Talk Elections

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Elections => Topic started by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 05:36:05 PM



Title: The People's Party (The People's Thread)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 05:36:05 PM
*** Please note, The Party has not be resurrected, The People have not returned to be the heroes Atlasia needs, but this thread may serve as a place to discuss The People's Plight. As the voice of The People, I have the power vested in me to call it The People's Thread. ***

()
The Mission Statement of The People's Party:
The People's Party is the party of The People. We support idea's that incorporate compromise and pragmatism. We oppose attempts by the federal government to infringe on the rights of our regions, and will be a fighter in Atlasia for regional rights.

While The People recognize the need for the federal government and applaud many of the things it is needed for: collecting taxes, bolstering infrastructure, protecting individual liberties through the courts and congress, The People first and foremost encourage regional level thinking. With strong regional governments comes a strong game with competition uniformly throughout. With more light shed on The People in the lowest level of this nation, the brighter that beacon will shine on the hill of hills. The lowly legislature election will be as contested as a senate election. Unknown Mideast Legislator can have his name in The People's Paper for writing that bill.

Friends, I am not asking you to join a party today, I am asking you to make an alliance with The People, and to know that no matter where you are now, you matter to Us. Our arms are open for you. Let's turn a new page in this game together.

Check us out at  ()/thepeoplespartytpp (http://facebook.com/thepeoplespartytpp)

If you are a member, please join this group (http://www.facebook.com/groups/230445787080540/).

Our bylaws are located here (https://www.evernote.com/shard/s4/sh/7dc1dc09-3d87-41d8-a7c7-81b67705a374/c6c05d3ebf0e67b385c471aaba509de9).

Our Founding Document is located here (https://www.evernote.com/shard/s4/sh/a2c774d4-af75-4bd7-86ab-8a72b109e167/674de8d610963bb84b03532156c6c760).

Our Members (https://www.evernote.com/shard/s4/sh/512decc8-5cd7-461e-a129-bf30c0eb2201/6626fa05358bc0b95868834d49d50f92)

The Party Members:

Total: 19
Northeast: 6
South: 3
Mideast: 7
Pacific: 3

The Caucus' Members:

Total: 6
Northeast: 1
South: 3
Mideast: 2


The People's Leaders:
Chairman: Duke
Vice Chairman: Senator Nix
Secretary: Cincinnatus

The People's Officeholders:

Federal (6)
Franzl - Senator At-Large
Nix - Northeast Senator
Ben - Mideast Senator
Oakvale - Pacific Senator
Mr. X - Senator At-large
Duke - Vice President

Regional (3)
FezzyFestoon - Northeast Legislator
Bacon King - IDS Legislator
Tallyrand - Mideast Legislator

The People's Platform:

Quote

The People's Platform

I. Economics


The main engine driving economic activity is The People, and through The People, government is derived and given its powers. Therefore, it is the government's job as an entity to protect the interests and general welfare through sound regulations to prevent rampant abuse by those who wish harm on the economy. The People recognize sound economic policies that include free trade among nations, as trade is not only important economically, but it also strengthens our foreign policy. If men were angels, we would not need government, but they are not and thus we must have a government for The People and by The People.


It is The People's job to ensure equality. We must have a progressive tax system, one that is fair and allows the government to offer services for the general welfare of The People - including transport and infrastructure and other public works, healthcare, education, and environmental protection. But when fairness is considered, we stress that those taxes must never exceed 50% on an individual's income. Further, The People recognize life is not perfect and people may hit the occasional bump in the road in life. As such, welfare must be a means of assistance to aid people through these difficult times, not a way of life. In summary, we call for an Atlasia that avoids both economic stagnation and extreme economic equality; an Atlasia that the best place in the world for someone with average talents and wealth to be born.


The People recognize businesses, large and small, are necessary in this country. Therefore, we favor a low corporate tax to encourage domestic job creation, keeping The People at work in their home country, not boosting employment numbers overseas. The People also recognize the role certainty plays in the economy. We must be in touch with our business community, large and small, by giving employers certainty when it comes to taxes and other issues that lead to layoffs and a deterioration of investor confidence. Furthermore, we recognize that so long as public services are provided transparently, equitably, and efficiently, it does not matter whether the public or private sector provides them.


In regard to investor confidence, The People recognize a portion of our country derives their income from capital gains and dividends. For the social well being of The People, The Party favors a flat 15% capital gains tax on low and middle income Atlasians, whereas the top 3% earners should pay 20%.


Finally, The People recognize the individual and the family. It is who we are. We recognize the hardships and protections employees experience in their everyday lives. The Party favors a policy of honesty and openness between both employer and employee. While we hold employment policies, including "at will" laws a regional issue, we encourage regional governments to change policies like these. They are archaic and are a tremendous disservice to the employee. They discourage honesty, openness, and job security.


II. Foreign Policy


The People are realists. We recognize that there is evil in this world, and there are groups of people whose basic interests and values conflict with our own. But dealing with this evil does not always begin with bombs and bullets. Diplomacy must be our first line of defense, and we must work to keep the lines of communication open with both our enemies and our allies. The People recognize Atlasia's position in the world. We must lead by example. However, if diplomacy does fail, and a national openly defies the wishes of the international community, The People shall not shy away from using force. Each situation must be handled in its own way.


III. Domestic Policy


Freedom of speech, religion, and love are basic freedoms all human beings must be given. The People do not wish to ever establish a national religion. Further, it is not the government's business who you love, what you do in your bedroom, or what kind of family you belong to. Therefore, we favor marriage and adoption rights for all couples, straight or same sex. The right to privacy, to organize and due process are evolutions of these principles. The People will always favor federal protection of abortion rights - as keeping abortion safe, legal and rare far outweigh the alternatives. It is a woman's decision, and her decision alone, and The People respect this fundamental right. It is the government's job to protect individual liberties from oppression by the majority.


It is The Party's firm belief that we must respond to the rapid decay of Atlasia's infrastructure. Our nation's infrastructure is vital to our economy, health, and ultimately, standard of living. The People believe in cleaner cost-effective energy, safe and reliable drinking water, public recreation for our youth, and a robust transportation system. Large investments and work projects are vital to not only sustaining, but improving living conditions for every Atlasian.


