:17 PM
Mitt should take a few lessons from Newt how to answer a question in a debate that you're not prepared for, because the SOPA question was a great example of that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:17:26 PM
Uh, he came out against SOPA. What more do you guys want?

Not calling for restricting freedom on the internet.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on January 19, 2012, 09:17:30 PM
Santorum: I oppose SOPA, but I support internet censorship.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: retromike22 on January 19, 2012, 09:17:39 PM
So Santorum wants MORE GOVERNMENT REGULATION on the internet?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:17:53 PM
The only thing that makes Santorum a Republican is he wants low taxes.

Otherwise he wants the government way upside your grill. In your bedroom, your family, your computer, etc.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:18:36 PM
Santorum is on the wrong side of the majority in this country? Most of the country opposes copyright law? And he's disgusting despite opposing SOPA? Wow.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 09:18:55 PM
Less then 40 minutes left and nothing that will overshadow Newt's opening answer.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:19:02 PM
Santorum's answer is predictably the worst.

And Ron Paul's is predictably the best.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:19:31 PM
Uh, he came out against SOPA. What more do you guys want?

These people are unreasonable.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tpfkaw on January 19, 2012, 09:19:59 PM
http://glennrowe.net/BaronCohen/AutismSpectrumQuotient/AutismSpectrumQuotient.aspx

Actually took the time to take that, and scored 11.  Of course, I probably was semi-consciously gaming my answers somewhat to score lower, but then again that just shows that I'm self-aware and therefore not autistic.  Sorry!  Find some other non-sequitur.

Opposing unions is incredibly un-libertarian.

It would be, if unions were actually free associations of collectively bargaining employees.  As they are, they're just petition-organizers who demand that companies be made centrally-planned as well as fundraising/GOTV entities for the Democratic Party.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Phony Moderate on January 19, 2012, 09:20:23 PM
He basically implied that SOPA doesn't go far enough.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:20:28 PM
Uh, he came out against SOPA. What more do you guys want?

I thought you were economically left-wing. Why are you supporting Santorum?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:20:47 PM
Oh G-d, Mitt. Maybe? That's... bad. That could be very bad.

It could be, but I don't think so.  He is reluctant because he's rich. We all know this.  It is not news.  He didn't create those tax-shelter laws, but he'd be a fool not to exploit them.  You would, if you were in his size-13 shoes, and so would I.

As far as Daddy is concerned, we all inherit from Daddy.  I got my good looks from Daddy.  And my charming manner.  And the fact that I drink too much.  Didn't get no funds from Daddy, though, because he was poor.  Now, if I'm asked about what I inherited from Daddy, what do I say?  I say "nothing."  Mostly because I wouldn't remember, on the spot, that I probably inherited lots of things from Daddy.  This is the way it is.  Mitt probably inherited his good looks from Daddy, and his cockiness, and, unlike my Daddy, his Daddy might have had a few dollars in the bank.  That doesn't mean his Daddy was better than my Daddy, just had a different set of attributes to bequeath.  What are we, French?  Do we suddenly guillotine our rich people?  No, we're Yankees.  We don't have any aristocracy, and therefore we don't need to make a pretense of the need to revolt against it.  Let's stop pretending that we don't know that Mitt Romney is rich.  Of course he's rich.  FDR was rich.  Bush was rich.  Kennedy was rich.  We had lots of rich guys run for office, and most of 'em would say that they're self-made men.  They might have inherited a million or two from Daddy, but that million or two is chump change for them.  Most of the money in his bank account he earned.  Yes, he should pay a much higher percentage of it to the federal government--and no, I"m not a Libertarian, so my attitude should come as no surprise--but that's a matter for the congress to decide.  Don't hold the laws against Mitt.  He's just living within them, not writing them.



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:21:20 PM
Less then 40 minutes left and nothing that will overshadow Newt's opening answer.

The question that is going to be on everybody's mind after Newt's opening answer, "what other skeletons does this guy have?"

They're also going to wonder if he has an "open marriage" right now when you consider that Gingrich was the Speaker that went after Clinton over Lewinsky. Apparently Gingrich was just envious of Clinton?

Ron Paul put it best: "Serial hypocrisy"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: useful idiot on January 19, 2012, 09:21:35 PM
He basically implied that SOPA doesn't go far enough.

Uh no, he in fact literally said it went "too far"....


