Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Elections => Topic started by: tpfkaw on February 14, 2012, 05:34:57 PM



Title: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 14, 2012, 05:34:57 PM
VOTE NOW, IN THIS THREAD: uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=149115 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=149115)

()

Hello all!  I am running for certain defeat to be your next Northeastern Senator in the election this month!

To that end, I will answer some frequently asked questions:

1. Why are you running?

To feed my megalomaniacal desire for power.

2. What is your position on [X]?

Don't you already know?

3. Why should I vote for you?

Because if you don't I'll phone the Nevada GOP and you know what happens after that.  Also, once I'm out of the Northeast Assembly (which I have served actively in for quite some time, including a term as Speaker) they'll be able to tax and spend and regulate like nobody's business.  Think tactically, folks, tactically!

4. I hate you and think you should be dead!

I hate you and think you should be dead!


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Fourth time's the charm!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 14, 2012, 11:07:01 PM
()

Presso Releaso Numero Uno!

The Anti-Conscription Amendment

Recently, the Senate has once again taken up debating the Anti-Conscription Amendment, as originally proposed by Jbrase.  I'll let you in on a little secret:

I was the original author of that amendment.  (Jbrase will confirm).

It is my personal belief that conscription is a war crime and has no place in a civilized society.  I will be one of the most forceful voices against conscription in the Senate and will introduce the Anti-Conscription Amendment in its original form in every Senate session until it is passed.  I applaud Senator Napoleon for his leadership on this issue and can assure all the citizens of the Northeast that there is no one who will continue his work more faithfully than I.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: CatoMinor on February 14, 2012, 11:49:27 PM
I am Jbrase, and I approve this campaign.

And yes, Wormy wrote the original amendment.



Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Napoleon on February 14, 2012, 11:56:50 PM
Change your name to Donut! Don't you want a Senator Donut?


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 12:03:40 AM
Change your name to Donut! Don't you want a Senator Donut?

Mmm... donuts...

Especially the glazed chocolate ones:

()


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Napoleon on February 15, 2012, 12:13:38 AM
...

()


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 12:19:04 AM

You have to keep an open mind with this sort of thing. :P  In the field of sweet stuff, I also like grape soda and white chocolate, so what do I know?


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 15, 2012, 06:19:02 AM
This is fantastic.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 15, 2012, 06:29:34 AM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 15, 2012, 06:33:13 AM
Vote for Wormyguy : Proven liar and election rigger


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 08:14:51 AM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.

Yes, I know.  It's disgusting.


Thank you for your endorsement! :)


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Napoleon on February 15, 2012, 02:53:21 PM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.
No, that isn't true.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 15, 2012, 02:54:27 PM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.

Yes, I know.  It's disgusting.


Thank you for your endorsement! :)

I'm disappointed you haven't put it in your sig, as you did last time you distorted one of my posts.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 15, 2012, 03:05:21 PM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.

No, that isn't true.

Rather, amendments have been proposed in an attempt to make it pro-conscription.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: Napoleon on February 15, 2012, 03:30:32 PM
P.S., the Anti-Conscription Amendment has been completely diluted with amendments contradictory to the title of the bill. It started out as a piece of legislation that actually banned conscription, but now has been amended to cater to odd situations. At this point, it's more pro-conscription than anti.

No, that isn't true.

Rather, amendments have been proposed in an attempt to make it pro-conscription.

And I will continue doing my best to defeat them, like I do on any bill, to preserve a better policy, much to the disappointment of others.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: k-onmmunist on February 15, 2012, 03:44:07 PM
Your opposition to military slavery will get you a high preference from me.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: Proven Leadership Against Conscription
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 03:46:07 PM
()

Presso Releaso Numero Deux!

Federal Tax Reform

So, you want the Northeast to have taxes, eh?  Well, I'll make it easy for you!  If I am elected to serve the Northeast in the Senate, I will introduce the following legislation such that federal revenues will be collected at the regional level.  This new mechanism will allow for regions to experiment with revenue collection methods in order to find whichever one yields the most economic growth for the revenue they are required to collect, while also increasing activity at the regional level as the federal budget request will require innovation in methods of revenue generation in every region.  Regions which do not provide enough revenue will be penalized by having their federal grants reduced, while regions which provide more than enough will have their revenue requests for the next year reduced.  Economically depressed regions, that is to say regions with higher unemployment, will have less of a revenue burden than more prosperous regions, creating a tax system which will now for the first time be progressive by region.  This mechanism also allows for automatic Keynesian stimulus by automatically increasing the deficit the government is allowed to run in periods of high unemployment.

