Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Elections => Topic started by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 20, 2012, 04:49:45 PM



Title: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 20, 2012, 04:49:45 PM
As one of Atlasia's most contraversial individuals I'd like to open this office for the purpose of dialogue and colilition building for a better Atlasia. I will be announcing my future direction regarding regional and national politics around 7 pm Indiana time.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 20, 2012, 07:40:06 PM
The grounds of the former Samuel P. Kyger Elementry School, Frankfort, IN

Thank you friends, family, and fellow Mideast citizens

In light of recent devlopments I felt bereft of a party that felt closest to my personal values because I had many principled agreements with both the Whigs and the PLP. As many know I'm of a rather conservative persuasion with regards to social matters. With careful discussion seeking advice from several Atlasians I have chosen the Whigs due to their closeness to my social views. To my friends in the PLP, this doesn't mean I disagree with you on economic issues and your belief in the free market. In fact I support them.

Many here on the left think we are extreme in our social views. I must politely and passionately disagree. I believe that childern are best raised in a home with a mom and a dad. That is what historically works. It's the social progressives that seek to destroy the family as we know it. Needless to say I must call my brothers and sisters of faith to look at ourselves to fight to preserve our families first. The citizens of he Mideast are a good people with a strong conservative tradition. We aided our own Tmfth in his succsessful run for President. We have men like ZuWo and TJ in Cleveland speaking out for our cause. As former President Kennedy once said , "The Chinese use two brush strokes to write the word 'crisis.' One brush stroke stands for danger; the other for opportunity. In a crisis, be aware of the danger - but recognize the opportunity." in order for the conservative causes of lower taxes, less spending, free market principals, and personal responsibility it's time to lend my voice and run for the Mideast Assembly.

Thank you and may God save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Lambsbread on February 20, 2012, 07:51:13 PM
Very well said, JCL :) I may not agree with you on social issues, but I can respect your views and your right to believe such.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 20, 2012, 07:52:49 PM
It's the social progressives that seek to destroy the family as we know it.

Muahahahaha!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 20, 2012, 08:03:10 PM
Very well said, JCL :) I may not agree with you on social issues, but I can respect your views and your right to believe such.

 We have many agreements despite our differences with regards to many social issues.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on February 20, 2012, 09:40:32 PM
Best of luck to you! Good announcement spot. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on February 21, 2012, 05:00:26 AM
I'm very glad to see that you will be a candidate for the Assembly. We really need new active people. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on February 21, 2012, 05:54:34 AM
I'm very glad to see that you will be a candidate for the Assembly. We really need new active people. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on February 21, 2012, 06:58:30 PM
Hi.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 21, 2012, 07:27:04 PM

Welcome


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 26, 2012, 08:24:50 PM
Courtyard across the street from Bartle Hall, Kansas City, MO

Missourians and fellow Atlasians,

Thank you for allowing me the opprotunity to return to a community that has had a considerable spiritual influance on my own worldview. Many come from here and in other points of our region to petition our government in Nyman with regard of the protection of the rights of the baby in the womb. Do they not realize what our founding documents say about the right to life? It was given to us by our creator and it is inalienable. That mean not even the government can alter that.

I've also recently been hearing of some of the reforms some want to institute to make our government more efficient. I would agree with the voices that want to give the VP tie breaking powers in our senate and would encourage MPolitico, our Regional Senator, to support these reforms. We would encourage him also to start advocating pro-life legislation on the national stage. As well as religious exemptions with regards to the adoption processes that weigh down good families for the sake of political correctness.

The tax system could use some reworking as well. How about taxing only on sales and not income. We must root out all the hidden taxes that hinder the individual from giving to their communities of faith. That especially means the inflation tax that hurts the working class from possibly moving up. I encourage the Polnut administration to allow the Keystone XL pipeline be built and in a way that would minimize environmental side effects by letting the market decide how to best handle this matter. These are hard times and we are Taxed Enough Already.  To those who are asking, the Tea Party is alive and well in Atlasia.

Thank you and may God save Atlasia and the Mideast Region


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 27, 2012, 08:53:57 AM

Hey. Welcome to my office. Anything you want to know?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 05, 2012, 08:46:09 PM
From the office of JCL

It has recently come to my attention there is a new bill in the Northeast that would give powers to the governor that should specifically stay with their assembly. I encourage all citizens to speak with their elected reps and ask them to oppose this HAEV bill with vigorous passion


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 17, 2012, 06:13:46 PM
Regional Elections

For all who have voted, thank you. If you haven't voted yet please do so. It's the citizens that will make the Mideast a great region.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 17, 2012, 07:12:51 PM
To the citizens of the Mideast

I thank you for this past season to represent you in our assembly. We are in the mist of great potential to enhance both safety and liberty. Indeed there is still more to be done. The causes of lower taxes, the protection of our preborn citizens, and reforms to improve our game.

With ZuWo looking at becoming governor it is important to bring in someone with both conservative credentials and an eye to get things done. That is why when I voted in the last election I wrote in A-Bob. His experience could be a potential asset to mentor younger assemblymen like myself to be an active force for the cause of good governance. That good governance I speak of will always one that seeks to constrain that governance to be limited and to be a defender of liberty. As Ronald Reagan once said

"You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right. Well I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right. There's only an up or down—[up] man's old—old-aged dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism. And regardless of their sincerity, their humanitarian motives, those who would trade our freedom for security have embarked on this downward course."

I believe in that vision and there are reforms both at the regional level and nationally that fundamentally need to be made for that liberty to flourish.

Also I'd like to say to the folks out there who desire gold and silver to be restored as legal tender, I am a friend. I raise my voice with yours for a sound monetary system.

For the communities of faith, thank you for your support. Faith and freedom must stay as friends with an indisoluable bound.

For the one who seeks criminal gain, if I'm returned to the assembly you will not like what I'm going to propose. Especially traffickers of individuals for the sex slave trade.

From Kansas City to Baltimore and all over the Mideast we are a hard working people who want to live quiet and peaceful lives. Government tends to embridle the deepest of our passions regardless of idealology. Regardless of the outcome of the elections lets strive for a better Atlasia

God Bless Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on May 17, 2012, 07:25:26 PM

It's Dave.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Lambsbread on May 17, 2012, 07:29:53 PM

Allah.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on May 17, 2012, 07:37:33 PM

Xenu.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on May 17, 2012, 07:45:36 PM

Dwight York (aka Malachi Z. York, Issa Al Haadi Al Mahdi, et alii).


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 17, 2012, 08:07:18 PM
I leave it as that out of respect of you all.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 17, 2012, 11:23:17 PM
Regarding Persia and Nuclear Weapons Testing

I and many fellow Atlasians are disturbed at the recent developments in the Islamic Republic of Persia. To let the power of the atom in the hands of a deranged government beholden to a group wanting to bring the Islamic messiah to power could have eternal ramifications on the whole of society in the free and oppressed worlds. I, as an assemblyman, ask the Polnut administration to aid the Christian and other rebels of political or religious conscience. We all know the current regime is illegitimate because the 2009 elections were stolen by the man in power when it was beyond obvious to the world that the reformers won the election. Please do so in a peaceful way before our fighting men and women are forced to act.

Blessed are the peacemakers

God Save Atlasia

We are the nameless, we are the faceless, we forgive yet we never forget, enemies of freedom fear us friends of freedom respect us, the brave join us, expect us


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on May 18, 2012, 06:13:02 AM
Since the time of Zoroaster (around 1000 BC) the people of Iran have called their nation "Aryānām" (Iran in the proto-Iranian language), eventually shifting to Iran during the Sassanid dynasty (226 AD). On March 21, 1935, Reza Shah Pahlavi issued a decree asking foreign nations to use the term "Iran" in formal writings. The current norm is that "Iran" is to be used in political writings, and "Persia" in historical-cultural areas. So in sum, they call themselves Iran and get significantly annoyed when someone calls them the "Islamic Republic of Persia". Just an FYI from your SoEA.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on May 18, 2012, 09:54:32 AM

And what us your opinion of the Franks Republic? Not to mention the Ottoman Republic.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on May 18, 2012, 01:02:00 PM
What is your opinion of the War on Drugs in general? Do you support legalized marijuana?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 18, 2012, 06:06:20 PM
I believe that the regions are the best place to dictate policy on any social domestic issue. Is it the duty of the government as a whole to allocate finances to aid drug users by buying their syringes while we are 16 trillion in debt?

As for marijuana, we need to handle it in a way that protects kids from all the drama that ensues because I it.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 31, 2012, 03:08:00 PM
I will be live on Michael Savage at the shows opening tonite.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 31, 2012, 07:37:54 PM
Case Arena, Frankfort, IN 

Thank you all for coming.

Since my recent defeat in the Assembly elections (crowd boos) I've been getting all sorts of tweets, Facebook messages and whatnot with regards to my next move in the cause of a smaller, more accountable government of, for and by the people. 

What do we as a republic do when we are multi-trillions of dollars in the red and our national security has potentially been impacted drastically by an Iran that has joined the nuclear club. While the people of Atlasia harbor no ill will to the people of Iran it's your government that seeks to destroy one of our most resolute of friends in the nation of Israel. So in the name of all that is good, remove the enemies of your own journey to liberty in a peaceful way that honors the rule of law. 

What do we do when many in the vested "old guard" of the  Atlasian body politik choose to neglect the duties of their station in places of power and not mentor the up and coming individuals? We give the regional assemblies more power to hold them accountable for their actions or inaction. I will encourage the assemblies to enact such reforms. 

In a multi party political system we often see one side always being forced to bend closer to the whims of the other, I don't believe that to be the proper course. We can all work for a better Atlasia. When the Republicans retook the House and Senate back in 1994, President Clinton realized he needed to appear to be above the ideological fracas of legislative matters. It's why we have welfare reform. 

As a conservative I will fight for my principals and I would expect the left an the center to do the same. But when it's all said and done we are all Atlasians regardless. 

We can come together to extend the hand of liberty to all who seek to call Atlasia home. 
That is why I am announcing candidacy for the Atlasian Senate from the Mideast. 

Thank you and may we seek a better way for all Atlasians


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on May 31, 2012, 09:40:45 PM
First off, good luck JCL :)

Second of all, do you feel I have neglected my duties in any way, especially regarding Iran and Israel?  Or that I have been excessively partisan, or have at all impaired the Senate?  And finally, have I hampered up and coming Atlasians?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on June 01, 2012, 02:28:36 AM
This will be the first competitive regional Senate election here since I have joined the game. That's great. Good luck to you!

I have a concrete question: The Senate is currently debating a budget proposal from the President. As Senator, what would you do to achieve a balanced budget?





Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 01, 2012, 10:28:56 PM
First off, good luck JCL :)

Second of all, do you feel I have neglected my duties in any way, especially regarding Iran and Israel?  Or that I have been excessively partisan, or have at all impaired the Senate?  And finally, have I hampered up and coming Atlasians?

I actually think you are one of the few of the old guard here that have been trying to do a good job in their place in the game. Tmfth, A-Bob, NC Yankee and Badger are others whom I've admired for their service and would try to emulate. Though with my own twist.

With regards to Iran and Israel, I share the concern over Iran having nuclear weapons but I think we need more options on the table. Sanctions hurt the people much more than Amideimijad or the Mullahs. We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the election was stolen. The reformers won and were robbed of their rightful place in power by a devious evil man.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on June 01, 2012, 10:37:56 PM
First off, good luck JCL :)

Second of all, do you feel I have neglected my duties in any way, especially regarding Iran and Israel?  Or that I have been excessively partisan, or have at all impaired the Senate?  And finally, have I hampered up and coming Atlasians?

I actually think you are one of the few of the old guard here that have been trying to do a good job in their place in the game. Tmfth, A-Bob, NC Yankee and Badger are others whom I've admired for their service and would try to emulate. Though with my own twist.

With regards to Iran and Israel, I share the concern over Iran having nuclear weapons but I think we need more options on the table. Sanctions hurt the people much more than Amideimijad or the Mullahs. We know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the election was stolen. The reformers won and were robbed of their rightful place in power by a devious evil man.

What other options specifically are you proposing?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 01, 2012, 11:08:31 PM
First remove the sanctions. Then we send a national delegation to ask for national forgiveness concerning our actions regarding Iran in 1953. The best way to destroy an enemy is turn him
into a friend. That is the most ideal thing to do yet we all know we can't always do that. We should prepare for any contingency. If Iran does something stupid however we should be prepared and do so without imperiling the liberties of our citizens.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 02, 2012, 12:07:47 AM
JCL Saturday Events:

Tea Party event in South Bend, IN 9am
Bound4Life Prayer Rally, Fort Wayne IN 11:30 am
Western Days Festival, Russiaville IN 1:30 pm singing in karaoke contest

Campaign takes Sunday off so team can be with family and attend religious services

Monday 6/4
Interview with Glenn Beck 9 am
More details in the works


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 04, 2012, 12:58:19 PM
6/4 Campaign events

Stops all over Ohio at various Tea Party and Pro-Life rallies ending at Bethel Church(one of the Bethel in Redding California daughter churches) in Cleveland.

6/5 Campaign events (as of 2:00pm Indiana time)

Coast to Coast Am interview
Stops in Wheeling, Morgantown, Charlston, Harpers Ferry, Huntington West Virginia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 04, 2012, 08:31:43 PM
First remove the sanctions. Then we send a national delegation to ask for national forgiveness concerning our actions regarding Iran in 1953. The best way to destroy an enemy is turn him
into a friend.

The issue, though, is what does this do for us?  The government enjoys a high amount of internal legitimacy in Iran; our apologizing for 1953 will not substantially harm the incumbent regime.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 04, 2012, 08:54:36 PM
It's a matter of conscience sake. Also the reformers were the rightful winners so Amideimijad is illegitimate. There was extremely high levels of voter fraud and it was not properly investigated.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 04, 2012, 09:33:19 PM
It's a matter of conscience sake. Also the reformers were the rightful winners so Amideimijad is illegitimate. There was extremely high levels of voter fraud and it was not properly investigated.

First off, there is no evidence to suggest that Mousavi actually won the election (as opposed to merely performing better than reported).  Second of all, while the international community may now view the government as illegitimate, that is not the view of the Iranian people; now is not the time to seek radical regime change, based on Western notions of legitimacy.

Also, the President's name is Ahmadinejad; it is worthwhile to make sure the name is spelled correctly - misspellings like that tend to annoy the citizenry.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on June 04, 2012, 10:32:25 PM
It's a matter of conscience sake. Also the reformers were the rightful winners so Amideimijad is illegitimate. There was extremely high levels of voter fraud and it was not properly investigated.

First off, there is no evidence to suggest that Mousavi actually won the election (as opposed to merely performing better than reported).  Second of all, while the international community may now view the government as illegitimate, that is not the view of the Iranian people; now is not the time to seek radical regime change, based on Western notions of legitimacy.

Also, the President's name is Ahmadinejad; it is worthwhile to make sure the name is spelled correctly - misspellings like that tend to annoy the citizenry.

To put it bluntly: misspelling their leader's name causes them to become angry. This particular angry nation has nuclear weapons. Let's not poke the bear.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 05, 2012, 09:15:58 AM
It's not worthwhile to attempt to make amends for 1953 while simultaneously butchering the name of their President - we're not Marion Berry.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 11, 2012, 06:46:58 PM
From the Office of JCL

I've been thinking long and hard with regards to my first preference for President. In this I look for a reliable conservative who will fight for the cause of a limited and transperant government. I've come to the conclusion that Senator Clarence would best suit this. We may disagree on a couple points here and there but if you want a smaller government with lower taxes and an advocate of balenced budgets then Clarence is your best bet.

In the IDS my support will be going to

HagridOfTheDeep

In his short time of activity he has shown that conservatives can show their fun sides.




Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on June 11, 2012, 08:43:35 PM
Thank you again for the support!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 11, 2012, 09:15:48 PM
6/13 campaign events.

Stops in Fredrick, MD, Virginia Beach VA,  Richmond VA, Hampton VA, Norfolk VA, Fredericksburg VA, Justice House of Prayer Washington DC, Willamsburg VA.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 12, 2012, 03:22:32 PM
University of Kentucky

Many thanks to Governor ZuWo and his endorsement. He has been someone who has championed many of the causes that I plan on fighting for in the senate.

Some thought I would communicate some of my vision regarding education at the debate yet much of the time was addressing foreign policy issues. Needless to say my stance on the "Home and Private Schooling Tax Credit Act" introduced by Senator Clarence is that anything that puts the education dollars back in the hands of the parents of private and homeschoolers is something worth supporting. It's not out of an opposition to public schools that I would support this legislation. It's out of a support of competition in the education system that I endorse this legislation. I believe the regions are the best place to handle issues like this. At some point we need to address the future role of the federal government in the field of education.

Where I believe all governments can contribute further to the cause of liberty is over the issue of human trafficking. This is an agregious crime against many of our most vulnerable. One of the reasons I oppose all foreign aid is that many of those dollars are aiding traffickers in other countries. Even we are not immune to this part of the massive organized crime complex. Allowing these criminals aid given be taxpayer is no better than forcing people of faith, via tax dollars, to fund contraceptives. Isn't that something the couple themselves could handle much better than government. We also need immigration reform that strongly addresses this issue. From the Tea Parties and the Houses of Prayer to the national government in Nyman, please get this done for the sake of the protection of liberties we all hold so dear.

Thank you and may God and Dave Bless


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Oakvale on June 12, 2012, 03:26:53 PM
...did you really just compare public contraception coverage to human trafficking?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on June 12, 2012, 03:35:31 PM
...did you really just compare public contraception coverage to human trafficking?

And did you suggest that "people of faith" should be opposed to public contraception coverage (implying that, if you support such coverage, you are not a person of faith)?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 12, 2012, 03:39:41 PM
...did you really just compare public contraception coverage to human trafficking?

And did you suggest that "people of faith" should be opposed to public contraception coverage (implying that, if you support such coverage, you are not a person of faith)?

There are many people of faith that are ok with such coverage. Many more are not in favor of those mandates. I see this as an issue of individual conscience and that government shouldn't be involved in this.

...did you really just compare public contraception coverage to human trafficking?

In the recent healthcare law, which I opposed, it put contraception as something that should be covered via taxpayer dollars. In my opinion mandating people of faith to fund contraception or abortion via tax dollars is no worse than human trafficking.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on June 12, 2012, 03:50:02 PM
...did you really just compare public contraception coverage to human trafficking?

And did you suggest that "people of faith" should be opposed to public contraception coverage (implying that, if you support such coverage, you are not a person of faith)?

There are many people of faith that are ok with such coverage. Many more are not in favor of those mandates. I see this as an issue of individual conscience and that government shouldn't be involved in this.

I can respect that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 16, 2012, 03:15:52 AM
From the office of JCL

I will be making stops all over Michigan ,Indiana, Missouri, and Illinois leading up to the election. The cities and towns so far as follows: Chicago IL, Peoria IL, Detroit MI (At Ford Field), Lansing MI, Dixon IL, Forest IN, Indianapolis IN, Muncie IN, Anderson IN, Brazil IN, St. Louis MO, Kansas City (Grandview) MO, the University of Missouri, Springfield (the headquarters of the A/G)

We also send out a heartfelt congratulations to Mr. Calloway and the Western Panthers for their victory in the Indiana State High School Baseball 3A tournament. Mr. Calloway taught JCL a lot about the fundamentals of the game. Only 4 things in RL could make me happier than what I am for them right now.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 16, 2012, 09:39:22 AM
Congrats to Western! I've met several from there, and they were all good people to me. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 16, 2012, 12:35:16 PM
Congrats to Western! I've met several from there, and they were all good people to me. :)

That's where I went. We're best known for our 12 time champion marching band (my family had a big role in that history)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 16, 2012, 12:55:45 PM
Congrats to Western! I've met several from there, and they were all good people to me. :)

That's where I went. We're best known for our 12 time champion marching band (my family had a big role in that history)
That's how I met folks from Western - marching band. We were in Class D, but we were in the same competition with them several times. Always great shows!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 16, 2012, 01:31:15 PM
What do you play? I marched trumpet all 4 years of high school. Did Baritone junior and senior year of concert and pep band.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (The Motor City Speech and Vision on tax Policy)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 19, 2012, 02:00:21 PM
I will be announcing my tax proposal in a speech at Ford Field sometime tonite.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 19, 2012, 03:32:26 PM
What do you play? I marched trumpet all 4 years of high school. Did Baritone junior and senior year of concert and pep band.
I played bariton in marching band, only because we didn't march trombone.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 19, 2012, 05:34:46 PM
What do you play? I marched trumpet all 4 years of high school. Did Baritone junior and senior year of concert and pep band.
I played bariton in marching band, only because we didn't march trombone.

Why didn't your school march trombones?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 19, 2012, 10:26:57 PM
Ford Field, Detroit MI

It's so good to be here in the Motor City again (crowd cheers)

My hometown and this city share in a great Atlasian tradition called the automotive industry. Ever since Elwood Haynes took the first drive down what we call today Boulevard Rd we have all been looking to get where we need to go just a little faster than before. The biggest concern I see ahead for Detroit and the Mideast as a whole is the government keeping the economic engine from purrin' like a kitten. Cities like this one, Kokomo IN, Cleveland OH and others are still struggling while the government milks us out of finances, through egregiously high, personal and corporate income taxes to use for projects that individuals families and the regions themselves are best suited for. The big spenders in Nyman are wanting to put a tax burden on us that is unreasonable and hinders job growth. Many of you know of my opposition to an income based tax system. If we want tax reform we must prepare to offer an alternative plan that will benefit all in the long run. Under my tax plan corporations will only pay a 15 percent rate. As for individuals it would look like this until we get out of debt.

9,500-20,000 5%
20,001-100,000 10%
100,001-500,000 20%
500,001-5,000,000 30%
5,000,001+ 40 %

Gifts and prize winnings will not be taxed period.

The long term goal is to get to a uniform flat tax system that would be fair untill we can change from an income based system of taxation to one of consumption.

I know some may think that this would be extreme but the rates under Fmr. President Clinton hold some similarities to this plan.

In the 90's a regulation called the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed. This action, among others, led to the current financial crises. The repeal lead to taxpayers having to take one on the chin so failed bankers could get away with their godless ponzi schemes. I put my sword in the ground saying no more to any industry who thinks it has the right to receive government bailouts without consequence. That is why Glass-Steagall must be restored as law. One thing both Senator Ben and I would both lead on.

I am an avowed conservative in the mold of Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, and the Tafts of Ohio, not in the mold of the Bushes, Richard Nixon or Cheney and Rumsfeld. I am a fan of Ronald Reagan, Ike, JFK, Pierre DuPont IV, Walter Jones and yes Ron Paul, David Mcintoish, Mike Pence and Jackie Walorski. Both sides have borne the taint of militarism outside the tenants of the Christian Just War Doctrine. To President Polnut and the members of the senate, we don't want any part of the Syrian Civil War whatsoever. Get us out of there immediately.

I still see hope for the city of Detroit and all the industrial cities of the Mideast and Atlasia. Isn't it right that this is the home of the Detroit Lions. A team being a sign that this city is coming back from a seeming long death. If only my God, who isn't dead but roars as a lion, would be so merciful to my Chicago Cubs (crowd laughs as they see a JCL surrogate hand him a guitar.

I'd like to end our time together with something a little different. A song

Do you see it coming
A rumble in the streets
Freedom's song is rising
It's meeting no defeat......




Thank you and may God and Dave Bless you



Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Election Weekend )
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 22, 2012, 12:24:21 AM
Hope to see you at the polls on your way to vote.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on June 22, 2012, 12:37:18 AM
Best of luck, JCL. :)
I'd vote for you if I could!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 22, 2012, 12:45:22 AM
Best of luck, JCL. :)
I'd vote for you if I could!

It's gonna be a close one. The left is gonna give it their all.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 22, 2012, 12:54:14 AM
Good luck JCL :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 22, 2012, 12:58:25 AM

And the same to you. Regardless of the outcome lets work together on putting an Atlasian Glass-Steagall in place.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 22, 2012, 01:00:04 AM
And the same to you. Regardless of the outcome lets work together on putting an Atlasian Glass-Steagall in place.

It already is, actually :)  Senator Scott had put in such an inquiry already.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 22, 2012, 01:08:05 AM
Good to hear.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 23, 2012, 01:24:26 AM
Welcome to day 2 of voting. Don't forget to vote and if
you're a Mideast citizen the senate race is of vital importance.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 24, 2012, 09:07:51 AM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 24, 2012, 11:43:28 AM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 24, 2012, 12:13:02 PM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D

In a way yes. You've been part of the Atlasian political establishment for some time. I'm just some new kid trying to break the glass ceiling that said establishment has placed on the fast rising group of Atlasian conservatives.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HappyWarrior on June 24, 2012, 06:48:07 PM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D

In a way yes. You've been part of the Atlasian political establishment for some time. I'm just some new kid trying to break the glass ceiling that said establishment has placed on the fast rising group of Atlasian conservatives.

Trust me this game does not have a glass ceiling for newbies, those who are newbies are just as likely to get elected as anyone else and there is surely no establishment conspiracy to hold down the new people.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on June 24, 2012, 06:52:24 PM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D

In a way yes. You've been part of the Atlasian political establishment for some time. I'm just some new kid trying to break the glass ceiling that said establishment has placed on the fast rising group of Atlasian conservatives.

Trust me this game does not have a glass ceiling for newbies, those who are newbies are just as likely to get elected as anyone else and there is surely no establishment conspiracy to hold down the new people.

^This is entirely true. I myself became an IDS Legislator almost the day I joined; I'm not even eligible to be President now and I'm SoEA. Not really a glass ceiling.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 24, 2012, 08:52:10 PM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D

In a way yes. You've been part of the Atlasian political establishment for some time. I'm just some new kid trying to break the glass ceiling that said establishment has placed on the fast rising group of Atlasian conservatives.

Trust me this game does not have a glass ceiling for newbies, those who are newbies are just as likely to get elected as anyone else and there is surely no establishment conspiracy to hold down the new people.

^This is entirely true. I myself became an IDS Legislator almost the day I joined; I'm not even eligible to be President now and I'm SoEA. Not really a glass ceiling.


I'm not entirely convinced of that. I've seen mostly the same people in power on the national level and that has led to an alliance of comfort. When conservatives vote for a liberal when there is one much closer to them idealogically in a race out of mere friendship with the liberal it reeks of a good ol boy network in play.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 24, 2012, 09:24:20 PM
Welcome to day 3 of voting. I'll be voting soon. Don't let the good ol boy network intimidate you to change your vote last minute.
Whut? ;)

Well, I am good, I'm male, and I'm old on this game. So do I qualify? :D

In a way yes. You've been part of the Atlasian political establishment for some time. I'm just some new kid trying to break the glass ceiling that said establishment has placed on the fast rising group of Atlasian conservatives.

Trust me this game does not have a glass ceiling for newbies, those who are newbies are just as likely to get elected as anyone else and there is surely no establishment conspiracy to hold down the new people.

^This is entirely true. I myself became an IDS Legislator almost the day I joined; I'm not even eligible to be President now and I'm SoEA. Not really a glass ceiling.


I'm not entirely convinced of that. I've seen mostly the same people in power on the national level and that has led to an alliance of comfort. When conservatives vote for a liberal when there is one much closer to them idealogically in a race out of mere friendship with the liberal it reeks of a good ol boy network in play.
Has ZuWo gotten to you? ;)

For whatever it's worth, friendship has nothing to do with my vote for Napoleon. Ask anyone who was around a year ago and they'd vouch for me on that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 24, 2012, 10:26:07 PM
It has nothing to do with ZuWo.

I know you and Napoleon went around a time or two. I guess the landscape has changed to where you could come around to support him.





Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on June 25, 2012, 12:21:18 AM
One of the problems with this game is that as conservatives, we don't have the option of voting across party lines for our friends and still be able to be competitive because we have such a severe structural disadvantage. It's a shame sometimes, but unilateral disarmament doesn't work here any better than in real life.

One of the lessons the right needs to learn from today is that if we had kept the votes for the former RPPers together, Clarence would have been elected president. A few things happened today I don't really understand. We'll see what happens moving forward, but honestly this was the most dysfunctional showing of the Atlas right since I've joined the forum, and I don't want to blame Clarence. At least to me, he appears more a victim of the mess that is the right than the cause.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 25, 2012, 12:50:57 AM


One of the problems with this game is that as conservatives, we don't have the option of voting across party lines for our friends and still be able to be competitive because we have such a severe structural disadvantage. It's a shame sometimes, but unilateral disarmament doesn't work here any better than in real life.

One of the lessons the right needs to learn from today is that if we had kept the votes for the former RPPers together, Clarence would have been elected president. A few things happened today I don't really understand. We'll see what happens moving forward, but honestly this was the most dysfunctional showing of the Atlas right since I've joined the forum, and I don't want to blame Clarence. At least to me, he appears more a victim of the mess that is the right than the cause.

It cost both Clarence and I. It's also why I opposed the dissolution of the old parties. The question is where do we as the right go from here? I think we need to think more ambitiously if we plan to gain a national foothold or stronger. Will you help me cast such an ambitious vision?