Finally, it is The People's job to protect this country from enemies both foreign and domestic. At home, the destruction of our environment is alarming and poses the greatest potential domestic threat to our homeland. To fight this, we must promote policies that encourage businesses and individuals alike to embrace a healthier and greener way of living that will benefit future generations. We firmly believe in a cap-and-trade system or carbon tax to limit harmful emissions of greenhouse gases and other pollutants. In addition, we recognize that Atlasians flora and fauna are vital to the ecosystem and culture heritage of our nation, and will work to preserve them.


IV. Regionalism


The People recognize individuals participate in both federal and regional government, and each is vitally important to the game. Regional governments are the greatest asset to this country, as they allow for new members to grow, learn and participate in the political process. This allows new members to mold into the leaders of our future. These regional governments are also the closest to The People. As such, we oppose any attempts to do away with regional senate seats.

In order to further promote regional activity, The Party favors the creation of sub-forums so each regional legislature will not feel like second class citizens confined to one or two threads to discuss an entire body of work. By doing this, it is the hope that new members will spend more time in the regional legislatures and grow that than rushing to the federal level. For the beautification of Atlasia, The People encourage relocation within the same region for the purpose of providing residents to all states in the union.


V. Game Reform


The People embrace this philosophy "it is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." The People believe this nation can do better by abandoning the tired orthodoxies and foraging for new ideas wherever they can be found. We believe regions can administer their own senate elections. We believe we can reform our amendment process. We believe we can make the VP relevant. We believe that one day, regions may be able to administer presidential elections. Most importantly, we believe we can try new things.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Mechaman on September 30, 2012, 06:03:38 PM
I join this party, whatever the hell it stands for.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on September 30, 2012, 07:51:48 PM
Looks very interesting......


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 07:57:48 PM
Our second governor has joined us! Welcome to the party all! It's an honor to have you for the ride!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:06:00 PM
I suppose at some point we need to form official bylaws and the like and decide which leadership positions we need. Unlike other parties, I don't really think we need 15 different positions. I want input from everyone. Tmth is already a great recruiter and I am sure he will work on behalf of The People regardless of title. Myself likewise.

Depending on what type of interest we get, we may look at running a candidate in the senate elections, but if we do, I want to be sure they can get elected. One of the goals of this party certainly will encourage anyone, especially new members interested in getting involved, to look to their regional legislatures as a wonderful place to start and to gain experience. That's where I and many other folks got our start. That's a bit of what to expect short term. We are only in the early hours of our existence. Input is always welcome. My door remains open. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on September 30, 2012, 08:06:33 PM
I have never been a member of the Liberal Party. I am joining The People's Party.

If we field a candidate in Senatorial elections, I would be glad to stand for The Party in that regards.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: They put it to a vote and they just kept lying on September 30, 2012, 08:07:57 PM
As I've just been elected Vice Chairman of the Whig Party, I cannot abandon my elected position, but I'd be honoured, nay PRIVILEGED to be considered as an honorary member of The People's Party.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on September 30, 2012, 08:11:44 PM
The People grow stronger with every convert.

I suppose at some point we need to form official bylaws and the like and decide which leadership positions we need.

Leadership?  The People lead us Duke.  We are at their beck and call.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:13:39 PM
I have never been a member of the Liberal Party. I am joining The People's Party.

If we field a candidate in Senatorial elections, I would be glad to stand for The Party in that regards.

Oh, you're welcome to run. The People will support you regardless of our meager numbers so far. Our goal short term will be to compete in regional elections and eventually the senate, but if anyone wants to run now, knowing the odds The Party faces given our infant status, by all means, you will have my support, and I will do all I can to help you win.

As I've just been elected Vice Chairman of the Whig Party, I cannot abandon my elected position, but I'd be honoured, nay PRIVILEGED to be considered as an honorary member of The People's Party.

As long as you hold Our message near and dear, we are honored to have you in our caucus.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on September 30, 2012, 08:14:24 PM
Yes, I imagined The People would serve as our leadership.

Must I maintain the pretense The People and the people are synonmous?

As I've just been elected Vice Chairman of the Whig Party, I cannot abandon my elected position, but I'd be honoured, nay PRIVILEGED to be considered as an honorary member of The People's Party.


Tell that to Nix!

I have never been a member of the Liberal Party. I am joining The People's Party.

If we field a candidate in Senatorial elections, I would be glad to stand for The Party in that regards.

Oh, you're welcome to run. The People will support you regardless of our meager numbers so far. Our goal short term will be to compete in regional elections and eventually the senate, but if anyone wants to run now, knowing the odds The Party faces given our infant status, by all means, you will have my support, and I will do all I can to help you win.

As I've just been elected Vice Chairman of the Whig Party, I cannot abandon my elected position, but I'd be honoured, nay PRIVILEGED to be considered as an honorary member of The People's Party.

As long as you hold Our message near and dear, we are honored to have you in our caucus.

Will do then!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on September 30, 2012, 08:15:06 PM
Happy to be here


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Oakvale on September 30, 2012, 08:16:41 PM
Checking in. Good to be on board!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2012, 08:16:50 PM
I forgive you, Duke.

It's very good to be here! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:17:04 PM
The People grow stronger with every convert.

I suppose at some point we need to form official bylaws and the like and decide which leadership positions we need.

Leadership?  The People lead us Duke.  We are at their beck and call.

You and I are aware of this, which is what I was hinting at when I said I'd prefer to keep the leadership positions lean and mean. The goal of The People is to have everyone give their input, as ideas from The People can be shared until the Ultimate Authority decides which should stand as our decision.

The People once loomed large in Atlasia. Recently Our voice has been stifled, but no more. We are a force to be reckoned with, and we will help change this game for the better!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on September 30, 2012, 08:18:10 PM
Too lazy to read anything. I'll just say that, as a proud servant of The People and one-time correspondent for The People, I'll gladly join the party of The People. I'm just too lazy to formally announce it right now.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:19:36 PM
I forgive you, Duke.