Quote
The Competitiveness and Equity in Taxation Act

1.  All current federally-collected taxes and tax credits, as outlined in The Fiscal Responsibility Act, Tax Increase Act, Estate Tax Reform Act, Break the Chains Act (Take 2), Atlasia Clean Energy Act, Green Homes Act, Make Internet Sales Fair Act, Social & Economic Development Zone Improvement Act, Viva Las Atlasia Act, Capital Gains Tax Co-Operative Act, Anti-Speculation Act, Public Transportation Encouragement Act, Section 6 of the Public Housing Act, Social Security Taxation Act 2009, Section 3 of the Help Atlasia Study Act of 2009, Section 3 of the Environmental Policy Act of 2009, End Plastic Bag Pollution Act, Dependent Child and Income Tax Credit Act, Carbon Import Tax Act, Carbon Tax Act, Carbon Tax Residential Relief Act, National Sin Tax Act, Sections 6-9 of the National Energy Act, Section 2c of the Atlasia National Healthcare Act, the Hiring Incentives Act, and any taxes and tax credits not here listed, are hereby repealed.

2.  The Senate shall produce a budget request once per year, in order to fund all federal programs.

3.  The Regions shall be required to raise funds (by taxes, fees, other revenues, or sale of debt) to fund the Senate's budget request.

4.  Each region shall be required to raise at least the amount of funds determined by the following formula: (Senate's budget request)*(fraction of registered voters in that region)*(100% - unemployment rate)

For example, if a region contained 1/4 of all registered voters, and had a 10% unemployment rate, and the Senate requested $1 trillion in funds, the region would be required to raise at least ($1 trillion)(1/4)(1 - .1) = $225 billion.

5.  Any region that does not meet these funding requirements may, at the discretion of the Senate, have its highway funding, and regional funding under the Atlasian National Healthcare Act, reduced up to the level that the region is in arrears.

6.  Any region which provides more funds than are required will have their funding requirements reduced by that same amount the next year.

7.  The Senate may increase or reduce funding requirements on each region, but each increase or reduction must be uniform percentage-wise across all regions.

8.  The game moderator shall determine the amount of revenue each region's policies provide.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 03:50:32 PM
Your opposition to military slavery will get you a high preference from me.

Thank you for your support; I'm glad that my reform-focused platform attracts supporters from both right and left. :)


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 15, 2012, 04:00:55 PM
Would the regional government get any of those tax funds?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 04:06:30 PM
Would the regional government get any of those tax funds?

Yes.  Obviously, the regional government would keep whatever revenues it raises that aren't requested by the federal government.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 15, 2012, 04:53:09 PM
You'll be getting my first preference.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: Mechaman on February 15, 2012, 05:05:29 PM
Hey Wormy, what's your position on electoral reform?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 15, 2012, 05:10:16 PM
Threads anybody should read before considering voting for wormyguy.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=129598.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=133264.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=133266.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=133278.0
https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=133452.0


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 05:40:24 PM
Hey Wormy, what's your position on electoral reform?

Reform is always a good idea.  I would prefer if regional senators were elected regionally instead of federally, and if regions could be allowed to recall their senators.  I also think a multi-member executive branch may be a good idea.  If you have any specific ideas I'd love to hear them.

(I'd love it even more if you moved to the Northeast and voted for me. :P )

As for Antonio, if he wants to drag up old controversies, I'll say myself that that incident is one of which I am deeply ashamed and have apologized profusely for.  In fact, I behaved poorly enough that I probably should have been banned for it.  In my defense, I was under an incredible amount of stress at the time due to an unfortunate incident within my family which I'd rather not discuss, except to say that it was highly personal in nature and did not reflect poorly on me.  Still, that's no excuse, and I displayed a lack of judgment in my actions that almost makes me sick to my stomach.  It's a perfectly legitimate reason not to vote for me, in fact.

That said, as long as we're dragging up old controversies, shortly afterwards, there was another controversy involving Polnut's running mate Tmth, who actually blackmailed Jake Matthews (or Carl Schulz) into changing his vote.  If Antonio thinks that old controversies are a reason not to vote for someone, then I'd challenge him to put his money where his mouth is and encourage people not to vote for the Polnut/Tmth ticket.  Now, I'm not saying this to pick on Tmth, who's a good friend of mine.  He's also apologized repeatedly, and I believe he is genuinely sorry for his actions, which like mine were made spur-of-the-moment without thinking.  All I'm saying is that Antonio's high standards right now seem like a bit of a double standard.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: tpfkaw on February 15, 2012, 10:42:06 PM
()

Presso Releaso Numero Drei!