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:21:49 PM
In general, the copyright laws in the US are pretty much stronger now than they've ever been in world history.  And way too overbroad in protecting old copyrights.  If anything, we need better protection of new copyrights (but not prior restraint-type laws) and less protection of old ones.

Of course, SOPA doesn't really deal with much of that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:22:23 PM
Uh, he came out against SOPA. What more do you guys want?

I thought you were economically left-wing. Why are you supporting Santorum?

Santorum is the least economically right-wing.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 09:23:04 PM
Opposing unions is incredibly un-libertarian.

in this context they'd be talking about federal recognition of unions for bargaining purposes


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:23:19 PM
Big happy family moment against Obama.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:23:29 PM
Why did CNN cut to a guy angling to get a handjob?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:23:41 PM
Santorum reminds the audience that he lost his last race and that he has no money.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 09:23:51 PM
is that Fred Thompson in the audience?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lincoln Republican on January 19, 2012, 09:24:00 PM
What would you do different question, Romney nailed it, taking the fight to Obama.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:24:16 PM
In general, the copyright laws in the US are pretty much stronger now than they've ever been in world history.  And way too overbroad in protecting old copyrights.  If anything, we need better protection of new copyrights (but not prior restraint-type laws) and less protection of old ones.

Of course, SOPA doesn't really deal with much of that.

whoa, SS and I agree on a policy issue.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:24:29 PM
Fred Thompson cameo!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:24:37 PM
God, what a terrible question by a racist. She was aching to call them 'illegals'.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The_Texas_Libertarian on January 19, 2012, 09:24:45 PM
The camera just showed Fred Thompson briefly!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:24:58 PM
Why is Santorum even anti-SOPA? Because it's unpopular? Because the rest of his answer indicated that it should have his full support.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:25:12 PM
What would you do different question, Romney nailed it, taking the fight to Obama.

Pretty sad for you that it took an hour and half to hit post on the "Romney nailed this answer" reply.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:27:10 PM
Whoa, Newt is a bit more sensible than most Republicans on immigration. That's..surprising?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:27:36 PM
Get in line for the fruit-picking jobs and we'll talk...

Um... I clearly missed the official government documents that are in Spanish...

Plus, Gingrich, a Former speaker of the House... is being so harsh about people he once had considerable control over, Federal Bureaucrats...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on January 19, 2012, 09:28:26 PM
Romney is going to do so, so, so, so, so poorly among Latinos with answers like that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:29:01 PM
Romney listed everything he's NOT going to do, but no plan as usual.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:29:05 PM
So Romney and Gingrich actually agree on immigration?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:29:53 PM
So yeah...how bout that 40% Hispanic vote for Bush? :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:30:21 PM
Santorum: still angry and whiny. Just now its a quarter of the entire debate.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:31:00 PM
Starting around 2020, if the GOP keeps this up, they're pretty much going to be shut out of winning national elections.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:31:12 PM
It appears the left finally won an issue: immigration.  GOP is slowing moving toward the center on it.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:31:47 PM
Whoa, Newt is a bit more sensible than most Republicans on immigration. That's..surprising?

a little.  It's the one issue where I agree with Newt more than the others.  

Most Republicans have bought into the hard anti-everybody except us dogma, which is really weird, because those of us over 40 remember when anti-Mexican equated to a solidly leftist/progressive attitude.  Pro=union and all that.  The GOP was always forgiving when it came to hiring illegal immigrants to clean the golf course, under the table of course.  But in the past couple of decades the Republicans have co-opted that issue from the Democrats.  At the worst possible moment, given the current demographic trends!

Anyway, I'm not a libertarian, but I'm with the libertarian on these types of issues:  people should be able to come and go as they please.  Borders are for police states.  No major candidate in either of the two major parties actually adopts my position, but Newt's is a little closer than most of the others.  Not that I'd ever trust the bastard, and I hope he crawls back into whatever hole he crawled out of, but he's a little gentler on this issue than the others so I have to credit him here.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:32:13 PM
In general, the copyright laws in the US are pretty much stronger now than they've ever been in world history.  And way too overbroad in protecting old copyrights.  If anything, we need better protection of new copyrights (but not prior restraint-type laws) and less protection of old ones.

Of course, SOPA doesn't really deal with much of that.

whoa, SS and I agree on a policy issue.

