|
Title: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Miles on August 03, 2012, 09:50:54 AM New Poll: Indiana Senator by Rasmussen on 2012-8-1 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2012/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=18100201281016)
Summary: D: 42%, R: 42%, U: 16% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_senate_elections/indiana/election_2012_indiana_senate) Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Miles on August 03, 2012, 09:52:46 AM Though I'm assuming this was an online poll, they didn't disclose the survey size or MoE. I just entered in 500 LV with 4.5% (pretty universal for Rasmussen polls)...I'll go in and edit that if they release more information.
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on August 03, 2012, 09:56:29 AM The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters in the Hoosier State finds Mourdock earning 42% of the vote, while Donnelly draws support from 40%.
Okay so is Rassy's title wrong or is the text incorrect? Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Miles on August 03, 2012, 10:02:51 AM This is what its showing:
() I just looked at the headline first, where it showed them each at 42%. They did that yesterday with the NC poll. They showed Romney up 46-44 but had him actually up 49-44 in their full report. Poll edited. (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2012/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=18100201281016) Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Incipimus iterum on August 03, 2012, 11:29:13 AM interesting this race will be close
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Tender Branson on August 03, 2012, 12:54:16 PM In the Rasmussen daily email I got, it also says 42-42 tie.
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: tmthforu94 on August 03, 2012, 03:47:19 PM Lugar would have been up by 20 points...
Oh well. Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Thomas D on August 03, 2012, 06:05:08 PM Lugar would have been up by 20 points... Oh well. Yes he would have. But he's not. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! ;D Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: mondale84 on August 03, 2012, 09:01:41 PM This means Donnelly is ahead by 2-5.
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: stegosaurus on August 05, 2012, 06:40:46 PM Lugar would have been up by 20 points... Oh well. This. FML... Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: morgieb on August 08, 2012, 04:54:42 AM Indiana really needs a non-Rassy poll. Damn laws...
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on August 08, 2012, 11:33:52 AM Indiana really needs a non-Rassy poll. Damn laws... Yeah! How dare Indiana decide that not being bothered by robocalls is more important than feeding our polling data obsessions! Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: krazen1211 on August 08, 2012, 11:39:32 AM Rasmussen has been putting out a number of polls as of late that are to the left or centered on the polling average. I wonder what the heck people are complaining about.
Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: morgieb on August 08, 2012, 05:22:14 PM Rasmussen has been putting out a number of polls as of late that are to the left or centered on the polling average. I wonder what the heck people are complaining about. Personally, I feel this race needs another opinion. Title: Re: IN: Rasmussen: Still dead even between Donnelly, Mourdock Post by: Holmes on August 08, 2012, 06:53:42 PM Indiana really needs a non-Rassy poll. Damn laws... Yeah! How dare Indiana decide that not being bothered by robocalls is more important than feeding our polling data obsessions! Pretty much. |