Constitutionally Protecting a Sensible Foreign Policy

Since 2001, Atlasia has been dragged into several needless wars that have damaged our international credibility and our strategic posture, as well as causing the deaths of thousands of our soldiers and the maiming of tens of thousands more, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of civilians in the countries we have invaded, bombed, or destabilized.  After over a decade, little progress meaningful to average Atlasians has been made after the expenditure of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.  Those who have benefited are largely well-connected corporate interests in the military-industrial complex, who profit off of a needlessly-aggressive foreign policy.  If I am elected Senator, there is no issue I will be more active on than to end this state of affairs, immediately and permanently.  To that end I will offer the following constitutional amendment:

Quote
Foreign Policy Transparency and Rationalization Amendment

1. Atlasian military forces are hereby only authorized to use lethal force in the following circumstances:

  • In the course of a war against a foreign government, having been declared by the Senate
  • In self-defense or the in defense of other Atlasian military forces
  • While in the normal course of their duties, to directly defend civilians against attack
  • In the course of the apprehension of criminals
  • To prevent a clear and immediate threat of the launch, release, or detonation of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear fission bombs, lethal chemical agents, or lethal biological organisms

2. Atlasian military forces may only be deployed abroad in countries on whose controlling government the Senate has declared war, or whose controlling government has requested the presence of Atlasian military forces.

3. The President may only exercise his or her powers as commander-in-chief of the Atlasian military in the context of wars having been declared by the Senate.

4. Atlasian military forces may not be placed under foreign or international command except by vote of the Senate.  Atlasian forces under foreign or international command may not offensively participate in conflicts not declared as wars by the Senate.  Atlasian forces under foreign or international command may be withdrawn from foreign or international command at any time at the discretion of their Atlasian commanding officers.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: Badger on February 16, 2012, 12:38:39 AM

 I'll say myself that that incident is one of which I am deeply ashamed and have apologized profusely for. 

Which one?


As for Antonio, if he wants to drag up old controversies,...

***


That said, as long as we're dragging up old controversies,...

::)


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: tpfkaw on February 16, 2012, 01:00:51 AM
Am I (or anyone else, for that matter) going into Polnut's campaign thread and complaining about Invaligate?  No, because that's not an appropriate thing to do.  Past is past, Tmth apologized, 20RP12 accepted his apology, move on.  If you have a substantive disagreement with me, I'd love to hear it.  If you have a personal problem with me, I'd ask as a simple courtesy that you PM me about it, or even start your own thread.  I've tried my hardest to refrain from personally attacking fellow forum members, and have the greatly-reduced infraction point tally to show for it.  I'm happy to be the adult in the room but would prefer if I didn't have to be.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on February 16, 2012, 01:35:40 AM
You've got some really interesting proposals here. Best of luck!


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 04:03:49 AM
From what I remember, the only thing Tmth did was PMing Jake and asking him to change his vote. The accusations of blackmailing were denied by Tmthforu and eventually retracted by Jake too. Comparing something so benign to what you actually did is ludicrous. Especially if we remember that invalidation was only the first part of the story...


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 04:07:16 AM
From what I remember, the only thing Tmth did was PMing Jake and asking him to change his vote. The accusations of blackmailing were denied by Tmthforu and eventually retracted by Jake too. Comparing something so benign to what you actually did is ludicrous. Especially if we remember that invalidation was only the first part of the story...

You're wrong. There's no need to talk about this stuff from thethe pastmost though. We just need to have fun together in this game. Im supporting Scott but id like to see a nice, clean race in this region, issue-centric as always.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 16, 2012, 06:17:27 AM
From what I remember, the only thing Tmth did was PMing Jake and asking him to change his vote. The accusations of blackmailing were denied by Tmthforu and eventually retracted by Jake too. Comparing something so benign to what you actually did is ludicrous. Especially if we remember that invalidation was only the first part of the story...

I really dont like talking about it, but what happened was, I voted, Tmth PMd me asking me either why I didn't vote for x or that I should change my vote, I don't recall exactly. 20 minutes had passed and so the only thing left to do was invalidate the vote. Why did I do it? Because I felt pressured to impress. I was young, naive (still am :P) and I was becoming so addicted to the game that it was actually effecting RL for me. I'd lose sleep trying to write legislation and budgets...it was scary. Being away from here was good for me. It's better now. But yeah.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 12:09:25 PM
From what I remember, the only thing Tmth did was PMing Jake and asking him to change his vote. The accusations of blackmailing were denied by Tmthforu and eventually retracted by Jake too. Comparing something so benign to what you actually did is ludicrous. Especially if we remember that invalidation was only the first part of the story...

I really dont like talking about it, but what happened was, I voted, Tmth PMd me asking me either why I didn't vote for x or that I should change my vote, I don't recall exactly. 20 minutes had passed and so the only thing left to do was invalidate the vote. Why did I do it? Because I felt pressured to impress. I was young, naive (still am :P) and I was becoming so addicted to the game that it was actually effecting RL for me. I'd lose sleep trying to write legislation and budgets...it was scary. Being away from here was good for me. It's better now. But yeah.

So, he didn't actually threaten you. Correct ?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 01:01:25 PM
Not from what I saw from more trustworthy sources.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 01:09:47 PM
Not from what I saw from more trustworthy sources.