It's very good to be here! :)

Feels nice, doesn't it? From the bottom of my heart, I want to thank you. Tmth has always been one to encourage new members to join this wonderful game and has been a champion of both the regional and federal levels of government. Without his work and encouragement, this Movement would not have made it to fruition! 


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:26:11 PM
Too lazy to read anything. I'll just say that, as a proud servant of The People and one-time correspondent for The People, I'll gladly join the party of The People. I'm just too lazy to formally announce it right now.

Once you're a correspondant for Us, you're always a correspondant. Your service to our newspaper is wonderful, and it is really sad that Atlasia has lost many newspapers over the years - The NWA, The Examiner. Those were some of my favorite parts about this game that the new members don't even know about! They have no idea what they are missing!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Oakvale on September 30, 2012, 08:26:11 PM
I agree with Duke. Personally, I don't see a need for more than one elected position within the party.

Seconded - party bureaucracy tends to stifle things IMO.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:29:45 PM
I agree with Duke. Personally, I don't see a need for more than one elected position within the party.

Well, in my past experiences with parties, I have seen many of them fall victim to needless gridlock and a mixed message with no clear direction. In my former party, we had a very streamlined operation, one I have always subscribed to. But with that streamlined model comes a heavy emphasis on allowing everyone to have a say in the eventual decisions. One man will not make the decisions - that will be left to The People. However, less is more - tmth and I and many others involved in the previous era of Atlasia know that :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2012, 08:30:46 PM
As someone who has seen multiple forms of party leadership in the game, here would be my recommendation:

Have an elected Chairman, which would obviously be Duke. There would then be one or two appointed positions that the chairman makes, just to make sure everything gets done. They shouldn't be elected, just appointed. But the positions are needed, I feel, to ensure that this party is ran properly. No pointless positions though, just for the sake of having them.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:34:53 PM
Also, I would like to formally request the party's endorsement in the upcoming Northeast Regional Senate Race. I understand that it is early, but it seems that I am not the only party member who will be running.

You already have it being a member, but I can leave a note for Homely if I need to for ballot purposes.

As someone who has seen multiple forms of party leadership in the game, here would be my recommendation:

Have an elected Chairman, which would obviously be Duke. There would then be one or two appointed positions that the chairman makes, just to make sure everything gets done. They shouldn't be elected, just appointed. But the positions are needed, I feel, to ensure that this party is ran properly. No pointless positions though, just for the sake of having them.

That could work, or we could have a chair and vice chair who fills in for the chair when they are away and are needed. I would like to see you as head recruiter, but I am not sure if we should make that a position or simply something you do. I would hope all of us would recruit for our party and bring in people we feel share our message ;) but tmth has been the best I have ever seen over the years :P

What say you all? Just 2 positions? Or a chair and two appointed positions?


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자) on September 30, 2012, 08:35:32 PM
Intriguing, but I'll need to see some more flesh upon these bones than a profession of support for regional rights before I'll consider changing parties, tho I will join the caucus, since that is something of interest to me, but not my primary interest right now.

I'm working on something else, which I hope to have ready soon.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:47:42 PM
We'll be adding more flesh soon.

On second thought, I do think I favor a chairman and one of two positions that the chairman can fill on his own discretion. Vice Chairmen tends to be a useless position unless a party elects a chairman that has a tendency to disappear often. And if they do that, it's probably their own fault :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on September 30, 2012, 08:55:42 PM
Sorry, running for Governor!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 08:57:55 PM
I don't know, actually.

How about this: A chairman and a vice chair. The vice chair's duties will mostly include the get out the vote effort of the party during election time. The chairmen will preside over everything else and be entrusted to weigh the suggestions and make the final decision.

The two appointed positions seem a bit, well, vague now that I think about it. A simple chair and vice chair would suffice. I don't see a need for a whip/secretary/majority leader/etc etc ... you get the picture :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on September 30, 2012, 09:01:10 PM
While recruiting was my strength years ago, GOTV efforts have been my preferred strength as of recent. I'm a competitive person, and losing is something I deeply despise - I've never lost an election in this game, and my goal is that The People never lose an election either. Should we go with Duke's suggestion, I would appreciate the position of Vice Chairman, should The People select me.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on September 30, 2012, 09:03:53 PM
I don't know, actually.

How about this: A chairman and a vice chair. The vice chair's duties will mostly include the get out the vote effort of the party during election time. The chairmen will preside over everything else and be entrusted to weigh the suggestions and make the final decision.

The two appointed positions seem a bit, well, vague now that I think about it. A simple chair and vice chair would suffice. I don't see a need for a whip/secretary/majority leader/etc etc ... you get the picture :P

I'd rather have a Whip and a Secretary to be honest.  One to lead the GOTV effort, and the other to lead in recruitment/keep bylaw records, ect.  Obviously GOTV effort would over-lap, but it's important that efforts are dispersed. 


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 09:07:03 PM
I don't know, actually.

How about this: A chairman and a vice chair. The vice chair's duties will mostly include the get out the vote effort of the party during election time. The chairmen will preside over everything else and be entrusted to weigh the suggestions and make the final decision.

The two appointed positions seem a bit, well, vague now that I think about it. A simple chair and vice chair would suffice. I don't see a need for a whip/secretary/majority leader/etc etc ... you get the picture :P

I'd rather have a Whip and a Secretary to be honest.  One to lead the GOTV effort, and the other to lead in recruitment/keep bylaw records, ect.  Obviously GOTV effort would over-lap, but it's important that efforts are dispersed. 

The People demand no more than 3 positions. Can we make a deal and let the Vice Chair lead the GOTV, a secretary do the bylaws/wiki/etc, and the chair oversee daily operations? I want the vice chair to have more of a job than to simply be there in case the chair dies. We're all young and handsome. I doubt any of us will die anytime soon.

While recruiting was my strength years ago, GOTV efforts have been my preferred strength as of recent. I'm a competitive person, and losing is something I deeply despise - I've never lost an election in this game, and my goal is that The People never lose an election either. Should we go with Duke's suggestion, I would appreciate the position of Vice Chairman, should The People select me.

People willing, I would second your nomination as Vice Chair.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 09:08:32 PM
Duke's proposal would work for me. I'd support Tmth for vice-chair.