At Indiana Whig HQ in Kokomo

It just came down to a 4 vote swing. The difference were individiuals whom I considered allies in the conservative cause, and very promininent civil servants at that, people I needed instead chose the safety of an incumbent when a bold vision of less taxes was brought to this table. I harbor no ill will towards Senator Ben or to my allies who chose him over me. He was respectful in the campaign when his surrogates were not. Accusing me of vicious lies saying I hate the GLBT community when I only oppose gay marriage and civil unions on grounds of religious conscience.


While tonite was a massive set back to the conservative movement all around, the left of Atlasia will not drive us into the sea or into the night. A resurgence is coming and they will know why we believe in Fiscal responsibility, faith, lower taxes, a humble foreign policy, and personal freedom within the bonds of traditional law order and morality. The people will someday see this. If you will join me, we can make the sun never set on Atlasian greatness.





Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 25, 2012, 01:04:59 AM
I'm not entirely convinced of that. I've seen mostly the same people in power on the national level and that has led to an alliance of comfort. When conservatives vote for a liberal when there is one much closer to them idealogically in a race out of mere friendship with the liberal it reeks of a good ol boy network in play.

I think that's a tad harsh, although you may not have meant it as such.  There is no conspiracy, I promise.  This was a close election, and crossover votes do happen - I should know, because I actively campaigned for these votes.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 25, 2012, 01:27:33 AM
The fact you took the person who recruited me into the game did kinda hurt. Tmfth has sway and people do listen to him. When Inks and A-bob sided with you I knew I was in trouble. I was hoping my supporting them in previous elections wouldve helped me in this one. Sadly it didn't. 

Know this if roles were reversed I would've given you a high preference in the At-Large race that's coming up in a few months.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 25, 2012, 01:28:44 AM
Know this if roles were reversed I would've given you a high preference in the At-Large race that's coming up in a few months.

I appreciate that :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 25, 2012, 02:37:05 AM
I haven't decided my next move yet but like my candidacy for the senate, it will send shockwaves all over Atlasia. As you fight for your progressive beliefs I will fight for my libertarian conservative ones.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on June 25, 2012, 03:41:04 AM
Thanks for having made this a real race, JCL. I look forward to seeing you serve our region in another role!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 25, 2012, 04:59:26 PM
Thanks for having made this a real race, JCL. I look forward to seeing you serve our region in another role!

The Mideast and Atlasia has not heard the last of me.(though many on the left would like to see me gone)
I won't rest until conservative and regionalist intrests are as respected as the left is in this game.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 26, 2012, 06:02:32 AM
In light of Tweed's lawsuit contesting the election, I have joined a Whig/Labor/Liberal brief against his claims. Any brand of communism and totalitarianism is not welcome in Atlasia. While we may disagree about the semantics of what freedom is about they are fighting to preserve the rule of law and thus I lend my support.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 26, 2012, 05:57:37 PM
Like 20RP12 I also have some hesitation about the first amendment purposed. I know that lack of candidates in the Assembly race in May had a role in my defeat. I believe we placed the minimum cap in to promote activity and this time it has proven in the direction of more than
minimum so we will have five assemblymen after the July race provided the incumbants run for reelection.

A Lt. Governor position could have the same potential. But we have to factor in that we have a solid Mideastern bench regardless of party that could be making a big impact on the national scene. If the recruitment stays strong by both Whigs and the MCPR it may not be much of a problem.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 30, 2012, 02:53:12 PM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Denver Colorado

I can understand the dissapointment of many in the room over the defeat of Senator Clarence. He is a good conservative friendly towards the evangelical community, in spite of a couple differences of opinion. Though we are a minority in Atlasian politics we must always use what voice we have in a way that is firm yet compassionate towards all Atlasians. We ask President-elect Napoleon to at least listen to our views and be open to possibilities of working with the faith community.

Yet we also see that a greater threat to religious liberty has arisen. In the form of Tweed. He has chosen to disput the election results obvious to us all conservative and liberal alike. We all know the history of countries that embrace a Marxist-Leninist idealology. It is a serious threat to liberty and the freedom of conscience. The National Council for the Restoration of Democracy is cross-partisan alliance to fight for the ideas of self governance that Marxist-Leninist-Tweedism would destroy. Is Tweed trying to turn us into an evil empire that Atlasians don't want to be? We must prepare for any outcome to occur.

May God Save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 06, 2012, 07:10:29 PM
Today starts a new administration. May Napoleon and Kal govern fairly and be open to the conservatives of the game. Know that you will have a passionate and vocal opposition keeping you on your toes. Because we are Taxed Enough Already.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 19, 2012, 06:14:12 PM
Marion County Whig Office, Indianapolis, IN

Thank you for having me just prior to the election. As many of us know the assembly elections are often really close and anything could change the dynamic of a close race. As we also know vision and activity do matter. If they aren't properly aligned defeat will be assured. I'm confident in my chances of returning to the assembly but it's not prudent to be complacent. The campaign is going to likely land decent preferences from both candidates for governor as well as many who stood with me in the senate campaign.

Remember folks vote for candidates who will make for an active and diverse assembly with a respect for life, lower taxes, regional sovreginity and traditional values. To the left and those who think its ok to slash and burn on defense spending and veto friendship treaties they had no busisness vetoing while our friends are being ruthlessly attacked by a tyrannical regime your time in power will not be long.

Thank you and may God be merciful to Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 19, 2012, 06:28:35 PM
Best of luck to you! You deserve to win this election. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 19, 2012, 08:28:22 PM
Best of luck to you! You deserve to win this election. :)

We just have to see how turnout and the various preferences go.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 23, 2012, 03:54:07 PM
Cogratulations to those who got elected or re-elected to the Mideast assembly. Let's be an active one. Certian items I plan to put before the assembly include reintroducing the amendments proposed by tmthforu that were recently defeated. Work on a law cracking down on human trafficking, and passing a budget that leaves the region in the black.


Regarding the Penn State sanctions:

What Sandusky did to those kids is deplorable. What the school (minus Paterno) did in hiding it is equally deplorable. However the NCAA crossed a sacred line in denying Penn State it's due process rights before handing the sanctions down. Are the sanctions fair? Yes and no. Yes in denying post season play and fines around 60 million dollars. No in punishing someone who tried to confront the problem head on while the school board did absolutely nothing. Paterno's statue should be put back in its place and the wins vacated by the NCAA reinstated. He tried to do the right thing and no one listened to him.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 08, 2012, 07:06:22 PM
To the Mideast:

Many are wondering why I chose to bring back the amendments proposed by citizen Tmth. I chose to bring them back because I felt that these specific issues needed to be brought to the people for a clear yes/no vote. My sponsorship in both does not nessasarily mean I support them. In fact I oppose the amendment bringing the assembly to a permanent number of 5. The current system has shown itself to work quite well and should stay. So keep that system in place.

As for the adding the position of Lt. Governor, I support this. But I would like to give a word of wisdom, tie it also to the number of candidates to the assembly. For instance if we have the current active level of assemblyman then adding a Lt. Governor would be a wise idea to help aid the governor in his duties.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 18, 2012, 01:54:52 PM
Response to recent political events

While the Lt. Governor amendment was defeated via a tie I'm not dissapointed in trying to bring back the position. I personally believe as we become a more active region, we will need the position to aid our governor regardless who they are or what ideology is.

In a more international scope, The Russian president Vladimir Putin has three musicians imprisoned just because he couldn't take a little criticism of his corrupt policies. These kids also invoked religious speech when they asked the Virgin Mary for aid. Prayer is not hooliganism. They were not inciting lawlessness. I'm asking President Napoleon and our diplomats to step in and grant these brave young people asylum until reforms granting further and total free speech rights are enacted in Russia. To the Duma, please step in and pass amendments to your Constuition safeguarding political and religious speech from criminal sanction.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on August 18, 2012, 02:22:10 PM
Just for the record, voting on the amendments has not ended yet. The figures I published were merely "current results". It seems unlikely that the two regional amendments will be passed because they require the support of two thirds of the people who vote, but no official results have been published yet.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 29, 2012, 12:23:50 AM
Purdue University, Lafyette IN

I submited the Mideast Anti-Human Trafficking Bill aka the Nefarious Act. I believe protections need to be in place to get justice for victims of being trafficked away from those they love for the purpose of sex slavery. The boys in Nyman are too busy looking to find ways to tax you more when real issues of justice should be dealt with.

As one who came from an abusive home I can relate to an extent the shame and torment with these poor souls caught in a web of lies for the sake of another's greed. Though the abuse I endured is not like what they had to endure because they had to go through worse than what I did. This is one of those issues that we as citizens of the Mideast and hopefully of Atlasia can come together on. When I was in Missouri over the Christmas holidays, I saw a documentary called Nefarious: Merchant of Souls. It showed the tolerance of some governments culture of tolerance of trafficking. It made me nearly sick to my stomach seeing many governments letting the traffickers get away with shredding the dignity of a woman or child for dishonest or immoral gain. As a compassionate people Atlasians must lead by example in the realm of human rights. The right to be personally, economically, spiritually and political free. Regardless of politics we need to come together to protect our most vulnerable and be a have of refuge and healing when many in our world see them as less than what God created them to be.

Recent announcements for the upcoming presidential election haven't escaped my attention. The liberal stranglehold on power has still lead to higher taxes, more spending and over gutting of a national duty of protecting our citizens. While many know my noninterventionist beliefs I also believe in strong preparedness. As a hero of mine once said "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance". A proper defense must be a strong one. Pingvin would best suit this vision. Whoever the Whigs nominate as their presidential candidate will likely garner my first preferance, IB member And Speaker of the IDS house JBrase has also shown a sensible and pragmatic style that this conservative is intregued by. He could make a good president as well and will likely have my second preferance depending on how things go.

Over the weekend we lost a legend in Neil Armstrong. A man who quietly served yet the achievement he made should inspire many generations to come. Our Atlasian pursuit of technological progress while maintaining common sense values of working hard and liberality of charity (via the family the faith and nonprofits in the local communities)Will take Atlasia to greater heights.

Thank you and may God Be merciful to Atlasia and the Mideast


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on August 29, 2012, 12:44:11 AM
I assume this is an endorsement, eh?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 31, 2012, 08:55:41 AM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a element of liberals is now trying to pass via citizen initiative. Besides the system of socialized medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I though the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvy Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines would dare come out in support of this abomitible of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on August 31, 2012, 10:22:23 AM
They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position.

Come on bro.  "The whole of our human experience"?  You cannot be serious with that language.  If you go that route, you have to consider the many Kings who had plural wives two thousand years ago, such as Solomon with his 900 wives.  I don't support this initiative, but nor do I support your hyperbolic language.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: afleitch on August 31, 2012, 10:34:12 AM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a an element of liberals is now trying to pass via a citizen initiative. Besides the system of 'socialized' medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I thought the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvey Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines (nice phrase. Good work!) would dare come out in support of this abomitible abominable of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.

B-

Please refrain from hyperbole and fact check next time. Otherwise good effort!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Supersonic on August 31, 2012, 10:49:11 AM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a element of liberals is now trying to pass via citizen initiative. Besides the system of socialized medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I though the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvy Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines would dare come out in support of this abomitible of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.

Thank you for standing up for marriage.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on August 31, 2012, 10:50:50 AM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a an element of liberals is now trying to pass via a citizen initiative. Besides the system of 'socialized' medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I thought the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvey Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines (nice phrase. Good work!) would dare come out in support of this abomitible abominable of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.

B-

Please refrain from hyperbole and fact check next time. Otherwise good effort!


Missed a spot.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 31, 2012, 11:17:52 AM
They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position.

Come on bro.  "The whole of our human experience"?  You cannot be serious with that language.  If you go that route, you have to consider the many Kings who had plural wives two thousand years ago, such as Solomon with his 900 wives.  I don't support this initiative, but nor do I support your hyperbolic language.

I oppose plural marriage too Ben. Sometimes I use that kind of language to make a point. The proposed idea is an inversion of our history. I may be against gay marriage but this totally goes against the current law.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on August 31, 2012, 11:19:01 AM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a an element of liberals is now trying to pass via a citizen initiative. Besides the system of 'socialized' medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I thought the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvey Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines (nice phrase. Good work!) would dare come out in support of this abomitible abominable of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.

B-

Please refrain from hyperbole and fact check next time. Otherwise good effort!


"via citizen initiative" is valid.  It's an adverbial phrase.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on August 31, 2012, 09:30:45 PM
Atlasian Evangelical Communion, Atlasian Tea Party, Whig Liberty Caucus,

The Marriage Revenge Initiative is a bill that a an element of liberals is now trying to pass via a citizen initiative. Besides the system of 'socialized' medicine, this is the worst attempt at legislation I've seen in my time of Atlasian service. They seek to fully pervert the whole of our human experience by denying traditional man-woman  marriage it's most noble position. I thought the gay community just wanted "equality". I don't think Harvey Milk would want our society go down this rabbit hole. Only the most radical of libertines (nice phrase. Good work!) would dare come out in support of this abomitible abominable of actions. This bill is an enemy of freedom with the most sinister of intentions. I urge all of conscience and reason to oppose this.

B-

Please refrain from hyperbole and fact check next time. Otherwise good effort!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X_Ot0k4XJc


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on August 31, 2012, 10:59:27 PM
If the Equal Rights Amendment is passed, the Revenge initiative would be unconstitutional.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 03, 2012, 05:35:52 PM
Zion, IL

Thank you for inviting me to your town to see some of the historical significance this town has had upon the entire country. This community was built on the values of faith and family. Atlasia shouldn't forget John Alexander Dowie.

It look like we have ourselves a race for governor. Both seeking the office have had experience in the office amongst other roles of service. Both have had an excellent record of activity which is commendable. Needless to say I feel this race has gotten way out of hand with personal attacks and negativity. We are better than this. We who serve should seek to be above the partisan fracas as much as we possibly can. Hence I'll be abstaining from making an endorsement.

In other news I'll be running for re-election to the Assembly. This has been an active session with several important laws were passed. Some I didn't support or vote for yet passed. Some I advocated for and fell short. Hopefully the Nefarious Act isn't one of those.  Protecting our women and children from predators who seek to profit off another's personal dignity is an important role for government. As I've heard it said, "The role of government is to protect liberty"

Let the campaigning fun begin
Thank you and may God save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on September 03, 2012, 08:40:41 PM
Good luck on your re-election. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 03, 2012, 08:55:42 PM

How are the hearings going for your possible new job?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on September 03, 2012, 09:03:05 PM

Slowly I'm afraid. However it's likely I'll be confirmed. But I think tomorrow is the last day of the hearing.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 03, 2012, 09:18:38 PM

Slowly I'm afraid. However it's likely I'll be confirmed. But I think tomorrow is the last day of the hearing.


I just put up a bill late last week. Chances that it passes are real good. It's the Anti-Human Trafficking bill. Plus I'm talks with various people on a budget proposal that will hopefully balance the ME budget.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 07, 2012, 02:31:53 PM
List of campaign stops 9/7-14

9/8 Rockfest Rochestor IN
9/9 Campaign team spending time with faith and family
9/10 Evansville IN
9/11 Patriot Day rally Tea Party Kokomo IN
9/12  Dixon IL/
9/13 Green Bay WI
9/14 Troy OH


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 10, 2012, 11:56:09 PM
Christian Rock Bands Endorse JCL

Several Christian bands mentioned their support of JCL in the upcoming Assembly race. Liquid6Teen, 12 Stones, and former Korn member Brian "Head" Welch.

"We may rock and roll heavy but we love Jesus and we believe JCL speaks our concerns over traditional values and the right to life."

JCL even got on stage with "Head" during his encore of "Adonai" and led the crowd in a collective headbang. JCL then says "I love to headbang for God. And it's ok to lose a little religious dignity and worship Jesus in a way most fundamentalists would be critical of. I've been headbanging most of my life and while I'm a little older than some here I still like to join in on a mosh pit."





Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on September 10, 2012, 11:58:51 PM
Was BRTD at this concert?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 11, 2012, 12:28:41 AM

I can't confirm or deny if he was there.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on September 12, 2012, 11:45:06 AM
This should help Tmth.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 12, 2012, 12:13:37 PM
I'm very proud of my pro-life record in this game - unlike many others, I have actual policy and votes to back my record, not just rhetoric. ;)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on September 12, 2012, 12:32:27 PM
Thank you very much, JCL! Your support, just like anyone else's support, is greatly appreciated. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on September 12, 2012, 12:49:32 PM
leaving one conservative ally hanging to aid a "Joe Lieberman" liberal to the senate.

Come again?  Huh?  Are you talking about me?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 12, 2012, 01:01:12 PM
From the office of JCL

I've been given further information that makes me reconsider a previous and now deleted post. Thus I will be retracting my endorsement. I am truly sorry.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on September 12, 2012, 03:16:11 PM
leaving one conservative ally hanging to aid a "Joe Lieberman" liberal to the senate.

Come again?  Huh?  Are you talking about me?

Voting for a Jew over an evangelical=sin.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on September 12, 2012, 03:44:20 PM
From the office of JCL

I've been given further information that makes me reconsider a previous and now deleted post. Thus I will be retracting my endorsement. I am truly sorry.

I'd also like an elaboration on the part about me, if you please.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Supersonic on September 12, 2012, 03:46:11 PM
From the office of JCL

I've been given further information that makes me reconsider a previous and now deleted post. Thus I will be retracting my endorsement. I am truly sorry.

Pray, explain.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 12, 2012, 04:16:07 PM
Focusing on the issues...

Is there a specific area in the budget you believe we could cut to help try and balance the budget?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: afleitch on September 12, 2012, 04:17:29 PM
I 'loled' at the pretend endorsements :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on September 12, 2012, 04:20:10 PM
What were they for?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 12, 2012, 08:12:58 PM
From the office of JCL

I've been given further information that makes me reconsider a previous and now deleted post. Thus I will be retracting my endorsement. I am truly sorry.

Pray, explain.

I retracted the endorsement for now because I'm sick of the negativity the race took.

Ben: I've made the "Joe Lieberman" statement about in the past. I wasn't trying to take a dig at you. It's what I respect about you despite policy differences.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on September 12, 2012, 08:57:16 PM
Ben: I've made the "Joe Lieberman" statement about in the past. I wasn't trying to take a dig at you. It's what I respect about you despite policy differences.

So I'm being compared to Joe Lieberman because our policies are similar?  Um, okay.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Badger on September 14, 2012, 12:27:05 PM
I remember people used to say this about Jesse Helms and, more recently, Alan Grayson.

When someone 'compliments' a politician in this manner, there ls usually reason to be concerned, not about whether the politician stands for something, but rather what they stand for.

Case in point...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on September 14, 2012, 01:09:57 PM
Oh, fine then, as I stupidly tried to modify my post where I gave an endorsement to JCL and accidentally deleted it, let me clarify my statement:

I am endorsing JCL for Mideast Assembly because he is a consistently pro-life voice and has actual positions he stands by, which are easily observable instead of going around the forum pretending to be both a conservative and liberal simultaneously and issuing a constant stream of blatant panders to various constituents to manipulate their view of him. He is the same before and after elections. I don't mean to attack pragmatism. Pragmatism is the only way anything gets done in a world where the two party system is constructed such that people have to actually live with the resutls (unlike on here where positions are determined externally and brought here). But pragmatism is applied in order to achieve some vision, some underlying core set of principles.

I don't always agree with JCL; in fact there are a number of issues where we have very different opinions, like how a tax system should be structured, or the role of a centralized banking system, etc. We have quite substantial disagreements about how a government should be run. Heck, in real life he probably wouldn't even vote for me. But I think he has been steadfast enough in his advocacy in areas we do agree that he merits my support.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 16, 2012, 06:29:16 PM
Fellowship Missionary Church Fort Wayne, IN

Well it looks like the ERA will pass (crowd boos). It goes to show that folks want federal intervention regarding rights betwixt the sexes and ones sexual orientation.  We the silent majority know that this is not how it was ment to be. While we agree that no one should be discriminated against based on race, creed color, national origin, gender or political idealology, we deplore further government intrusion upon the rights of the regions. Furthermore to restore the proper balance of power between the national government and the regions I propose and seek aid of a senator the amending of Article 1 Section 5 Clause 5 to take out matters regarding marriage, divorce and adoption. Regional governments are better attuned and suited for these sensative matters. Regions are better to handle this because having the national government handling authority regarding marriage law could lead to draconian and obviously centralized control over an issue most critical to an extremely local matter.

Now I've finally seen a clear distinction in the governors race. One far beyond partisan bickering and personal attack. To some who may say a certain individual got to me over certian contraverseries is flat out false. Did I let the negative aspects of that race effect me? Honestly I did. The two men running for governor have fine records of activity and have served the Mideast and Atlasia well. I wish they would put their personal issues aside and work to build a better Mideast region. Needless to say I've finally made up my mind of a formal endorsement. Earlier this week I though I had made a decision but upon further deliberation I withdrew it. I've made further deliberation in this race and I can now say with no reservation that I endorse the current Governor ZuWo. It's not that I dislike former President and Governor Tmth, it that I agree with ZuWo more on certian matters of relations between the regions and the government in Nyman. I wouldn't be making this decision if they had been united in a recent decision. Come what may Tmfth knows if he wins and I'm re-elected I would work with him on things we both agree upon. The budget and elements of game reform. This coming weekend we have an important election. Get out and vote

Thank you and may God save Atlasia

*JCL sees a female friend and beelines to her to talk*


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on September 17, 2012, 03:48:41 PM
I only saw your endorsement now so I'll gladly repost what I stated earlier:

Thank you very much, JCL! Your support, just like anyone else's support, is greatly appreciated. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 19, 2012, 09:18:24 PM
From the office of JCL

In light of Clarence's resignation, should there be a primary amongst conservatives I will submit to such a primary. I respect Clarence and thank him for his service. We hope he chooses to return when he is ready and be an important conservative voice Atlasia needs.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 23, 2012, 02:20:27 PM
As I'm leaving the assembly at the end of the term I'd like to leave the people with this thought. What is it that the people fear so much that they run to those who believe that government is the solution to whatever the problems of our Atlasian society? Do they fear being responsible for themselves and thus being more governing of themselves, or is it that they fear that individuals do much more for charity on their own than what government can do through its repressive tax policies?

I believe Tmth will make a great governor. It's only fair that I didn't get his vote because I didn't endorse him. I still believe ZuWo was the better choice. Should 20RP12 win the Whig primary and defeat Franzi for the At-Large seat vacated by Clarence, I will rematch Senator Ben.

To those who think I'm an extremist, I could throw that word right back at you. However I'm not going to. Progressives around here tend to have a rather thin skin because they have a numerical advantage. Just because they have pulled a wave election back in our faces doesnt mean we conservatives and libertarians won't hold your feet to the fire. In RL my wing of the GOP will have to hold Mitts feet to the fire and see if he holds a line that says no more to extreme spending and tax hikes.

My service to the region and Atlasia is not over. We have a presidency to take back to a place of reason and conservative stewardship. They say Napoleon has been one of the best. Tell that to the unborn in the later stages of development that he wants to allow abortions for via a ruthless practice of partial birth abortion. Late term abortions should never be allowed any sort of legal support. Thus I will be proposing a citizens referendum to ban abortion after the 16th week totally and before only allow it in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. I hope to have your support on my future endeavors.


Thank you and may God be merciful to Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on September 23, 2012, 03:30:14 PM
JCL: would you be interested in working to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan focusing on these five points (below) so that we can further interregional cooperation on infrastructure?

1. Energy
2. Rail/High-speed rail/high-speed bus
3. Protected areas and expansion of our national park system
4. Broader transportation development (air and road development, as well as our current infrastructure maintenance and revenue measures such as infrastructure banks)
5. Water supply


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 28, 2012, 09:22:52 AM
Will you be suing due to your original absence from the ballot?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on September 28, 2012, 03:52:54 PM
Will you be suing due to your original absence from the ballot?

I hope he does.

I've introduced legislation in the senate that would make sure errors like this one are properly corrected. I'm not sure when it will be debated, but I really hope it passes. Homely is only human, so mistakes happen. Still, there's got to be a legal way to fix them. Chaging the ballot after people have already voted is not the way to do it.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 12:31:40 PM
JCL: would you be interested in working to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan focusing on these five points (below) so that we can further interregional cooperation on infrastructure?

1. Energy
2. Rail/High-speed rail/high-speed bus
3. Protected areas and expansion of our national park system
4. Broader transportation development (air and road development, as well as our current infrastructure maintenance and revenue measures such as infrastructure banks)
5. Water supply

I could support some of the ideas as long as they respect the property rights of land owners.
What is your idea on a high speed bus? Like a faster version of Greyhound?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 01:11:25 PM
From the office of JCL

It has come to our attention that JCL was originally left off the ballot for the Special Election for the At-Large seat vacated by Clarence. We reject this egregious omission and thereby petition President Napoleon to remove the current SOFE. Franzi was elected by acclaim and I will recgonize that. Even if he would've been on the ballot from the start (as JCL was duely entitled to as a candidate) Franzi would've still won regardless. If the SOFE isn't removed within 48 hours, JCL will sue the administration and seek the removal of Napoleon and Nathan from office due to official corruption and neglegence. The results are recognized but this omission of a candidate the administration dislikes with a passion will not be tolerated.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 01, 2012, 01:14:13 PM
JCL: would you be interested in working to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan focusing on these five points (below) so that we can further interregional cooperation on infrastructure?

1. Energy
2. Rail/High-speed rail/high-speed bus
3. Protected areas and expansion of our national park system
4. Broader transportation development (air and road development, as well as our current infrastructure maintenance and revenue measures such as infrastructure banks)
5. Water supply

I could support some of the ideas as long as they respect the property rights of land owners.
What is your idea on a high speed bus? Like a faster version of Greyhound?

It might be feasible to change the brown-colored lines to high-speed bus; it is still very much on the table.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 01:16:19 PM
JCL: would you be interested in working to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan focusing on these five points (below) so that we can further interregional cooperation on infrastructure?

1. Energy
2. Rail/High-speed rail/high-speed bus
3. Protected areas and expansion of our national park system
4. Broader transportation development (air and road development, as well as our current infrastructure maintenance and revenue measures such as infrastructure banks)
5. Water supply

I could support some of the ideas as long as they respect the property rights of land owners.
What is your idea on a high speed bus? Like a faster version of Greyhound?

It might be feasible to change the brown-colored lines to high-speed bus; it is still very much on the table.

How extensive would those changes be?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on October 01, 2012, 02:02:26 PM
From the office of JCL

It has come to our attention that JCL was originally left off the ballot for the Special Election for the At-Large seat vacated by Clarence. We reject this egregious omission and thereby petition President Napoleon to remove the current SOFE. Franzi was elected by acclaim and I will recgonize that. Even if he would've been on the ballot from the start (as JCL was duely entitled to as a candidate) Franzi would've still won regardless. If the SOFE isn't removed within 48 hours, JCL will sue the administration and seek the removal of Napoleon and Nathan from office due to official corruption and neglegence. The results are recognized but this omission of a candidate the administration dislikes with a passion will not be tolerated.

First of all, I thank you for your maturity and honesty regarding the overall results of the election.

I think your demand that Homely resign is excessive, though. I've been in charge of many federal elections and this kind of thing can happen easily. Considering he fixes his unintentional error as soon as possible, I don't think any further action is warranted.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 02:05:51 PM
I agree that your calls for his removal are a tad excessive.  I think, if anything, a repeat election is a more reasonable solution to the problem if you plan on pursuing a case.  I agree that an innocent mistake was made, but in defense of Homely, there was some confusion as to who would represent the Whig Party in the special election.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 02:17:56 PM
Calling for homly's resignation I felt was the fairer route than throwing this election into chaos. I don't see that as excessive. As I said in the statement, even if I would've been on the ballot from the start, Franzi was elected by acclimation. A change in the SoFE is only fair over this matter. As I also said the Napoleon/Nathan administration has 48 hours from when I made the statement to remove him or I will sue for their removal for official misconduct and conspiracy to commit official misconduct.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 02:26:51 PM
Calling for a new election is chaotic?  Um, okay.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 02:31:38 PM
Calling for a new election is chaotic?  Um, okay.

We're nearly half way to the next at large election. Franzi was elected. That isn't disputed. It's the negligence that must be accounted for.

It's a matter of somebody must take responsibility. If homely doesn't resign or the administration doesn't fire him I will sue to remove Napoleon and Nathan from office.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on October 01, 2012, 02:33:16 PM
How do you think you can sue for removal of a federal office holder?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 02:34:42 PM
I think the fact that you would rather see Homely removed from his position than have another opportunity to win the Senate seat is sort of interesting.  In spite of my personal opinion though, I don't think the Court is going to give you exactly what you want... but I guess we'll see how it all plays out.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 02:38:49 PM
Prediction: The Supreme Court will rule in JCL's favor and appoint Young Tweed to the presidency.

And that will be the day I finally give up on all of this.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on October 01, 2012, 02:41:31 PM
The SoFE will not be fired. Please sue though, I could use more political donations from my lawyer pals.

I am sorry that mistakes were made. My administration plans to resolve this independently.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 02:48:12 PM
The SoFE will not be fired. Please sue though, I could use more political donations from my lawyer pals.

I am sorry that mistakes were made. My administration plans to resolve this independently.