I can hardly see a more trustworthy source than the poster in question.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: tpfkaw on February 16, 2012, 01:12:47 PM
Well, I wasn't here for the whole invaligate thing, but whatever the case, people aren't harassing 20RP12 for falsely accusing Tmth of blackmail, or whatever the case may be.  My point is that I'll admit I'm a highly-imperfect person, but I'd ask to keep things positive if at all possible.  It's not like I go and follow Antonio from thread to thread in order to harass him.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 01:13:52 PM
Not from what I saw from more trustworthy sources.

I can hardly see a more trustworthy source than the poster in question.

Yeah, no chance someone bends the truth to cover up for their buddy huh? Regarding Invalidate, worm's posts ought to be taken more seriously than Jake or Tmth's. Frankly you should STOP TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW AND THERE IS NO POINT.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 01:24:38 PM
Not from what I saw from more trustworthy sources.

I can hardly see a more trustworthy source than the poster in question.

Yeah, no chance someone bends the truth to cover up for their buddy huh? Regarding Invalidate, worm's posts ought to be taken more seriously than Jake or Tmth's. Frankly you should STOP TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW AND THERE IS NO POINT.

Why in the world would Jake lie to cover his alleged blackmailer ? I really don't get the logic now...

And now, I don't stop talking, because I don't really like when wormy tries to associate two events which have nothing in common in order to shift attention away from his despicable behaviour. And I also don't understand why you are defending him.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 01:30:01 PM
What Tmth did was way worse, but I've moved on. Why you're so intent on attacking Wormy for running in an election he isn't even going to win, I will never understand. Why hate someone in this game? There is no need for hatred or grudge holding. There is likewise no need to lie which is what you've been told regarding Invalidate.

The two events have a lot in common, with Invalidate being objectively worse. You should be applauding Wormy for cooperating and coming clean. I don't think making Wormyguy look like an innocent victim is your intention but it is what you're doing...


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 02:28:32 PM

No it wasn't, unless you think Jake is a liar. And in this case you'd better come with a valid reason.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 03:43:30 PM

No it wasn't, unless you think Jake is a liar. And in this case you'd better come with a valid reason.

It's knowing more than thinking...but sure, take the word of a guy who doesn't "recall exactly" and keep bringing up old stuff that literally everyone else has moved on from. There's really no reason. At all.

BTW, I wouldn't care to defend wormyguy except that his Invaligate analogy is more than valid, I think it is worse than what wormy did and further I think if I can forgive Tmth for what he did when I was directly affected by it, you can forgive wormy for a harmless stunt that didn't affect you at all. I've certainly wanted to slap the sh**t out of wormyguy at times but we're better than this sort of thing.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 05:21:46 PM

No it wasn't, unless you think Jake is a liar. And in this case you'd better come with a valid reason.

It's knowing more than thinking...but sure, take the word of a guy who doesn't "recall exactly" and keep bringing up old stuff that literally everyone else has moved on from. There's really no reason. At all.

Yeah, I'd like to know where all this knowledge comes from... Since you are basically accusing the alleged victim of lying for no reason, you must be very confident. Yet, you still haven't brought anything close to a proof for such allegations.

Wormyguy's wrongdoing, apart from being undisputed, has gone well beyond vote invalidation.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 05:29:34 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 05:36:56 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 05:38:17 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?

IT DOESN'T NEED TALKED ABOUT.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 05:40:52 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?

IT DOESN'T NEED TALKED ABOUT.

Very courageous from you, really. First you throw extremely grave accusations at a poster, claiming that you know stuff, and when asked to provide evidence you suddenly backtrack. I don't know why anyone should take you seriously.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 16, 2012, 05:45:34 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?

IT DOESN'T NEED TALKED ABOUT.

Very courageous from you, really. First you throw extremely grave accusations at a poster, claiming that you know stuff, and when asked to provide evidence you suddenly backtrack. I don't know why anyone should take you seriously.

This was discussed way back when it was actually relevant. I understand you want to make this game about petty grudges and past mistakes but neither Tmth nor Wormy deserves that. Its called forgiveness. Its called moving on. This is a game!!!!


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on February 16, 2012, 05:53:12 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?

IT DOESN'T NEED TALKED ABOUT.

Very courageous from you, really. First you throw extremely grave accusations at a poster, claiming that you know stuff, and when asked to provide evidence you suddenly backtrack. I don't know why anyone should take you seriously.

This was discussed way back when it was actually relevant. I understand you want to make this game about petty grudges and past mistakes but neither Tmth nor Wormy deserves that.

Yeah sure, I barely participate in Atlasia anymore and I'm stepping in just because I hold a grudge against wormyguy ? Man, I don't give a sh*t about wormyguy. This little petty asshole can do whatever he wants. However, I think it's fair for voters to know what kind of person he is. So, what, 10 months have passed so suddenly everything is forgotten ? Sorry, but no. By acting in such a hypocritical way, by repeatedly lying until his tricks were exposed, he permanently made himself unfit to be considered as a member of the forum community. He said himself he should have been banned : since weak moderation policies made him escape sanctions, it should at least refrain from taking any major activity. Actually, if he had some decency, he would already have left the place.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Progressive Tax Reform for Activity, Prosperity and Innovation
Post by: tpfkaw on February 16, 2012, 06:32:50 PM
Since we now have almost two pages of this idiocy, I'll repost the actually-relevant stuff for people actually concerned about the election.  Cheers all! :)

()

Presso Releaso Numero Uno!