An appointed secretary also strikes me as a worthwhile office to establish.

I'll volunteer to contact newly registered Atlasians for the party, in either an official or unofficial capacity. I enjoy doing that, although I'm not too keen on the random-PM side of recruiting.

I think we should all be in the business of recruiting, even if some are better than others. I don't think we should make recruiter an official position really. That should be the job of our members and as a matter of Party Pride


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on September 30, 2012, 09:21:42 PM

Supported :)


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Lincoln Republican on September 30, 2012, 09:28:20 PM
I would like to maintain my independent status at this time, but I would be honored to caucus with the People's Party if that is acceptable.

Lieutenant Governor of the Northeast, Governor of the Northeast, multi term Representative of the Northeast Assembly, Speaker of the Northeast Assembly, candidate for President of Atlasia

Winfield


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 09:33:55 PM
You're certainly allowed to caucus with us. As an independent for the better part of the past year, I know how liberating it can be!



Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Oakvale on September 30, 2012, 09:38:21 PM


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Lincoln Republican on September 30, 2012, 09:48:03 PM
I would like to maintain my independent status at this time, but I would be honored to caucus with the People's Party if that is acceptable.

Lieutenant Governor of the Northeast, Governor of the Northeast, multi term Representative of the Northeast Assembly, Speaker of the Northeast Assembly, candidate for President of Atlasia

Winfield

Perhaps I should say

Lieutenant Governor for the people of the Northeast, Governor for the people of the Northeast, multi term Representative for the people of the Northeast, Speaker for the people
of the Northeast, candidate for President for the people of Atlasia  :)


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 11:46:19 PM
Duke/Cinci is always on the ballot ;)

But seriously, we have no intentions to run a ticket. We are just getting our feet wet, as it were, and running a national ticket this soon with twofour candidates already established in the race would probably be asking for trouble.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: LastVoter on September 30, 2012, 11:47:57 PM
Duke/Cinci is always on the ballot ;)

But seriously, we have no intentions to run a ticket. We are just getting our feet wet, as it were, and running a national ticket this soon with two candidates already established in the race would probably be asking for trouble.
There are four established candidates running.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on September 30, 2012, 11:49:16 PM
My point stands, even more emphatically now :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on October 01, 2012, 12:08:58 AM
You guys, instead of becoming your own party, should make Caucuses in the existing ones. For example, "Gerald" could be a Whig, but in the People's Caucus of the Party.

I wish my caucus law hadn't been repealed. >:(


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 01, 2012, 12:14:51 AM
You guys, instead of becoming your own party, should make Caucuses in the existing ones. For example, "Gerald" could be a Whig, but in the People's Caucus of the Party.

We already have friends doing that, but the RG will not recognize them. Poor Marokai.

This party aims to be run differently than any other party currently in Atlasia. If we fail, we fail, but right now I and hopefully the other new members are all in on this. I think we can make something special.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Associate Justice PiT on October 01, 2012, 12:20:53 AM
     Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 01, 2012, 12:34:21 AM
    Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on October 01, 2012, 12:58:12 AM
FORWARDS EVER, BACKWARDS NEVER!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Adam Griffin on October 01, 2012, 01:02:33 AM

Great work, but you are forgetting a very important article.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: LastVoter on October 01, 2012, 01:05:48 AM
The people?

How about the masses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blGVaUQ2bzI


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Franzl on October 01, 2012, 10:13:14 AM
I'm a proud Liberal, but I hope to maintain good relations with the PP and work together in the interests of The People!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on October 01, 2012, 10:38:20 AM

It's "The People's Party", not "People's Party".

Also, I've joined The People's Caucus!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 01, 2012, 12:45:16 PM
Welcome to all of those who have joined both The Party and The Caucus!

I think short term we need to first decide whether to let caucus members vote in our elections, and then once we decide that, we need to nominate and vote on the chair vice chair, and secretary.

I am working on an official platform which will need to be published in the coming weeks. I think one of the major goals I want to focus on early on is securing subforums for each region, for example.

As for voting, I am favoring allowing only Party members to vote, but Caucus members may voice their opinions and input as they wish. Allowing Caucus members to vote in our elections may encourage double dipping, and I don't think any party wants that.

 


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 01, 2012, 05:56:05 PM
Welcome to all of those who have joined both The Party and The Caucus!

I think short term we need to first decide whether to let caucus members vote in our elections, and then once we decide that, we need to nominate and vote on the chair vice chair, and secretary.

I am working on an official platform which will need to be published in the coming weeks. I think one of the major goals I want to focus on early on is securing subforums for each region, for example.

As for voting, I am favoring allowing only Party members to vote, but Caucus members may voice their opinions and input as they wish. Allowing Caucus members to vote in our elections may encourage double dipping, and I don't think any party wants that.

 

Perhaps 1/2 votes would suffice for caucus members that way they could be involved but still not have the same privileges as full members...... just a thought


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 01, 2012, 06:27:23 PM
Allowing caucus members to vote discourages them from actually joining our party. I oppose it.

My thoughts on this as well. While The Caucus is important, it wouldn't be right to allow people to vote in two parties (their own and Our Party).

If they want to vote with us, they need to join us!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on October 01, 2012, 07:23:53 PM
Allowing caucus members to vote discourages them from actually joining our party. I oppose it.

I share this opinion.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 10:10:35 PM
May I request a party endorsement? :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Goldwater on October 01, 2012, 10:19:11 PM

Really? Are you gonna be asking for the Whig Party's endorsement next? :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on October 01, 2012, 10:20:36 PM

Really? Are you gonna be asking for the Whig Party's endorsement next? :P

I don't know.  ZuWo asked for the Liberal Party's endorsement, right?  It never hurts to ask. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Simfan34 on October 01, 2012, 10:21:41 PM

Well, if the party endorses you, I'll retire. I'm pretty sure it's standard policy to support your party's candidate in a race. That's some cheek you have.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 01, 2012, 11:48:11 PM
()

Got a little motivated/ excited and this is what I made with it!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 01, 2012, 11:53:00 PM
Also is there a headcount of how many people are full party members vs. just caucus members?