Firing the SOFE is the only fair and right thing to do.

Prediction: The Supreme Court will rule in JCL's favor and appoint Young Tweed to the presidency.

Tweed gets nothing. The highest ranked senator would assume presidency till the next president is installed.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 01, 2012, 04:00:10 PM
JCL: would you be interested in working to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan focusing on these five points (below) so that we can further interregional cooperation on infrastructure?

1. Energy
2. Rail/High-speed rail/high-speed bus
3. Protected areas and expansion of our national park system
4. Broader transportation development (air and road development, as well as our current infrastructure maintenance and revenue measures such as infrastructure banks)
5. Water supply

I could support some of the ideas as long as they respect the property rights of land owners.
What is your idea on a high speed bus? Like a faster version of Greyhound?

It might be feasible to change the brown-colored lines to high-speed bus; it is still very much on the table.

How extensive would those changes be?

I've got a map in my office: for a Florida example it'd be having high-speed bus to Bradenton/Sarasota from Tampa instead of a conventional rail line.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 01, 2012, 04:41:37 PM
I have no seditious intent.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 03, 2012, 07:55:47 PM
From the office of JCL

It's almost 9pm EDT and there has been nothing done regarding the termination of homely. I hereby petition the Atlasian senate to impeach Napoleon and Nathan for official misconduct in violation of Article 1 section 4 Clause 6 of the Atlasian Constuition.

I didn't want the situation to come to this. However the administration has failed to properly address the
disenfranchisement leveled upon JCL by the administration even if by omission.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 03, 2012, 10:36:50 PM
Nope, not happening.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on October 03, 2012, 10:37:38 PM
From the office of JCL

It's almost 9pm EDT and there has been nothing done regarding the termination of homely. I hereby petition the Atlasian senate to impeach Napoleon and Nathan for official misconduct in violation of Article 1 section 4 Clause 6 of the Atlasian Constuition.

I didn't want the situation to come to this. However the administration has failed to properly address the
disenfranchisement leveled upon JCL by the administration even if by omission.
I will support that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 05, 2012, 07:44:49 PM

I'm trying to defend the senate against an encroachment of its due authority by the administration Ben. If Hagrid's bill passes, I will withdraw this


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on October 05, 2012, 08:04:14 PM

I'm trying to defend the senate against an encroachment of its due authority by the administration Ben. If Hagrid's bill passes, I will withdraw this

If you truly cared about the Constitution, you wouldn't support an unconstitutional bill.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 07, 2012, 12:27:39 PM
How is Hagrid's bill unconstuitional?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 11, 2012, 07:19:02 PM
So did the Whigs dissolve or what's going on with the Atlasian Right.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on October 12, 2012, 05:23:34 PM
The Whigs tend to lose a lot when parties like TPP and the MCPR come up.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on October 13, 2012, 12:04:01 PM
...and when our chair resigns; and when we lose a senate seat halfway through a term; and when a past judicial overlord returns in a coup; and when our best governor loses reelection because of a two-sided, petty, jealous feud; and when our new chair drops off the face of the planet; and when our questionably-elected vice chair leaves the party without giving us any notice or without having done anything at all to try and fix our situation.

This is a mess. I'd consider stepping in officially but as you can see, I'm an ass.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 13, 2012, 12:37:24 PM
and when our best governor loses reelection because of a two-sided, petty, jealous feud
Seriously? ::)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on October 13, 2012, 12:38:58 PM


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 13, 2012, 12:40:08 PM
Not so much that, but more just inaccurate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on October 13, 2012, 12:55:15 PM
Well, perception matters too. But I don't want to get into an argument


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on October 13, 2012, 01:12:06 PM
...and when our chair resigns; and when we lose a senate seat halfway through a term; and when a past judicial overlord returns in a coup; and when our best governor loses reelection because of a two-sided, petty, jealous feud; and when our new chair drops off the face of the planet; and when our questionably-elected vice chair leaves the party without giving us any notice or without having done anything at all to try and fix our situation.

This is a mess. I'd consider stepping in officially but as you can see, I'm an ass.

I feel your pain.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 14, 2012, 09:01:38 AM

You're not a donkey. You may be the person we need


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on October 14, 2012, 03:01:24 PM
Wow. Labor is actually the best-running party right now.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on October 14, 2012, 03:21:54 PM
Some people needs to either get laid or stay away from the internet.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 14, 2012, 08:56:13 PM
And let you liberals run roughshod over this game... I don't think so Kal.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 24, 2012, 09:56:27 PM
As one of Atlasia's most contraversial individuals I'd like to open this office for the purpose of dialogue and colilition building for a better Atlasia. I will be announcing my future direction regarding regional and national politics around 7 pm Indiana time.

I've joined the club :P

What has made you so contraversial? You seem like a reasonable center-left individual who wants to make a positive impact on this game. If you've read about why I am polarizing you may think me an extremist. I'm willing to work with most Atlasians to build a strong nation.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on October 24, 2012, 10:12:47 PM
None of that is really a big deal, wolfentoad. You're just new and a little bit eager. I wouldn't necessarily call it a bad thing.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 24, 2012, 10:20:27 PM
As one of Atlasia's most contraversial individuals I'd like to open this office for the purpose of dialogue and colilition building for a better Atlasia. I will be announcing my future direction regarding regional and national politics around 7 pm Indiana time.

I've joined the club :P

What has made you so contraversial? You seem like a reasonable center-left individual who wants to make a positive impact on this game. If you've read about why I am polarizing you may think me an extremist. I'm willing to work with most Atlasians to build a strong nation.

Well, thank you :)

But lets see:

1. The Hagrid Lynching comment contorversy, dubbed by the media as Lynchgate
2. My one time threat of joining the Labors
3. My disrespect of Xahar
4. Some other minor stuff

I guess I'll mention the ways I've honked off many here:
1: My firm opposition to things like gay marriage and especially abortion
2. My ramblings in support of Ron Paul
3. My opposition to government ran healthcare
4. This recent war with Napoleon regarding a special election recently held
5. Being sympathetic to the Birther and Truther positions
6. I've been accused of being a Calvinist when my position is much closer to Wesleyan Arminianism  (I was raised Wesleyan-Holiness but converted to the Assemblies of God as a teenager)
7. And my views on Churchill (a gay Brit got really honked off on that one)
And here's # 8. If I were president I ask for a bust of the Iron Lady as a symbol of the special relationship between the UK and the US


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on October 24, 2012, 10:46:20 PM
As one of Atlasia's most contraversial individuals I'd like to open this office for the purpose of dialogue and colilition building for a better Atlasia. I will be announcing my future direction regarding regional and national politics around 7 pm Indiana time.

I've joined the club :P
Oh wow. You just don't know that good to consider yourself controversial.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on November 16, 2012, 04:46:07 PM
Don't forget to vote in the Mideast assembly race. I'm taking write in votes.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on November 17, 2012, 07:13:30 AM
Stupidity is hardly controversial.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Zanas on November 17, 2012, 07:17:16 AM
It's actually very mainstream...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 05, 2012, 05:53:09 PM
I'm fielding questions for the upcoming senate race. So ask away.

Also, this office expresses dissapointment over the recent bill passed giving transgendered individuals rights that would aid human traffickers to ply their NEFARIOUS trade.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 05, 2012, 05:59:50 PM
Opinion on my poker bill?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on December 05, 2012, 06:00:52 PM
Well, you never weighed in on my suggestion of just abolishing public bathrooms.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 05, 2012, 06:01:35 PM
Well, you never weighed in on my suggestion of just abolishing public bathrooms.

Why would I?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on December 05, 2012, 06:02:16 PM
Well, you never weighed in on my suggestion of just abolishing public bathrooms.

Why would I?
Sorry, I meant to quote JCL.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on December 05, 2012, 06:23:06 PM
I'm fielding questions for the upcoming senate race. So ask away.

Also, this office expresses dissapointment over the recent bill passed giving transgendered individuals rights that would aid human traffickers to ply their NEFARIOUS trade.

What would you do to help improve the working relationship between the President and the Senate?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 06, 2012, 12:10:05 AM
What's your opinion of the compromise that the Senate reached on the LGBT Dignity Act (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=162455.msg3479835#msg3479835)?

I would lean towards its support. Though religious freedom protections should be specifically put in the legislation


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 06, 2012, 12:39:21 AM
Well, you never weighed in on my suggestion of just abolishing public bathrooms.

I think an Atlasian ADA kind of nixes that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 06, 2012, 12:57:05 AM

I think tmth best articulates my view on your poker bill. I personally oppose gambling based on Franzi's reasons for maintaining the status quo. This is where the regions are better suited. I would support this in intent to let the regions regulate this as they see fit.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 07, 2012, 12:42:04 PM
If elected, what committee would be interested in serving on?

Also, what is your opinion on the recent issues regarding the inactivity of several cabinent officials?

oh and one more thing, you said you agree with Franzl's reasonings, would you thus offer an opinion regarding his tactics in trying to stop the Poker bill?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 07, 2012, 03:48:12 PM
If elected, what committee would be interested in serving on?

Also, what is your opinion on the recent issues regarding the inactivity of several cabinent officials?

oh and one more thing, you said you agree with Franzl's reasonings, would you thus offer an opinion regarding his tactics in trying to stop the Poker bill?

His filibuster I actually do not agree with. I would like to see more senators weigh in on the subject before a final vote. To Senator Franzi, I'm asking you to end your obstruction of the poker bill. Please articulate your position in a clear way and let your fellow senators vote whether you or Ben's view is consistent with Atlasian law. Also consider what Gov. Tmth has said as well.

Personally, my intrest would best be suited as a partner with Senator Ben in National Security.

The inactivity is not acceptible. An active cabinent is an important cornerstone for this game to be a great one. If elected I would sponsor or cowrite legislation to mandate the cabinet to give a state of their department report like the president gives a staten of the union address.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on December 07, 2012, 03:55:11 PM
I don't quite understand how I could articulate my position any more clearly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 07, 2012, 04:24:30 PM
I don't quite understand how I could articulate my position any more clearly.



Give specific moral arguments and that would make it plain. I'm against gambling but I don't see this as a place the federal government should be able to interveine. Like on matters of marriage, divorce, and adoption.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 14, 2012, 10:58:53 PM
Regarding the Tragedy in CT

Our thoughts and prayers are with you. I can't imagine what the citizens of Conneticut and New Jersey are feeling after this senseless shooting. As an uncle of 10 nieces and nephews I can sense the collective anger and shock of these events. It is times like these that should remind us of the faith our country was built on and has so sadly fallen from.

I'm not going to place blame on anyone because in a sense it should be on us all. Did we see mass shootings like this prior to 1973? Rarely. I was a senior when Columbine happened and worked alongside the Scotts whrn they did an event in my hometown. The senseless spilling of innocent blood must end or I fear something worse will occur. Look at the Civil War as an example. While I disagreed with some of President Lincoln's policies he was right to say

" The Almighty has His own purposes. “Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.” If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.”

Let us heed these words.

May God be merciful to Atlasia and the United States of America.

OOC: I'm speaking as both JCL and as my Real Life Personage.l


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 28, 2012, 10:06:18 AM
Have a blessed Christmas and New Year season. I'll be active on campaign matters on New Years Day.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 03, 2013, 08:52:01 PM
Campaign Kickoff in Fort Wayne Indiana
I hope you all had a great Christmas and  New Years. Hopefully you didn't have too much alcohol and got too crazy.

I see that the campaign is active as all get out and it's about time I engaged in the discorse. The recent left leaning turn in the Mideast Assembly is quite disconcerting. Recent legislation liberalizing abortion rights and even changing the way we elect the assembly have not gone past my eye while I was away tending to real life matters. Quite frankly is there a reason that we in the Mideast should be like everyone else in how we conduct our elections? No. I see no benefit in changing it.

It's good to see the governor veto the reliberalization of the laws on abortion. If elected i'll bring a bill to restrict abortion after the twelth week of pregnancy in all cases.

Regarding bringing back the position of Lt Governor, provided the region stays as active as it has been of late I will support it.

I will propose an amendment to the Atlasian Constitution to give the regions back the supremacy of legislative policy regarding marriage, abortion, and adoption. Federal intervention on this issue is unsound and beyond senseless in a free society.

One of the most important rights of free people is the right to keep and bear arms. Recent tragedies have brought this issue into the forefront and to see many advocate that we should give up the right to have certain types of guns or magizines for the perceived sake of security. What did Benjamin Franklin say about this? I'm a supporter of backround checks and all to keep violent felons from having a gun but don't punish the law abiding and repentant non-violent offenders from this important right.

And of course keeping taxes as low as they can be to maximize economic prosperity. One way we can do this is
promote changing over to engines that would handle natural gas. We've recently discovered more natural gas than what we thought we had. Lets utilize this resourse to eventually eliminate our need for foreign oil and use those savings to pay down the national debt.

Right to work is a good thing and shouldn't be taken away. Unions don't like it because it curtails their power to force individuals to join them. As a Federalist I believe that freedom of association is as sacrosanct as our other rights and thus these progressives and union lobbiests want to attack that. If elected I will fight to counter their vision of coersive force regarding our places of employment. Notice how the right to work states are becoming more prosperous. Economic freedom is one of the cornerstones of a free society. The others being faith, defense, and proper game reform.

I know many are wondering why I briefly took that tangent into national politics and I'll say this. The regions and national government in some matters need to partner together for the liberties both social and economic within traditional law, order and morality.

Thank you and may God and Dave save The Mideast and Atlasia.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 15, 2013, 10:31:03 PM
To the Liberal Party

Thank you for your endorsement and hope to work with your candidate on issues we do concur on.

From the Campaign

The election is this weekend. I hope you are paying attention to the debate. Consider who's been active and who hasn't. Vote your conscience and I hope a Federalist/Liberal slate is one that the people will support.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 29, 2013, 05:17:48 PM
The Mideast will have three candidates for senate. I am hereby announcing my candidacy for Senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Talleyrand on January 29, 2013, 05:25:36 PM
While I can't say I agree with you on many issues, JCL, you've earned my grudging respect for standing up for your beliefs strongly in a center-left country, however unpopular they may be. You genuinely care about The People, although your priorities may be out of the mainstream. Good luck.

We have three great candidates in the race now, and I'm very excited to watch this campaign unfold.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 29, 2013, 05:38:09 PM
While I can't say I agree with you on many issues, JCL, you've earned my grudging respect for standing up for your beliefs strongly in a center-left country, however unpopular they may be. You genuinely care about The People, although your priorities may be out of the mainstream. Good luck.

We have three great candidates in the race now, and I'm very excited to watch this campaign unfold.

I run because an honest and civil public discourse on the issues are needed.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Gass3268 on January 29, 2013, 05:42:42 PM
Good luck JCL! I look forward to the campaign and the upcoming debate!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 29, 2013, 05:48:34 PM
Ler the campaign be a good one.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on January 29, 2013, 05:58:57 PM
While I can't say I agree with you on many issues, JCL, you've earned my grudging respect for standing up for your beliefs strongly in a center-left country, however unpopular they may be. You genuinely care about The People, although your priorities may be out of the mainstream. Good luck.

We have three great candidates in the race now, and I'm very excited to watch this campaign unfold.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 29, 2013, 07:23:34 PM
Good luck JCL :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 29, 2013, 07:27:40 PM

You too Ben. Lets show the people a good race based on the issues like we did last time.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 30, 2013, 01:23:38 AM
From the JCL for Senate campaign

There are some who question my decision to run. My motives are as the same as they always been. While many don't agree with my views and some even think them to be extreme in nature, there are some here who do share many of what I believe in. These people are sadly not represented at the national level well enough. While we have good conservatives jn the game I believe we need to take it to a higher level. A higher level of fighting for our most vulnerable including those the womb and the fight against human trafficking. The right for the individual to keep more of what they earn by flattening the current tax rates. The right to keep and bear arms that all law abiding citizens should enjoy. As well as cooperation between busisness and environmental intrests to properly utilize the resourses God has given us while doing so voluntarily and as the market and not government dictates. The motive is the people. It always has been and always will be. Regardless of internal partisan bickering or the constant competition betwixt the parties. As your Senator I will fight to let loose the dawgs of freedom and prosperity. I respect my opponents. Both have served well and while we differ on policy I believe they seek to serve you, the citizen, well. Hear us out. Be open to each of us and our ideas. Don't let the status quo dictate where we as a people can go. Don't be dictated by party establishments but vote with your conscience.

I'll talk about my ideas in the coming days. If you have any questions just drop them by this thread and I will answer as soon as my real life obligations permit.

Thank you and May God Save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on January 30, 2013, 01:31:53 AM
I will leave the region if you are elected. Thankfully, that is unlikely to happen...:)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 30, 2013, 02:13:57 AM
Honestly what is your problem with me? You don't see me threatening to leave the region everytime the left gets what they want. We agree on almost as much as disagree. I view you in a respectable way. It disappoints me that you don't.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on January 30, 2013, 02:18:34 AM
It's nothing particularly personal. I just value sane representation.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 30, 2013, 02:22:13 AM
It's nothing particularly personal. I just value sane representation.

So do I. What makes you think my representing the people not be sane?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on January 30, 2013, 02:26:08 AM
It's nothing particularly personal. I just value sane representation.

So do I. What makes you think my representing the people not be sane?

We granted his request at the Health Directorate for access to some records. The results weren't pretty.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 30, 2013, 11:33:20 AM
It's nothing particularly personal. I just value sane representation.

So do I. What makes you think my representing the people not be sane?

We granted his request at the Health Directorate for access to some records. The results weren't pretty.

More like the results are doctored for political motivation.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on January 30, 2013, 04:03:35 PM
You've been a friend in Atlasia for a long time and I like that you are always outspoken about your views. We don't agree on everything and may look at certain issues from a different angle, but I'll give you my first preference.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on January 31, 2013, 04:42:20 AM
I officially endorse you. You're on of the best conservatives here.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 07, 2013, 03:33:46 AM
New Life Church, Kokomo IN

Its good to finally get to speak to the home crowd. The family that stepped up when parts of my own bailed and shirked their duties and instead nearly made me a statistic of what happens when a family is torn apart. For that I'm thankful for that.

Just a few short months ago we gave a proper tribute to our veterans and their families and Pastor, alongside my brother and a vet of Vietnam, articulated clearly our beliefs on foreign matters which are rooted in the principals of Holy Writ. As your Senator I will advocate these beliefs clearly as ones who strattle between the extremes of pacifism and neoconservatism. We prefer peaceful and quiet lives that we may give proper respect and honor to both our God and the government under which we are submitted to.

On matters of national finance I echo many of your concerns. Our government is a rather poor steward of the revenue it gains via the current tax structure which doesn't respect the rights of the well to do and the middle classes to give cheerfully and with a willing heart and that. Is evidenced by the extremely high rates that are paid in taxes. We need a flatter tax structure with the hope that income taxes become a thing of the past.

Our message that every life is sacred and thus must be protected by force of law. Recent events liberalizing the regional policy regarding abortion are disheartning to us all and must be delt with. The old law should be restored with some teeth to it. No abortions after the first trimestor for any reason except the mothers life and in those situation the doctors must do all they can to save both.

As we end our time together I'm not gonna give the "Andy Griffith" quips Pastor like to use on occasion but I will use one given to a comic book icon from his uncle and father figure. "With great power comes great responsibility." Be mindful of
these words as you go and vote.

God bless you and may He be merciful to Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 15, 2013, 01:56:40 PM
It's election weekend and I'm urging all Federalists to be active in voting and encouraging your friends to as well.  The Cathcon/Spamage ticket is in need of your votes as is Goldwater, your regional races as well as myself in the Mideast.

Happy voting.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 16, 2013, 12:26:23 AM
Welcome to day two of voting. If you have voted thank you. If you haven't yet please do so.

For the Mideast Region Senate race. If you are a Federalist we can't afford to split our first preference. Splitting that vote will hand the seat to hands that are not friendly to our intrests.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on February 16, 2013, 12:27:01 AM
Splitting that vote will hand the seat to hands that are not friendly to our intrests.

Now I'd disagree with that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 16, 2013, 12:30:29 AM
Splitting that vote will hand the seat to hands that are not friendly to our intrests.

Now I'd disagree with that.

It wasn't in reference to you. I've openly asked those who first preference me to second preference you.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 16, 2013, 11:54:05 PM
From the office of JCL

The third day of voting is fast approaching. If you haven't voted please do so and if you're in the Mideast please consider supporting me for regional senator and giving our current senator Ben your second preference. This is a conservative yet pragmatic region and I would keep that tradition going. There are folks including former presidents who would like to
say that my representing the fine folks of the region would move things back. That's not true. If elected I would promote enviromental stewardship while respecting property rights and advocate for women, vets and kids. You are not getting an extremist. You are getting a person with principals and values who can come together with those of other views for thw better of the region and nation as a whole. Ultimately that is up to you the people.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on February 17, 2013, 02:02:53 AM
Good luck JCL! You've run a great campaign for the seat, even if you lost.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 18, 2013, 02:24:18 AM
Good luck JCL! You've run a great campaign for the seat, even if you lost.

Congrats on your victory. Hopefully you serve people of the Midwest well.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Adam Griffin on February 18, 2013, 03:52:31 AM
You did very well in a race that made my persistent regional Senate result-watching actually interesting. From one rigid ideologue to another, kudos to you, good sir.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Pondering the Future
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 22, 2013, 11:18:54 AM
After taking a few days to think since the last election I've decided not to run for the Mideast assembly next month. However don't take this as me withdrawing from my work to promote the conservative movement in Atlasia. My eyes are set higher. There is greater work that the conservative movement needs to do inside itself and in the nation as a whole. A coherent and well articulated set of ideas and principals that individuals can come together on.

Lets get to work.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 14, 2013, 12:27:44 AM
From JCL to all Atlasian Catholics

You have chosen well in the choosing of Pope Francis. May he guide the Catholic faithful and show those of all faiths Christian or otherwise the message that Jesus brought to us.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 24, 2013, 07:37:59 PM
From the Office of JCL

After some time away from the Atlasian body politick, I feel refreshed and ready to serve the people once again.  With that I encourage you to vote NAY on the Federal Amendment Amendment. This would make amending the constituition much easier than it should be.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 27, 2013, 02:00:25 PM
Russiaville, IN

Thank you for coming out to the town square to hear my announcement.

The Mideast region is a vibrant region one being governed by reason rather than inflamed passions. Where the principals of liberty and moral restraint are valued rather than an anything goes mentality that peremeates the folks in Nyman who show no respect to the business owners and their employees alike with draconian labor laws which violate the rights of the individual laborer as well as the rights of the job creator. They show no respect towards those who seek to bear arms for hunting or for self defence by limiting magazine capacity and raising the taxes to purchase these items.Even our taxes are too high for everybody. You shoud be able to keep as much of what you earn as possible as opposed to the current tax policies which penalize the prosperous and the needy alike. Which is why I will propose my Detroit Plan if elected.

This race will not be easy.  A fellow Federalist is also in the race. So we'll be involved in a primary race to determine who will have the backing of the party. TJ has an excellent history of service that gives him an advantage. I'm best known for my work to protect our kids against traffickers via the Nefarious Act which has crossed over to the Northeast.

Let the fun of the race begin


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on May 31, 2013, 01:02:37 PM
The Danger of the Status Quo

Recently an individual of some distinction chose to say that I would drag the region and the nation backwards. That is the farthest thing from the truth. Do they not realize that I desire economic freedom and prosperity that shames anything they and the current administration could come close to imaging. I don't discount that Atlasia is center-left. Needless to say however the Mideast is a center-right region and as such should have that kind of representation in the Senate. As much as they say that there is an extreme right there is also an extreme left. Both are equally dangerous to the liberty we all seek. They fail to realize that all sides have great points that can contribute to the betterment of us all. I seek a fair way. If you do as well please join me and make the Mideast and Atlasia better than we came to know her.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: The JCL Doctrine regarding Syria
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 14, 2013, 03:04:13 PM
We recently heard and confirmed the disturbing rumor that Assad of Syria was using weapons of mass destruction. Now there is a debate regarding the rebels. What many Atlasians may not know is the rebels are just as sinister. They are under the authority of none other than the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Quaida. They have no regard for the human and civil rights of those who dissent from their warped view of mans relation with their creator or their fellow man. As such I seek an audience with any Christian or other oppressed minority who is not aiding Assad before the UN Security council. Let them petition the security council for aid. Don't get this twisted. I'm a noninterventionist in philosophy to foreign matters. However if Assad or the rebels even so much as sneeze on Israel, I fear the aftermath will be none other than Isaiah 17


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 17, 2013, 11:49:04 PM
A Matter of Conscience

As many of you have heard TJ will be the Federalist nominee. This means he'll have the party's machine backing him in this race. For that congrats TJ. However I'm not leaving this race. While I'm a Federalist at heart I must finish what I started with regards to this campaign even without the benefit of a party to help me. I've spent my entire life with my back against the wall always having to fight back like I have nothing left to lose. This will be no different. So if you have any further questions please pm me on policy. I'd love to hear from you


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MadmanMotley on June 18, 2013, 01:36:45 PM
Endorsed!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 18, 2013, 03:36:43 PM

Congrats on your appointment to the assembly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 22, 2013, 03:53:14 PM
Its day two of the elections and I've just voted. Don't forget to vote. Especially if you're a Federalist or part of the Union of National Democrats for Atlasia.

For those in the Mideast Region who haven't voted yet, please get out and consider voting for me for senate. I'm your independent voice for Free People, Free Markets and a Free Society. If I'm not your first cup of tea I suggest voting for TJ. He has an excellent record of service for the citizens of the Mideast and Atlasia as a whole and would make a great senator.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 03, 2013, 07:24:47 PM
There he goes Again

My fellow culture warriors,

Outgoing Secretary Polnut is at it again. This time he attacks the Russian leader Vladimir Putin over singing legislation limiting gay rights further. While I don't usually back Putin on policy especially concerning Israel but on this I have to applaud the Russian attempts to keep this destructive lifestyle in check. Do I fully agree with the drastic authoritarian measures, no. Could he be looking at this as a national health issue? I don't know but to denegrate a major world leader and his country's policies over such a sensative issue is not wise when trying to build productive working relationships with the international community. Not everybody holds to your "enlightened" sensibilities. I don't but I'm not as drastic as the Russians. Respect their national sovereignty on how they handle this internally. Where we should work together is rescuing women and kids out of the hands of the human trafficker.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on July 03, 2013, 07:37:34 PM
This is ridiculous. The contents of the Secretary's private conversations should have never been leaked in the first plac.  And I'm sure the only reason it leaked is because of you and the rest of the vast right wing conspiracy attempting to discredit the political achievements of the outgoing administration. Shame on you.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 03, 2013, 10:14:09 PM
This is ridiculous. The contents of the Secretary's private conversations should have never been leaked in the first plac.  And I'm sure the only reason it leaked is because of you and the rest of the vast right wing conspiracy attempting to discredit the political achievements of the outgoing administration. Shame on you.

My folks had nothing to do with the leak. There's no doubt Polnut and I have some serious differences and he's actively made it personal to hinder my advancing to higher office but I slammed Putin as much as Polnut in my article.

Nix, I'm sorry that you choose to side with Polnut though I'm not surprised. For all of Putins flaws policy wise I believe he's right on this one and the administration is wrong.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on July 03, 2013, 11:57:02 PM
but on this I have to applaud the Russian attempts to keep this destructive lifestyle in check.
[citation needed]


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 06, 2013, 12:11:59 PM
I will be running for Mideast Assembly this month. I'll have my platform up in the next couple days.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 17, 2013, 10:53:23 PM
We offer our deepest sympathies to Senator Scott as to the reason of his departure. In spite of his principaled liberalism we found ourselves on the same side on quite a few things. Namely our pragmatic ideas on helping inmates on a path to honest citizenship and protecting our kids against the trafficker and as a place of refuge for the victim who seeks healing and wholeness. Hope you are able to return soon.

Also you may've seen that this now a campaign for two races. I am standing in for a recently vacated at-large senate seat in addition to the Mideast Assembly race this weekend. There are times when Atlasia needs a choice and not an echo of the current status quo which is failing the people and has led to what is going on in the Pacific region. For the naysayers who think I won't represent all Atlasians that is a thought that needs to rendered nonexistent. I would represent all Atlasins fairly and justly. Our dark days are due to mistrust and fear. Regardless of conservativs fear of new ways and ideas of doing things or the progressive being resistant to tried and true ideas. We need both to promote the cause of human freedom.  Do we desire the upward trend to the maximum amamount of liberty within traditional law and order or towards the ash heap of despotism? If you seek the former, that cause of liberry, I seek your support.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 18, 2013, 04:58:15 AM
As a candidate for the vacant At-Large Senate, would you be willing pledge to check every senate related thread every day, and if not then perhaps every two days?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 18, 2013, 10:49:20 AM
As a candidate for the vacant At-Large Senate, would you be willing pledge to check every senate related thread every day, and if not then perhaps every two days?