Used to be musician, well aware of what's going on in the issue, and my experience says that is what needs to be done.  I'm sure we agree in other areas too - don't let my opinion on certain issues fool you - I have my logic for everything I believe.  :)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:32:28 PM
Santorum: Compassionate Conservative.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 09:33:03 PM
In general, the copyright laws in the US are pretty much stronger now than they've ever been in world history.  And way too overbroad in protecting old copyrights.  If anything, we need better protection of new copyrights (but not prior restraint-type laws) and less protection of old ones.

Of course, SOPA doesn't really deal with much of that.

whoa, SS and I agree on a policy issue.

Used to be musician, well aware of what's going on in the issue, and my experience says that is what needs to be done.  I'm sure we agree in other areas too - don't let my opinion on certain issues fool you - I have my logic for everything I believe.  :)

have you read Notes from Underground?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:33:14 PM
Santorum is disgusting.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:33:26 PM
If this were an election for student government president, Romney would win 75-80% of the vote.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 09:33:59 PM
Stop the presses: Ron Paul just said something was the job of the federal government.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: © tweed on January 19, 2012, 09:34:33 PM
If this were an election for student government president, Romney would win 75-80% of the vote.

Ann Romney is lead cheerleader?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:35:46 PM
The CNN debate lineup is basically Most to Least Fascist.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:35:58 PM
Stop the presses: Ron Paul just said something was the job of the federal government.

But he did tie it together with "bringing our troops home."


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:36:11 PM
If this were an election for student government president, Romney would win 75-80% of the vote.

Ann Romney is lead cheerleader?

Santorum is the overacher head of the debate team. Gingrich is a cranky nerd from the school newspaper. Paul is the class clown.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Negusa Nagast 🚀 on January 19, 2012, 09:36:36 PM
Need to buy time... attack John King!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:36:47 PM
I'm confused...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 19, 2012, 09:36:50 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:37:18 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

You're not going to believe any of us because Romney is barely beating John King for 4th best.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:37:33 PM
LOL, snarky answer from Newt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:37:40 PM
CNN is going to be ripping Gingrich the next couple of days, and if he wins in South Carolina they're not going to spin it nicely for Gingrich.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:38:11 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

It's honestly been pretty much a wash, I think. Everyone is just attacking everyone. Romney's answer on his tax returns was terrible again, so he's probably doing the worst I guess. But I don't think there'll be a big effect.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:38:23 PM
CNN is going to be ripping Gingrich the next couple of days, and if he wins in South Carolina they're not going to spin it nicely for Gingrich.

Does Gingrich care? His fans watch Fox.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:38:30 PM
Mitt's character isn't often questioned? Uh, what? For real?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:38:38 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

The Grinch won the debate in the opening minutes.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:38:55 PM
Romney: "I rarely have to answer questions about my integrity or character."

!!!!!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 09:39:06 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

Newt tore John King's head off in the fist 2 minutes. Not much since then. Santorum's had a good night.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:39:22 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

Santorum - generally strong answers, pretty aggressive
Romney - had a couple of strong moments, but then he got really tripped on the tax issue
Gingirch - less aggressive, more pompous, still relatively strong
Paul - useless.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 09:39:28 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

Everyone's doing well, Gingrich got the best soundbite but I'd say Santorum has been doing consistently well. Paul has been hit or miss, rambling a bit more than usual. Romney is doing worse then average but better then last debate.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:39:57 PM
My rankings so far:

First Quarter (8-8:30 ET)
1. Gingrich
2. Santorum
3. Paul
4. Romney

Second Quarter (8:30-9 ET)
1. Santorum
2. Gingrich
3. Romney
4. Paul

Third Quarter (9-9:30 ET)
1. Gingrich
2. Paul
3. Romney
4. Santorum

We'll see how it closes.



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:40:11 PM
THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO BE DOUBTING PEOPLE'S VIEWS. EVERYONE STOP ASKING MITT ROMNEY UNCOMFORTABLE QUESTIONS.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: M on January 19, 2012, 09:40:38 PM
That little whisper thing didn't work.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:40:57 PM
"This is not the time to be questioning someone's integrity."

Yeah, Mitt. We're only vetting you for President of the United States.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:41:07 PM
Just started watching - can an unbiased person please tell me who's probably the biggest winners and losers thus far?

You're not going to believe any of us because Romney is barely beating John King for 4th best.

LOL.