The Anti-Conscription Amendment

Recently, the Senate has once again taken up debating the Anti-Conscription Amendment, as originally proposed by Jbrase.  I'll let you in on a little secret:

I was the original author of that amendment.  (Jbrase will confirm).

It is my personal belief that conscription is a war crime and has no place in a civilized society.  I will be one of the most forceful voices against conscription in the Senate and will introduce the Anti-Conscription Amendment in its original form in every Senate session until it is passed.  I applaud Senator Napoleon for his leadership on this issue and can assure all the citizens of the Northeast that there is no one who will continue his work more faithfully than I.

()

Presso Releaso Numero Deux!

Federal Tax Reform

So, you want the Northeast to have taxes, eh?  Well, I'll make it easy for you!  If I am elected to serve the Northeast in the Senate, I will introduce the following legislation such that federal revenues will be collected at the regional level.  This new mechanism will allow for regions to experiment with revenue collection methods in order to find whichever one yields the most economic growth for the revenue they are required to collect, while also increasing activity at the regional level as the federal budget request will require innovation in methods of revenue generation in every region.  Regions which do not provide enough revenue will be penalized by having their federal grants reduced, while regions which provide more than enough will have their revenue requests for the next year reduced.  Economically depressed regions, that is to say regions with higher unemployment, will have less of a revenue burden than more prosperous regions, creating a tax system which will now for the first time be progressive by region.  This mechanism also allows for automatic Keynesian stimulus by automatically increasing the deficit the government is allowed to run in periods of high unemployment.

Quote
The Competitiveness and Equity in Taxation Act

1.  All current federally-collected taxes and tax credits, as outlined in The Fiscal Responsibility Act, Tax Increase Act, Estate Tax Reform Act, Break the Chains Act (Take 2), Atlasia Clean Energy Act, Green Homes Act, Make Internet Sales Fair Act, Social & Economic Development Zone Improvement Act, Viva Las Atlasia Act, Capital Gains Tax Co-Operative Act, Anti-Speculation Act, Public Transportation Encouragement Act, Section 6 of the Public Housing Act, Social Security Taxation Act 2009, Section 3 of the Help Atlasia Study Act of 2009, Section 3 of the Environmental Policy Act of 2009, End Plastic Bag Pollution Act, Dependent Child and Income Tax Credit Act, Carbon Import Tax Act, Carbon Tax Act, Carbon Tax Residential Relief Act, National Sin Tax Act, Sections 6-9 of the National Energy Act, Section 2c of the Atlasia National Healthcare Act, the Hiring Incentives Act, and any taxes and tax credits not here listed, are hereby repealed.

2.  The Senate shall produce a budget request once per year, in order to fund all federal programs.

3.  The Regions shall be required to raise funds (by taxes, fees, other revenues, or sale of debt) to fund the Senate's budget request.

4.  Each region shall be required to raise at least the amount of funds determined by the following formula: (Senate's budget request)*(fraction of registered voters in that region)*(100% - unemployment rate)

For example, if a region contained 1/4 of all registered voters, and had a 10% unemployment rate, and the Senate requested $1 trillion in funds, the region would be required to raise at least ($1 trillion)(1/4)(1 - .1) = $225 billion.

5.  Any region that does not meet these funding requirements may, at the discretion of the Senate, have its highway funding, and regional funding under the Atlasian National Healthcare Act, reduced up to the level that the region is in arrears.

6.  Any region which provides more funds than are required will have their funding requirements reduced by that same amount the next year.

7.  The Senate may increase or reduce funding requirements on each region, but each increase or reduction must be uniform percentage-wise across all regions.

8.  The game moderator shall determine the amount of revenue each region's policies provide.

()

Presso Releaso Numero Drei!

Constitutionally Protecting a Sensible Foreign Policy

Since 2001, Atlasia has been dragged into several needless wars that have damaged our international credibility and our strategic posture, as well as causing the deaths of thousands of our soldiers and the maiming of tens of thousands more, as well as the deaths of hundreds of thousands if not millions of civilians in the countries we have invaded, bombed, or destabilized.  After over a decade, little progress meaningful to average Atlasians has been made after the expenditure of trillions of dollars and thousands of lives.  Those who have benefited are largely well-connected corporate interests in the military-industrial complex, who profit off of a needlessly-aggressive foreign policy.  If I am elected Senator, there is no issue I will be more active on than to end this state of affairs, immediately and permanently.  To that end I will offer the following constitutional amendment:

Quote
Foreign Policy Transparency and Rationalization Amendment

1. Atlasian military forces are hereby only authorized to use lethal force in the following circumstances:

  • In the course of a war against a foreign government, having been declared by the Senate
  • In self-defense or the in defense of other Atlasian military forces
  • While in the normal course of their duties, to directly defend civilians against attack
  • In the course of the apprehension of criminals
  • To prevent a clear and immediate threat of the launch, release, or detonation of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear fission bombs, lethal chemical agents, or lethal biological organisms

2. Atlasian military forces may only be deployed abroad in countries on whose controlling government the Senate has declared war, or whose controlling government has requested the presence of Atlasian military forces.