Is this part of an effort to promote senate activity?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on July 18, 2013, 01:55:56 PM
We may disagree on many issues, but the civic union endorses you for Mideast assembly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 19, 2013, 01:19:01 PM
Don't forget to vote in the Mideast Assembly race. Looks like we've got a good one.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Energy Policy
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 20, 2013, 07:34:36 PM
Houston,  Texas

Its been an interesting week. I wasn't expecting to be in Texas. I was expecting to be campaigning in West Virginia for a seat in my regional assembly. Yet times required that I travel a little more extensively for a cause just as important and that is that of putting another Federalist into the Senate in Nyman. I'd like that opprotunity. With the increasing influance of the Labor party and the recent death of the Liberal Party a greater counterweight is needed. Regardless of if that's myself or Maxwell as Federalists representing you in Nyman.

Energy..... its what powers our daily lives from our cars, trucks and motorcycles to our industries and military might. Some think the idea of an all of the above policy is crazy and want to limit the kinds of fuel sources we utilize. I must disagree. Coal is an indispensable source of energy that can be used and still find ways to minimize the enviromental impact. So I would oppose the moratorium on the building of coal processing plants until these alternative sources can be proven their effectivness. We should make further emphasis on natural gas and possibly a transition to natural gas engines which burn cleaner and are more efficient than standard engines.

Nuclear energy when utilized for peaceful purposes is a powerful force for good. Needless to say there are enviromental concerns that should be addressed. As such the question to my opponents is what about putting research into the feasibility of putting our nuclear waste onto rockets and shooting it into the sun. Honestly I'm not sure of keeping it in our deserts will be a wise idea going into the long term.

What about our research into cold fusion? How much promise do we have in Hydrogen-1 and Helium-3? While we take further study into these we should find ways to utilize our current technology to fullest extent while finding ways to further minimizing enviromental impact.

Thank you for your time and be blessed


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Phoenix speech on fiscal responsibility
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 23, 2013, 01:58:46 PM
Hello Phoenix,

Its good to come to a city that has shown growth inspite of the crisis of government in the Pacific region. It doesn't hurt to have had one Barry Goldwater as a famous citizen statesmen of the past as one of the great state of Arizona. Many of you have been adversely affected as well by the fiscal irresponsibility that has invaded Nyman through Labour control. Look at Detroit for a lesson of what happens when one party is dominant for decades. It doesn't allow for new ideas to come and allow for progress in things that need to progress naturally.

With that we need serious change in the halls of Nyman and with that change some things government does now it will not do when I'm done with the reforms needed. Most know of my opposition to progressive taxation as it is a model to force charity from the rich via government force. If a rich person wants to give of their abundance they should want to and with gregarious joy to a church or other private charity. 

A return to a healthcare system that is market driven will free the government to pay down the debt and all Atlasians could have an efficent high speed rail system that would be the envy of the world. Sadly we can't have things like this when the government is still in the red. We can do this via private medical savings accounts with the option to put all of what you would pay in FICA taxes into that account. 

Many of you have heard of my Detroit Plan. For those who haven't its a flatter version of what we know to be the Clinton taxrates. If we must have a progressive tax system it should be utilized to promote the maximum amount of growth possible with the goal to reduce and eventually eliminating the debt. With that a better Atlasia can emerge.

Don't forget if you are a Federalist to vote JCL in the Federalist Primary

Be blessed


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on July 23, 2013, 05:01:23 PM
This Labor Senator has only signed balanced budgets. The one you're runnjng against put us on that path. Untkl two weeks ago, Federalists had just as many Senate seats as Labor. I think its safe to blame the ex-RPP administration for the economic troubles that developed under their watch and we should stop electing more of these fiscally irresponsible ex-RPP members. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 23, 2013, 05:26:44 PM
One of the few things Polnut and I agree on except we differ on the method of its execution.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Sec. of State Superique on July 23, 2013, 09:44:06 PM
Where it is that Detroit Plan?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 23, 2013, 09:53:59 PM
Ford Field, Detroit MI

It's so good to be here in the Motor City again (crowd cheers)

My hometown and this city share in a great Atlasian tradition called the automotive industry. Ever since Elwood Haynes took the first drive down what we call today Boulevard Rd we have all been looking to get where we need to go just a little faster than before. The biggest concern I see ahead for Detroit and the Mideast as a whole is the government keeping the economic engine from purrin' like a kitten. Cities like this one, Kokomo IN, Cleveland OH and others are still struggling while the government milks us out of finances, through egregiously high, personal and corporate income taxes to use for projects that individuals families and the regions themselves are best suited for. The big spenders in Nyman are wanting to put a tax burden on us that is unreasonable and hinders job growth. Many of you know of my opposition to an income based tax system. If we want tax reform we must prepare to offer an alternative plan that will benefit all in the long run. Under my tax plan corporations will only pay a 15 percent rate. As for individuals it would look like this until we get out of debt.

9,500-20,000 5%
20,001-100,000 10%
100,001-500,000 20%
500,001-5,000,000 30%
5,000,001+ 40 %

Gifts and prize winnings will not be taxed period.

The long term goal is to get to a uniform flat tax system that would be fair untill we can change from an income based system of taxation to one of consumption.

I know some may think that this would be extreme but the rates under Fmr. President Clinton hold some similarities to this plan.

In the 90's a regulation called the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed. This action, among others, led to the current financial crises. The repeal lead to taxpayers having to take one on the chin so failed bankers could get away with their godless ponzi schemes. I put my sword in the ground saying no more to any industry who thinks it has the right to receive government bailouts without consequence. That is why Glass-Steagall must be restored as law. One thing both Senator Ben and I would both lead on.

I am an avowed conservative in the mold of Grover Cleveland, Calvin Coolidge, and the Tafts of Ohio, not in the mold of the Bushes, Richard Nixon or Cheney and Rumsfeld. I am a fan of Ronald Reagan, Ike, JFK, Pierre DuPont IV, Walter Jones and yes Ron Paul, David Mcintoish, Mike Pence and Jackie Walorski. Both sides have borne the taint of militarism outside the tenants of the Christian Just War Doctrine. To President Polnut and the members of the senate, we don't want any part of the Syrian Civil War whatsoever. Get us out of there immediately.

I still see hope for the city of Detroit and all the industrial cities of the Mideast and Atlasia. Isn't it right that this is the home of the Detroit Lions. A team being a sign that this city is coming back from a seeming long death. If only my God, who isn't dead but roars as a lion, would be so merciful to my Chicago Cubs (crowd laughs as they see a JCL surrogate hand him a guitar.

I'd like to end our time together with something a little different. A song

Do you see it coming
A rumble in the streets
Freedom's song is rising
It's meeting no defeat......




Thank you and may God and Dave Bless you



This would be the Detroit Plan Superique


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on July 24, 2013, 05:29:19 AM
As a candidate for the vacant At-Large Senate, would you be willing pledge to check every senate related thread every day, and if not then perhaps every two days?

Is this part of an effort to promote senate activity?

Yes it is.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 24, 2013, 11:00:03 AM
As a candidate for the vacant At-Large Senate, would you be willing pledge to check every senate related thread every day, and if not then perhaps every two days?

Is this part of an effort to promote senate activity?

Yes it is.

I would make the effort to check all of them at least every other day Yankee.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 26, 2013, 09:43:35 PM
Please folks don't forget to vote. From what I've seen with the first day of voting it could be an historic non presidential race. And please vote for Maxwell. He has spearheaded a comback in the Midwest that makes it look nearly as good as my beloved Mideast. Don't get me wrong I ran for that seat but folks weren't quite ready for my views to be in such august company. I will be running for a senate seat in the future and I hope I can count on your support when that time comes. But for now get out and vote Maxwell.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: At-Large Campaign
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 31, 2013, 11:07:08 PM
Bangor, Maine

It's good to see so many liberty lovers today. It seems so crazy so soon after a special election that we're at the beginning of another national race. It's good that Governor Maxwell has decided to announce his run for the upcoming at-large senate race. His capable record as governor has brought the Midwest up out of a level of inactivity that nearly destroyed the Pacific region.  As such he will have my firm support in this upcoming as would any Federalist or any conservative or libertarian minded independent or member of another party. But enough of the preliminaries.

I want to talk to you about why I'm also stepping in this race. It's the state of our economy. We can do better. There is potential for much more and faster growth. Our friends in the Labour party and their allies in the NMAM think their cradle  to grave mentality of government of entitlements will work much better than a system where the market is left largly alone. Of course with the obvious exceptions of ensuring consumer safety along with a fair and safe job market where the individual is allowed to decide to be in a workplace with a union while not being apart of that union. The individual also knows the risks and benefits of that decision in a fair and balanced way.

The other snag I see in our ability to maximise individual economic prosperity is the current tax brackets. They simply don't work. No government, if they were smart, would tax a class of citizen that is more well off by a rate of nearly 70 percent (that is if you combined the various federal, regional local rates). That simply chokes the life out something that needs to grow.

I know some folks wonder why some kid from rural Indiana who only had two terms run for Senate. I run because we can be better than we are. We can be an Atlasia where regardless of political view we can be a beacon of hope to the world. A shining city on a hill which has a rather difficult time being hidden. Where the intellectual, rational, and often passionate debate in the sphere of government and politics can be a peaceful model that should be the envy of the world. Where the democratic process is protected and firmly underpinned with hard work, faith in something bigger than yourself, and a belief that though times could get dark that light can be found if each of us individually and as communities and regions do so on our own and together

Thank you and may God save and keep Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 04, 2013, 01:54:59 PM
1. What are your thoughts on the basic income bill as it stands? What changes will you propose, if any, and will you support the bill if those changes are made?

2. What are your thoughts on the package of education reforms that is under debate in the Senate? What changes will you propose, if any, and will you support the bill if those changes are made?

3. You have referred to yourself as an "ardent" supporter of regional rights. What additional responsibilities should be devolved to the regions? Why are the regions better suited to these tasks?

4. The Judicial Tenure Amendment is currently at a vote. How would you have voted on this amendment, and what other reforms to the Supreme Court, if any, will you recommend and support if you are elected?

1. I'm rather leery of the bill. While T.J. does bring up good points in particular with means testing and other matters, I think there is another way to go about reducing unemployment and raise incomes and thus raise govenmental revenue. I know around here what I may say next won't be popular but mandating union membership as a term of employment in any service or industry is simply wrong. While unions have done a great service in gaining better conditions and compensation packages there have been abuses. So I'm saying open up the shops to nonunion labor. Also we need to encourage a return to an industral rather than a service based economy. Lower taxes on companies so they can hire more labor. I'm suggusting a three percent corporate tax rate across the board. To help small business to increase I would advocate my Detroit Plan which is a flattened version of the Clinton tax rates.

2. Private schools should not be turned into defacto public schools. Of course we need to have a better quality of education but we should look at what our private schools are doing that promotes more success amongst their students and rather than demonizing them adopt their merhods. This will get a bit into question three but education should be handled more on the local and regional level. Also let in educators who aren't part of the teachers unions. Bring in successful teachers from all over the world to help our teachers improve in their methods of education. So I'd vote nay on the current education bill.

3. Other than education I'd devolve family matters to rhe regions. As it goes now marriage, divorce and adoption are under federal purview as a power given to the senate. Regions are better suited on these matters because they are closer to the situation. Someone in Nyman doesn't know how to handle a family situation in Nebraska or New Hampshire. Adoption should be a partnership as you have not just interstate adoptions you also have international ones.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 05, 2013, 10:19:15 PM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on August 05, 2013, 10:20:56 PM
While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

No one is trying to ram this through - in speaking with President Nix, Governor Maxwell (who also supports this), and several others, I think we're all hoping for a very thoughtful and detailed debate on the issue. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 05, 2013, 10:35:19 PM
While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

No one is trying to ram this through - in speaking with President Nix, Governor Maxwell (who also supports this), and several others, I think we're all hoping for a very thoughtful and detailed debate on the issue. :)

I'm surprised Max would support this given his region would be blown to kingdom come .


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 05, 2013, 10:47:20 PM
While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

No one is trying to ram this through - in speaking with President Nix, Governor Maxwell (who also supports this), and several others, I think we're all hoping for a very thoughtful and detailed debate on the issue. :)

I'm surprised Max would support this given his region would be blown to kingdom come .

I think we need less instances of catastrophic regions, and I don't see so much harm in changing the regional system if we do it in a thoughtful way, which I think is in the works. If that means shaking things up in such a manner, so be it.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on August 06, 2013, 03:25:55 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on August 07, 2013, 08:20:25 AM
JCL, what are you positions on school vouchers, private schools, and homeschooling?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 07, 2013, 01:07:34 PM
JCL, what are you positions on school vouchers, private schools, and homeschooling?

On School Vouchers: I'm for them. When you're running in 25th in academic achievement amongst the first world nations, that is simply below what we should hold ourselves to. The source of that problem is failing schools. We have parents who want the best for their kids yet are often stuck in a bad school system due to bad policy. Look at the Indiana system of doing vouchers. Our scores and standards are steadily improving and parents are being able to choose where their kids go to. Why isn't competition amongst schools for students a good thing. I see it as a very good thing.

On private schools: Again this is a matter that parents rather than government should be the final authority on as much as possible. Often these schools come about because of religious conscience and that should be respected. What is being attempted by elements of the senate to force these schools into being ran like public schools is simply wrong and must be stopped.

Homeschooling: As I said in the private school section parents mostly due to religious consciences make use of this option. Usually the academic standards amongst this goup of Atlasians are the highest along with private schools. Our public schools need to look at the good things they're doing and maybe adopt some of those methods. Why do you think homeschoolers are winning spelling bees like none other?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on August 07, 2013, 03:54:35 PM
JCL, I have been having a hard time deciding who to give my third preference to, and that answer has convinced me to give it to you. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 07, 2013, 06:15:18 PM
JCL, I have been having a hard time deciding who to give my third preference to, and that answer has convinced me to give it to you. :)

Thanks Goldwater. Any help I can get is a good thing.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 09, 2013, 02:34:37 PM
My foreign policy speech will be coming this weekend.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TNF on August 10, 2013, 12:26:31 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on August 10, 2013, 02:15:55 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)

Hint: I'm neither running for Senate nor are your fact-checking abilities particularly strong. I also think that some people in your party would prefer it if you posted less. ;)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Gass3268 on August 10, 2013, 02:46:16 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)

Hint: I'm neither running for Senate nor are your fact-checking abilities particularly strong. I also think that some people in your party would prefer it if you posted less. ;)

I would actually prefer it if TNF posted more. He's advocating for the party's core principles and bringing up key differences between candidates. It might not always be pretty, but that's not his style ;)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Napoleon on August 10, 2013, 03:19:15 AM
I also think that some people in your party would prefer it if you posted less. ;)

True; which I would hope means you and TNF aren't so different, considering you're more insulting, disgusting and hypocritical than he could ever hope to be.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on August 10, 2013, 03:31:03 AM
I also think that some people in your party would prefer it if you posted less. ;)

True; which I would hope means you and TNF aren't so different, considering you're more insulting, disgusting and hypocritical than he could ever hope to be.

I would argue that this comment is a tad ironic but since I don't have the intention to derail JCL's thread any further I will not write more. ;)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 10, 2013, 06:42:06 AM
TNF,

I don't oppose religious freedom for those who follow the teachings of Mohammed provided that they aren't masking it for an agenda of violence as much as much as I would for anybody else. With regards to gay adoption, do I need to bring up the Rembrandt expression again?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 10, 2013, 10:11:06 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Also, this is for everyone. If you're going to argue, stop it with the fake smileys.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TNF on August 10, 2013, 10:15:33 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Also, this is for everyone. If you're going to argue, stop it with the fake smileys.

Calling out a politician on his retrograde positions has nothing to do with his retrograde position on game reform? I'm realize you and your party are as reactionary as they come PJ, but c'mon, there's obviously a link here between being a radical social conservative who wants to ban minarets and gay adoption and is opposed to changing the regional structure. Perhaps ZuWo is afraid of losing his power over the Mideast and that region's status as the nation's most reactionary?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 10, 2013, 10:33:33 AM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Also, this is for everyone. If you're going to argue, stop it with the fake smileys.

Calling out a politician on his retrograde positions has nothing to do with his retrograde position on game reform? I'm realize you and your party are as reactionary as they come PJ, but c'mon, there's obviously a link here between being a radical social conservative who wants to ban minarets and gay adoption and is opposed to changing the regional structure. Perhaps ZuWo is afraid of losing his power over the Mideast and that region's status as the nation's most reactionary?
Reactionary? Reactionary? REACTIONARY? SERIOUSLY? You simply know that's not true, TNF, FloridianOranges and I have a similar Matrix score to Bernie Sanders. I'm going to leave this arguement now, I wish you all well, I apologize if I offended anyone, and I hope no one kills anybody.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 10, 2013, 06:31:41 PM
Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Thank you for such a robust welcome.

The issue I want to talk about is on the hearts and minds of many Atlasians of all political views. The current regional structure itself. Many in the political class and citizens are supportive of cutting the regions down from five to three. Their main concerns are well intentioned to promote greater activity. Are they not aware of the reforms Spamage and Maxwell are trying to promote within their regions to spur activity along with the IDS and my own Mideast and the ever solid Northeast once led by a friend in former governor Scott? While it will be a great way to shake things up I as a regionalist can't support this until I have more information on the pros and cons of going to three regions. Lets have a.careful and thoughtful debate rather than running towards a fad that could hurt the game we all love irreparably.

I agree with you but would go even further in that I vehemently oppose any attempts to reduce the number of Atlasian regions.

Since this is a crucial issue for me I proudly endorse you!

Just like you vehemently oppose religious freedom for Muslims and gay adoption. Go figure! :)
One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

Also, this is for everyone. If you're going to argue, stop it with the fake smileys.

Calling out a politician on his retrograde positions has nothing to do with his retrograde position on game reform? I'm realize you and your party are as reactionary as they come PJ, but c'mon, there's obviously a link here between being a radical social conservative who wants to ban minarets and gay adoption and is opposed to changing the regional structure. Perhaps ZuWo is afraid of losing his power over the Mideast and that region's status as the nation's most reactionary?

TNF, Look at what I said about religious freedom. It applies to Muslims as well as Christians as long as they aren't using it as a cover to commit acts of violence and terror. I deplore the actions of those who bombed abortion clinics as much as the ones who bomb our embacies and burn churches.

You know my reasoning for the opposition to gay adoption.

On the changing of the regional map I oppose it because partially none of these proposed maps benefit my state of Indiana in terms of representation and merging the Mideast with the Northeast is a bad idea because combining the two most active regions into one I believe will set back giving a hand up and moving forward with the reforms of the Midwest and Pacific regions. Plus I believe this a power grab by the left to destroy the one conservative bastion of the game and I can't sit back and let that happen.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 10, 2013, 06:32:34 PM
I wasn't so decided before, but endorsed for a third preference!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Foreign Policy Town Hall
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 10, 2013, 07:38:06 PM
As for my format for the foreign policy section I would like to turn it into a Town Hall style meeting. If possible I would like to start fielding questions around 10:45 AM EDT tomorrow. So you may start to ask your questions now.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 10, 2013, 07:44:23 PM
When do you think its appropriate to use force?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on August 11, 2013, 04:31:58 AM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 11, 2013, 09:38:40 AM
When do you think its appropriate to use force?

Before I give my answer I'm going to give you my story. I'm from a military family. This goes all the way back to the days of Willam Wallace and Robert the Bruce the King of Scotland. It is also traced to the peace churches of the Protestant Reformers like the Pennsylvania Dutch, the Amish and other groups of that nature. So I'm going to try to keep it simple. The use of force will be something I will sparingly use. I'm a firm believer in what Jesus said. "Blessed are the peacemakers for they will be called the children of God" The Christian Just War doctrine is something I will use as a guide wether or not I will support the use of force.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 13, 2013, 04:53:09 PM
Townhall bump


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2013, 10:58:14 AM
Get you vote on folks. Fellow Federalists its important that we give our first three preferences to the party's candidates. To have a chance of all three winning I'm reccomending this order.

JCL
Tmth
Maxwell

We can't afford to split our votes like the left so lets stand together and create the change we want.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 24, 2013, 02:30:57 PM
Good luck JCL!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2013, 02:50:59 PM

Looks like you're already in Max


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2013, 08:18:39 PM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on August 25, 2013, 01:32:53 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 08:15:07 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 25, 2013, 08:35:17 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 08:48:48 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)

Him and Scott I expected. I'm talking about Vosem and Torie.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on August 25, 2013, 09:05:13 AM
I don't perceive Vosem and Torie as raving fundamentalists, either.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 25, 2013, 09:22:24 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)

Him and Scott I expected. I'm talking about Vosem and Torie.
Your position on gay marriage would probably explain Torie's vote.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 09:46:10 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)

Him and Scott I expected. I'm talking about Vosem and Torie.
Your position on gay marriage would probably explain Torie's vote.

Yet I would back him if he were running in this race.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 25, 2013, 09:56:01 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)

Him and Scott I expected. I'm talking about Vosem and Torie.
Your position on gay marriage would probably explain Torie's vote.

Yet I would back him if he were running in this race.
There are RL politicians who I wouldn't vote for even if they endorsed me. (If I was a RL politician.)

I'm not saying I wouldn't vote for you if you endorsed me, not sure what I would do in that situation, but I can't imagine your getting your endorsement in the first place.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on August 25, 2013, 10:12:16 AM
I have a question for fellow Federalists. If Max is well over quota for election why are you still first preferencing him and not helping Tmth and myself with first preferences. Do you want a majority in the senate? Then throw some first preferences our way.
Maybe there are Federalists who (shock! horror!) don't actually want you in the Senate.
Same principle exists on the other side, see for example


Nix not voting for Napoleon....... I expect this kind of behavior from the left not the right. To think if they (meaning the federalist) were running and I wasn't I would give them my vote. I only expect the same in return. Isn't that how the party system works. I knew Nix wasn't going to preference me at all but for Federalists to preference Napoleon and SJoyce ahead of me when I would preference them ahead of any non federalist vote I make shows a double standard that will cripple any political movement.
What is that first sentence supposed to mean? Fortunately, a lot of the Federalists are less partisan than you. Let's take the most moderate member of the Federalist Party, which in my opinion is Sbane.  Not sure if they already voted, but based on ideology alone, does it make sense for a federalist with Sbane's matrix score to vote for someone they differ from 2 points economically and 3 points socially (Napoleon), or someone they differ from 6 points economically and 5 points socially? (You)

Him and Scott I expected. I'm talking about Vosem and Torie.
Your position on gay marriage would probably explain Torie's vote.

Yet I would back him if he were running in this race.

You're missing some basic logic here.

()

Blue guy might vote for red guy, but red guy will prefer green guy over blue guy.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on August 25, 2013, 10:27:38 AM
Jeez, people. JCL is not a "raving fundamentalist", he's just a typical social conservative who's been outcasted by the extreme social liberalism of Atlasia. People like Torie and Vosem have supported people IRL who oppose gay marriage, what makes JCL any different?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Supersonic on August 25, 2013, 10:32:10 AM
Don't blame me. I second pref'd JCL. *badge of honour*


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on August 25, 2013, 10:36:27 AM
Sorry if anyone was offended by my comments.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 10:39:38 AM
The idea I've try to go with as I've developed in this game is build issues based coalitions. I know many despise my view on gay marriage but they should look at my tax plan which is built on a compromise. Look at my foreign policy which many on the site would sympathize with. Look at my energy policy which takes the best of conservative ideas and considers the enviromental concerns of the left. Look at my view on criminal justice which is rehabilitative in nature but still shows the punitive side that our laws have to have. Look at my advocacy of protecting our kids against predators and traffickers. That's what they need to look at in spite of my view of marriage which regardless of that should not be a senate power but one of the regions.

I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Supersonic on August 25, 2013, 10:46:58 AM
I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.

The Federalists have an large big-L Libertarian wing who are very socially liberal, this is probably a thorn in your side. I think it's more a perception, rather than any actual policy difference.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 10:57:47 AM
I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.

The Federalists have an large big-L Libertarian wing who are very socially liberal, this is probably a thorn in your side. I think it's more a perception, rather than any actual policy difference.

Could be. But I back them as vigorously as I would the socon wing many try to paint me to be part of.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 25, 2013, 11:08:11 AM
I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.

The Federalists have an large big-L Libertarian wing who are very socially liberal, this is probably a thorn in your side. I think it's more a perception, rather than any actual policy difference.

And as chairman, I have encouraged federalists to vote for JCL, so let's not blame the Libertarian wing of the party, shall we?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Supersonic on August 25, 2013, 11:30:36 AM
I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.

The Federalists have an large big-L Libertarian wing who are very socially liberal, this is probably a thorn in your side. I think it's more a perception, rather than any actual policy difference.

And as chairman, I have encouraged federalists to vote for JCL, so let's not blame the Libertarian wing of the party, shall we?

I'm not blaming. Merely stating.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2013, 11:40:42 AM
I'm not blameing you Supersonic. I'm trying to address the federalist and center-right disconnect that I've had to deal with unlike most.

The Federalists have an large big-L Libertarian wing who are very socially liberal, this is probably a thorn in your side. I think it's more a perception, rather than any actual policy difference.

And as chairman, I have encouraged federalists to vote for JCL, so let's not blame the Libertarian wing of the party, shall we?

Most assume because of my view on marriage that I'm not of the Libertarian wing myself. I've tried to be a bridge between the Conservative and Libertarian wings.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Wisconsin+17 on August 26, 2013, 12:54:08 PM
JCL:

I was thrilled to see you on the ballot. :)

Thanks for running. You made THIS socon damned proud. :) I gave you my third preference, because I wanted SJoyce to make it (having worked with him in the IDS), and TM to make sure he got in.

Please, some of us did notice and are glad you ran.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 27, 2013, 11:54:07 AM
I plan on running again Kenobi. Don't know when or what for yet. Not to say I don't have a prospect or two.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 02, 2013, 12:51:54 PM
Chicago IL,

It's good to be back in The Windy City. If only our Cubs would leave their losing ways. I can kinda relate to their situation but I'm going for something better that we will all benefit from. A JCL term in our assembly. I'm running this time on a plan to propose specific infrastructure improvements that will benefit all of the region. As part of this Chicago would serve a very important role in this project. A rail system that would put the current proposal to shame all while maintaining a balanced budget.

Thank you and on to break my losing streak.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on September 03, 2013, 12:07:52 AM
Are you a Cubs fan?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 03, 2013, 10:54:58 AM

Fourth Generation one.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on September 03, 2013, 11:19:23 AM
Endorsed! The assembly needs an ideas man, and you are certainly that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 05, 2013, 11:18:02 PM
Indianapolis, IN

I'd like to express my thoughts on this drive to call for a convention to overall the Atlasian Constitution. I can understand why some want to do so. Some believe the game is becoming stagnant and want to change legislative processes. This will not be getting my support. One of the proposed changes would end the regional system we have. There is a very good reason for the idea of seperation of powers and duel federalism. The federal government has no business dictating matters of family to the regions. The powers of the national government need to be clear, specific and limited.

Regarding the matter of unions I have examined a certain system used in Canada (discussion in Spamage for President thread) called the Rand Formula. Given my economic views I cannot in good conscience support any move towards. While I firmly believe unions have a right to be an advocate for individual workers going before management, I also believe that the individual has the right not to join said union and the rights and responsibilities that come with it. I believe union and non union labor can work together amicably and peacefully in the same shop. So why should one be forced to join a union as part of being hired to say an auto or steel factory? They shouldn't be. That's why I believe in right to work. It promotes a fair job playing field. Union exclusivity doesn't.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on September 05, 2013, 11:45:16 PM
Indianapolis, IN

I'd like to express my thoughts on this drive to call for a convention to overall the Atlasian Constitution. I can understand why some want to do so. Some believe the game is becoming stagnant and want to change legislative processes. This will not be getting my support. One of the proposed changes would end the regional system we have. There is a very good reason for the idea of seperation of powers and duel federalism. The federal government has no business dictating matters of family to the regions. The powers of the national government need to be clear, specific and limited.

Regarding the matter of unions I have examined a certain system used in Canada (discussion in Spamage for President thread) called the Rand Formula. Given my economic views I cannot in good conscience support any move towards. While I firmly believe unions have a right to be an advocate for individual workers going before management, I also believe that the individual has the right not to join said union and the rights and responsibilities that come with it. I believe union and non union labor can work together amicably and peacefully in the same shop. So why should one be forced to join a union as part of being hired to say an auto or steel factory? They shouldn't be. That's why I believe in right to work. It promotes a fair job playing field. Union exclusivity doesn't.
I and many others don't support the elimination of regional governments. Yet I support the new constitutional convention. The current constitution has flaws. I'm sure everyone, including yourself, know of something in the constitution they would like to change.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 06, 2013, 12:29:43 AM
Indianapolis, IN

I'd like to express my thoughts on this drive to call for a convention to overall the Atlasian Constitution. I can understand why some want to do so. Some believe the game is becoming stagnant and want to change legislative processes. This will not be getting my support. One of the proposed changes would end the regional system we have. There is a very good reason for the idea of seperation of powers and duel federalism. The federal government has no business dictating matters of family to the regions. The powers of the national government need to be clear, specific and limited.