Tmthforu94, it's better with only 4 actually.  I thought I'd miss Perry, but this is just as entertaining.  Santorum actually looks reasonably now that he has some time.  Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Mitt has said some things that may or may not crush him--I"m banking on the average SC voter being better informed than most here are thinking--and Newt has actually said a thing or two that has made him look a bit gentle, if you can believe that.  Maybe it's good coaching.  

Mostly, it's just a lot of clapping by residents of South Carolina.  They're very much into clapping.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 19, 2012, 09:41:33 PM
Thank you.

From what I've seen, this is more a debate against CNN.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:41:40 PM
I actually feel like Santorum is going to benefit the most from this. He was wise to always go after Romney and Gingrich at the same time. He needed that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:42:58 PM
Mitt lecturing Santorum on abortion. Awesome.

GO PAUL!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Reginald on January 19, 2012, 09:43:41 PM
The Paulites revolt!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 09:43:56 PM
Good for including Paul :) The Hecklers were actually right for once!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:44:01 PM
Ignoring Ron Paul, still.  Lol.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:44:17 PM
The crowd got pissed about King ignoring Paul. Heh.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:44:25 PM
Ron Paul was doctoring before the Age of Abortion.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:44:44 PM
Are those just Paul supporters, or does the real crowd really want to hear more from Paul?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:44:51 PM
Paul, how do you propose we correct the 'morality of the people'?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: TheDeadFlagBlues on January 19, 2012, 09:44:57 PM
Ron Paul basically bashes his supporters - LOL.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:45:15 PM
PAUL CALLS NATION MORALLY BANKRUPT
ROMNEY EDUCATES SANTORUM ON ABORTION


WHAT PLANET ARE WE ON?!?!?!?!??!?!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:46:10 PM
PAUL IS A BABY KILLER!!!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 19, 2012, 09:46:17 PM
The Declaration of Independence isn't a legal document...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Lief 🗽 on January 19, 2012, 09:46:29 PM
DID RON PAUL JUST CRITICIZE DRUG AND PORNOGRAPHY USE?!??!

He has betrayed the rEVOLution.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:46:40 PM
OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE OVERLY SENSITIVE


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Atlas Has Shrugged on January 19, 2012, 09:46:40 PM
Paul just gave the soundbite of the night.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:47:11 PM
Santorum is OVERLY sensitive! :P


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:47:15 PM
Why did Santorum think that was about him, anyway? Santorum was doing such a good job of ignoring Paul all night.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: retromike22 on January 19, 2012, 09:47:24 PM
Ron Paul was doctoring before the Age of Anesthetics.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:47:31 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:47:39 PM
HAHAHA. Paul just owned Santorum!

"You're being overly sensitive!"


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:47:51 PM
Man, how can anybody not vote for Ron Paul?  Seriously.



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:48:05 PM
An old lady just made a "heh, interesting" face at Paul's answer.  This might have been the best answer of Ron Paul's political life.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: RI on January 19, 2012, 09:48:20 PM
Why did Santorum think that was about him, anyway?

Because he attacked the argument Santorum was using against Romney?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: NHI on January 19, 2012, 09:48:25 PM
Why did Santorum think that was about him, anyway? Santorum was doing such a good job of ignoring Paul all night.

Santorum must have his obligatory fight with Paul at least once in every debate. ;)


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:48:35 PM
Ron Paul just demonstrated that Rick Santorum has ever quality we've ever hated in Keystone Phil.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:49:27 PM
Paul lectures someone else on sensitivity while his supporters are shrieking when he doesn't get to answer an issue they don't even care about. You can't make it up!


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:49:43 PM
Ron Paul just demonstrated that Rick Santorum has ever quality we've ever hated in Keystone Phil.

I was thinking the same thing the second "overly sensitive" rolled off his tongue.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:50:01 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:51:05 PM
Yep, overly sensitive. That's me. Proven by the fact that I've been here for how long as basically the lone Santorum supporter, right?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 19, 2012, 09:51:31 PM
That clip will get some play. Paul basically just defanged Santorum.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:51:50 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



My beef is that, despite how I think he's more sane than any of the other candidates currently running (within reason), I disagree with him on many issues.  Abortion is one of them.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 19, 2012, 09:52:21 PM
The Declaration of Independence isn't a legal document...
LOL, just paused the tv and had a good laugh at that. Surprised Gingrich didn't interject, being a historian and all.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 09:52:57 PM
Paul lectures someone else on sensitivity while his supporters are shrieking when he doesn't get to answer an issue they don't even care about. You can't make it up!