3. The President may only exercise his or her powers as commander-in-chief of the Atlasian military in the context of wars having been declared by the Senate.

4. Atlasian military forces may not be placed under foreign or international command except by vote of the Senate.  Atlasian forces under foreign or international command may not offensively participate in conflicts not declared as wars by the Senate.  Atlasian forces under foreign or international command may be withdrawn from foreign or international command at any time at the discretion of their Atlasian commanding officers.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 16, 2012, 08:26:11 PM
Why would I provide evidence on a topic I've continuously said you should drop?

Because accusing someone without evidence is pretty dickish ?

IT DOESN'T NEED TALKED ABOUT.

Very courageous from you, really. First you throw extremely grave accusations at a poster, claiming that you know stuff, and when asked to provide evidence you suddenly backtrack. I don't know why anyone should take you seriously.

He does the same thing in the Senate all the time, so this isn't new.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 16, 2012, 09:09:35 PM
Let me point out all the things wrong with this:

  • Grown men are fighting over a 15 year old boy
  • Said fighting is taking place in a fantasy politics game
  • In the thread of someone's Senate Candidacy HQ
  • Said fight is over a months old issue that has been properly buried, yet continues to be dug up

take it elsewhere, gents.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Mechaman on February 16, 2012, 09:15:58 PM
Let me point out all the things wrong with this:

  • Grown men are fighting over a 15 year old boy
  • Said fighting is taking place in a fantasy politics game
  • In the thread of someone's Senate Candidacy HQ
  • Said fight is over a months old issue that has been properly buried, yet continues to be dug up

take it elsewhere, gents.

Double emphasis.


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 12:55:41 AM
()

Presso Releaso Numero Fjórir!

Election Day!!!

Fellow Atlasians and Northeastern citizens,

Election day is upon us!  You may vote in this thread: uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=149115 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=149115)

While I would like you to vote even if you do not vote for me, I strongly urge you to support my campaign for Northeastern Senator.  I am

  • The ONLY candidate to present detailed proposals for actual legislation (while the Senate is reduced to debating "joke" legislation).
  • The ONLY candidate to consistently support a volunteer military and a peaceful foreign policy that puts Atlasia first, and who is willing to ensure their implementation with constitutional amendments.
  • The ONLY candidate to propose serious, progressive tax reform that empowers regions, will provide a much-needed increase to activity at the regional level, and promotes automatic countercyclical policy in the case of recession.
  • The candidate with the longest record of public service and reform in the Northeast.

Many thanks for your support,

-wormy


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 17, 2012, 01:16:43 AM
(while the Senate is reduced to debating "joke" legislation).

Are you KIDDING me?


Title: Re: wormy for Senate: Constitutionally Protecting a Smart, Sensible Foreign Policy
Post by: Napoleon on February 17, 2012, 01:19:13 AM

He isn't. Marokai is a Senator.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 01:19:53 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 17, 2012, 01:22:41 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

That was not a joke Amendment, I supported it completely. The "getting it over with" had to do with wanting to stop people from constantly abusing the political football that is registration requirements. People constantly pranced around as if they loved newbies by knocking off a few days from the requirements every now and then, and it was gross.

As for the Prime bill; I'm from the Midwest, we have a reputation to uphold, sir.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 17, 2012, 01:23:44 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

So why is it wrong to propose joke legislation in the Senate, but okay (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117504#msg3117504) to do it in the Assembly? (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117272#msg3117272)


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 01:27:26 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

So why is it wrong to propose joke legislation in the Senate, but okay (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117504#msg3117504) to do it in the Assembly? (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117272#msg3117272)

I wasn't proposing that legislation as a "joke" or to annoy people, but to delay the passage of other legislation.  I've never proposed any legislation without an actual purpose and will continue my record of activity in the Senate. :)


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 17, 2012, 01:30:40 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

So why is it wrong to propose joke legislation in the Senate, but okay (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117504#msg3117504) to do it in the Assembly? (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117272#msg3117272)

I wasn't proposing that legislation as a "joke" or to annoy people, but to delay the passage of other legislation.  I've never proposed any legislation without an actual purpose and will continue my record of activity in the Senate. :)

Perhaps one of the most skillful spins you've ever made. :P


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 17, 2012, 01:31:17 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

So why is it wrong to propose joke legislation in the Senate, but okay (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117504#msg3117504) to do it in the Assembly? (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117272#msg3117272)

I wasn't proposing that legislation as a "joke" or to annoy people, but to delay the passage of other legislation.  I've never proposed any legislation without an actual purpose and will continue my record of activity in the Senate. :)

Sounds more like trolling than representing.  I don't see why someone would propose dumb laws for the sake of preventing legislation that hadn't even been written at the time, yet.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 01:34:05 AM

Nope, I'm not kidding you.  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0 (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=148726.0)

The "Let's Get it Over With Amendment" was also proposed as a 'joke' (although it passed, ironically).