Regarding the matter of unions I have examined a certain system used in Canada (discussion in Spamage for President thread) called the Rand Formula. Given my economic views I cannot in good conscience support any move towards. While I firmly believe unions have a right to be an advocate for individual workers going before management, I also believe that the individual has the right not to join said union and the rights and responsibilities that come with it. I believe union and non union labor can work together amicably and peacefully in the same shop. So why should one be forced to join a union as part of being hired to say an auto or steel factory? They shouldn't be. That's why I believe in right to work. It promotes a fair job playing field. Union exclusivity doesn't.
I and many others don't support the elimination of regional governments. Yet I support the new constitutional convention. The current constitution has flaws. I'm sure everyone, including yourself, know of something in the constitution they would like to change.

And I expressed my concerns regarding the current constitution in the first paragraph. I don't think a overall is needed.  Just a couple tweaks.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 09, 2013, 01:29:10 PM
I applaud the passage of the Mass Transit bill in the Mideast Assembly. This will allow for the next steps towards having a region wide system of mass transit. While the best methods are still via automobile and by plane having alternative forms of transit will promote job growth and further economic prosperity towards our region. I urge ZuWo to sign this bill. This is something that is widely supported across party lines and can be done in a fiscally responsible manner.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 16, 2013, 11:13:20 PM
Thank you Governor ZuWo for this appointment. I wish I were assuming these responsibilities under better circumstances but I will do my best for this brief term. Hopefully the people will elect me to a full term in its own right. There is more we can do to promote freedom and prosperity in the Mideast region. I know many don't see eye to eye with me but I'd like to ask for your help in this weeks election. A matter of national intrest has not caught me by surprise.There is talk of regional consolidation. I see this as a threat to our region and stand to defeat those who seek to rip the region asunder. If I were a member of any these other assemblies I would be incensed as well. So if you want to preserve this region regardless of party I ask for your help. It doesn't matter if you are a Federalist, Progressive Unionist, Liberal or pro-regionalist Labourite I ask for you help and vote in this weeks election.

Thank you and May God save and keep the Mideast and Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PPT Spiral on September 16, 2013, 11:19:40 PM
Congratulations on being appointed. Also just wanted to say that you have my full endorsement for the Assembly. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 16, 2013, 11:30:41 PM
Congratulations JCL! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Sopranos Republican on September 16, 2013, 11:45:24 PM
Congratulations Representative JCL! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on September 17, 2013, 12:05:40 AM
Congrats, JCL! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 17, 2013, 07:53:22 AM
Congratulations on being appointed. Also just wanted to say that you have my full endorsement for the Assembly. :)

As you have mine for your run for Lt.. Governor.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Double Victory Speech
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 23, 2013, 09:07:39 PM
Fellow Mideasterners:

I thank you for your support in this race. It was a close one. Any one of the six of us could've been on the outside looking
in. Njall brought a good fight and I expect him to be back soon. Yet we have business to attend to. That business is to preserve this region against those who seek to rip it apart like ravenous wolves for the sake of centralizing power in one monolithic government. With that improving our alternative forms of transportation like a regional wide light rail system would provide a massive opportunity for job growth for all Atlasians.

Its also a momentous day as the Colts won in a fashion I didn't expect. The running game. But remember Coach Pagano, don't abandon the passing game. I want to see Luck have 300 yards passing too. That trade shocked me like anyone. Welcome to Colts nation Trent Richardson.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 26, 2013, 02:30:53 PM
I'm not sure Atlasia is ready for this but an announcement may be forthcoming about a possible future plan.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 27, 2013, 06:14:46 PM
This is not the possible announcement. This is a bill I will submit for action in the Mideast Assembly.

Allocution of funds from Pacific Crises Stimulus Fund Act
1. Three Billon Dollars is specified for the purpose of improving rail stations for regional mass transit.
   A. Contracts are to be offered to non-union and union rail infrastructure workers
   B. The following cities are considered for this phase of improvements
        1. Baltimore Maryland
        2. Richmond Virginia
        3. Charleston West Virginia
        4. Columbus Ohio
        5. Cleveland Ohio
        6. Indianapolis Indiana
        7. Chicago Illinois
        8. St. Louis Missouri
        9. Kansas City, Missouri

2. Seven Billion Dollars are to be specifically utilized in the form of various tax cuts and credits as the Assembly and Governor shall decide or designated for the Rainy Day Fund

         


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on September 28, 2013, 03:15:06 PM
Is it your intention to tie section 1 of your bill to the "Mideast High Speed Rail Act", JCL?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on September 28, 2013, 08:19:13 PM
Is it your intention to tie section 1 of your bill to the "Mideast High Speed Rail Act", JCL?

In addition to.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 03, 2013, 08:44:08 PM
It's senate campaign time. If you have any questions just pop in and ask away.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Foreign Policy)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 10, 2013, 03:53:55 PM
Don't forget to vote in the Federalist senate primary tomorrow. That is if you are a Federalist. For those who are I'd like to give you a reason to vote for me.


I see a fundamental flaw in Atlasian foreign policy. The folks in power want to aid the enemies of one our most important allies and sanction that friend unjustly. That friend while not perfect is the only liberal democratic(with a parliament) country in its entire region. I'm talking about Israel. For those who think that I hate the sons of Ishmael you couldn't be further from the truth. I have Arab friends. They also support my view on Israel as they are Christ followers as well. For those who say Israel is practicing apartheid I have news for you. Look at Israel's neighbors and their treatment of religious minorities and women before you judge Israel's property laws. I ask our Jordanian friends to take in their Palestinian brothers for the sake of regional peace and goodwill. If in the senate I will work to undo the Pro-Muslim bent of this government. Former Senator Ben would be ashamed of the national governments actions towards his people.

I know many of you think my social views are extreme but I am a moderate compared to many evangelicals. As we are the Atlasian party of the center-right we all kinds of conservatives to join us. This party needs the social conservative as much as we need the economic conservative or the national security conservative or the moderate or the various strands of libertarian. No wing should be treated as less than any of the other wings. If that happens that part could break away and it cost the party as a whole.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 10, 2013, 05:33:54 PM
I see a fundamental flaw in Atlasian foreign policy. The folks in power want to aid the enemies of one our most important allies

Please, do tell, what enemies are we aiding?


Unjustly?

That friend while not perfect is the only liberal democratic(with a parliament) country in its entire region.

()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()

None are authoritarian regimes and some are democracies. Only democracy? Not hardly.

For those who think that I hate the sons of Ishmael you couldn't be further from the truth. I have Arab friends.

"I don't hate blacks. I have black friends. But..."

For those who say Israel is practicing apartheid I have news for you. Look at Israel's neighbors and their treatment of religious minorities and women before you judge Israel's property laws.

Is it okay to murder someone if a couple of your neighbors do so as well?

I ask our Jordanian friends to take in their Palestinian brothers for the sake of regional peace and goodwill.

As in annexation of the West Bank? On the table, but the Jordanians have expressed reluctance to the idea in the past.

If in the senate I will work to undo the Pro-Muslim bent of this government.

Good luck.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 10, 2013, 06:48:56 PM
I see a fundamental flaw in Atlasian foreign policy. The folks in power want to aid the enemies of one our most important allies

Please, do tell, what enemies are we aiding?


Unjustly?

That friend while not perfect is the only liberal democratic(with a parliament) country in its entire region.

()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()
()

None are authoritarian regimes and some are democracies. Only democracy? Not hardly.

For those who think that I hate the sons of Ishmael you couldn't be further from the truth. I have Arab friends.

"I don't hate blacks. I have black friends. But..."

For those who say Israel is practicing apartheid I have news for you. Look at Israel's neighbors and their treatment of religious minorities and women before you judge Israel's property laws.

Is it okay to murder someone if a couple of your neighbors do so as well?

I ask our Jordanian friends to take in their Palestinian brothers for the sake of regional peace and goodwill.

As in annexation of the West Bank? On the table, but the Jordanians have expressed reluctance to the idea in the past.

If in the senate I will work to undo the Pro-Muslim bent of this government.

Good luck.

None of the countries afford full religious freedom towards non-Muslims.
The West Bank belongs to Israel. What I'm saying is let the Jews have their rightful land. Turkey is fast turning away from the West and towards a more fundamentalist strand of Islam. Is the government acting like Obama and aiding the Arab Spring revolutionaries?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 10, 2013, 07:03:10 PM
None of the countries afford full religious freedom towards non-Muslims.

()

Egyptian Muslims protecting a Christian church. Lebanon is also a state of great religious tolerance (in light of its demographics in particular), Turkey is extremely secular, and Morocco and Tunisia are also generally free.

The West Bank belongs to Israel. What I'm saying is let the Jews have their rightful land.

The Administration rejects this position and views the West Bank in its pre-1967 entirety as the basis of negotiations for an independent and sovereign state of Palestine.

Turkey is fast turning away from the West and towards a more fundamentalist strand of Islam. Is the government acting like Obama and aiding the Arab Spring revolutionaries?

A major controversy in Turkey is over whether or not headscarves should be banned. Fundamentalist strand? Not hardly.

I don't know what you mean by specifically "aiding the Arab Spring revolutionaries". The fall of Mubarak/Qaddafi/Ben Ali were positive events and I hope that al-Assad joins their number soon, but we are not providing assistance to the FSA or the other assortment of less-than-friendly groups in the country (al-Nusra Front, ISIL).


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Gass3268 on October 10, 2013, 07:19:16 PM
I would have to say I was a little hesitant to vote for you as SoEA, thank you Secretary SJoyce for easing all of my doubts! :) 


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 10, 2013, 09:50:36 PM
The administration is wrong on its view of the West Bank. The 1967 War happened. Israel won and thus got the West Bank as part of the treaty ending the war. Atlasia must recgonize those results. Israel is the rightful and duly recognized national sovereign over the West Bank.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 11, 2013, 01:50:54 PM
The administration is wrong on its view of the West Bank. The 1967 War happened. Israel won and thus got the West Bank as part of the treaty ending the war. Atlasia must recgonize those results. Israel is the rightful and duly recognized national sovereign over the West Bank.

This is false. The West Bank, Golan Heights, and Gaza Strip are under Israeli military occupation. They were seized during warfare and are not legally part of the State of Israel. No treaty was signed following the war that legally recognized the occupied territories as part of the State of Israel. Israel is neither the rightful sovereign (that'd be the State of Palestine) nor the duly recognized (see UN recognition of the State of Palestine) sovereign (it's an occupying power) of the West Bank.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 11, 2013, 02:10:59 PM
The administration is wrong on its view of the West Bank. The 1967 War happened. Israel won and thus got the West Bank as part of the treaty ending the war. Atlasia must recgonize those results. Israel is the rightful and duly recognized national sovereign over the West Bank.

This is false. The West Bank, Golan Heights, and Gaza Strip are under Israeli military occupation. They were seized during warfare and are not legally part of the State of Israel. No treaty was signed following the war that legally recognized the occupied territories as part of the State of Israel. Israel is neither the rightful sovereign (that'd be the State of Palestine) nor the duly recognized (see UN recognition of the State of Palestine) sovereign (it's an occupying power) of the West Bank.

Israel won them in just warfare thus they are legally part of Israel. You're taking Obama's position which is totally the wrong side. Israel is the rightful sovereign of that land by the decree of Divine Providence. My previous statement is correct.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 11, 2013, 05:01:37 PM
Israel won them in just warfare thus they are legally part of Israel.

Right of conquest has been discredited since the Second World War.

Israel is the rightful sovereign of that land by the decree of Divine Providence.

That won't hold up in any court.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 14, 2013, 07:01:09 PM

St. Louis MO


Fellow Atlasians,


I'm here today because there is a message and cause that being neglected in Atlasian politics. That message is that of conservatism.

As a Federalist one of our most dear causes is that of regional rights and decentralization. There is a movement out there that seeks to rip asunder the current regional make up and targets one region in particular for destruction. I can not stand by and let that happen. While I do understand the concerns over activity or the lack thereof, changing the regional structure in a wholesale manner is not a prudent course of action. Moving a few states around might be a more sensible move. That is if the states in question via a vote of their citizens accede to the proposal.

Also the issue of the family is one that needs to be reexamined. The centralizers want to dictate terms which are a hindrance to individuals of faith and conscience. Laws regarding marriage and divorce are better handled at the regional level. Regions should have more say in regards to adoption. The current arrangement simply doesn't work. Folks want to say social issues are off the table in total favor of liberalism. I don't conform to any truce on social issues. Why can't we have an honest discussion about these issues and have a fair and just compromise? Because social liberals and centralizers refuse to come to the table and discuss them openly and candidly.

The current administration and the candidates for president are making a colossal mistake in the realm of foreign policy. We don't sanction our friends and allies when they are working on internal infrastructure improvements because we think the land isn't theirs. In fact the land is theirs and for us to butt in on an internal issue is being a bad friend. That won't happen in my administration.

For these reasons I'm throwing my hat into the ring for President.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LastVoter on October 14, 2013, 07:42:21 PM

St. Louis MO


Fellow Atlasians,


I'm here today because there is a message and cause that being neglected in Atlasian politics. That message is that of conservatism.

As a Federalist one of our most dear causes is that of regional rights and decentralization. There is a movement out there that seeks to rip asunder the current regional make up and targets one region in particular for destruction. I can not stand by and let that happen. While I do understand the concerns over activity or the lack thereof, changing the regional structure in a wholesale manner is not a prudent course of action. Moving a few states around might be a more sensible move. That is if the states in question via a vote of their citizens accede to the proposal.

Also the issue of the family is one that needs to be reexamined. The centralizers want to dictate terms which are a hindrance to individuals of faith and conscience. Laws regarding marriage and divorce are better handled at the regional level. Regions should have more say in regards to adoption. The current arrangement simply doesn't work. Folks want to say social issues are off the table in total favor of liberalism. I don't conform to any truce on social issues. Why can't we have an honest discussion about these issues and have a fair and just compromise? Because social liberals and centralizers refuse to come to the table and discuss them openly and candidly.

The current administration and the candidates for president are making a colossal mistake in the realm of foreign policy. We don't sanction our friends and allies when they are working on internal infrastructure improvements because we think the land isn't theirs. In fact the land is theirs and for us to butt in on an internal issue is being a bad friend. That won't happen in my administration.

For these reasons I'm throwing my hat into the ring for President.



Dear Atlasians,


I would like to announce my VP declaration in this thread. I will be accepting write-ins as a VP for JCL's ticket because I share many of his views. To echo some of the key platform points, I think it's absolutely necessary to preserve 5 regions, because 3 regions would simply be too active and it would be impossible for me to be re-elected as a councilor. I would like to say a few words about the family issue as well. I think marriage is a terrible institution and federal bureaucrats should not be involved in such a messy affair, and since I don't support any kind of marriage it's best to leave it to the regions since they are very likely to be incompetent enough to  it up. Finally I would like to say it's absolutely necessary to increase aid to Israel,  since it's the only progressive state in the Middle east. As a labor party member & former union organizer in Atlasia I know that taking the strongest postition is always the best positon.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Kitteh on October 15, 2013, 07:41:10 AM
My fellow Atlasians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_wildcat

^this species is native to all of Israel but only parts of Jordan (which my running mate has "wisely" suggested is basically totally the same thing as Palestine) and the west bank. Thus the state of Israel is a kitty state and should exist. I oppose any policies that would threaten the existence of an independent feline state in Israel.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 15, 2013, 08:57:21 AM
My fellow Atlasians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_wildcat

^this species is native to all of Israel but only parts of Jordan (which my running mate has "wisely" suggested is basically totally the same thing as Palestine) and the west bank. Thus the state of Israel is a kitty state and should exist. I oppose any policies that would threaten the existence of an independent feline state in Israel.

You are not my running mate kitteh.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on October 15, 2013, 10:37:49 AM
Who are you thinking about for a running mate JCL?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LastVoter on October 15, 2013, 04:38:56 PM
My fellow Atlasians:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_wildcat

^this species is native to all of Israel but only parts of Jordan (which my running mate has "wisely" suggested is basically totally the same thing as Palestine) and the west bank. Thus the state of Israel is a kitty state and should exist. I oppose any policies that would threaten the existence of an independent feline state in Israel.
Copycat.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 16, 2013, 06:11:04 PM
Pingvin is my running mate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Poirot on October 17, 2013, 04:38:43 PM
I think I will write in JCL / Pingvin for presidential first preference because of your policy on regions.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LastVoter on October 17, 2013, 05:07:25 PM
I think I will write in JCL / Pingvin for presidential first preference because of your policy on regions.
The real ticket is JCL/Seatown


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 17, 2013, 09:56:14 PM
I think I will write in JCL / Pingvin for presidential first preference because of your policy on regions.
The real ticket is JCL/Seatown

The ticket is JCL/Pingvin. The NM-AM who you align with has no place in my agenda.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LastVoter on October 18, 2013, 01:11:47 AM
I think I will write in JCL / Pingvin for presidential first preference because of your policy on regions.
The real ticket is JCL/Seatown

The ticket is JCL/Pingvin. The NM-AM who you align with has no place in my agenda.
I'm a deep red laborite again.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 18, 2013, 01:28:56 PM
Don't forget to vote in the election this weekend.

Vote Federalist in the senate races. Rooney and Spiral are excellent candidates.
The presidential race has grown more intriguing with the write in candidacies of DallasFan/Jbrase and JCL/Pingvin.

Friends in Luimne and Matt are in the race as well. While I wish them the best I'm playing to win.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 19, 2013, 08:18:06 PM
Looks like this election is humming along. Don't forget to vote and if you would, write in JCL/Pingvin for your Presidential ticket. Remember if you preference me for President only Pingvin and Matt are valid running mates for me. Not any of the leftists who think they can claim the spot.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: homelycooking on October 19, 2013, 10:03:40 PM
Looks like this election is humming along. Don't forget to vote and if you would, write in JCL/Pingvin for your Presidential ticket. Remember if you preference me for President only Pingvin and Matt are valid running mates for me. Not any of the leftists who think they can claim the spot.

Why would Matt from VT be considered your running mate? He didn't declare a write-in candidacy, nor did he write you in on his ballot.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 19, 2013, 10:23:24 PM
Looks like this election is humming along. Don't forget to vote and if you would, write in JCL/Pingvin for your Presidential ticket. Remember if you preference me for President only Pingvin and Matt are valid running mates for me. Not any of the leftists who think they can claim the spot.

Why would Matt from VT be considered your running mate? He didn't declare a write-in candidacy, nor did he write you in on his ballot.

It's my way of telling NM-AM who I'd rather have then any of their party.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL-Concession Speech
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 21, 2013, 06:33:43 PM
Indianapolis, IN

It has been a wild ride the past week.  Going from a Senate campaign to a Presidential campaign wasn't an easy decision. The senate race is one I had been concentrating on for a serious amount of time and my efforts for whatever reason come up in vain. Lt. Governor Spiral will make a solid senator who will do the Mideast proud.

So why did I run an insurgent campaign for President? Not all voices were fairly heard in the electoral process. All the tickets were left of center and none of them merited my support in good conscience. The strict regionalist was not represented in any of the other tickets. The conservative voice was ignored again in the results. The party who professed to be of the center-right nominated a center-left candidate for President. There is no way you can avoid the President-elect Duke is of a left of center bent. The party power brokers chose a Faustian deal to win. Not only that, but conservatives hadn't been seen on the Federalist ticket in nearly a year with the possible exception of Hagrid's campaign. So I chose to run.

When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Lumine, I hope to see you run again. Or maybe we have our coalition ticket sometime.

ZuWo, I hope you veto the repeal the Assembly's attempt to undo the ban on gender selective abortions.

Well.... I head back to my duties in the Assembly. This isn't my last Presidential campaign.

God Save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 21, 2013, 07:07:19 PM
When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Maybe they would prefer a President who knows how to spell?

I was using the British spelling on Labor/Labour.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 21, 2013, 07:23:55 PM
A lot of folks may not have even been aware that you were running a write-in campaign, while others don't vote for write-in's out of principle. I would urge you not to be so quick to judge.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Enderman on October 21, 2013, 08:09:21 PM
When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Maybe they would prefer a President who knows how to spell?

I was using the British spelling on Labor/Labour.

Because you're British?

Because he likes the non-mainstream version of it. To be fair, I use it a lot, but I am part Brit'. :P


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 21, 2013, 09:38:02 PM
A lot of folks may not have even been aware that you were running a write-in campaign, while others don't vote for write-in's out of principle. I would urge you not to be so quick to judge.

Point taken.
When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Maybe they would prefer a President who knows how to spell?

I was using the British spelling on Labor/Labour.

Because you're British?

Because he likes the non-mainstream version of it. To be fair, I use it a lot, but I am part Brit'. :P

Nix, I'm an American cousin of the Baron of Berriew. You guys would love his views on transgendered people.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 22, 2013, 10:14:38 PM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 23, 2013, 11:41:51 PM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 24, 2013, 12:03:29 AM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.

The same reason I oppose gay marriage.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 24, 2013, 12:07:47 AM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.

The same reason I oppose gay marriage.

Why do you oppose both of those?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Adam Griffin on October 24, 2013, 12:23:24 AM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.

The same reason I oppose gay marriage.

Why do you oppose both of those?

()

When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Maybe they would prefer a President who knows how to spell?

I was using the British spelling on Labor/Labour.

Because you're British?

Because he likes the non-mainstream version of it. To be fair, I use it a lot, but I am part Brit'. :P

()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 24, 2013, 04:26:28 PM
Hey JCL, why are you against gay people adopting kids?

I've been waiting three months for a response, Assemblyman.

The same reason I oppose gay marriage.

Why do you oppose both of those?

()

When Federalists prefer the Labour ticket over a Federalist write in ticket it makes me wonder where many of them really stand. I can understand you picking Duke over me but to pick the Labour ticket over one of your own in lower preferences is disrespectful.

Maybe they would prefer a President who knows how to spell?

I was using the British spelling on Labor/Labour.

Because you're British?

Because he likes the non-mainstream version of it. To be fair, I use it a lot, but I am part Brit'. :P

()

Faith and medical science thank you very much.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 24, 2013, 04:36:50 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 24, 2013, 04:54:02 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 24, 2013, 05:02:29 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 24, 2013, 10:16:36 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

JCL, you do realize medical science does not support you on this?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 25, 2013, 08:46:25 PM
I'd still love to know your medical science sources.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Gass3268 on October 25, 2013, 11:10:08 PM
You would have done better with Seatown as your running mate. Just saying...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 26, 2013, 01:35:55 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.



I'd still love to know your medical science sources.

You are aware the AMA sometimes gets it wrong. I will get you a source. Are not Physiologists licensed medical professionals as well?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 26, 2013, 02:34:26 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.

No it doesn't. Fritzcare does.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 26, 2013, 03:07:22 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.

No it doesn't. Fritzcare does.

Do they run along the same lines?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 26, 2013, 05:04:41 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.



I'd still love to know your medical science sources.

You are aware the AMA sometimes gets it wrong. I will get you a source. Are not Physiologists licensed medical professionals as well?

First of all, I would like to get a factual report from you about this. Secondly why do you really see gay people as not fit to raise children? I know gay people have every right to adopt a child because they are good parents. Think about this, JCL: If you are gay and you want a kid, you need to go through a long process of security checks, home visits, and they have to go through all these processes to adopt someone. Now, if they don't want kids, they can't because well gay sex is not able to produce children. Now, JCL, I think you don't realize how being gay truly works. What actual science has pointed out is that being gay is not a choice, but even if it is, why are you so opposed to gay people adopting?

Why do you feel as if a gay person isn't enough of a human being to raise a child?

Don't give me this faith and science bull because first of all, science does not support your claims, it will never support your claims, your claims have no base. And I'm a pretty religious person, I believe in God, Jesus, Mary, etc. and I know being gay is not a choice, I know that gay people are people, who if they want a kid, they should be able to raise one, I know that.

Your claims that gay people are unfit to raise a child is unbelievable, homophobic, and if one of your children is gay, I will pray for them, because you obviously are against human rights.

There is no freedom until we're equal. All of us. Gay, straight, white, black, Christian, Muslim.

And that you are against equality, against other people for who they love, against others who want to raise a child that a straight couple couldn't take care of, or that child of a mother or father who had died, it sickens me to my core.

I hope you have a wonderful day, JCL.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: afleitch on October 26, 2013, 05:18:52 PM
JCL, stop pretending you know about these things. You don't.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on October 27, 2013, 08:44:45 PM

Not at all.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 28, 2013, 04:59:29 PM

Still government ran healthcare is antithetical to individual liberty.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 28, 2013, 05:43:31 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.



I'd still love to know your medical science sources.

You are aware the AMA sometimes gets it wrong. I will get you a source. Are not Physiologists licensed medical professionals as well?

First of all, I would like to get a factual report from you about this. Secondly why do you really see gay people as not fit to raise children? I know gay people have every right to adopt a child because they are good parents. Think about this, JCL: If you are gay and you want a kid, you need to go through a long process of security checks, home visits, and they have to go through all these processes to adopt someone. Now, if they don't want kids, they can't because well gay sex is not able to produce children. Now, JCL, I think you don't realize how being gay truly works. What actual science has pointed out is that being gay is not a choice, but even if it is, why are you so opposed to gay people adopting?

Why do you feel as if a gay person isn't enough of a human being to raise a child?

Don't give me this faith and science bull because first of all, science does not support your claims, it will never support your claims, your claims have no base. And I'm a pretty religious person, I believe in God, Jesus, Mary, etc. and I know being gay is not a choice, I know that gay people are people, who if they want a kid, they should be able to raise one, I know that.

Your claims that gay people are unfit to raise a child is unbelievable, homophobic, and if one of your children is gay, I will pray for them, because you obviously are against human rights.

There is no freedom until we're equal. All of us. Gay, straight, white, black, Christian, Muslim.

And that you are against equality, against other people for who they love, against others who want to raise a child that a straight couple couldn't take care of, or that child of a mother or father who had died, it sickens me to my core.

I hope you have a wonderful day, JCL.


I want you to Google Dr. James Dobson on gay adoption go to page two and click on the scienceblog.com web page. It mentions noted Sociologist David Popenoe of Rutgers University and his research on the subject of gay adoption.  It basically shows why a child does best in a home with a mom and a dad.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 28, 2013, 05:56:23 PM
I'm sorry, JCL, but I have to disagree with you here. Would a kid do better with a mother and father? Sure. A kid would also likely do better in a private school than public, in a wealthier home, in a more urban area, etc. This isn't about whether heterosexual couples are more capable than homosexual couples.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on October 28, 2013, 06:19:03 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Sec. of State Superique on October 28, 2013, 06:56:28 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.

No it doesn't. Fritzcare does.

Do they run along the same lines?

No, they don't...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 28, 2013, 11:24:09 PM

Medical science? Like, say, the AMA or APA? Both back gay adoption.

Do they also support Obamacare?

Don't avoid the question with irrelevant counter-questions about a nonexistent program.

It's relevant because Obamacare exists. So answer my question.



I'd still love to know your medical science sources.

You are aware the AMA sometimes gets it wrong. I will get you a source. Are not Physiologists licensed medical professionals as well?

First of all, I would like to get a factual report from you about this. Secondly why do you really see gay people as not fit to raise children? I know gay people have every right to adopt a child because they are good parents. Think about this, JCL: If you are gay and you want a kid, you need to go through a long process of security checks, home visits, and they have to go through all these processes to adopt someone. Now, if they don't want kids, they can't because well gay sex is not able to produce children. Now, JCL, I think you don't realize how being gay truly works. What actual science has pointed out is that being gay is not a choice, but even if it is, why are you so opposed to gay people adopting?

Why do you feel as if a gay person isn't enough of a human being to raise a child?

Don't give me this faith and science bull because first of all, science does not support your claims, it will never support your claims, your claims have no base. And I'm a pretty religious person, I believe in God, Jesus, Mary, etc. and I know being gay is not a choice, I know that gay people are people, who if they want a kid, they should be able to raise one, I know that.

Your claims that gay people are unfit to raise a child is unbelievable, homophobic, and if one of your children is gay, I will pray for them, because you obviously are against human rights.

There is no freedom until we're equal. All of us. Gay, straight, white, black, Christian, Muslim.

And that you are against equality, against other people for who they love, against others who want to raise a child that a straight couple couldn't take care of, or that child of a mother or father who had died, it sickens me to my core.

I hope you have a wonderful day, JCL.


I want you to Google Dr. James Dobson on gay adoption go to page two and click on the scienceblog.com web page. It mentions noted Sociologist David Popenoe of Rutgers University and his research on the subject of gay adoption.  It basically shows why a child does best in a home with a mom and a dad.

 He was distorting reports JCL. He was hijacking them for a political agenda. (https://www.au.org/church-state/september-2006-church-state/people-events/dobson%E2%80%99s-fof-distorts-research-says-nyu)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 28, 2013, 11:27:48 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on October 28, 2013, 11:33:07 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 28, 2013, 11:35:25 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?
He doesn't want to acknowledge the fact that this sociologist is distorting reports and lying. I mean, who cares about facts right? As long as it makes your cause seem worthy, facts don't truly matter. (https://www.au.org/church-state/september-2006-church-state/people-events/dobson%E2%80%99s-fof-distorts-research-says-nyu)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 28, 2013, 11:42:27 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Goldwater on October 28, 2013, 11:53:47 PM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.

Why, exactly? I thought the argument was that children need both a father figure and a mother figure? So why, for example, would just having a mother be preferable to having two father figures?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 29, 2013, 12:01:22 AM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.