Phil, I sincerely hope you do a good job of getting out the vote on Saturday. You should be very proud of your boy. I still disagree with Santorum on many issues, but I have gained a great deal of respect for him lately for sticking this out and coming this far. I thought he was a joke, but now I can understand why you appreciate him so finely and how he managed to win multiple races in Pennsylvania. He was obviously just unlucky to be running for re-election in 2006. Oh, and at this point he is the only viable alternative to Romney, IMHO.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 09:53:05 PM
Yep, overly sensitive. That's me. Proven by the fact that I've been here for how long as basically the lone Santorum supporter, right?

Phil, you're making the case with posts like these.

Probably we all are.  Ah, it's down to 4, and by now we're all stereotypes of the supporters of our favorite candidates, I suppose.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Penelope on January 19, 2012, 09:53:22 PM
Newt Gingrich: I'd like to thank CNN.

LOL


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:53:35 PM
Newt: I want to thank CNN for being a strawman for me to attack the media


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 19, 2012, 09:54:07 PM
South Carolina is known for their respect for liberty? WHAT?!?!?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segregation_in_the_United_States


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:54:23 PM
Who are you to talk about radicals, Newt?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Thomas D on January 19, 2012, 09:54:36 PM
Newt Gingrich: I'd like to thank CNN.

LOL


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 09:54:59 PM
R ::) MNEY


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:55:06 PM
Obama's a "Saul Alinsky radical?" Way to be original, Newt.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:55:38 PM
Newt keeps talking about a series of lincoln douglas debates with Obama as a selling point.

Of course he knows that those will never happen. The parties have already agreed on the presidential debates


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The_Texas_Libertarian on January 19, 2012, 09:56:12 PM
lol at the use of Saul Alinsky by Newt Gingrich


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:56:20 PM
America is already an entitlement society, Mittens. You're just now realizing this?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:56:24 PM
Heh.  Mittens thinks he's Reagan, now.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 09:56:31 PM
Gotta say, that was the most passionate I've seen Mitt in quite a while.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 09:56:57 PM
Yep, overly sensitive. That's me. Proven by the fact that I've been here for how long as basically the lone Santorum supporter, right?

Phil, you're making the case with posts like these.

So, essentially, you're telling me to not defend myself with facts. Otherwise, I'm sensitive. Sorry, I disagree.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Sam Spade on January 19, 2012, 09:57:11 PM
Yep, overly sensitive. That's me. Proven by the fact that I've been here for how long as basically the lone Santorum supporter, right?

I never thought I'd remove Assad from my sig.  Thanks, bro.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: NHI on January 19, 2012, 09:57:21 PM
Romney: A
Gingrich: A
Santorum: C+
Paul: C-


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Negusa Nagast 🚀 on January 19, 2012, 09:57:57 PM
Is Santorum calling himself the next Reagan?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 09:58:46 PM
Didn't Rick also LOSE an election, once he became Frothy?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 09:58:51 PM
Is Santorum calling himself the next Reagan?

They have all tried to anoint themselves as the next Reagan


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: NHI on January 19, 2012, 09:58:59 PM
Is Santorum calling himself the next Reagan?

Dear God...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 09:59:10 PM
Gingrich: A
Santorum: A
Paul: B
Romney: C


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dereich on January 19, 2012, 09:59:33 PM
Santorum:A
Newt:A-
Mittens: B+
Ron Paul: Ron Paul


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: All Along The Watchtower on January 19, 2012, 10:00:13 PM
Is Santorum calling himself the next Reagan?

They have all tried to anoint themselves as the next Reagan

Except Paul. He is kinda notorious for pointing out (correctly) Reagan's big government deficit spending ways.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 10:01:53 PM
Santorum A
Romney A
Gingrich A-
Paul B+


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Likely Voter on January 19, 2012, 10:03:54 PM
Is Santorum calling himself the next Reagan?

They have all tried to anoint themselves as the next Reagan

Except Paul. He is kinda notorious for pointing out (correctly) Reagan's big government deficit spending ways.

Paul has done it too
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLGt1O1wycQ
“America must decide who to trust: Al Gore Texas cheerleader, or the one who stood with Reagan.” 


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 19, 2012, 10:04:51 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



My beef is that, despite how I think he's more sane than any of the other candidates currently running (within reason), I disagree with him on many issues.  Abortion is one of them.