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Adam Griffin on October 02, 2012, 12:01:59 AM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

Oh, God. Looks like I have to do that thing I promised you last night, Nix.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on October 02, 2012, 12:02:51 AM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

Oh, God. Looks like I have to do that thing I promised you last night, Nix.

Uh....


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Goldwater on October 02, 2012, 12:06:07 AM
According to my count there are ten party members (Duke, Cincinnatus, Tmth, Spamage, Nix, Simfan, Oakvale, Ben, Miles, & Cathcon) & seven caucus members (20RP12, Goldwater,
True Federalist, Mr. X, PiT, SJoyceFla, & Alfred). Interestingly, the caucus seem to fairly balanced among all parties, with two Whig members, two Liberal members, two Imperial Bloc members, & one Labor member,


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Adam Griffin on October 02, 2012, 12:07:57 AM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

Oh, God. Looks like I have to do that thing I promised you last night, Nix.

Uh....

New GriffGraph coming! :D


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 02, 2012, 12:15:32 AM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

Oh, God. Looks like I have to do that thing I promised you last night, Nix.

Uh....

New GriffGraph coming! :D

Yay! I love those!


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Adam Griffin on October 02, 2012, 01:54:52 AM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

Oh, God. Looks like I have to do that thing I promised you last night, Nix.

Uh....

New GriffGraph coming! :D

Yay! I love those!

It's up! (https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=160568.0) TPP has already done some serious damage.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 02, 2012, 02:41:33 PM
Current membership:

1. Duke
2. Cincinnatus
3. Tmth
4. Spamage
5. Averroës Nix
6. Simfan
7. Oakvale
8. Ben
9. Miles
10. Cathcon

By my count we have 1 current Senator, two current Governors, a cabinet member, multiple legislators, and former officeholders as well.  Pretty impressive.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 02, 2012, 03:11:24 PM
Okay, so I think three positions for leadership are what I would like to see. Chairman, vice chairman and a secretary.

Chairman - oversees everything, everyone reports to him.
Vice Chair - focuses on the GOTV effort and is heavily involved in recruiting
Secretary - keeps Wiki and bylaws updated.

I think three is all the positions we really need, as I feel more just makes things complicated and communication and message will get mixed up, but that is merely my opinion.

Also, I will be preparing the bylaws for us to begin discussing and ratifying as soon as possible.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 02, 2012, 11:41:37 PM
Am I correct in stating this is a generally centrist party (I'm in the midst of making a wiki article) also which image will be our logo.... is pink our color (basing it off of what griffgraph used) and should Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever! be our slogan?


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 02, 2012, 11:55:07 PM
Am I correct in stating this is a generally centrist party (I'm in the midst of making a wiki article) also which image will be our logo.... is pink our color (basing it off of what griffgraph used) and should Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever! be our slogan?

Yellow is your color, and the Logo I made is what your gonna use!

But your logo forget the THE while mine doesn't :P. Isn't yellow already being used?


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 03, 2012, 12:13:20 AM
Am I correct in stating this is a generally centrist party (I'm in the midst of making a wiki article) also which image will be our logo.... is pink our color (basing it off of what griffgraph used) and should Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever! be our slogan?

Yellow is your color, and the Logo I made is what your gonna use!

But your logo forget the THE while mine doesn't :P. Isn't yellow already being used?

()

You mad? :P

Nope :) just waiting for more input...


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 12:17:51 AM
Am I correct in stating this is a generally centrist party (I'm in the midst of making a wiki article) also which image will be our logo.... is pink our color (basing it off of what griffgraph used) and should Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever! be our slogan?

Yes. And pink is a fine color, perhaps we should all design something as our logo and see which we all like most... and go from there. That sounds like a catchy slogan.. but let's sleep on it before we go with anything else.

Tomorrow we need to have formal declarations for the Chair, Vice Chair and Secretary positions. I have written bylaws for our elections, but we will need to decide how to handle reelection - whether we do the approval system or have outright elections each time. So much to do still! But I have to get some sleep for class tomorrow.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Spamage on October 03, 2012, 12:21:54 AM
Am I correct in stating this is a generally centrist party (I'm in the midst of making a wiki article) also which image will be our logo.... is pink our color (basing it off of what griffgraph used) and should Glory to the People; Today, Tomorrow, Forever! be our slogan?

Yellow is your color, and the Logo I made is what your gonna use!

But your logo forget the THE while mine doesn't :P. Isn't yellow already being used?

()

You mad? :P

Nope :) just waiting for more input...


Yay! So do you support mine being used?

To see my answer look at the bottom of the last page

:P


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 04:59:11 PM
Okay guys. We need to begin the selection of our leadership core.

Quote
Leadership
A. National Party
1) The leadership committee will consist of a Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary.

2) The Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and Secretary shall serve a term of four months.
    i) The Chairman is in charge of overseeing day to day activities of The Party and is responsible for The Party's successes and failures.
    ii) The Vice Chairman is responsible for controlling the get-out-the-vote effort and orchestrating a plan for recruitment.
    iii) The Secretary is responsible for updating the wiki and bylaws as changes are made, and the leadership sections. The Chairman reserves the right to delegate additional duties to the Secretary when needed.


3) This term shall conclude at the conclusion of the leadership election and the new term shall begin immediately. 

4) If the Party Chairman shall be absent for the period of the convention, The Vice Chairmen is then charged with opening the convention just as he is charged with all other duties of the Chairmen, in the Chairman‘s absence. The Vice Chairmen may delegate some of those duties to other highly trusted members off The Party at his discretion.

5) At all times, the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Secretary must act appropriately and ethically in the carrying out of their duties assigned, and strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety in their conduct.

That is for national positions so far. We need to discuss if we want to do the approval system for reelection of our officers or have full blown elections every 4 months, and I would like to set up regional chairs as we (hopefully) grow.



Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 05:19:23 PM
As would I. From my experience that's what works best.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 03, 2012, 05:35:14 PM
I prefer the approval system, as well as having regional chairs.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 03, 2012, 05:35:21 PM
I have no objections to approval.  I do however have serious qualms with that ugly pink on our logo.

I prefer the approval system, as well as having regional chairs.