In the original, non distorted research by Judith Stacey, not the distorted article by your prized sociologist, it explained why two parents, no matter their sexual preference, is usually better than one parent. The original author of these documents stated that

Quote from: Judith Stacey
“Whenever you hear Focus on the Family, legislators or lawyers say, ‘Studies prove that children do better in families with a mother and a father,’ they are referring to studies which compare two-parent heterosexual households to single-parent households,” Stacey said. “The studies they are talking about do not cite research on families headed by gay and lesbian couples.”

“The bottom line is there is no research-based reason to deny rights to same-sex couples and their children. We should be passing laws and making policies that make life easier for all families – not harder.”


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: PJ on October 29, 2013, 12:01:58 AM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.
1. If this is your belief, then women who can't have children shouldn't be allowed to adopt.
2. Back it up with more than disproven research.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on October 29, 2013, 01:02:43 AM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.
1. If this is your belief, then women who can't have children shouldn't be allowed to adopt.
2. Back it up with more than disproven research.
So women and men who do not have the ability to have a child together can't adopt either?

Oh and I think that a gay couple would show much more appreciation for their children and wouldn't discriminate them because of their sexual preferences.

Another thing: gay people still have to go through months of checks for the child, caring for the child, adoption procedures, they would be as good or even better than straight parents who had a child through sex.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on November 08, 2013, 01:16:14 AM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.
1. If this is your belief, then women who can't have children shouldn't be allowed to adopt.
2. Back it up with more than disproven research.
So women and men who do not have the ability to have a child together can't adopt either?

Oh and I think that a gay couple would show much more appreciation for their children and wouldn't discriminate them because of their sexual preferences.

Another thing: gay people still have to go through months of checks for the child, caring for the child, adoption procedures, they would be as good or even better than straight parents who had a child through sex.

Heterosexual unions have the potential to create new life. Sometimes couples in those unions for whatever reason aren't able to have biological children of their own. Allowing homosexual adoption is complete and total discrimination against those heterosexual married couples. Why do you think I fight against abortion so heavily besides that of my faith based convictions? If I were married I will tell you this..... Her and I would heavily consider adoption in addition to having children of our own. I have always been an advocate for adoption and will always be. How can a gay couple be better than a traditional one in the rearing of children? I can understand what the kid in a situation like this is going through because I know what a custody fight is like. Don't you think I considered other options on who to live with other than my biological parents? I had a couple certain options because of other families that I had close contact with. Needless to say I chose my dad. Not just because I could have a chance at a better situation and could actually have considerably more freedom as a kid, but ultimately my brother and I thought it best that we stuck together.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on November 08, 2013, 01:34:04 AM
JCL, do you oppose adoptions by single parents?

I was raised by a single parent. My mother from 3-11 and my dad after that. While I think any situation besides the two parent married heterosexual couple is less than ideal,  if the circumstances were right a single could. There's this young lady who became a missionary in Africa. I believe she adopted some 14 or so African kids. The story is talked about in the book Kisses from Katie. .
So you have no problems with single parents, but gay parents are unacceptable because a child does better with a mother and a father?

If your union can't produce new life, you don't get to adopt. I gave you one instance where a single could do it. The circumstances of my life from 3-adulthood of how I was raised wouldn't be close to the ideal situation but it is miles ahead of a gay couple could ever offer.
1. If this is your belief, then women who can't have children shouldn't be allowed to adopt.
2. Back it up with more than disproven research.
So women and men who do not have the ability to have a child together can't adopt either?

Oh and I think that a gay couple would show much more appreciation for their children and wouldn't discriminate them because of their sexual preferences.

Another thing: gay people still have to go through months of checks for the child, caring for the child, adoption procedures, they would be as good or even better than straight parents who had a child through sex.

Heterosexual unions have the potential to create new life. Sometimes couples in those unions for whatever reason aren't able to have biological children of their own. Allowing homosexual adoption is complete and total discrimination against those heterosexual married couples. Why do you think I fight against abortion so heavily besides that of my faith based convictions? If I were married I will tell you this..... Her and I would heavily consider adoption in addition to having children of our own. I have always been an advocate for adoption and will always be. How can a gay couple be better than a traditional one in the rearing of children? I can understand what the kid in a situation like this is going through because I know what a custody fight is like. Don't you think I considered other options on who to live with other than my biological parents? I had a couple certain options because of other families that I had close contact with. Needless to say I chose my dad. Not just because I could have a chance at a better situation and could actually have considerably more freedom as a kid, but ultimately my brother and I thought it best that we stuck together.

Yay you answered!

Quote
Allowing homosexual adoption is complete and total discrimination against those heterosexual married couples.

Yes, exactly. The fact that gay people can raise a child is COMPLETE discrimination against straight people. Yes. 100% correct.

No, what's really going on is that gay people are raising children that straight people couldn't care for and these children finally have a home to live in. A family.

()

And the funny thing? You argue that same sex couples will damage the lives of children they raise, but not one couple conceived a child by accident. Every single gay and lesbian couple who decided to have a child must plan for it, in great detail, whether it is a gay couple who needs to find a surrogate mother, or a lesbian couple who needs to find a sperm donor, or either going through the very difficult process of adoption. Now it's great that you would consider adoption, but every single child brought into the home of a gay or lesbian couple is wanted. And you should know that.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on November 10, 2013, 11:23:08 AM
()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on November 26, 2013, 10:04:42 PM
Have a great and blessed Thanksgiving holiday.  Its gonna be crazy in the land of JCL (not that it hasn't been since the tornado ) thus I'm going to be gone from the site till at least Saturday so I can totally keep focused on the remaing 19 hours I have on my work schedule for the week.

Till thn I'm on loa.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 05, 2013, 02:05:47 PM
I have returned from some much needed time away to recharge from putting in 95 hours in the past two weeks at my RL job. So I've heard some rumor that I'm running for At-Large Senate. I'm flattered that I made the polls for this race but I'm considering my options and I'll have a decision by the end of the day Sunday Indiana time.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Enderman on December 05, 2013, 03:15:02 PM
is that normal Indiana or those rebellious western border counties' time?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 05, 2013, 04:11:03 PM
is that normal Indiana or those rebellious western border counties' time?

The western counties are right. It's normal Indiana that's in rebellion (including my own county). Indiana needs to go back to not changing their clocks or go to CST.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 08, 2013, 02:52:56 PM
Thank you for the mentions in various polls regarding the At-Large Senate race. I make no bones about it. I do plan on running for the Senate again. This time however is not the right time. Real life gets hectic at this time of the year and I need to devote my energy to that.

 I also hand my endorsements to Tmth and Shua for my first two preferences in the At-Large race. Tmth brought me into the game and I brought with me the Tea Party wing of the Atlasian Right and social conservatives. Shua is also a long time active Atlasian whose record is worthy of a position of merit in the Atlasian body politick.

I will be running in the Janurary Mideast elections for certain. What position will be decided upon my return from my end of the year trip to Kansas City for the Onething Conference, as well as slipping out to Wichita to see family.

No matter your worldview humanity lost a great leader in the cause of individual freedom and racial equality this week. Nelson Mandela was a near mirror of the story of Joseph. From prison to the place of power. He will be missed.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on December 08, 2013, 04:09:55 PM
I appreciate your endorsement and wish you the best. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (RL News)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 16, 2013, 10:24:52 PM
I'll be auditioning for The Voice this Feburary Lord willing.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on December 16, 2013, 10:26:24 PM
That's awesome! I'm really hoping you make it! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 16, 2013, 10:47:55 PM
That's awesome! I'm really hoping you make it! :)

Anything could happen with auditions like this.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on December 16, 2013, 10:56:34 PM
You mean for real?  Good luck! :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 16, 2013, 11:47:33 PM

I tried out for American Idol several years ago.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 25, 2013, 11:05:55 AM
Happiest of Christmases to you all. JCL will return New Years Day with more conservatarian shenanigans and a campaign announcement.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 02, 2014, 07:50:49 PM
I'm back from my Christmas vacation and am happy to announce a double campaign. I'm running for assembly in the Mideast in January and for Mideast Senator in Feburary. We need assemblymen and senators who will fight vigorously for the regions against a ever increasing centralization of power in Nyman. We can have responsible laws regarding the controversial issues that divide us. Needless to say there is a law that needs to return to active status in the Mideast. That is the law banning abortions by reason of gender. Yes I understand this is a contentious issue, but a baby souldn't be aborted just they're not the desired gender of the prospective parents. Also fathers should have the right to fight an abortion by their female partner. Its not fair that the father doesn't have the  right to have a say in the matter. That has to change.

Thank you and let the fun begin.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 02, 2014, 10:55:53 PM
Endorsed for Assembly! :) It looks like we are going to have a primary for the Senate!!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 06, 2014, 11:20:08 AM
Thanks for the endorsement Senator. I urge our citizens in the arreas affected by #snowstormhercules to stay indoors if at all possible. Let emergency workers get the snow cleared and the temps improve.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 13, 2014, 11:09:12 PM
Looks like a challenger of the left has emerged for the upcome Mideast Senate race. Snowstalker will be a formitible opponent which means I need Federalists, D-R's and my friends in the Progressive Union to stand with me should I receive the Federalist nomination. I know some left leaning Federalists balk at giving me their vote. I can understand that. There are bigger issues than just political ideology. I see hope in Atlasia for stronger regions and more active and lively debate. Stand with me and I will fight for those things as well as your freedoms.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 16, 2014, 03:44:44 PM
Fellow Mideasterners,

The Assembly and gubernatorial election should be starting shortly. Regardless of political view I encourage you to be active and vote. Encourage your fellow citizens to vote as well that we may truly be a government of for and by the people of this fine region. I would like your votes as would my fellow Federalist Party slate and hifly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 19, 2014, 04:21:20 PM
The voting has ended and results for the Mideast assembly and governors race will be up soon. This looks like it could be a barnburner.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: ZuWo on January 19, 2014, 05:21:04 PM
Congratulations on winning a seat in the Mideast Assembly! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: I Will Not Be Wrong on January 19, 2014, 05:33:53 PM
Congratulations dude!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Hifly on January 19, 2014, 05:35:29 PM
Major Congratulations! It's great to have a socially conservative majority in the Mideast Assembly once again!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 19, 2014, 05:40:30 PM
Major Congratulations! It's great to have a socially conservative majority in the Mideast Assembly once again!

Thanks guys. I do want to hear ideas from the people on how we can serve your good in a better way.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on January 19, 2014, 07:34:54 PM
Congratulations JCL!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Lumine on January 19, 2014, 07:38:25 PM
Congratulations, JCL!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 20, 2014, 12:37:05 PM
Thank you fellow Mideasterners for investing your trust in me to do the business of the people of this fine region. If you have any legislative proposals you would like me to consider bringing to the Assembly just leave them here in the office.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Potus on January 20, 2014, 03:09:08 PM
Congratulations. :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 24, 2014, 03:36:07 PM
I will be issuing a statement regarding the talks of merging the Pacific and the Midwest regions into a Western super region by the end of the weekend.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 30, 2014, 05:29:49 PM
Im asking Snowstalker not to withdraw. The people need to have two ideas out there to choose from.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 31, 2014, 02:01:33 PM
I welcome RileyKeaton to the Mideast Assembly. Spiral made an excellent decision in his replacement of now senator DC.

I'm honestly not sure regarding the idea of merging the two western regions into one government. I will be watching this situation as it develops so as to ascertain my own thoughts.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 09, 2014, 02:54:55 PM
I'm not here to issue a concession just some words of wisdom to the Federalist Party. This party was founded on conservatism that can win in Atlasia. I'm not talking this moderate brand the party has been going into. We are not the Peoples Party that Duke had founded a couple years ago.  This conservatism I'm talking about is one that takes chances and doesn't care what people think. Have we sacrificed our principals just for the sake of winning? That is a sad indictment I have to make. Doesn't activity matter? ReaganFan was more active on the campaign trail and brought a better message. Duke was about a status quo and having a boring run to the Presidential election. That doesn't mean Duke isn't going to do good things by conservatives. However I have to say this. Boring is not what I came here for. I came here for lively, civil and passionate debate and the Federalist primaries have shown that that lively, civil and passionate debate of issues isn't wanted. However boring is ok. I will not accept this. The party blew it on the Presidential front massively.

With regards to the Mideast race I can't say I'm pleased. I was expecting a competitive race where I had a strong chance of winning and I was undermined. Not by my governor and should be VP candidate Spiral.  I knew he was going to appoint DC and was ok with that. Yes DC and I are closer on the political diamond scales than what Duke and I will ever be, the establishment wing chose a wrong fear instead of taking a chance that I would be true to the words I said in the convention thread. That's why I was undermined yet again. That's four times now. When will the Atlasian right that isn't moderate will be backed as loyally as we back you who are? That time should be now. Not two months from now. Now.

What is this fear that you have for not supporting conservatives for high office? Fear of losing or fear of taking chances and proposing bold steps to make Atlasia even greater. Needless to say I declaring for At-Large Senate. Conservatarian views need to be expressed in the senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 20, 2014, 11:49:51 AM
It's sad to see Tmth depart for now. He brought me into the game and as such I feel I could continue his work in the Senate. Yes we found ourselves on differing sides on occasion but a respect was always there. With this I announce my candidacy for At-Large Senate to finish his term. This does not cancel out my candidacy for a full term in its own right.

May God and Dave bless Tmth and Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 24, 2014, 07:54:39 PM
If I may, Mr. JCL, I would like to ask you a non-Atlasia related question.  That is, will we catch you on The Voice this week? :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 24, 2014, 08:05:22 PM
If I may, Mr. JCL, I would like to ask you a non-Atlasia related question.  That is, will we catch you on The Voice this week? :)

The auditions for this cycle were back over the summer. Unfortunately bad weather in my area kept me from auditioning a couple weeks ago :(


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on February 24, 2014, 08:13:45 PM
If I may, Mr. JCL, I would like to ask you a non-Atlasia related question.  That is, will we catch you on The Voice this week? :)

The auditions for this cycle were back over the summer. Unfortunately bad weather in my area kept me from auditioning a couple weeks ago :(

Aw, I'm sorry to hear that.  Hopefully next season.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 24, 2014, 08:25:18 PM
If I may, Mr. JCL, I would like to ask you a non-Atlasia related question.  That is, will we catch you on The Voice this week? :)

The auditions for this cycle were back over the summer. Unfortunately bad weather in my area kept me from auditioning a couple weeks ago :(

Aw, I'm sorry to hear that.  Hopefully next season.

There's also the Texaco Country Showdown as well coming up as well.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 04:15:27 PM
Wow. Looks like we've got a jungle for a special election. I know some think that I'm getting in in the special election. They would be right. I respect Simfan, Deus and the others running but it just feels like some matters of policy are being neglected. Through this quick campaign I will try to explain these points from a place of compassion towards those who don't agree. I'll be presenting my platform soon.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 27, 2014, 08:27:54 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 08:44:38 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 27, 2014, 08:52:25 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 09:23:44 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas. 

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 27, 2014, 09:26:36 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas. 

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.

1. It's not Israel's land. They stole it in 1967.

2. Why the emphasis on non-renewable resources?

3. Would you leave the poor to die on the street?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Deus Naturae on March 27, 2014, 09:40:49 PM
Do we even have sanctions on Israel currently? I thought TNF introduced a bill that would do that because we didn't have them already.

Regardless, sanctions strike me as a really bad idea. Do we really expect Israeli citizens to vote for candidates that share our ideals when we're making economic life much harder in their country? If anything, sanctions would isolate and further the persecution complex of the Israeli government, which would make them even more likely to undertake aggressive actions against Palestinians.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 09:46:12 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas. 

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.

1. It's not Israel's land. They stole it in 1967.

2. Why the emphasis on non-renewable resources?

3. Would you leave the poor to die on the street?

1. No they won it in a just war. The Arab countries attacked them because the Arabs wanted to in the words of Fmr. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "Drive them into the sea" and the Arab nations got soundly beaten. Call it spoils of war or divine mandate but Israel is the legal and rightful sovereign of that land. They are not an illegal occupier.

2. That's what our European friends need. If we're gonna not gonna use it shouldn't we sale it to those who would while we retain rights on the land.

3. The poor wouldn't be left to die. Private medical savings accounts would come into play in matters of healthcare.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 09:52:23 PM
Do we even have sanctions on Israel currently? I thought TNF introduced a bill that would do that because we didn't have them already.

Regardless, sanctions strike me as a really bad idea. Do we really expect Israeli citizens to vote for candidates that share our ideals when we're making economic life much harder in their country? If anything, sanctions would isolate and further the persecution complex of the Israeli government, which would make them even more likely to undertake aggressive actions against Palestinians.

There is a serious anti-Israel/pro-Palestinian lobby in the Atlasian left. Iirc they put sanctions regarding defense tech.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 09:59:04 PM
What policy implications do you infer from Ezekiel 23?

Why are you ignoring the tough questions?

Ezekiel 23? I thought the left was criticizing my view of the flat tax from Exodus 23. I firmly agree with the secular reasons brought up by libertarian and conservative  economists.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 27, 2014, 10:31:58 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas. 

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.

1. It's not Israel's land. They stole it in 1967.

2. Why the emphasis on non-renewable resources?

3. Would you leave the poor to die on the street?

1. No they won it in a just war. The Arab countries attacked them because the Arabs wanted to in the words of Fmr. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "Drive them into the sea" and the Arab nations got soundly beaten. Call it spoils of war or divine mandate but Israel is the legal and rightful sovereign of that land. They are not an illegal occupier.

2. That's what our European friends need. If we're gonna not gonna use it shouldn't we sale it to those who would while we retain rights on the land.

3. The poor wouldn't be left to die. Private medical savings accounts would come into play in matters of healthcare.

1. Israel struck first in the Six Day War (assuming that is the war we're discussing). The spoils of war is a 19th-century idea for a 21st-century world based on fairness and equity, not conquest.

2. How do you know what they want? Are they shunning Atlasian wind and solar?

3. What if private insurance and MSAs aren't enough, as they have proven not to be in that weird alternate universe I visited once (you might like it, it's relatively right-wing).

And we are criticizing your Exodus 23 thing. We also want to know what policies you might support because of Ezekiel 23.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 27, 2014, 11:43:41 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas. 

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.

1. It's not Israel's land. They stole it in 1967.

2. Why the emphasis on non-renewable resources?

3. Would you leave the poor to die on the street?

1. No they won it in a just war. The Arab countries attacked them because the Arabs wanted to in the words of Fmr. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "Drive them into the sea" and the Arab nations got soundly beaten. Call it spoils of war or divine mandate but Israel is the legal and rightful sovereign of that land. They are not an illegal occupier.

2. That's what our European friends need. If we're gonna not gonna use it shouldn't we sale it to those who would while we retain rights on the land.

3. The poor wouldn't be left to die. Private medical savings accounts would come into play in matters of healthcare.

1. Israel struck first in the Six Day War (assuming that is the war we're discussing). The spoils of war is a 19th-century idea for a 21st-century world based on fairness and equity, not conquest.

2. How do you know what they want? Are they shunning Atlasian wind and solar?

3. What if private insurance and MSAs aren't enough, as they have proven not to be in that weird alternate universe I visited once (you might like it, it's relatively right-wing).

And we are criticizing your Exodus 23 thing. We also want to know what policies you might support because of Ezekiel 23.

1.  Israel believed they were under severe threat of attack. (Arabs were mounting on all sides)

2. I honestly don't know how Atlasian wind power could help Europe. Solar can because haven't we gave them many of our ideas regarding solar panel technology. I'm not shunning them

3. I didn't say my ideas are perfect but the current format is tantamount to socialized medicine and that simply is immoral.

Ezekiel 23, it's a parable useful for individual and national morality. However I have no policy ideas that are inspired from this passage of scripture.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 28, 2014, 01:22:59 PM
Don't forget to get out and vote. I'm a write in candidate in the At-Large so if you are ok with some of my views I need your support.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 28, 2014, 02:31:37 PM
What policies do you think are neglected? Banning homosexuality and instituting a flat tax because Exodus said so?

Ending Atlasian sanctions against Israel and utilizing our vast energy supply to wean Europe off Russia and us off the Middle East.

I don't want to ban homosexuality. Just "gay marriage". On tax policy you need to look at what I've proposed a little bit further. My Detroit Plan is a flattened version of the Clinton era Tax rates.

Israel deserves to be sanctioned at least a little bit for their occupation of Palestine. And what energy would you use to gain energy independence? Oil and natural gas or wind and solar or both? And why would you ban gay civil unions (we abolished government recognition of marriage a while ago) for a non-religious reason (remember, we don't do things based on religion here)? And what programs would you cut to make up for the revenue decrease your tax plan would bring?

It's Israel's land. The Palestinians need to assimilate. Read the book The Israeli Solution for a better understanding on how it works.  My energy policy is all of the above with further emphasis on oil/natural gas.  

It's not programs that get cut it's one program. Fritzcare. The government is getting out of the healthcare business.

1. It's not Israel's land. They stole it in 1967.

2. Why the emphasis on non-renewable resources?

3. Would you leave the poor to die on the street?

1. No they won it in a just war. The Arab countries attacked them because the Arabs wanted to in the words of Fmr. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "Drive them into the sea" and the Arab nations got soundly beaten. Call it spoils of war or divine mandate but Israel is the legal and rightful sovereign of that land. They are not an illegal occupier.

2. That's what our European friends need. If we're gonna not gonna use it shouldn't we sale it to those who would while we retain rights on the land.

3. The poor wouldn't be left to die. Private medical savings accounts would come into play in matters of healthcare.

1. Israel struck first in the Six Day War (assuming that is the war we're discussing). The spoils of war is a 19th-century idea for a 21st-century world based on fairness and equity, not conquest.

2. How do you know what they want? Are they shunning Atlasian wind and solar?

3. What if private insurance and MSAs aren't enough, as they have proven not to be in that weird alternate universe I visited once (you might like it, it's relatively right-wing).

And we are criticizing your Exodus 23 thing. We also want to know what policies you might support because of Ezekiel 23.

1.  Israel believed they were under severe threat of attack. (Arabs were mounting on all sides)

2. I honestly don't know how Atlasian wind power could help Europe. Solar can because haven't we gave them many of our ideas regarding solar panel technology. I'm not shunning them

3. I didn't say my ideas are perfect but the current format is tantamount to socialized medicine and that simply is immoral.

Ezekiel 23, it's a parable useful for individual and national morality. However I have no policy ideas that are inspired from this passage of scripture.

1. That doesn't give them the right to conquer other nations' land. If Canada were making threatening moves towards Atlasia, I wouldn't support taking over British Columbia as a preemptive measure.

2. I'm not up on European-Atlasian solar ideas trade, but if we are giving them ideas, hen why don't we tell them how to wind?

3. Really? Not being able to start up a private insurance company (which I'm not even sure is part of the law) is worse than thousands of people dying for lack of medical care? And don't say that's a hypothetical, because there is proof that that would happen in a nation without universal health care.

Furthermore, are your emissions like that of a stallion?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 29, 2014, 09:13:51 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on March 29, 2014, 09:23:31 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 29, 2014, 09:34:37 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on March 29, 2014, 09:36:11 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

I... I... I can't


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 29, 2014, 09:37:11 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 29, 2014, 09:43:30 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 29, 2014, 09:46:42 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Donerail on March 29, 2014, 09:49:02 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

http://www.snopes.com/religion/lostday.asp (http://www.snopes.com/religion/lostday.asp)

()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 29, 2014, 09:56:13 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Also, JCL, you do realize that the earth rotates, causing the day, no? God would have to stop the earth in order to stop the day.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 29, 2014, 10:05:31 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 29, 2014, 10:09:21 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


I'm not equating religion with opposition to science. I'm equating stating that the sun goes around the earth (which is what agreeing with the Biblical account is tantamount to) is unscientific.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 30, 2014, 02:25:11 PM
It's late in the game folks I still need the support of Atlasian rightists. Regardless of the outcome you know it's the right thing to do.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 31, 2014, 12:18:16 PM
Congrats Deus on your Senate victory. Labor didn't steal this seat boys.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Simfan34 on March 31, 2014, 12:19:01 PM
Congrats Deus on your Senate victory. Labor didn't steal this seat boys.

?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on March 31, 2014, 12:20:37 PM
Congrats Deus on your Senate victory. Labor didn't steal this seat boys.

?

check the count.

OFFICIAL RESULTS

AT-LARGE SENATE (election to fill vacancy)

FIRST BALLOT

ALFRED F. JONES 39 (Bore, Cranberry, Jbrase, Sjoyce, YSY, Flo, Dr Cynic, Icehand Gino, Alfred, Talleyrand, Adam OABB, Adam Griffin, Sirnick, A. Belano, Badger, Ogre Mage, DemPGH, Zanas, Somebody, Njall, Sol, ilikeverin, Ebowed, Sir John Johns, Malaspina, rejectamenta, TDAS04, Bacon King, Bacon Bacon, Marokai, Antonio V, morgieb, Sibboleth, MaxQue, Peternerdman, badgate, TNF, hawkeye, Gass)

DEUS NATURAE 34 (Spiral, Maxwell, Goldwater, Deus, Sanchez, Small L, Napoleon, Peeperkorn, Cathcon, Cris, Sbane, Elections Guy, Torie, Jack Enderman, Rogue Beaver, cinyc, Rooney, Shua, PiT, dead0man, Dallas, Vosem, Mechaman, Hashemite, Nathan, ProgReal, Bgwah, Xahar, Windjammer, Rosettastoned, Tyrion, Velasco, Snowguy, Brewer)

SIMFAN 28 (Fritz, Simfan, Grumps, Hagrid, benconstine, Matt, Superique, Riley Keaton, Oakvale, Polnut, Scott, Winfield, Pingvin, Master Jedi, Inks, Oldiesfreak, Devin, Antineutrino, Simfan, Hifly, Duke, Keystone Phil, Miles, Cincinnatus, Grant, Averroes, Franzl, ZuWo)

JCL 10 (WI) (Lumine, tmthforu, Cassius, A. Kreitzer, DC al Fine, TJ in Cleve, Reaganfan, JCL, Dereich, NCYankee)

POIROT 3 (WI) (Homely, Poirot, Oak Hills)

HATMAN 1 (WI) (Hatman)

INVALID 2 (Snowstalker, Bmotley)
 


SECOND BALLOT

ALFRED F. JONES 41 (Bore, Cranberry, Jbrase, Sjoyce, YSY, Flo, Dr Cynic, Icehand Gino, Alfred, Talleyrand, Adam OABB, Adam Griffin, Sirnick, A. Belano, Badger, Ogre Mage, DemPGH, Zanas, Somebody, Njall, Sol, ilikeverin, Ebowed, Sir John Johns, Malaspina, rejectamenta, TDAS04, Bacon King, Bacon Bacon, Marokai, Antonio V, morgieb, Sibboleth, MaxQue, Peternerdman, badgate, TNF, hawkeye, Gass, Oak Hills, Hatman)

DEUS NATURAE 37 (Spiral, Maxwell, Goldwater, Deus, Sanchez, Small L, Napoleon, Peeperkorn, Cathcon, Cris, Sbane, Elections Guy, Torie, Jack Enderman, Rogue Beaver, cinyc, Rooney, Shua, PiT, dead0man, Dallas, Vosem, Mechaman, Hashemite, Nathan, ProgReal, Bgwah, Xahar, Windjammer, Rosettastoned, Tyrion, Velasco, Snowguy, Brewer, A. Kreitzer, JCL, Poirot)

SIMFAN 37 (Fritz, Simfan, Grumps, Hagrid, benconstine, Matt, Superique, Riley Keaton, Oakvale, Polnut, Scott, Winfield, Pingvin, Master Jedi, Inks, Oldiesfreak, Devin, Antineutrino, Simfan, Hifly, Duke, Keystone Phil, Miles, Cincinnatus, Grant, Averroes, Franzl, ZuWo, Lumine, tmthforu, Cassius, DC al Fine, TJ in Cleve, Reaganfan, Dereich, NCYankee, Homely)

INVALID 2 (Snowstalker, Bmotley)



THIRD BALLOT

ALFRED F. JONES 56 (Bore, Cranberry, Jbrase, Sjoyce, YSY, Flo, Dr Cynic, Icehand Gino, Alfred, Talleyrand, Adam OABB, Adam Griffin, Sirnick, A. Belano, Badger, Ogre Mage, DemPGH, Zanas, Somebody, Njall, Sol, ilikeverin, Ebowed, Sir John Johns, Malaspina, rejectamenta, TDAS04, Bacon King, Bacon Bacon, Marokai, Antonio V, morgieb, Sibboleth, MaxQue, Peternerdman, badgate, TNF, hawkeye, Gass, Oak Hills, Hatman, Fritz, Grumps, benconstine, Matt, Superique, Oakvale, Polnut, Scott, A Person, Hifly, Duke, Averroes, Franzl, Homely, Lumine)

DEUS NATURAE 55 (Spiral, Maxwell, Goldwater, Deus, Sanchez, Small L, Napoleon, Peeperkorn, Cathcon, Cris, Sbane, Elections Guy, Torie, Jack Enderman, Rogue Beaver, cinyc, Rooney, Shua, PiT, dead0man, Dallas, Vosem, Mechaman, Hashemite, Nathan, ProgReal, Bgwah, Xahar, Windjammer, Rosettastoned, Tyrion, Velasco, Snowguy, Brewer, A. Kreitzer, JCL, Poirot, Hagrid, Riley Keaton, Winfield, Pingvin, Master Jedi, Inks, Oldiesfreak, Antineutrino, Miles, Cincinnatus, Grant, ZuWo, tmthforu, Cassius, DC al Fine, TJ in Cleve, Dereich, NCYankee)

EXHAUSTED 4 (Reaganfan, Simfan, Keystone Phil, Devin)

INVALID 2 (Snowstalker, Bmotley)



ALFRED F. JONES is elected At-Large Senator.