I'm not exactly sure what your position is on abortion, we'll probably have to discuss that in another thread.  I'm not an obstetrician, so my position is probably different than Ron Paul's, but I"m in favor of safe and legal abortion, and in that respect I'm probably in the mainstream of US voters.  Moreover, I've been there.  I've been a 19-year-old with a pregnant girlfriend, being scared and worried, and hoping that she won't decide to actually have the baby.  Wanting to blurt out "Oh, sh**t, you're not actually going to have the baby, are you?" but also being man enough to keep my mouth shut because it's her decision.  By law!  And, frankly, by reason and by ethical and historical moral conditioning.  I've had to cough up half the money for the procedure, in a time when coughing up half of 400 dollars wasn't easy.  I've walked past those irritating protesters with their rosaries and their placards with giant pictures of aborted babies--as offensive as they are, as taxpaying citizens they had every much right to occupy that sidewalk as we had to walk upon it toward the door of the clinic--abortion is not a political issue.  It's a personal issue.  And it's one that pregnant individuals must make without interference of their government.  I don't want a state like China, where a pregnant woman can be forced to abort a child, and I don't want a state like Ireland, where a pregnant woman must leave the country to have a legal abortion.  Luckily, I don't live in China or Ireland.  I live in the USA, where we have a constitution that allows each person, via his legislature, to make laws.  This is where Ron Paul stands.  And this is where I stand.

Ron Paul wants you to be in charge of your future.  He doesn't want others in charge of your future.  Yes, this human fetal abortion is tricky, because it is one issue in which one human must necessarily be somewhat in charge of the issue of another.  But that is between two people connected by an umbilical chord.  There is no bond in nature as strong as that between a mammal and its mother, and no god or government can come between it.  I think Ron Paul fundamentally understands this.  Do you?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 19, 2012, 10:08:27 PM
Yep, overly sensitive. That's me. Proven by the fact that I've been here for how long as basically the lone Santorum supporter, right?

I never thought I'd remove Assad from my sig.  Thanks, bro.

Well, "we'll see" if it lasts.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: HST1948 on January 19, 2012, 10:10:54 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



My beef is that, despite how I think he's more sane than any of the other candidates currently running (within reason), I disagree with him on many issues.  Abortion is one of them.

I'm not exactly sure what your position is on abortion, we'll probably have to discuss that in another thread.  I'm not an obstetrician, so my position is probably different than Ron Paul's, but I"m in favor of safe and legal abortion, and in that respect I'm probably in the mainstream of US voters.  Moreover, I've been there.  I've been a 19-year-old with a pregnant girlfriend, being scared and worried, and hoping that she won't decide to actually have the baby.  Wanting to blurt out "Oh, sh**t, you're not actually going to have the baby, are you?" but also being man enough to keep my mouth shut because it's her decision.  By law!  And, frankly, by reason and by ethical and historical moral conditioning.  I've had to cough up half the money for the procedure, in a time when coughing up half of 400 dollars wasn't easy.  I've walked past those irritating protesters with their rosaries and their placards with giant pictures of aborted babies--as offensive as they are, as taxpaying citizens they had every much right to occupy that sidewalk as we had to walk upon it toward the door of the clinic--abortion is not a political issue.  It's a personal issue.  And it's one that pregnant individuals must make without interference of their government.  I don't want a state like China, where a pregnant woman can be forced to abort a child, and I don't want a state like Ireland, where a pregnant woman must leave the country to have a legal abortion.  Luckily, I don't live in China or Ireland.  I live in the USA, where we have a constitution that allows each person, via his legislature, to make laws.  This is where Ron Paul stands.  And this is where I stand.

Ron Paul wants you to be in charge of your future.  He doesn't want others in charge of your future.  Yes, this human fetal abortion is tricky, because it is one issue in which one human must necessarily be somewhat in charge of the issue of another.  But that is between two people connected by an umbilical chord.  There is no bond in nature as strong as that between a mammal and its mother, and no god or government can come between it.  I think Ron Paul fundamentally understands this.  Do you?


I'm sorry, that must have been really hard for you and your girlfriend.

I agree that Ron Paul holds that fundamental position, and I actually agree with Ron Paul on that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on January 19, 2012, 10:15:30 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



My beef is that, despite how I think he's more sane than any of the other candidates currently running (within reason), I disagree with him on many issues.  Abortion is one of them.