I agree, but regional chairs should be appointed by the Vice-Chair as he's directly responsible for GOTV efforts.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 05:35:52 PM
I'll run for Chairman of The Party.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 03, 2012, 05:36:40 PM
I'll run for Secretary.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2012, 05:37:13 PM
I'll run for Vice Chairman of The Party of The People.

I agree that approval voting is probably the best method.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 05:37:47 PM
Pink isn't our final color. Don't worry :P

And yes, the chairman will appoint regional chairs, at least that's how I have it written up in my first draft.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 05:42:39 PM
I suppose I'll say officially you all have 24 hours to declare before we vote.


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 03, 2012, 05:48:43 PM
Pink isn't our final color. Don't worry :P

And yes, the chairman will appoint regional chairs, at least that's how I have it written up in my first draft.

I like pink :P  And I think the VC should appoint regional chairs, for GOTV purposes.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 05:54:13 PM
It's all about the shade of pink. I'm sure that's what Cinci is referring to. He's always been picky about his colors.

I would agree with you, considering regional chairs will be responsible for GOTV in their own region. It would only make sense for the VC to appoint them.

Also, please welcome HappyWarrior, ladies and gentlemen!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Spamage on October 03, 2012, 06:00:06 PM
I guess I'll try for Secretary! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Talleyrand on October 03, 2012, 06:08:54 PM
This party is easily the best fit for me! I'm very excited at its creation, and even more excited by joining it.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 03, 2012, 06:11:15 PM
This party is easily the best fit for me! I'm very excited at its creation, and even more excited by joining it.
We're very happy to have you, along with Happy Warrior!!! :) :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 03, 2012, 06:14:22 PM
Yes, welcome TexasDem! I wish HW would tell us how happy he is to be here too. :(


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 03, 2012, 06:22:06 PM
This party is easily the best fit for me! I'm very excited at its creation, and even more excited by joining it.

Welcome! 

Yes, welcome TexasDem! I wish HW would tell us how happy he is to be here too. :(

He's having a moment to take it all in.  It's not everyday you return to serve The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 04, 2012, 05:21:12 PM
The declaration period is over. VOTING will begin at midnight!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 04, 2012, 09:00:29 PM
Simply put, experience is a key component in being a successful Vice Chair, and I'd say there are only a select few in this game who have more experience than I do when it comes to getting voters to the booth, along with recruiting new members to the party. Activity has never been a problem for me, and it never will be as long as I serve as Vice Chair. Commitment is also important to me - I believe those in leadership positions should be fully committed to the party, and I will never just up and leave this party unless there's a good explanation.

This party is off to a great start...let's make it even better. I would appreciate your vote! :)

Thanks!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 04, 2012, 10:23:35 PM
The Official Ballot is listed below, and voting will begin at midnight eastern time (39 minutes from now) and will last for 48 hours.

Ballot for The People's Party Leadership Core:

Chairman
[ ] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[ ] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[ ] Spammage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:

On behalf of The People, I wish all the candidates luck. Run a spirited race. Pick the candidate you feel have the most experience and good will. The future of this Party depends on it!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on October 04, 2012, 10:27:52 PM
Duke, I believe you spelled your name wrong, "Dule". :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 04, 2012, 10:36:37 PM
Duke, I believe you spelled your name wrong, "Dule". :P

Sorry. It's thirsty thursday.. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 05, 2012, 07:53:42 AM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[1] Spammage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 05, 2012, 08:36:59 AM
Ballot for The People's Party Leadership Core:

Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[ ] Tmthforu94
[1] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[ ] Spammage
[1] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:



Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 05, 2012, 08:58:44 AM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[1] Spammage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Spamage on October 05, 2012, 09:26:34 AM

Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[1] Spamage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Oakvale on October 05, 2012, 10:00:13 AM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[2] Tmthforu94
[1 ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[2] Spamage
[ 1 ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Declarations)
Post by: Miles on October 05, 2012, 11:57:11 AM
Chairman
[1] Duke


Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94

Secretary
[1] Spammage


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Simfan34 on October 05, 2012, 04:13:41 PM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[  ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[2] Tmthforu94
[1] Nix
[  ] Write-in:

Secretary
[2] Spamage
[1] Cincinnatus
[  ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Talleyrand on October 06, 2012, 11:18:34 AM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[  ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[2] Nix
[  ] Write-in:

Secretary
[2] Spamage
[1] Cincinnatus
[  ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2012, 03:47:12 PM
Chair:
1. Duke

Vice chair:
1. Tmth
2. Nix

Secretary
1. Cinci
2. Spammage

Voting ends at midnight. I will be out so I can't declare it over. I just trust you all will remember. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 06, 2012, 11:32:13 PM
FINAL VOTES:

Duke elected as chair 10-0
Tmth elected as vice chair 6-4
Cincinnatus elected as secretary 6-4

Congrats to all the winners. Now, we have a responsibly to The People to get to work! Onwards and upwards!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 07, 2012, 12:36:27 AM
Thank you guys! :) Congrats to Duke and Cinci as well.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Leadership Core Voting begins soon)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 08, 2012, 01:01:05 PM
Yes, now let's get started on the bylaws. I will try to publish most of it by tonight and we can start making changes and then vote on it. And appoint regional chairs as well. Anyone who is interested in being a regional chair, please make your voices heard!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: HappyWarrior on October 08, 2012, 02:38:37 PM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[1] Spammage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 08, 2012, 02:45:52 PM
Chairman
[1] Duke
[ ] Write-in:

Vice Chairman
[1] Tmthforu94
[ ] Nix
[ ] Write-in:

Secretary
[1] Spammage
[ ] Cincinnatus
[ ] Write-in:

Put down the bottle... voting ended a day ago ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Simfan34 on October 08, 2012, 04:09:37 PM
I would be interested in being a regional chair!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 09, 2012, 08:08:07 PM
OK, here is the full leadership core text.

Quote
The People's Party Leadership Core
A. National Party
1) The leadership core will consist of a Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Secretary.