So why is it wrong to propose joke legislation in the Senate, but okay (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117504#msg3117504) to do it in the Assembly? (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=127652.msg3117272#msg3117272)

I wasn't proposing that legislation as a "joke" or to annoy people, but to delay the passage of other legislation.  I've never proposed any legislation without an actual purpose and will continue my record of activity in the Senate. :)

Sounds more like trolling than representing.  I don't see why someone would propose dumb laws for the sake of preventing legislation that hadn't even been written at the time, yet.

No, it sounds like representing the Northeasterners who voted to elect me to Assembly and continue to.  In fact, I regularly top the poll in Assembly elections.  If the legislation had not, in fact, been written, then I would have withdrawn my bills.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: homelycooking on February 17, 2012, 08:46:17 AM
In fact, I regularly top the poll in Assembly elections.

This is not true. Scott won five 1st preferences in December, and you had three. Scott won nine 1st preferences in October, and you had five. Cincinnatus had four 1st preferences in August, and you had one - your own. You certainly are elected quite often by the NE people, but you seldom, if ever, "top the poll".


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Modernity has failed us on February 17, 2012, 10:05:12 AM
The Prime Supremacy Act and The Never Forget The Painting Horse Act are certainly two bills that weren't/aren't worthy of the Senate's time. However, there are other bills that are taking up way too much time. The Anti-Conscription Amendment went from being a simple proposal to ban conscription to now we're up to 4 amendments twisting the wording for some "in such a case" scenario. Plus, there's so much constant bickering in every thread, it's becoming ridiculous. If I wasn't such an enthusiastic person, I would've left Atlasia a while ago. But I can't and I won't. I strive to make this game better, for the future posters that want to play. I've sat here grappling with the thought of running for re-election. My approvals are so damn low, and for what? I'm an active Senator, I've proposed legislation. I've voiced my opinions, I've voted on every bill and I've taken a stand against every amendment to the Anti-Conscription Amendment that would seismically change the tone of the bill. But why are my approval ratings low? You tell me. My best guess is because I'm a Libertarian and I'm a kid. So what? It's a sad day when we'd kick an active Senator out because of his political beliefs. Back when I was in the Northeast, Napoleon and I worked tirelessly to recall an inactive Governor--one whom I shared similar beliefs with. We didn't get him recalled, of course, but we still won the election. I'm not going to talk about what happened afterward because it doesn't need to be talked about. Anyway, we need to get our sh*t together to be frank, cuz this game's going down hill. It's sad. I used to have so much hope for this game--that we'd change. But at this rate...I dunno. We won't last another year. Whatever. Sorry for clogging up your thread, Wormy. Best of luck.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 17, 2012, 08:36:18 PM
In fact, I regularly top the poll in Assembly elections.

This is not true. Scott won five 1st preferences in December, and you had three. Scott won nine 1st preferences in October, and you had five. Cincinnatus had four 1st preferences in August, and you had one - your own. You certainly are elected quite often by the NE people, but you seldom, if ever, "top the poll".

pfffff. Get out of here with your "facts" you jerk.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 09:35:34 PM
Well, he conveniently leaves out the ones in which I did top the poll, and I was second in each of those (if I'm recalling correctly, I'll admit I'm not an expert in Atlasian election minutia).  I didn't say I always do.  In any case nitpicking is rather beside the point.  I have a substantive, reform-oriented platform and have run an entirely positive campaign to serve the Northeast region.  If my opponents want to engage in the politics of negativity, that's fine, but the politics of negativity ultimately benefit no one in the end.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: homelycooking on February 17, 2012, 10:28:05 PM
Well, he conveniently leaves out the ones in which I did top the poll, and I was second in each of those (if I'm recalling correctly, I'll admit I'm not an expert in Atlasian election minutia).  I didn't say I always do.  In any case nitpicking is rather beside the point.  I have a substantive, reform-oriented platform and have run an entirely positive campaign to serve the Northeast region.  If my opponents want to engage in the politics of negativity, that's fine, but the politics of negativity ultimately benefit no one in the end.

Let's go back further.

June 2011: Homelycooking won 7 1st preferences, you won two, one of which was your own.
April 2011: You didn't win any 1st preferences.
February 2011: You tied for first place with sbane, 5 1st preferences each. This is the most recent election - exactly one year ago - in which you "topped the poll", but in this case you weren't alone at the top.
December 2010: You tied for fifth place. Two first preferences, one was your own.
October 2010: You recieved one first preference: you wrote yourself in.