I'm not exactly sure what your position is on abortion, we'll probably have to discuss that in another thread.  I'm not an obstetrician, so my position is probably different than Ron Paul's, but I"m in favor of safe and legal abortion, and in that respect I'm probably in the mainstream of US voters.  Moreover, I've been there.  I've been a 19-year-old with a pregnant girlfriend, being scared and worried, and hoping that she won't decide to actually have the baby.  Wanting to blurt out "Oh, sh**t, you're not actually going to have the baby, are you?" but also being man enough to keep my mouth shut because it's her decision.  By law!  And, frankly, by reason and by ethical and historical moral conditioning.  I've had to cough up half the money for the procedure, in a time when coughing up half of 400 dollars wasn't easy.  I've walked past those irritating protesters with their rosaries and their placards with giant pictures of aborted babies--as offensive as they are, as taxpaying citizens they had every much right to occupy that sidewalk as we had to walk upon it toward the door of the clinic--abortion is not a political issue.  It's a personal issue.  And it's one that pregnant individuals must make without interference of their government.  I don't want a state like China, where a pregnant woman can be forced to abort a child, and I don't want a state like Ireland, where a pregnant woman must leave the country to have a legal abortion.  Luckily, I don't live in China or Ireland.  I live in the USA, where we have a constitution that allows each person, via his legislature, to make laws.  This is where Ron Paul stands.  And this is where I stand.

Ron Paul wants you to be in charge of your future.  He doesn't want others in charge of your future.  Yes, this human fetal abortion is tricky, because it is one issue in which one human must necessarily be somewhat in charge of the issue of another.  But that is between two people connected by an umbilical chord.  There is no bond in nature as strong as that between a mammal and its mother, and no god or government can come between it.  I think Ron Paul fundamentally understands this.  Do you?


He certainly does not.  I know that Ron Paul hasn't referred to outlawing abortion nationwide, or going to the extremes like Santorum wants to do, but as someone who doesn't believe that a fetus has the same rights as a person, I don't believe that states should be allowed to decide on things like this.  It should be legal at a federal level.  The reason for that is because, like you said, no government can come between something like that.  If we roll the abortion issue back to the states, then a woman's freedom would vary by where she lives and, contrary to what Paul says he wants, government will be able to control your future - only, at a state level.  And I respect states' rights and all that, for the most part, but I don't think they should be allowed to get involved with personal issues like these.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: J. J. on January 19, 2012, 10:21:01 PM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: King on January 19, 2012, 10:22:02 PM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Well, that confirms it.  Romney's finished.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Politico on January 19, 2012, 10:24:57 PM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

I tend to agree that Santorum is going to eat into Gingrich's numbers. He had his best debate ever. Romney did enough to keep his 30%. It'll probably go 30-25-25-20, or something like that.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 19, 2012, 10:35:49 PM
Paul, this is one of the many reasons why I could just never support you.

?!

Dude, WTF?

Ron Paul is Ron Paul.  Tonight he is no different than any other night.

What's your beef with Ron Paul?



My beef is that, despite how I think he's more sane than any of the other candidates currently running (within reason), I disagree with him on many issues.  Abortion is one of them.

I'm not exactly sure what your position is on abortion, we'll probably have to discuss that in another thread.  I'm not an obstetrician, so my position is probably different than Ron Paul's, but I"m in favor of safe and legal abortion, and in that respect I'm probably in the mainstream of US voters.  Moreover, I've been there.  I've been a 19-year-old with a pregnant girlfriend, being scared and worried, and hoping that she won't decide to actually have the baby.  Wanting to blurt out "Oh, sh**t, you're not actually going to have the baby, are you?" but also being man enough to keep my mouth shut because it's her decision.  By law!  And, frankly, by reason and by ethical and historical moral conditioning.  I've had to cough up half the money for the procedure, in a time when coughing up half of 400 dollars wasn't easy.  I've walked past those irritating protesters with their rosaries and their placards with giant pictures of aborted babies--as offensive as they are, as taxpaying citizens they had every much right to occupy that sidewalk as we had to walk upon it toward the door of the clinic--abortion is not a political issue.  It's a personal issue.  And it's one that pregnant individuals must make without interference of their government.  I don't want a state like China, where a pregnant woman can be forced to abort a child, and I don't want a state like Ireland, where a pregnant woman must leave the country to have a legal abortion.  Luckily, I don't live in China or Ireland.  I live in the USA, where we have a constitution that allows each person, via his legislature, to make laws.  This is where Ron Paul stands.  And this is where I stand.