There was a total turnout of 117 votes, with 2 ballot papers being rejected.

I, Homelycooking, Secretary of Federal Elections, declare the above results to be a complete and accurate summary of the votes cast.

()

Jbrase voted for Deus, not Alfred.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Simfan34 on March 31, 2014, 12:21:26 PM
Yikes, this is confusing.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 31, 2014, 12:22:30 PM
JBrase voted for Deus and that puts Deus into the senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on March 31, 2014, 09:47:55 PM
JBrase voted for Deus and that puts Deus into the senate.

The official count has Jbrase voting for Deus and me winning. Next.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on March 31, 2014, 10:48:32 PM
Its amazing how JCL is trying to mask the crazy delusions of his ideology by being crazy and delusional about everything else. I'm not sure it will work.

I think it's just stupidity, not some intentional plot.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: President Tyrion on April 01, 2014, 12:29:41 AM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


I'm not equating religion with opposition to science. I'm equating stating that the sun goes around the earth (which is what agreeing with the Biblical account is tantamount to) is unscientific.

Can we get a response to this?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on June 06, 2014, 02:57:07 PM
Just because I'm not running this time around doesn't mean I'm taking a total vacation from Atlasian politics. I urge the Federalists to field a presidential ticket.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 11, 2014, 10:28:02 AM
Now that the musical shenanigans are done for now it's time for Atlasian ones.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 11, 2014, 02:38:56 PM
JCL policy point:

The Demilitarization Act is a unmitigated hindrance towards the recruitment process into our fine and noble armed forces. The President for, whatever reason I do not know, wants to hinder some of our brightest and best young people into service of our noble country. I urge our senators to strongly oppose this proposal by the President.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: 🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸 on July 11, 2014, 04:30:11 PM
You have a geologist friend?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 11, 2014, 04:57:36 PM

Who happens to be a girl. *waiting for the shock in the comfort of his home like when his Facebook went nuts last nite.

To further clarify I am dating this geologist in question. Yes folks JCL has a girlfriend.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on July 13, 2014, 01:06:18 PM
How old does she think the earth is?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 13, 2014, 03:35:21 PM

She's an old earth creationist.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 22, 2014, 03:55:06 PM
Denver, CO


It's that time folks. My rl summer vacation is over and that means it's time to focus more on dealing with the matters of the Atlasian body politick.

Our condolences go to those who lost their lives, their families and close friends in the recent attack in the Ukraine. I strongly urge Russian President Putin and the Ukrainian government to come to the table and discuss a peace settlement. We have a potential breach of the treaty we all signed in 1994 and it must be addressed with all due haste.

This is a subject I don't usually talk about but I can not ignore it. That would be the subject of game reform. Many of us have been trying to find something that would enhance the game experience to all of us from the most seasoned politico to the everyday citizen. I am lending my support to Duke's proposal of bicameral reform. While we need strong regions, we also need a strong but limited national governmental structure. That's why I'm supporting the plan.

We have something good. Let's make it better

Thank you


Title: Re: The Office of JCL-Special Election
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 28, 2014, 08:53:29 PM
Houston TX

Thank you Texas for that fine welcome. That BBQ is something fierce. I'm down here not only as a candidate in two upcoming senatorial races but as an advocate for reform. The honorable former president Duke has a dream of a bicameral legislative system that if done right will improve activity and encourage competition for elective office.

Many still view some of the policies I advocate as out of the typical mainstream and are cautious if lending their support towards being a senator. Needless to say I do have some cross partisan credibility. I've worked cross party lines towards protecting our kids and lending our aid to victims of human trafficking.

With that said there are other issues I must take a stand on. The recent End Mcarthyism Once and For All Act of 2014 is well intentioned to respect civil liberties but shouldn't our government still retain the right to deport foreign nationals formenting terrorism or violance against Atlasian interests. That's why I'll support the act if Lumine's amendment passes. Otherwise I must oppose.

If elected, I'll be as active as RL considerations allow and fight alongside VP Windjammer for religious freedom regardless where I may elsewhere have to oppose.

Thanks and may God and Dave Save Atlasia and all who defend her


Title: Re: The Office of JCL-Pending Special Election for At-Large Senate
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 30, 2014, 12:30:53 AM
I will have an announcement regarding this race around 12 noon Indiana time today.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: windjammer on July 30, 2014, 07:12:58 AM
Good luck JCL. We don't agree on a lot of things (except on religious freedom), but I know you would be an active senator.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 31, 2014, 02:06:19 PM
I reject Riley's appointment of Cassius to the Senate. I also hereby reject any and all offers of appointment to the Mideast Assembly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: GAworth on July 31, 2014, 02:31:00 PM
I reject Riley's appointment of Cassius to the Senate. I also hereby reject any and all offers of appointment to the Mideast Assembly.
I promise i'm not trying to start anything, but you just went to court asking for the election of Franzl to be overturned, and you take his place as the elected member, are wanting to only serve if you are "democratically" elected? It certainly looks like you want to be in the Assembly. Sorry just puzzled as the position you are taking.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on July 31, 2014, 02:34:46 PM
I reject Riley's appointment of Cassius to the Senate. I also hereby reject any and all offers of appointment to the Mideast Assembly.
I promise i'm not trying to start anything, but you just went to court asking for the election of Franzl to be overturned, and you take his place as the elected member, are wanting to only serve if you are "democratically" elected? It certainly looks like you want to be in the Assembly. Sorry just puzzled as the position you are taking.

Inks will be in Franzi's place. I'm not seeking the assembly. I'm seeking the senate in light of DC's resignation and am running in the Special Election this weekend.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: GAworth on July 31, 2014, 03:58:01 PM
I reject Riley's appointment of Cassius to the Senate. I also hereby reject any and all offers of appointment to the Mideast Assembly.
I promise i'm not trying to start anything, but you just went to court asking for the election of Franzl to be overturned, and you take his place as the elected member, are wanting to only serve if you are "democratically" elected? It certainly looks like you want to be in the Assembly. Sorry just puzzled as the position you are taking.

Inks will be in Franzi's place. I'm not seeking the assembly. I'm seeking the senate in light of DC's resignation and am running in the Special Election this weekend.
My mistake, I got the two of you mixed up.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 01, 2014, 10:48:02 AM
It's election time. Help me correct Gov? Riley's mistake by electing me to the Senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Potus on August 01, 2014, 01:19:03 PM
It's election time. Help me correct Gov? Riley's mistake by electing me to the Senate.

Let's be very clear. You are in no way, shape, or form entitled to DC's seat. That's an absurd assumption and it's something I never offered or promised to you. That was never something you approached me about before I appointed Cassius and something you have no real claim on.

This notion that you're going to try to run against me in your senate campaign is inadvisable. I like you JCL, I honestly do. However, your sense of entitlement about becoming a member of the Senate is a bit absurd and taking out your unelectability on me gets you nowhere. Stop making this into a big deal when it doesn't have to be, and stop acting like you're entitled to a Senate seat.

I'm more than happy to appoint you to a vacancy in the Assembly should one arise. I suspect your rejection of any appointment maybe waver in the coming days.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on August 01, 2014, 01:33:44 PM
This could've been handled better.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 01, 2014, 01:56:37 PM

You're right Hagrid.

It's election time. Help me correct Gov? Riley's mistake by electing me to the Senate.

Let's be very clear. You are in no way, shape, or form entitled to DC's seat. That's an absurd assumption and it's something I never offered or promised to you. That was never something you approached me about before I appointed Cassius and something you have no real claim on.

This notion that you're going to try to run against me in your senate campaign is inadvisable. I like you JCL, I honestly do. However, your sense of entitlement about becoming a member of the Senate is a bit absurd and taking out your unelectability on me gets you nowhere. Stop making this into a big deal when it doesn't have to be, and stop acting like you're entitled to a Senate seat.

I'm more than happy to appoint you to a vacancy in the Assembly should one arise. I suspect your rejection of any appointment maybe waver in the coming days.

I'm gonna be clear as well. This is not about being entitled. It's about what's best for the region. I feel like you may've miscalculated and it could hurt you legislatively. I did approach you before you appointed Cassius. I've got claim as having the second most votes in the past several Federalist regional primaries. Cassius has never ran for the senate. So simply put you've shot yourself in the foot and my rejection of appointment to the Assembly is final and absolute.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Cassius on August 01, 2014, 02:47:36 PM
To be fair, DC had no experience (I believe) running for the Senate before he was appointed to this post, yet, in my opinion, he did a rather good job, and I hope to do the same.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 01, 2014, 02:57:17 PM
To be fair, DC had no experience (I believe) running for the Senate before he was appointed to this post, yet, in my opinion, he did a rather good job, and I hope to do the same.

DC was elected. He beat me, as had Spiral and TJ before him, in a primary to win the parties nomination. Then he won the general.  This isn't personal Cassius but Riley is not acting in the regional interest and he isn't realizing that. I do hope you make a great senator however you need to build your credentials in the assembly first.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Day Two)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 01, 2014, 11:32:49 PM
We're almost to day two. I hope to see much more voting the next two days and I hope to have earned your vote. Federalists and D-R voting alliance will lead to a victory on the right. We need this in the cause of Liberty and smaller government. Some have unfortunately broken with that. We respect those who do so out of conscience but if at all possible we must stand together for victory.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 03:02:04 AM
To be fair, DC had no experience (I believe) running for the Senate before he was appointed to this post, yet, in my opinion, he did a rather good job, and I hope to do the same.

DC was elected. He beat me, as had Spiral and TJ before him, in a primary to win the parties nomination. Then he won the general.  This isn't personal Cassius but Riley is not acting in the regional interest and he isn't realizing that. I do hope you make a great senator however you need to build your credentials in the assembly first.

Who are you to tell anyone what they need to do? Cassius was appointed to the Senate and clearly is a competent candidate. There's no reason to oppose him.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 03:13:38 AM
To be fair, DC had no experience (I believe) running for the Senate before he was appointed to this post, yet, in my opinion, he did a rather good job, and I hope to do the same.

DC was elected. He beat me, as had Spiral and TJ before him, in a primary to win the parties nomination. Then he won the general.  This isn't personal Cassius but Riley is not acting in the regional interest and he isn't realizing that. I do hope you make a great senator however you need to build your credentials in the assembly first.

Who are you to tell anyone what they need to do? Cassius was appointed to the Senate and clearly is a competent candidate. There's no reason to oppose him.

I'm not opposing Cassius. I'm opposing the unconstitutional way Riley has gone about this and am trying to preserve the continuity of the assembly.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on August 02, 2014, 03:15:28 AM
... unconstitutional?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 03:18:02 AM

He tried for 24 hours to appoint Cassius without consent of the Assembly which is required by Mid-eastern law.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 04:08:15 AM
I motion the Supreme Court to block Franzi from being seated in the Mideast Assembly on grounds of unfair bias on part of the judge in Inks vs Mideast Region

Stop embarrassing yourself.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 04:31:30 AM
I motion the Supreme Court to block Franzi from being seated in the Mideast Assembly on grounds of unfair bias on part of the judge in Inks vs Mideast Region

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Inks beat you fair and square. The courts gave you the seat inspite of the indisputable fact that those ballots were invalid.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 04:36:19 AM
I motion the Supreme Court to block Franzi from being seated in the Mideast Assembly on grounds of unfair bias on part of the judge in Inks vs Mideast Region

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Inks beat you fair and square. The courts gave you the seat inspite of the indisputable fact that those ballots were invalid.

The Court disagreed with your "indisputable" facts. I think you'll find that the plaintiff, an infinitely more honorable man than yourself, is not disputing that the Court reached its conclusion in good faith after having reviewed both sides' arguments. Just as I would have if the Court had found differently.

Feel free to throw a temper tantrum but don't expect it to earn you anything but ridicule.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 04:48:29 AM
I motion the Supreme Court to block Franzi from being seated in the Mideast Assembly on grounds of unfair bias on part of the judge in Inks vs Mideast Region

Stop embarrassing yourself.

Inks beat you fair and square. The courts gave you the seat inspite of the indisputable fact that those ballots were invalid.

The Court disagreed with your "indisputable" facts. I think you'll find that the plaintiff, an infinitely more honorable man than yourself, is not disputing that the Court reached its conclusion in good faith after having reviewed both sides' arguments. Just as I would have if the Court had found differently.

Feel free to throw a temper tantrum but don't expect it to earn you anything but ridicule.

I don't believe the court reached their decision in good faith. That's what I've been trying to say. If Inks doesn't want to appeal then I will. I'm used to ridicule.  If the supremes refuse to hear me then I hope you're prepared to be the only member of the assembly for most of the term.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 04:55:57 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 04:57:53 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Blatant political bias on part of the judge. Those are my grounds. How is that not hard of a concept for you to grasp.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 04:58:38 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Blatant political bias on part of the judge. Those are my grounds. How is that not hard of a concept for you to grasp.

lol


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 05:02:03 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Blatant political bias on part of the judge. Those are my grounds. How is that not hard of a concept for you to grasp.

lol

It's why when the judge was up for nomination while I was in the Assembly I voted against confirmation. Guess what? I was proven 100% correct.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 02, 2014, 05:03:43 AM
... wait... Geologist? You know, rocks? Billions of years old...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 05:06:18 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Blatant political bias on part of the judge. Those are my grounds. How is that not hard of a concept for you to grasp.

lol

It's why when the judge was up for nomination while I was in the Assembly I voted against confirmation. Guess what? I was proven 100% correct.

I think you're the only one convinced by your "proof". But by all means, continue the temper tantrum if it makes you feel better.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 05:11:36 AM
You have no grounds on which to appeal. Is that so difficult to comprehend?

Blatant political bias on part of the judge. Those are my grounds. How is that not hard of a concept for you to grasp.

lol

It's why when the judge was up for nomination while I was in the Assembly I voted against confirmation. Guess what? I was proven 100% correct.

I think you're the only one convinced by your "proof". But by all means, continue the temper tantrum if it makes you feel better.

I stood alone on that one and a lot of other things too. I've gotten used to it. The fact you refuse to stand up to the governors unconstitutional way of nearly subverting the legislative right of confirmation regarding appointees shows me you really don't merit what the court gave you. The people didn't elect you. The court gave the seat to you.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 02, 2014, 05:13:17 AM
In all honesty, I'd be a lot more worried if I had your approval.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 06:36:45 AM
In all honesty, I'd be a lot more worried if I had your approval.

It was sometime ago but we did stand on the same issue.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 07:13:25 AM
... wait... Geologist? You know, rocks? Billions of years old...

She knows rocks. She believes roughly in old earth creationism.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: TJ in Oregon on August 02, 2014, 10:39:32 AM
JCL, Franzl is right and so is Badger. The argument that we should count all votes for an undeclared candidate as invalid votes is a substantial departure from the way we have previously counted PR-STV and one not required explicitly by law. Let the ruling be. The election may not have turned out the way we wanted, but sometimes it's more important to get the rule of law right than it is to have the outcome we want in the election. It was a close election no doubt; few Mideast Assembly elections if any have had a closer count in the final round than with Franzl and Inks. Indeed, if Inks had even gotten one more Federalist transfer we would have one. But it's important to conduct fair elections, and to follow the same set of rules applying to people on both sides of the political aisle.

JCL, let it go. I know we've had worse lawsuits (anyone remember BK's saying non-Mideast residents could vote in the Mideast??) but this one is not a winner and to drag it out any longer is simply sore losership.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 02:02:20 PM
JCL, Franzl is right and so is Badger. The argument that we should count all votes for an undeclared candidate as invalid votes is a substantial departure from the way we have previously counted PR-STV and one not required explicitly by law. Let the ruling be. The election may not have turned out the way we wanted, but sometimes it's more important to get the rule of law right than it is to have the outcome we want in the election. It was a close election no doubt; few Mideast Assembly elections if any have had a closer count in the final round than with Franzl and Inks. Indeed, if Inks had even gotten one more Federalist transfer we would have one. But it's important to conduct fair elections, and to follow the same set of rules applying to people on both sides of the political aisle.

JCL, let it go. I know we've had worse lawsuits (anyone remember BK's saying non-Mideast residents could vote in the Mideast??) but this one is not a winner and to drag it out any longer is simply sore losership.

I firmly disagree with y'all on this one but I will defer to your judgement. However Riley still can't have both of his preferred choices in the senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 02, 2014, 02:33:59 PM
It's well into Day 2 of special election weekend. I hope I can count on your support to pull of the Atlasian upset of well... Forever.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 12:12:52 AM
Welcome to Day 3 of the Special election. I'll be voting later this morning and I need all the cool conservative and conservatarian kids to first preference me and second preference Spiral. I know many want to switch that and I'm ok with that concerning our D-R friends and allies. If you are a Federalist I need those first preferences to cause the greatest upset since Boston came from 3 games down to beat the Yankees and then the World Series.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LeBron on August 03, 2014, 12:47:11 AM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 12:56:36 AM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D

I was just passed over regarding the Mideast vacancy again. Governor Riley has somebody going through the confirmation process. It comes down to a couple high level party mates who ruin the fun for me sometimes. Sadly someone from my own wing refuses to nominate me.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LeBron on August 03, 2014, 01:30:12 AM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D

I was just passed over regarding the Mideast vacancy again. Governor Riley has somebody going through the confirmation process. It comes down to a couple high level party mates who ruin the fun for me sometimes. Sadly someone from my own wing refuses to nominate me.
That's terrible especially when Riley refused to endorse you over Spiral, a Democratic-Republican for the Senate race. I mean, Cassius is at least better than Spiral, but it almost seems like Riley has something against you, a fellow conservative value voice.

If he does refuse to appoint you, then you should definitely try to primary Riley out in September. He's failed to be an active Governor as he promised and took a much longer LOA than he announced (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=193927.0), good excuse or not. It's amazing he wasn't impeached and he could be a vulnerable Governor.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Franzl on August 03, 2014, 02:40:51 AM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D

I was just passed over regarding the Mideast vacancy again. Governor Riley has somebody going through the confirmation process. It comes down to a couple high level party mates who ruin the fun for me sometimes. Sadly someone from my own wing refuses to nominate me.

You act like you're entitled to a Senate seat, like it's your turn and everyone else has to recognize that.

I understand that you've experienced enough defeat that you long for political success, but don't you see something wrong with this?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LeBron on August 03, 2014, 04:02:19 AM
Franzl is correct.

Moreover, the fact that voters have repeatedly rejected your efforts to win a Senate seat is a reason not to appoint you.
If voters haven't rejected JCL in the past for Assembly, then why would Mideast voters reject JCL in October as the incumbent, appointed Senator? Face it, he's a good fit for the region now that it's more right-wing and less competitive.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 08:29:06 AM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D

I was just passed over regarding the Mideast vacancy again. Governor Riley has somebody going through the confirmation process. It comes down to a couple high level party mates who ruin the fun for me sometimes. Sadly someone from my own wing refuses to nominate me.
That's terrible especially when Riley refused to endorse you over Spiral, a Democratic-Republican for the Senate race. I mean, Cassius is at least better than Spiral, but it almost seems like Riley has something against you, a fellow conservative value voice.

If he does refuse to appoint you, then you should definitely try to primary Riley out in September. He's failed to be an active Governor as he promised and took a much longer LOA than he announced (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=193927.0), good excuse or not. It's amazing he wasn't impeached and he could be a vulnerable Governor.

I know. I'd rather have experience in the senate before I try for the governor. On that other point I considered it but have been advised against it.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 12:13:12 PM
Franzl is correct.

Moreover, the fact that voters have repeatedly rejected your efforts to win a Senate seat is a reason not to appoint you.
If voters haven't rejected JCL in the past for Assembly, then why would Mideast voters reject JCL in October as the incumbent, appointed Senator? Face it, he's a good fit for the region now that it's more right-wing and less competitive.

Winning one out of 3-5 Assembly seats doesn't have much bearing on a candidate's ability to win a region-wide election.

The Mideast is not much more conservative than it was the last time that JCL made an attempt at its Senate seat, and it's disservice to the region's citizens to presume that "right wing" entails support for brain-dead Young Earth Creationism and populist gold buggery.

My belief in Young Earth Creation is not brain-dead. It's rooted in a study and love of science. My idea on currency doesn't just use gold backing. It's a mix of the major commodities (gold, silver, platinum, oil, coal, natural gas). The current fiat system does nothing but decrease the buying power of the consumer and thus we need to reform that system.

Many on the left and some on the right think I'm not open minded at all. That couldn't be further from the truth. I wasn't always open to medical marijuana being legal but I read up on it and spoke with those who supported it and their reasons for it. If you want to know more Nix ask me in my Ask JCL thread in the religion and philosophy section.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 01:00:58 PM
You'll get a Senate seat at some point or another. I could only give you my 3rd preference in the At-Large special Senate race, but if you don't win this one, you undoubtedly will become the next Mideast Senator or win a seat in the August elections. Despite us disagreeing on a lot of issues, you definitely deserve a Senate seat after your continued optimism to go for it plus you have a better family value record than just about anybody which the Senate desperately needs.  Good luck! :D

I was just passed over regarding the Mideast vacancy again. Governor Riley has somebody going through the confirmation process. It comes down to a couple high level party mates who ruin the fun for me sometimes. Sadly someone from my own wing refuses to nominate me.

You act like you're entitled to a Senate seat, like it's your turn and everyone else has to recognize that.

I understand that you've experienced enough defeat that you long for political success, but don't you see something wrong with this?

It's not about entitlement Franzi. It's about hard working actually paying off. Nix, you are wrong on that part. I figured Riley would've recognized it the way is did but he didn't.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: At-Large Special Election Concession
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 01:43:32 PM
Unless we get more votes Spiral will be going back to the Senate. It's not a total loss he'll represent us well.  However it's simply just another minor delay in accomplishing what I've set out to do in the Atlasian game. To Federalists who went for Spiral and put me lower than the left, or not all I'd like to know why. What else do you want before you'll let me sit at the big kids table?

 I'm ready to go to Nyman now. Duke needs help in turning our national legislature into a bicameral one which would promote activity. The foreign policy needs straightened out to where we don't force our friends into taking bad treaties. The recent Middle East treaty is absolutely terribad. A two state solution will utterly fail. A one state solution will foster peace, commerce and freedom in such a war torn yet holy place. That state is Israel. Quit forcing Israel to give up land for peace. Let them settle unhindered on their own land.

This battle is over but the war for liberty is never over


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 03, 2014, 10:08:24 PM
Franzl is correct.

Moreover, the fact that voters have repeatedly rejected your efforts to win a Senate seat is a reason not to appoint you.
If voters haven't rejected JCL in the past for Assembly, then why would Mideast voters reject JCL in October as the incumbent, appointed Senator? Face it, he's a good fit for the region now that it's more right-wing and less competitive.

Winning one out of 3-5 Assembly seats doesn't have much bearing on a candidate's ability to win a region-wide election.

The Mideast is not much more conservative than it was the last time that JCL made an attempt at its Senate seat, and it's disservice to the region's citizens to presume that "right wing" entails support for brain-dead Young Earth Creationism and populist gold buggery.

My belief in Young Earth Creation is not brain-dead. It's rooted in a bible-study and love of bogus science. My idea on currency doesn't just use gold backing. It's a mix of the major commodities (gold, silver, platinum, oil, coal, natural gas). The current fiat system does nothing but decrease the buying power of the consumer and thus we need to reform that system.

Many on the left and some on the right think I'm not open minded at all. That couldn't be further from the truth. I wasn't always open to medical marijuana being legal but I read up on it and spoke with those who supported it and their reasons for it. If you want to know more Nix ask me in my Ask JCL thread in the religion and philosophy section.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 03, 2014, 10:24:09 PM
Franzl is correct.

Moreover, the fact that voters have repeatedly rejected your efforts to win a Senate seat is a reason not to appoint you.
If voters haven't rejected JCL in the past for Assembly, then why would Mideast voters reject JCL in October as the incumbent, appointed Senator? Face it, he's a good fit for the region now that it's more right-wing and less competitive.

Winning one out of 3-5 Assembly seats doesn't have much bearing on a candidate's ability to win a region-wide election.

The Mideast is not much more conservative than it was the last time that JCL made an attempt at its Senate seat, and it's disservice to the region's citizens to presume that "right wing" entails support for brain-dead Young Earth Creationism and populist gold buggery.

My belief in Young Earth Creation is not brain-dead. It's rooted in a study and love of science. My idea on currency doesn't just use gold backing. It's a mix of the major commodities (gold, silver, platinum, oil, coal, natural gas). The current fiat system does nothing but decrease the buying power of the consumer and thus we need to reform that system.

Many on the left and some on the right think I'm not open minded at all. That couldn't be further from the truth. I wasn't always open to medical marijuana being legal but I read up on it and spoke with those who supported it and their reasons for it. If you want to know more Nix ask me in my Ask JCL thread in the religion and philosophy section.

Much better.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL Pacific Tour
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 08, 2014, 12:35:01 PM
Pacific Tour Announcements:

August 8:

Afternoon- Speech/Meet and Greet at Atlasians for Prosperity event San Diego, CA
Evening- Speech/Meet and Greet with Marines at Camp Pendleton  San Diego, CA

August 9:

All Day Community Service/Meet and Greet/Youth Group Service with and at Angelus Temple/Dream Center Los Angeles, CA

August 10:

Church Services at Bethel/Jesus Culture Sacramento Sacramento, CA

August 11:

Speech/Meet and Greet at Atlasians for Prosperity events in  Phoenix, Tempe, Scottsdale,Mesa, Tuscon, AZ


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 08, 2014, 07:58:35 PM
Endorsed for a third preference.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 08, 2014, 08:34:55 PM
Endorsed for a third preference.

Any help is appreciated.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL: Townhall on Bicameral
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 12, 2014, 02:24:54 PM
Denver, CO

I'd like to take questions regarding your thoughts on the possibility of a bicameral legislative system.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 14, 2014, 10:27:03 PM
D-R Convention Speech

Thank you for inviting us to speak at your convention.

Liberty has always been at the root of how I've tried to contribute. It's been said that Victor Hugo once said No army can stop an idea whose time has come. The ideas and principals of that liberty we all seek go back further than any tyrant. The tyrant is a perverse facsimile of the upward climb towards universal freedom. Yes, I admit we differ at points on what that liberty looks like and how we should seek it. Yet it is our mutual journey.

 Those who want to centralize economic power in the hands of government beaurocrats have no idea that the more control the government and those who benefit from the current status quo the less the market can effectively grow. Friedrich Hayek in Individualism and Economic Order continues

 There is all the difference in the world between treating people equally and attempting to make them equal. While the first is the condition of a free society, the second means as De Tocqueville describes it, 'a new form of servitude.'

We have prominent citizens in the halls who are by force trying to make people equal and by thus failing to treat them equal. The perversion of nationalization of industry is on our doorstep and we need people in the senate who will not only fight it tooth and nail but promote the time tested methods of freedom to work their way into the halls of power.  We have a PPT who abhors our economic beliefs and is taking every step to hinder any hope of economic recovery by nationalizing the energy industry. Your own candidate to the senate has rightly focused on restoring the healthcare industry to the market and the demilitarization of the police. I happen to agree with him on those matters and on that I hope to build a coalition with you to gain entry to the halls of the senate and promote the ideas of liberty.

Thank you and may God and Dave save and keep Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 21, 2014, 07:28:25 PM
Tulsa OK

Thanks for the warm welcome. I'd like to talk today about two things today. Foreign Policy and Energy Policy. Because they in some ways are intermingled due to the nature of our economy. I'd like to discuss some concerns we all have and some solutions I have or support.

Energy has been a major topic in the senate of late. We have a sharp divide between those of us who believe in market based solutions and those who believe in nationalization. The recent Public Fuel and Power Act of 2014 effectively nationalizes our energy sector. The Clean Energy Act of 2014 would end our link to vital energy sources. I'm not sure what the PPT is thinking but nationalization plus cutting links to valuable resources from friends and allies is going to grind our economy to a halt. Those are the energy concerns domestically and within our sphere of influence. I counter with this. We expand our pipelines further but we as the government stay out of the way unless it's to ensure safety of the employees and the minimizing of environmental impact when possible and yes repeal all the bans on fracking. Also for those who say carbon taxes are a good thing I'd like to introduce you to a University of Stanford article that asserts that working class Atlasians would bear the brunt of the impact of carbon taxes.

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/february/kolstad-carbon-tax-022814.html

This is why we need to pull the reins in on governmental regulation not on industry.