You didn't say that you "always" topped the poll, but that you "regularly" do. You "topped the poll" once - a year ago this month - in eight elections. I simply want to be clear about the facts.  I don't blame you if you made that statement in honest error, because in fact it isn't all that important. I did, however, want to show that your statement was, in fact, in error.

In fact, I regularly top the poll in Assembly elections.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 10:36:02 PM
Alright, I'll amend my statement.  If I wanted to, I could top the poll in every election, however, since February 2011 I haven't seen fit to pester people to vote for me because I am well-liked enough that I do not have to, and have continued to be elected with even stronger totals even after the reduction in Assembly size.  In fact, I have had to pester people not to vote for me, so that I could have allies in the Assembly.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 17, 2012, 10:43:48 PM
Alright, I'll amend my statement.  If I wanted to, I could top the poll in every election, however, since February 2011 I haven't seen fit to pester people to vote for me because I am well-liked enough that I do not have to, and have continued to be elected with even stronger totals even after the reduction in Assembly size.  In fact, I have had to pester people not to vote for me, so that I could have allies in the Assembly.

This is all getting very DWTL-ish, now.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 17, 2012, 10:45:52 PM
It's funny, several pages of negativity directed at me, nearly all of it from out of region, and not a single one a substantive criticism based on my campaign or my platform.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Mechaman on February 17, 2012, 10:57:06 PM
It's funny, several pages of negativity directed at me, nearly all of it from out of region, and not a single one a substantive criticism based on my campaign or my platform.

I'm not your biggest fan, but I agree.
FOr the record I'm impressed with the amount of detail Wormyguy has put into his campaign.  Especially the bills and stuff.  A lot more than the vague policy speeches and pictures of sporting arenas displayed by a certain red Australia avatar.

Arguing that somebody shouldn't vote for candidate (x) because he's unsuccessful at running for office or whatever isn't a very strong argument.  Just saying.


I say it's been nearly a year since Wormy wronged the Atlasia with his self-admitted court fraud thing, let's ease up on the guy.  Maybe give him a sort of Gingrich like skepticism, but not flood his campaign thread left and right with "haha! You suck at contests!" or "You totally the dickhead!" that I've been seeing here.

ONE MORE NOTE: If you guys are going to go ape on Wormyguy for not being 1st preference or whatev, I would appreciate that somebody show me the same courtesy when analyzing my own electoral past :(.  Barely losing the April 2010 At-Large Senate Special Election with the 5th most votes and being a part of the epic loser ticket known as Teddy/Mechaman probably isn't as impressive as actually winning office.

Just saying.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on February 18, 2012, 01:30:33 PM
It's funny, several pages of negativity directed at me, nearly all of it from out of region, and not a single one a substantive criticism based on my campaign or my platform.

I'm not your biggest fan, but I agree.
FOr the record I'm impressed with the amount of detail Wormyguy has put into his campaign.  Especially the bills and stuff.  
Absolutely. I took another look at that foreign policy amendment, and it looks very well thought out and practical. We've had some confusion about the president's military authority in the past, and what wormy put together is something I think people could support even if they are much more interventionist than he is.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 19, 2012, 12:29:31 PM
()

Presso Releaso Numero πέντε!

An end...  And a beginning.

Friends, Northeasterners, Countrymen,

Unfortunately, my opponent has amassed a lead that appears insurmountable at this point.  While I am disappointed in the apparent outcome of this election, I would like to congratulate Scott on a well-fought campaign and I am sure he will make a fine senator for the region.

I'm glad that our voters were enthusiastic and motivated to give me a lead on day 1 of this campaign, and while the choice of Northeastern voters was clear, it was equally clear what the choice of active and reform-oriented Northeasterners was, and I would like to thank each and every one of them for their support.  I'm glad I ran a campaign that attracted broad support on its own merits and didn't require PMing anyone 10 times to vote for me, and that it didn't succumb to the negativity that so often plagues our politics.

I never expected to win, but we exceeded expectations and have shown that active, issues-oriented Northeasterners reject politics as usual.  I believe that this is only even more true of Atlasia as a whole.  That is why I would like to announce that I am continuing this campaign and will be a candidate in the April at-large Senate election.


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: Barnes on February 19, 2012, 12:36:38 PM
If I may say so, your campaign sign is probably the one I've liked the most since joining Atlasia! ;D


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: tpfkaw on February 19, 2012, 12:42:14 PM
If I may say so, your campaign sign is probably the one I've liked the most since joining Atlasia! ;D

Muchas gracias! :)

Yours is quite nice too, if vaguely ominous. :P


Title: Re: wormyguy for [Northeast Regional] Senate: VOTE NOW!!!
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 19, 2012, 12:53:51 PM
You ran a very active campaign.  Good job.