Ron Paul wants you to be in charge of your future.  He doesn't want others in charge of your future.  Yes, this human fetal abortion is tricky, because it is one issue in which one human must necessarily be somewhat in charge of the issue of another.  But that is between two people connected by an umbilical chord.  There is no bond in nature as strong as that between a mammal and its mother, and no god or government can come between it.  I think Ron Paul fundamentally understands this.  Do you?


I hope she would choose to have the child. I have two younger sisters who were pregnant last year though not married. I personally believe, and this is up to you, Choosing life for that child would be so much a blessing, not without challenges, for both families. My sisters did.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Dan the Roman on January 19, 2012, 10:57:34 PM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Won't be the narrative though. The media wants a race, so between Marrianne, the Polls out tonight, Gingrich's outburst, and taxes there will be little to no mention of Santorum for those who didn't watch.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: J. J. on January 20, 2012, 12:14:11 AM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Won't be the narrative though. The media wants a race, so between Marrianne, the Polls out tonight, Gingrich's outburst, and taxes there will be little to no mention of Santorum for those who didn't watch.

I think you missed the point.  Gingrich didn't win tonight, though he didn't do badly.  Santorum is the one that stopped Gingrich; it is that Gingrich says weird stuff and he's not dependable.  That does not give anybody a reason to vote for Santorum, but it gives a good reason not to vote for Gingrich.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on January 20, 2012, 01:41:55 AM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Well, that confirms it.  Romney's finished.

Yeah, but what about the Bradley Effect?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: J. J. on January 20, 2012, 01:49:18 AM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Well, that confirms it.  Romney's finished.

Yeah, but what about the Bradley Effect?

Don't worry, Santorum took care of Gingrich nicely.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Negusa Nagast 🚀 on January 20, 2012, 01:50:13 AM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Well, that confirms it.  Romney's finished.

Yeah, but what about the Bradley Effect?

Don't worry, Santorum took care of Gingrich nicely.

What debate were you watching?


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Eraserhead on January 20, 2012, 02:02:21 AM
Just watching the highlight, Newt's momentum was stopped, by Santorum.

A default Romney win.

Well, that confirms it.  Romney's finished.

Yeah, but what about the Bradley Effect?

Don't worry, Santorum took care of Gingrich nicely.

Haha, okay...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Iosif on January 20, 2012, 03:47:52 AM
Paul lectures someone else on sensitivity while his supporters are shrieking when he doesn't get to answer an issue they don't even care about. You can't make it up!

()


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Tender Branson on January 20, 2012, 03:53:42 AM
Why didn't Paul say that he delivered 4000 babies and tell that abortion story from his ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkAsLPrnJGc) ?

Would have been better IMO than talking about something random and then getting attacked by Santorum.


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: Keystone Phil on January 20, 2012, 07:30:51 AM
Paul lectures someone else on sensitivity while his supporters are shrieking when he doesn't get to answer an issue they don't even care about. You can't make it up!

()


You're about eight hours late on that one, pal. The insurgency is slipping...


Title: Re: Official CNN South Carolina Debate Thread
Post by: angus on January 20, 2012, 09:32:42 AM
I hope she would choose to have the child. I have two younger sisters who were pregnant last year though not married. I personally believe, and this is up to you, Choosing life for that child would be so much a blessing, not without challenges, for both families. My sisters did.

And that's a commendable sentiment.  I assume Ron Paul shares it.  I don't want to argue this any more, and I don't usually post in the abortion threads because people who feel passionately about it one way or the other are generally not to be convinced otherwise, which is fine.  I wouldn't put abortion in my top ten most important issues anyway.  I generally don't find myself moved to vote for or a against a candidate based on his attitude about human fetal abortion, but I realize that there are some for whom this is an important issue.  There are those who think that terminating a pregnancy is so immoral that it should be outlawed in all cases, and they base that on deeply-held moral convictions, so I can't really fault them for that.  In contrast, there are those who think that the right to terminate a pregnancy for any reason and at any time is fundamental, and they base that on deeply-held moral convictions, so I can't really fault them for that.  But I can't figure out why no one who is moved by this issue wouldn't respect Ron Paul's position.  It seems reasonable, moral, and based on the same precepts of American democracy as outlined in the Constitution as all his other positions are based.  Yet, the hardcore anti-abortion crowd and the hardcore pro-abortion crowd both hate him for his position.  It's mystifying.