Another issue has come to my recent attention. The Peace and Prosperity Act of 2014
 ( https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=197435.0 )

This would literally neuter the most powerful military force since the dawn of human history. Most know me as one who is reluctant in wanting to send our finest into battle. However when we must, we must give them the best equipment possible. To quote my own statement earlier regarding this bill

[bMost know me as rather dovish on foreign policy. Needless to say I must oppose this bill. Cutting defense spending by 75 percent while our enemies abroad are building up is totally not wise at all. No nation is meant to be the policemen of the world. The reality is we need a strong national defense and this bill destroys that. I urge the Senate to defeat this bill and if I come to the senate I will vote against it.
][/b]


We need to put a stop the governmental excess and I need your support to be your next Senator.

Thank you and may God and Dave save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 08:23:44 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 22, 2014, 08:27:17 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.

Sorry... this is a joke surely?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 08:48:09 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.

Sorry... this is a joke surely?

It's not a joke. I hope to work with you in the senate someday Polnut. Just because we are on opposite sides doesn't mean I don't respect you. Your record in Atlasia is something I'd aspire to even if it is from a conservatarian view.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 22, 2014, 09:13:57 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.

Sorry... this is a joke surely?

It's not a joke. I hope to work with you in the senate someday Polnut. Just because we are on opposite sides doesn't mean I don't respect you. Your record in Atlasia is something I'd aspire to even if it is from a conservatarian view.

That's very kind -what I'm perplexed about is referring to yourself as 'centre-right'...


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Enderman on August 22, 2014, 09:16:40 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.

Sorry... this is a joke surely?

It's not a joke. I hope to work with you in the senate someday Polnut. Just because we are on opposite sides doesn't mean I don't respect you. Your record in Atlasia is something I'd aspire to even if it is from a conservatarian view.

JCL, if you're a center-right, I'm a freakin Commie. :P


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 09:22:36 PM
Keep getting out the vote for your center-right candidates. Lumine, Deus and yours truly. The race is close and every vote will be needed to push us to victory.

Sorry... this is a joke surely?

It's not a joke. I hope to work with you in the senate someday Polnut. Just because we are on opposite sides doesn't mean I don't respect you. Your record in Atlasia is something I'd aspire to even if it is from a conservatarian view.

JCL, if you're a center-right, I'm a freakin Commie. :P

Not based on your PM scores. You're more socon than I but slightly to my left economically.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: President Tyrion on August 22, 2014, 10:29:19 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


I'm not equating religion with opposition to science. I'm equating stating that the sun goes around the earth (which is what agreeing with the Biblical account is tantamount to) is unscientific.

Can we get a response to this?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 10:35:52 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


I'm not equating religion with opposition to science. I'm equating stating that the sun goes around the earth (which is what agreeing with the Biblical account is tantamount to) is unscientific.

Can we get a response to this?

The Bible does not agree with the geocentric model.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 22, 2014, 10:40:13 PM
So the Universe is wrong? I thought science was based on evidence?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 10:56:17 PM
Looks like the some of the other candidates are getting into a mud fight of dirty politicking. That's sad. Can we get this back to an issues focused election. And for the love of all that is good lets be civil and have fun. Otherwise this game will be no fun and eventually go the way of the pre-flood dinosaur.

You know it was an meteorite?

That's what the evolutionist would say. I as a creationist would say that the dinos went out with Flood.

Or any other kind of scientist.

BTW, did God literally stop the sun in the sky? Because that would have no effect on the length of the day.

Yes, God literally did. The account in The Book of Joshua has been scientifically proven to have happened. NASA proved that years ago. 

Oh, right, the National Anti-Science Association. I remember that study.

Can we quit with the "calling people of faith anti-science line" please. As a kid (after I had come to faith in Jesus) I had a serious interest in several scientific realms. Meteorology and Astronomy mainly. It's part of why I hold a somewhat left-libertarian position on environmental issues.


I'm not equating religion with opposition to science. I'm equating stating that the sun goes around the earth (which is what agreeing with the Biblical account is tantamount to) is unscientific.

Can we get a response to this?

The Bible does not agree with the geocentric model.

So this is what makes you "center" right? Accepting that the Earth revolves around the Sun?

That's not what makes me center-right.


So the Universe is wrong? I thought science was based on evidence?
[/quote

The evidence points to at least an intelligent designer if not outright creationism.

Look at these articles for further details:

http://www.gotquestions.org/geocentrism-Bible.html
http://muse.tau.ac.il/museum/galileo/interpretation.html

The incident in Joshua is Biblical proof for a heliocentric view.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 22, 2014, 10:58:18 PM
There is no evidence for creation ... What's going on there is twisting evidence to suit a desired outcome, not accepting the implications of the evidence, come what may


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 11:04:11 PM
There is no evidence for creation ... What's going on there is twisting evidence to suit a desired outcome, not accepting the implications of the evidence, come what may

The flood is evidence for creation.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 22, 2014, 11:08:38 PM
There is no evidence for creation ... What's going on there is twisting evidence to suit a desired outcome, not accepting the implications of the evidence, come what may

The flood is evidence for creation.

How?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 22, 2014, 11:33:41 PM
For those who wish to continue the religious discussion I urge you to ask me those questions here.

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=194441.0

This thread is my Atlasian one


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2014, 02:08:06 PM
We have less than 10 hours to vote. This race is a really close one so those remaining conservative voters out there please get to the voting booth and vote for the upset and send me to Nyman.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 24, 2014, 03:16:27 PM
Your candidacy is looking better than I've seen it before, I think winning is possible.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2014, 03:38:02 PM
Your candidacy is looking better than I've seen it before, I think winning is possible.

I don't give up that easily.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 24, 2014, 03:42:27 PM
I have confidence and faith man. I wish I was able to do more. I hate this, I really hate being hindered like this. :(


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Cassius on August 24, 2014, 04:02:20 PM
May God grant you victory in this election JCL! Lumine too of course.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on August 24, 2014, 04:18:14 PM
Good luck, JCL!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2014, 05:26:24 PM
I have confidence and faith man. I wish I was able to do more. I hate this, I really hate being hindered like this. :(

I'm still learning the vice chair and may make mistakes but I'll do my best Yankee.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 24, 2014, 09:12:46 PM
We just have a few short and precious hours left and it's a close race. I need your support and votes for the Atlasian upset to finally happen.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Simfan34 on August 25, 2014, 01:15:19 AM
I congratulate you on what appears to be your victory. :) Good luck, and best wishes.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: GAworth on August 25, 2014, 01:17:29 AM
May you make the Senate a more interesting place. It was a pleasure running with you. Congrats.




P.S.: I look foward to the sure-to-be epic TNF v. JCL fights.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 01:19:44 AM
May you make the Senate a more interesting place. It was a pleasure running with you. Congrats.




P.S.: I look foward to the sure-to-be epic TNF v. JCL fights.

They've already begun.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on August 25, 2014, 01:21:31 AM
()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on August 25, 2014, 01:22:22 AM
In all seriousness, congrats. :) It was going to happen eventually. Now go prove everyone wrong, okay?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Dr. Cynic on August 25, 2014, 01:45:13 AM
Congratulations on the election you desired so deeply. I look forward to your and TNF's future slagging matches.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 01:53:24 AM
Congratulations on the election you desired so deeply. I look forward to your and TNF's future slagging matches.

Hopefully we can find common ground in the mist of the slag fests. Seriously.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Dr. Cynic on August 25, 2014, 02:10:38 AM
Congratulations on the election you desired so deeply. I look forward to your and TNF's future slagging matches.

Hopefully we can find common ground in the mist of the slag fests. Seriously.

In all seriousness, I wish you best of luck!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 02:16:40 AM

I think TNF needs to see that as he said:


Too late, and you're not in the Senate (and probably never will be) so you have no ability to call for a vote on the amendment.





Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on August 25, 2014, 02:17:01 AM
Congratulations, Mr. JCL, (though not too many, what with blood for the blood feud and all).


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 02:28:16 AM
Congratulations, Mr. JCL, (though not too many, what with blood for the blood feud and all).

I have no feud with you personally. We disagree politically but we can all still have fun and raise a glass sometime.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on August 25, 2014, 02:42:20 AM
Congratulations, Mr. JCL, (though not too many, what with blood for the blood feud and all).

I have no feud with you personally. We disagree politically but we can all still have fun and raise a glass sometime.

Personal violence is how I have fun with people, Johnny, and we can't have a Burr-Hamilton duel without Hamilton.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 02:48:12 AM
Congratulations, Mr. JCL, (though not too many, what with blood for the blood feud and all).

I have no feud with you personally. We disagree politically but we can all still have fun and raise a glass sometime.

Personal violence is how I have fun with people, Johnny, and we can't have a Burr-Hamilton duel without Hamilton.

Hamilton and Libertas would have serious problems as Libertas would've opposed a centralized banking structure.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Senator Cris on August 25, 2014, 02:55:28 AM
That's great news! Congratulations Senator JCL! After great efforts, you are in the Senate! :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 03:02:55 AM
That's great news! Congratulations Senator JCL! After great efforts, you are in the Senate! :D

The last few hours of the race looked hairy for both Lumine and I.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 25, 2014, 03:06:43 AM
Congratulations, I doubt we'll find too much common ground but shall be entertaining


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 03:08:37 AM
Congratulations, I doubt we'll find too much common ground but shall be entertaining

Remember our conversation regarding Alzheimer's.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: LeBron on August 25, 2014, 03:24:08 AM
Congrats JCL! Even though we disagree on a lot especially gay rights, a Senate with a Tea Partier who supports Christian family values is cool with me. You've definitely earned that Senate seat. Good luck! :D


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on August 25, 2014, 06:06:07 AM
Congrats JCL! Even though we disagree on a lot especially gay rights, a Senate with a Tea Partier who supports Christian family values is cool with me. You've definitely earned that Senate seat. Good luck! :D

...you're an odd bird.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Hifly on August 25, 2014, 10:06:35 AM
Congratulations! I'm happy you made it to the senate and you'll do an excellent job :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on August 25, 2014, 10:10:51 AM
Happy Birthday!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on August 25, 2014, 11:00:52 AM
Happy birthday and congratulations on becoming a Senator! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 11:23:28 AM

My birthday is in January.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on August 25, 2014, 11:30:44 AM

()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Deus Naturae on August 25, 2014, 11:36:25 AM
Congrats on your election man! Truly you have earned it.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on August 25, 2014, 11:39:37 AM

Happy early birthday


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 11:44:02 AM
Congrats on your election man! Truly you have earned it.

You did too.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on August 25, 2014, 12:15:23 PM
()


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 01:15:58 PM

Indeed it is.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Pingvin on August 25, 2014, 01:49:59 PM
Congratulations on a long awaited victory.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on August 25, 2014, 02:39:33 PM

I took tmthforu94's word for it. Well, happy birthday several months in advance. :P


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 03:49:04 PM

I took tmthforu94's word for it. Well, happy birthday several months in advance. :P

Now for epic showdowns with TNF


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 25, 2014, 04:30:07 PM
This Senate is going to be the best in years and it will be a miracle if I even get to see the first week.

Anyway, congratulations. SPC tried nine times before he finally made it. I knew you would eventually too. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: tmthforu94 on August 25, 2014, 10:20:39 PM
Sorry, I was spaced out when I posted that.

Congratulations! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 10:22:35 PM
Sorry, I was spaced out when I posted that.

Congratulations! :)

No biggie. Getting ready to go back to class are ya?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on August 25, 2014, 11:45:34 PM
     Glad to see you finally make it to the Senate. You can give them a slight respite from the waves of far-left nuttery.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 25, 2014, 11:51:25 PM
     Glad to see you finally make it to the Senate. You can give them a slight respite from the waves of far-left nuttery.

With some small l libertarian shenanigans


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Victory)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 27, 2014, 09:54:48 PM
Lucas Oil Stadium, Indianapolis, IN, ME

The impossible occurring seems to be a running meme lately. Some even thought my repeated attempts to join the honorable Atlasian Senate as such a meme. Memes have a limited short life and can only end with two possible outcomes. One of surrender and deregistering. The other which has now occurred. I will not continue this portion with a recent statement I made quoting Victor Hugo. Instead I'd like to thank each and every one of you.

Regardless of which side you are on, we are hopefully on the verge of new era in Atlasian politics. Are there gonna be knock down drag out fragfests over the role and scope of the national government? Without a doubt. To my fellow senators, even in the mist of those fragfests, let's seek to find common ground. What that means is even TNF and I will have to find that common ground however unlikely that may seem.

I am going to walk in to the Senate running. There are issues that have come to my attention that are out of balance. There are those who think it's ok to not wanna use our energy reserves in the name of environmental protection. Those alternative technologies are not ready in a massive enough way to end our dependence of fossil fuels. What about promoting natural gas as fuel for our vehicles?

In a recent look at Atlasian statutory law I discovered a serious imbalance. This government favors certain lobbies to the detriment of all Atlasians. Hence the Taft-Hartley act was repealed. We were sorely mistaken for doing so. I get that many think the current Atlasian balance between labor and management is preferable. Many of us disagree and our voices were unfairly ignored during the process. So were going to have a fair and civilized debate and examining restoring Taft-Hartley.

That's just the first couple things I have to plan on spurring debate regarding. As other issues come along I will consider them.

Thank you and May God and Dave save Atlasia



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Badger on August 29, 2014, 06:27:26 PM
     Glad to see you finally make it to the Senate. You can give them a slight respite from the waves of far-left nuttery.

With waves of far-right nuttery. Oh joy.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on August 29, 2014, 08:04:16 PM
     Glad to see you finally make it to the Senate. You can give them a slight respite from the waves of far-left nuttery.

With waves of far-right nuttery. Oh joy.

Prepare to be disappointed on that account.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on October 06, 2014, 01:00:41 PM
From the Office of Senator JCL

I must express my serious disappointment with the senate for voting against the Captial Freedom Act. The idea of the act was to undo the recent anti-economic freedom acts by the previous senate and administration. Taft-Hartley provides a proper balance between the interests of labor and captial. The current arrangement is untenable and must be changed and I will not stop until Taft Hartley is reinstated.

The recent unrest has divided even the senate. While I agree we need serious changes to the national government, we must uphold the rule of law in these chaotic times. While I think Tryion should not have been confirmed, he is President. DemPgh took the way of the coward out of office. First by sacking SirNick for purely political reasons but resigning rather than face the senate for his actions. Let's get ourselves back to civil discussion of the issues.

Thank you and may God Save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on November 15, 2014, 03:10:19 PM
This weekend we have a special election for the seat vacated by now President Lumine. Vote your conscience. As for myself I'm voting for Cris.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (re-election campaign and thoughts on the Civil Rights Ac)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 02, 2014, 11:00:57 PM
 Dallas, Texas

The past few months have been eventful for our nation. Some civil unrest, the election of a new president, my region being represented by a Labor senator for the first time in quite a while.  Atlasia has changed some. As such we need stability and that is why I'm running for re-election.

I'm concerned however for your right to speak out on cultural issues. There is a bill being discussed in the senate right now that could very well take those rights away. The Civil Rights Act of 2014. If passed it would outlaw simple speech like pastors and religious leaders teaching publicly what their faiths teach regarding sensitive moral issues. Pro-life activists would not be allowed a voice because the law would allow late term abortions on demand and arrest and suppress the rights of pro-life Atlasians and Atlasians of faith like myself and many of you who speak out against such practices. This bill would outlaw speech in churches and houses of worship that calls certain lifestyle choices as contrary to their teachings. Meaning pastors and layleaders could be arrested for speaking on behalf of the traditional family. Atlasia was founded on the principle that all have a voice. This law would eliminate that. Even for those we disagree with. That's why I need to stay in the senate. To protect the voice of all Atlasians regardless of race, creed,  national origin, gender, religious belief, or sexual preference.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on December 02, 2014, 11:02:54 PM
You have my endorsement for re-election in the next At-Large Senate election, and I fully support your effort to take down the so-called ''Civil Rights Act of 2014''.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 14, 2014, 02:24:43 PM
My apologies everyone. RL got really busy and I had to address those issues. Now that a good chunk has been dealt with I urge those of you who haven't voted to get out and vote.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on December 14, 2014, 04:30:52 PM
Your numbers are starting to look better JCL. Good luck!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 14, 2014, 04:42:36 PM
Your numbers are starting to look better JCL. Good luck!

RL had me running like crazy the past few days. Wish we both could get in.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Senator Cris on December 15, 2014, 09:13:10 AM
Thanks for your service, Senator.
I hope that you will run for an office soon.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Lumine on December 16, 2014, 12:39:15 AM
I echo Cris's comments, I hope to see you back in office soon!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 25, 2014, 11:29:01 PM
Hope you've all enjoyed the holidays with those you love most.

Though I'll be leaving the Senate, don't think I'll be gone long. I'm gonna take my yearly vacation to Kansas City with the gf and rest, relax and reflect. I have a few projects I could implement. A gauntlet or two has been thrown in my direction. Don't think I've ignored that challenge. Individuals have decided to challenge conservative Atlasians to step up their organizational game. Challenge is healthy and needed to make this game much better and more enjoyable. Announcements regarding these plans will come upon the New Year.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Coolidge Society and Mideast Assembly Run)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 09, 2015, 12:39:25 AM
Now that I've returned from the yearly trip to KC, it's time to get back to business.

The Coolidge Society

I'd like to announce the formation of a new conservative/conservatarian think tank to discuss ways of expanding our influence in Atlasia. In honor of a notable conservative in Atlasian history I've named this organization after Calvin Coolidge. If you value fiscal restraint, value all human life (from conception to natural death) a loosening of regulations on all socioeconomic classes, and a more influential role in world affairs(while honoring our tradition of reluctance in using military force) come and join us.

Mideast Assembly

I'm glad to see my mentor, Tmth, in Atlasian politics return to the governor's mansion here in the Mideast region. As such I'm seeking to return to that fine body to aid this reform minded agenda while still keeping feet to the fire.



Title: Re: The Office of JCL (Mideast Townhall)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 10, 2015, 09:26:23 PM
I'm ready and open for questions from the Mideast citizens I seek to serve once again. I will also issue a statement regarding the recent terrorist attacks in Paris.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Flake on January 10, 2015, 09:33:55 PM
Will you be running for Senate in February?


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 10, 2015, 09:36:42 PM
Will you be running for Senate in February?

I have not made any decisions regarding that at this time.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Unconditional Surrender Truman on January 10, 2015, 11:40:36 PM
What would your legislative priorities be if you are elected to the Assembly? In particular, how do you feel about the proposals to expand high-speed rail and subsidize charter schools?

Harry S Truman
Editor, Mideast Record-Courier


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 11, 2015, 12:41:57 AM
What would your legislative priorities be if you are elected to the Assembly? In particular, how do you feel about the proposals to expand high-speed rail and subsidize charter schools?

Harry S Truman
Editor, Mideast Record-Courier

I was the sponsor of a high speed rail law in a previous term as an assemblyman. I've always supported the idea of a rail system that could be both high speed and with minimal environmental impact. When it comes to schools I've always had the view of an all of the above approach. Our public schools need healthy competition and I would have to look at the bill carefully before making any decision regarding any sort of subsidies.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on January 11, 2015, 02:17:23 PM
I'm not from the Mideast, but you have my endorsement regardless.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on January 27, 2015, 10:53:41 PM
Response to threats against Senator TNF and the Civil Rights Act

I quite frankly don't care if you're of the right or the left but a threat against the life of one public servant is one against all of us who serve the public trust. You are only hurting your own cause for or against. Let the legislative process and the peaceful assemblies for and against go as they organically will or the force of the law will be levied against you heavily.

While I was in the Senate I argued in opposition to much of the act as being a credible threat to religious liberty and the pro-life movement in Atlasia. My concerns were summarily disregarded by many of my former colleagues. If you think my opposition to free contraception was on religious grounds, you would be wrong. It was on fiscal reasons. Contraception is an individual decision of conscience between you, your spouse, and whatever faith tradition you subscribe to or none at all. Governmental intervention in such a personal matter is unwise use of the taxpayer dollars. I understand many think governmental intervention is a good thing in this intimate matter. My concern is that this could lead to more authoritarian measures in the long run may mirror other nations with draconian family planning laws.

Ending discrimination against the GLBT community is a rather tricky subject. While I'm personally against gay marriage on grounds of my faith, it's basically law in Atlasia. There is growing concern that the Civil Rights Act will force faith based schools to compromise their core beliefs for the sake of compliance with a law that they oppose because of those beliefs. Gender neutral bathrooms are a security risk towards our kids and women by reason of those who would mask themselves as cross-dressers and take advantage of a vulnerable situation. Take out sections 3 and 4 along with clauses 1 and 9 of Section 2 and I would urge my supporters to support the Act. Otherwise my opposition must stand.

May God and Dave save and keep Atlasia



Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 12, 2015, 11:08:06 PM

From the Federalist Convention

Fellow Federalists, Mr. President and Mr. Chairman

We as a party are at a crossroads. My colleagues have echoed some serious concerns as to the survival of not just the party but of a center-right, libertarian, and centrist bulwark against the dominance of the Atlasian left.

Wether you're part of the Mainstreet Partnership or the Coolidge Society we all have a shared view on the role of government in the every day lives of fellow Atlasians we rub shoulders with. Fiscal conservatism, Regional rights and an active place in the game for foreign policy. We may quibble on an issue or two but we need to stand together. If we don't, the radical agenda that TNF and his wing of Labor will continue to get cart blanche in government and that is a potentially dangerous if not outright dangerous to the liberties we hold dear.

I respect our D-R friends and their desire for a successful ticket. However not having a Federalist running for President or VP shows serious weakness and I can not accept that in good conscience. So I'm here to announce my candidacy for President of Atlasia. In a show of unity in the party I'd like the party itself to nominate my running mate.

I commend Bore and BK on their service to Atlasia. They are fine public servants and have earned the acclaim and respect they are rightfully due. Needless to say I disagree with many of their policy views and as such we should discuss our ideas publicly and with great civility.

May God and Dave save and bless Atlasia


As I've offically announced my candidacy for President I'm seeking a complimentary running mate. Anyone of center-right persuasion is welcome to apply. Just PM me and we'll talk and see if we could work well together.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Prince of Salem on February 12, 2015, 11:11:39 PM
As I've said before, you have my endorsement. Now let's get a VP!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 13, 2015, 01:00:01 PM
Seattle WA

I know many of you are still shocked at my candidacy for President. I'm doing this to give the Federalist Party and message something it needs. A shot in the arm. We need more than a couple of our members as public officials regardless if of national or regional station.

We Federalists and those of the center-right are obvious underdogs in a race like this. The left likes to pigeonhole me as this hyper religious conservative nutcase. The pick I made for running mate will make you think twice when it comes to that. This individual is a proof that I take seriously the need for freedom and the rule of law and will have serious influence on policy matters if elected. This person is one of your fellow Pacificans Federalist Pacific Chair Devin.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on February 13, 2015, 01:01:43 PM
Good luck man, though I'm not sure I like my characterization of not being center right.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on February 13, 2015, 01:10:12 PM
Good luck man, though I'm not sure I like my characterization of not being center right.

Max, I consider you part of the center-right. Our economic views are similar. Shua and I are working together on important legislation in the Mideast.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: homelycooking on February 13, 2015, 01:25:01 PM
Devin did not declare his candidacy before the deadline of midnight last night. I'm afraid that the law does not permit me to place your ticket on the ballot.

Quote
3. The candidacy declaration deadline for full tickets of a Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidate to declare shall be seven days before the earliest possible commencement of the election.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on February 13, 2015, 01:27:20 PM
So it would have to be Poirot as your runningmate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: homelycooking on February 13, 2015, 01:42:01 PM
So it would have to be Poirot as your runningmate.

JCL must first assent to having Poirot as his running mate before he can be placed on the ballot. He could also replace his running mate until Monday night if Poirot chooses to drop out of the race.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on February 13, 2015, 05:39:04 PM
I would like to hear more about your foreign policy agenda.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: SNJ1985 on February 13, 2015, 09:40:50 PM
Endorsed, as usual!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Prince of Salem on February 23, 2015, 08:04:04 PM
You ran a great campaign and, in my humble opinion, deserved better results. You're a true hero to the Federalist Party and hope you keep it up for the time to come :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MASHED POTATOES. VOTE! on February 23, 2015, 08:10:17 PM
You certainly deserved congratulations on running an energetic (despite a late entry) and civilized campaign.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL(Gun Rights, Domestic Security and, ISIS)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 12, 2015, 02:34:43 PM
My fellow Atlasians,

For next few minutes I'd like to discuss the issue of national security. This is not an easy subject to discuss in light of recent unrest both domestically and internationally. We must look at this from lens of both liberty the ensurence of domestic tranquility, the rule of law and how to reconcile all of these factors when discussing issues of security.

The role of government is to preserve and protect liberty. It's greatest role is the defense of the folks abiding by the law. First thing first is maintaining the rights of self-defense for our citizens. Thus protecting the right to keep and bear arms is priority one.
I made a mistake in supporting The Protect Us From Explosives Amendment. I will try to make right what I messed up on and propose it's repeal. I will also fight to codify protections for the possession of all non-military grade firearms and a reduction of of the waiting period to purchasing of a handgun. I would also encourage future gun owners to educate yourself of the use and maintaining of said firearms as I will avail myself in said education.  I applaud TNF for proposing The Domestic Security Act of 2014 which would proscribe chemical agents for law enforcement as well as military operators though I would be amenable to the allowance of tear gas for the police.

While we must protect the liberties of our citizens we must consider security reforms I'm unsure we have made the vital changes need to protect our infrastructure. This would include airports, city halls, bridges, roads, courthouses, and our power grid. What these changes look like must come from all sides in our body politick but the first thing must be the preservation of liberty. I plan to discuss security reforms in the Mideast region regarding our infrastructure in the coming weeks should I return to the Assembly.

This next part is gonna be the hardest. It's also one I've agonized about even in RL geopolitics. How should Atlasians and their leaders address The Islamic State (better known as ISIS). While I'm sympathetic with and would propose a declaration of war against them, they are not a recognized nation in the global community. It is absolutely clear and present to us all that they have committed atrocities against women, children,  Christians, Jews, Non-Islamic Arab religious minorities, and even Muslims because they are not Muslim enough. They burned a Jordanian pilot alive, cut the heads off of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians, trafficked women and kids into slavery both labor and sexual. They even threaten our friends and family in Europe. I wish we could turn a blind eye to all of this but we can't. The best solution at this moment is aiding our allies in the region who can prosecute action against ISIS until the legal debate over wether or not a formal declaration of war or a letter of mark and reprisal can be used.

These are not extreme or radical ideas to protect liberty and promote domestic tranquility. I'm just an assemblyman from the state of Indiana who is concerned about ensuring liberty for us and future generations of Atlasians.

Thank you and May God and Dave Save Atlasia


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Adam Griffin on March 16, 2015, 12:11:27 AM
Congratulations on a hard-fought campaign. I think you proved a lot of naysayers wrong tonight with how much party unity you were able to maintain, and despite all of the criticism, I can think of multiple strong Laborite candidates who under-performed your result tonight in comparable races.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Prince of Salem on March 16, 2015, 12:17:50 AM
You're a true loyal to our party and a man of principle, and it seems now that fellow party members have also noticed. Congratulations, for this great campaign, JCL. All of us Federalist owe you so much :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on March 16, 2015, 12:20:41 AM
     I'm proud to have voted for you, JCL. Good show out there.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on March 16, 2015, 12:23:05 AM
Congrats on putting forth such a strong effort man. :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 16, 2015, 12:30:27 AM
     I'm proud to have voted for you, JCL. Good show out there.

I'm gonna do it again soon.

Congratulations on a hard-fought campaign. I think you proved a lot of naysayers wrong tonight with how much party unity you were able to maintain, and despite all of the criticism, I can think of multiple strong Laborite candidates who under-performed your result tonight in comparable races.

You haven't heard the last of me Griff. Maybe we'll both be senators soon. In a center-right majority senate.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on March 16, 2015, 09:27:59 AM
We don't agree on much of anything politically, but congrats on an impressive performance.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Maxwell on March 16, 2015, 12:48:16 PM
I think you performed well enough JCL. Good job man!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL(Mideast Assembly Elections)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on March 19, 2015, 03:48:49 PM
It's election time in the Mideast. We are at a crossroads indeed. Do we wish to continue the leftist lean of recent months or return to conservatarian prosperity. If you wish to return to conservatarian prosperity and freedom, support Shua and myself along with the conservative write in of your choice.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on March 19, 2015, 03:53:45 PM
Endorsed for reelection! :)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Prince of Salem on March 19, 2015, 10:04:12 PM


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Boston Bread on March 22, 2015, 05:33:13 PM
Good job on getting another term in the Assembly!


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Unconditional Surrender Truman on March 22, 2015, 05:41:28 PM
While we might not agree on every issue, you've always been cordial to me and I look forward to working with you over the next two months.


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on March 22, 2015, 09:25:55 PM
Congrats on still being our only elected Federalist :D


Until PiT is declared victorious in about three more hours. ;)


Title: Re: The Office of JCL
Post by: Prince of Salem on March 22, 2015, 09:27:38 PM
Congratulations for being elected to the Assembly with the 1st place! :D