|
Title: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: © tweed on August 10, 2012, 10:57:36 AM why did Scalia put this in here? even if 'true' in some narrow sense he had to know the word choice was inflammatory, so, was he trolling out?
Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a law-profession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: I spent the winter writing songs about getting better on August 10, 2012, 11:14:41 AM The actual decision supported by 5 of the justices had absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality, only O'Connor's could be accused of that.
Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: Supersonic on August 10, 2012, 11:19:20 AM He was trolling.
Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: Marokai Backbeat on August 11, 2012, 01:48:23 PM Because Scalia is a bad person.
Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: minionofmidas on August 11, 2012, 03:21:33 PM He was trolling. Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: Stranger in a strange land on August 11, 2012, 09:19:29 PM Scalia is an ideological right-wing activist who is incapable of judging cases on their actual constitutional merits.
Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on August 13, 2012, 01:19:01 AM Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago.
Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian. on August 13, 2012, 01:21:24 AM Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago. No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll. Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: Stranger in a strange land on August 13, 2012, 06:40:53 PM Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago. No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll. In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays. Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: minionofmidas on August 15, 2012, 02:11:29 PM Antonin Scalia (as well as Thomas) is a troll; we settled this a while ago. No no no. Thomas is a hack, Scalia is a troll. In this case at least, Thomas's opinion was directly related to what he felt to be the actual constitutional merits of the case, rather than his opinion of gays. Title: Re: "the homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v Texas Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on August 15, 2012, 03:59:32 PM Please discuss the fine distinctions between hacks and trolls elsewhere. Since there appears to be no more on-topic discussion... Locking.
|