|
Title: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Tender Branson on March 27, 2012, 11:04:02 AM New Poll: Nebraska Senator by Public Policy Polling on 2012-03-25 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2012/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=31120120325108)
Summary: D: 37%, R: 54%, U: 9% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NE_032712.pdf) Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: tmthforu94 on March 27, 2012, 12:53:07 PM Why did Kerrey run?
What's sad is, this has potential to even be a bigger win for Republicans, as many still remain undecided on them, so they have room to grow. Kerrey doesn't, really. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on March 27, 2012, 12:55:36 PM Because he thought name recognition would overcome voter id in the state.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Keystone Phil on March 27, 2012, 01:59:03 PM This will be a marvelous result. Thanks for running, Bob!
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Svensson on March 27, 2012, 02:04:31 PM This is going to narrow, but there's no chance in Hell Kerrey wins, frankly.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Oakvale on March 27, 2012, 02:05:45 PM PPP point out that, hilariously, Nelson would only have trailed by 4.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: RogueBeaver on March 27, 2012, 02:10:05 PM This will be a marvelous result. Thanks for running, Bob! Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Miles on March 27, 2012, 02:18:32 PM Yikes. Pretty harsh.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: redcommander on March 27, 2012, 04:30:34 PM This will be a marvelous result. Thanks for running, Bob! Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Landslide Lyndon on March 27, 2012, 04:34:45 PM I thought Kerrey was disliked only among liberals.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Nhoj on March 27, 2012, 05:10:54 PM Im not sure why PPP decided to waste money here.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Niemeyerite on March 27, 2012, 05:17:03 PM Im not sure why PPP decided to waste money here. Democracy. People wanted to see NE polled. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Keystone Phil on March 27, 2012, 05:34:52 PM I thought Kerrey was disliked only among liberals. "Santorum - that's Latin for 'asshole.'" Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Nhoj on March 27, 2012, 05:46:53 PM Im not sure why PPP decided to waste money here. Democracy. People wanted to see NE polled. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on March 28, 2012, 01:08:22 AM Winning any statewide race in Nebraska this year is probably out of reach for any Democrat.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Small Business Owner of Any Repute on April 05, 2012, 05:37:08 PM Why did Kerrey run? Perhaps he ran knowing that he was the only Dem who had even a remote shot of holding the seat, and so he felt obligated to step in and be a good Democrat. You know, the "nice guy conspiracy" idea. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: RodPresident on April 06, 2012, 03:13:59 PM I think that was because he wanted to help Obama to get at least one electoral vote in Nebraska.
Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: rbt48 on April 18, 2012, 10:03:14 PM I think that was because he wanted to help Obama to get at least one electoral vote in Nebraska. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on April 19, 2012, 06:58:03 AM I think that was because he wanted to help Obama to get at least one electoral vote in Nebraska. Wrong. (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av8O-dN2giY6dEZjR2p4VElRZmljdGlDbkpXLTBRQmc&hl=en_US#gid=1) Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: Napoleon on April 19, 2012, 08:01:22 AM I think that was because he wanted to help Obama to get at least one electoral vote in Nebraska. Wrong. (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Av8O-dN2giY6dEZjR2p4VElRZmljdGlDbkpXLTBRQmc&hl=en_US#gid=1) He's right with his first claim, not that it will matter because that single EV would never be a deciding factor and it doesn't even offer the benefit of a House pick up downballot. Still, go Kerrey! He can break 40%. Title: Re: NE: Public Policy Polling: R+1 Post by: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on May 10, 2012, 11:28:01 PM So, it quite unlikely that Kerrey will win, but you have to give him points for having the balls to come out for gay marriage when he's running in a statewide election in Nebraska.
|