|
Title: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: throatcutter on January 22, 2012, 09:21:12 PM Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Miles on January 22, 2012, 09:28:38 PM Eh...tough. 'Slight edge to South Dakota.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Negusa Nagast 🚀 on January 22, 2012, 09:28:45 PM North Dakota: has a lot of jobs and the potential to be a center for green technology.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario) on January 22, 2012, 10:04:05 PM ()
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Frodo on January 22, 2012, 10:42:43 PM Definitely North Dakota -that's where the jobs are.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: greenforest32 on January 23, 2012, 12:06:18 AM Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on January 23, 2012, 01:20:13 AM Where my family is.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Username MechaRFK on January 23, 2012, 04:06:54 AM North Dakota
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: freepcrusher on January 23, 2012, 04:52:11 AM South Dakota, particularly Rapid City. The chinook winds there doesn't make it overly cold.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Torie on January 23, 2012, 01:13:05 PM SD somewhere in the Black Hills outside the kitsch tourist zone running from Rapid City to Mt Rushmore.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: I'm JewCon in name only. on January 28, 2012, 10:59:00 PM South Dakota, but it'd have to be Sioux Falls.
North Dakota only for the job market in Fargo. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Brittain33 on January 29, 2012, 12:42:07 PM South Dakota, but it'd have to be Sioux Falls. Right. Sioux Falls is the only sort of sizable metro area. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: minionofmidas on January 29, 2012, 12:47:19 PM Either, as long as it's the rez. And I have a return ticket stashed somewhere.
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on January 30, 2012, 03:12:58 PM South Dakota, but it'd have to be Sioux Falls. Right. Sioux Falls is the only sort of sizable metro area. Metro Fargo is actually about the same size as Metro Sioux Falls, it's just that a chunk of the Fargo metro is in Minnesota. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Brittain33 on January 30, 2012, 03:31:25 PM South Dakota, but it'd have to be Sioux Falls. Right. Sioux Falls is the only sort of sizable metro area. Metro Fargo is actually about the same size as Metro Sioux Falls, it's just that a chunk of the Fargo metro is in Minnesota. Aha, you're right. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: opebo on January 30, 2012, 08:16:53 PM Another gazing-into-the-toilet-bowl question. I guess whichever one is a closer drive to an international airport. What's the nearest one there? Chicago? Minnyapolis?
Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on January 30, 2012, 08:39:59 PM Another gazing-into-the-toilet-bowl question. I guess whichever one is a closer drive to an international airport. What's the nearest one there? Chicago? Minnyapolis? Well Fargo is slightly closer to here. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Nhoj on January 30, 2012, 08:41:50 PM Another gazing-into-the-toilet-bowl question. I guess whichever one is a closer drive to an international airport. What's the nearest one there? Chicago? Minnyapolis? Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Хahar 🤔 on January 30, 2012, 08:57:15 PM Another gazing-into-the-toilet-bowl question. I guess whichever one is a closer drive to an international airport. What's the nearest one there? Chicago? Minnyapolis? Fargo has an international airport but no scheduled international flights. The closest real international airport is Winnipeg. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on January 30, 2012, 09:59:06 PM South Dakota, but it'd have to be Sioux Falls. North Dakota only for the job market in Fargo. The oil boom is actually on the other side of the state, by Montana and Canada. Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: jimrtex on January 31, 2012, 12:15:51 AM Another gazing-into-the-toilet-bowl question. I guess whichever one is a closer drive to an international airport. What's the nearest one there? Chicago? Minnyapolis? Scheduled one stop service from Fargo to Astana, Kazakhstan. One customer complained they were packed in like cattle on the Korean Airlines Flight. (http://www.fargoairport.com/news/FJC_100411.html) Goodyear Blimp visits Fargo after returning from covering Pan Am Games in Winnipeg (http://www.fargoairport.com/news/Airport_071999.html) Title: Re: North Dakota vs. South Dakota Post by: Oldiesfreak1854 on June 26, 2012, 02:13:25 PM I don't have much of a preference, but probably in South Dakota, most likely in the Black Hills.
|