2) The Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and Secretary shall serve a term of four months.
    i) The Chairman is in charge of overseeing day to day activities of The Party and is responsible for The Party's successes and failures.
    ii) The Vice Chairman is responsible for controlling the get-out-the-vote effort and orchestrating a plan for recruitment.
    iii) The Secretary is responsible for updating the wiki and bylaws as changes are made, and the leadership sections. The Chairman reserves the right to delegate additional duties to the Secretary when needed.

3) This term shall conclude at the conclusion of the leadership election and the new term shall begin immediately. 

4) If the Party Chairman shall be absent for the period of the convention, The Vice Chairmen is then charged with opening the convention just as he is charged with all other duties of the Chairmen, in the Chairman‘s absence. The Vice Chairmen may delegate some of those duties to other highly trusted members off The Party at his discretion.

5) At all times, the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Secretary must act appropriately and ethically in the carrying out of their duties assigned, and strive to avoid even the appearance of impropriety in their conduct.

B. Regional Parties
1.) Each region shall have its own Regional Chairman, appointed by the Party Vice Chairman and will report to the chairman. 

2.) Regional Chairmen may be hired/fired at the discretion of the Party Vice Chairman. A decision to emplace, or remove a Regional Chair may be overturned by a 2/3’s vote of the party members. This vote shall last 72 hours.

3.) The primary duty of Regional Chairman is to remind voters in their regions to vote and to represent the party in their region. The Vice Chairman may delegate other responsibilities to the Regional Chairman, at his discretion.


C. Leadership Elections
1.) At each Party Convention, a leadership election shall be conducted using the Approval Vote method.

2.) The Party Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Party Secretary shall be up for a vote during this election.

3.) The Presiding Officer of the Convention, shall start the vote on the Friday following the conclusion of the Presidential election and shall end it exactly 72 hours later.

4.) If a sitting official fails to receive majority approval, he is removed from the position and candidate declaration period shall commence for each vacated office following the conclusion of the approval vote, lasting 48 hours. After the conclusion of the declaration period a 72 hour vote shall be held, with the winner being chosen by virtue of receiving the most votes. Any vacant offices at the time of the Leadership election shall be filled at this time.

5.) Any offices that become vacant more then one week prior to the next leadership election, shall be filled with a temporary interim appointment, by the Chairman. If the office of Chairman becomes vacant more then one week prior to the leadership election, the Vice Chairman shall act as chairman till a special election can be held using the same election guidelines as listed for filling vacant offices above.

6.) To vote in The People’s Party Leadership Elections, one must have been a legally registered Atlasian Voter and a member of The Party for at least 24 hours prior to the commencement of the vote.



Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 16, 2012, 01:43:42 AM
And now the bylaws for The Regional Party of The People

Quote
The Regional Party

1) Each region shall have its own Regional Chairman, appointed by The Party Vice Chairman.

2) Regional Chairmen may be hired/fired at the discretion of The Party Vice Chairman. A decision to emplace, or remove a Regional Chair may be overturned by a 2/3’s vote of the party members. The vote shall be commenced by the leadership within 72 hours of the publication of an appeal by a Party member of an action regarding the chairman.

3) The primary duty of Regional Chairman is to remind voters in their regions to vote and to represent the party in their region. The Party Vice Chairman may delegate other responsibilities to the Regional Chairman, at his discretion.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 16, 2012, 01:50:11 AM
How we do our endorsements....

Quote
The People’s Endorsement

1) One week prior to the commencement of the election, The Chairman or Vice Chairman, in the Chairman's absence, or the Presiding officer of the Convention in which the election is taking place, shall open a thread to allow candidates who are not party of The Party to state whether they are seeking the endorsement of The People’s Party in that race.

2) After 48 hours the declaration period shall be closed and a vote shall begin in which all party members may vote for which candidates to endorse in each race.

3) After 72 hours the vote shall be closed. The candidate with the most votes in each race will receive the highest non-People’s preference endorsement (first if a Person is running). The next highest in votes will receive the next highest People preference endorsement and so on.

4) Upon motion by three members, a vote shall be held on whether to unendorse any Person candidate named in the motion who is running in the upcoming election.

5) This motion shall be voted on concurrently with the out-of-party endorsement vote held pursuant to Section 2 of this bylaw if possible. Otherwise, the vote shall be opened within 24 hours of the motion gaining requisite support.

6) In order to vote in endorsement elections, one must be a member of The People’s Party for at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of the vote.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaws and Regional Chair work)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 16, 2012, 01:53:20 AM
And our glorious convention....

Add all of these together and we have our bylaws. I will set a 48 hour deadline for discussion on changes and the like before we have a final vote.

Quote
The People’s Convention

1) The People shall hold a Party convention every four months prior to the presidential election.

2) The People’s Convention shall begin no less then three weeks before the Presidential Election and be brought to a close no less then three days prior to the said Election. The convention shall then reconvene at the conclusion of the Presidential Election to discuss and conduct the Leadership Core Elections.

3) There will be 2 caucuses: The Party and The Caucus. The Party consists of members of The People's Party. These members are allowed to vote in the Leadership Core and other bylaw elections. The Caucus members may sign in and attend, but they will be considered non-voting delegates.

4) When the Chairman or delegated person opens the convention a list of Delegates (Party members) shall be listed to encourage active participation of all party members. Members will have 72 hours to sign in. Also to be listed are links to the current bylaws and platform.

5) Following the conclusion of the delegate sign in, the convention shall proceed to the election a Presiding Officer to conduct the affairs for the rest of that convention. This shall include a 24 hour declaration period, to be followed by a 48 hour vote. The person with the most votes, shall be elected as the Presiding officer.

6) If the Convention is delayed or started later then proscribed in these bylaws, the chairman or designated person opening the convention may preside throughout if there is general agreement that there isn’t available time to elect a permanent presiding officer.

7) Following the conclusion of the delegate sign in and/or the Presiding officer election, the convention shall proceed with endorsements as proscribed in the “Endorsements” section of these bylaws.

8) After the conclusion of the Presidential Election, the Convention shall proceed to the matter of the Leadership elections. After which, the presiding officer must close the convention if no other business is in order

8) At some point during the convention, the opportunity to offer, debate, and vote on amendments to the platform and or bylaws must be available. If need be, after the Leadership election, but before the convention is closed. To vote in these matters, one must have been a member of the party for 48 hours prior to the commencement of the election.



Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 17, 2012, 10:27:54 AM
The People clearly have no interest in boring things like bylaws :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 17, 2012, 11:11:23 AM
Just read through it all - looks good to me! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: Spamage on October 17, 2012, 05:58:03 PM
Just read through it all - looks good to me! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on October 17, 2012, 06:00:49 PM


Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: Simfan34 on October 17, 2012, 08:51:28 PM
Salgood, indeed.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Full Bylaws Text Posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 18, 2012, 08:49:21 PM
Okay. So let's ratify these bylaws as The People's Party Bylaws!

Those in favor vote aye, and those who oppose vote nay.

Voting will go for 48 hours!



Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 18, 2012, 08:54:22 PM
Aye


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Spamage on October 18, 2012, 08:58:11 PM
AYE! :) :) :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 18, 2012, 09:11:34 PM
Aye


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Simfan34 on October 18, 2012, 09:27:23 PM
Ayiii! Wait, that means no.

Aye. Yes. Affirmative.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 18, 2012, 11:40:16 PM
Aye

On a side note, I was actually unaware the election started today. We need to appoint regional chairs asap and form some sort of coherent GOTV effort for our candidates like Ben, Oakvale, Nix, Cinci, etc.. I trust Tmth is on top of things though :P (i hope)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 19, 2012, 04:33:26 PM
Aye.

Aye

On a side note, I was actually unaware the election started today. We need to appoint regional chairs asap and form some sort of coherent GOTV effort for our candidates like Ben, Oakvale, Nix, Cinci, etc.. I trust Tmth is on top of things though :P (i hope)

I think the most important thing to focus on is that the Phil/Inks ticket is beating The Peoples ticket Duke/Cinci :\

On a side note, we have about 15 members, so we should be able to easily achieve 100% turnout in the Federal election.  Tmth, if you need any help coordinating our GOTV effort, just send me a message, though I suspect you have it under control :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 19, 2012, 04:38:36 PM
On a side note, we have about 15 members, so we should be able to easily achieve 100% turnout in the Federal election.

We have 46% turnout (6/13) so far, the highest of any party.

To be expected from a new, small party.  100% is certainly attainable considering our members are pretty active.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: FEMA Camp Administrator on October 19, 2012, 04:49:44 PM
Aye.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 19, 2012, 05:02:42 PM
Yes. I'd like to see us hit 100% turnout if we can get HappyWarrior to make an appearance. :P

We obviously didn't have time to have a convention and the like, so a 100% turnout goal is something we should shoot for this cycle. And of course getting all of our candidates into office!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 20, 2012, 06:04:28 PM
Welcome Nik!  Even if I completely disagree with you on voting eligibility ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 21, 2012, 11:49:49 PM
All things considered, I think this was a great first election for us! Congratulations to all candidates elected, especially TPP candidates.

I think we need to start working hard at developing a platform - there seems to be a rumor going around that we have absolutely no ideological backbone or beliefs, which obviously isn't true. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Spamage on October 22, 2012, 12:13:14 AM
All things considered, I think this was a great first election for us! Congratulations to all candidates elected, especially TPP candidates.

I think we need to start working hard at developing a platform - there seems to be a rumor going around that we have absolutely no ideological backbone or beliefs, which obviously isn't true. ;)

We definitely need a platform :)

Also we had amazing turnout 13/14 isn't anything to be ashamed of! Not to mention 3 Senate seats won I believe!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 22, 2012, 12:40:13 AM
Congrats to everyone! 3 senate seats isn't a bad start for The Party!

And yes, we do. Obviously the main goal of The Party is centered around The People and making every level of government as important as the next, and one of the main objective I want to see is subforums for each regional legislature to start, so people at the regional level don't feel like the step children to the major senate. Whether we write that into our platform remains to be seen.

I think our naysayers are just looking at reasons to count us out. The nasty little truth is, 75% of Atlasians believe in nearly the same "ideology" - center left socially and centrist economically, and this party should stand out from the rest in our reform ideas. Voting was up, but we want to give people a reason to play the game! Because when you don't have a reason to check these parts each day, what incentive do you have to play?

That was one of my passions when I created this party, because I've now been a governor, a senator, a retired person, and now a legislator in the IDS. I've seen what works and what doesn't work and what needs to be changed. If we want this new found interest in the game to last, let's make it happen. That's why this party is here! For every Atasian to have a voice and a purpose in the fantasy country we call Atlasia!

Wonderful job on the turnout though, and congrats to Ben, Oakvale, Nix, Cinci, and Simfan. Job well done everyone!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Franzl on October 22, 2012, 03:34:22 AM
The People have spoken! Congratulations to your winners.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: AndrewTX on October 22, 2012, 08:43:00 AM
Can a nobody like me join this club?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 22, 2012, 10:59:11 AM

Getting you to join is the only reason we exist... It's to win over your heart... To impress you


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: AndrewTX on October 22, 2012, 12:43:15 PM
This might be the perfect party for me, especially coming off of our large Co-President re-election win!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 22, 2012, 12:48:50 PM
Please contact me via PM if you'd like to be a regional chair. I haven't received any applications.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 22, 2012, 12:49:19 PM
This might be the perfect party for me, especially coming off of our large Co-President re-election win!

I figure we needed a party to join in order to continue our dominance in the White House, so I created one for us based on our love and respect for every man, woman and child. I was hoping this would catch your eye sooner, but I'm sure you have a lot of other people wanting your love an attention..


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on October 22, 2012, 04:47:26 PM
We could also use a symbol and logo, although that's less important than the platform, of course.

Well, Wolfentoad and Spamage made logos already, but will we use either one of their's? I like Spamage's a lot (although I think we need a more bright, positive color than black).


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 22, 2012, 05:10:13 PM
We could also use a symbol and logo, although that's less important than the platform, of course.

Well, Wolfentoad and Spamage made logos already, but will we use either one of their's? I like Spamage's a lot (although I think we need a more bright, positive color than black).

Yeah, we have quite a bit of work to do before the next election cycle. Platform, color, logo, etc..

I may try my hand at making one for the vote as well if I can find the time in the next few days.

As for our color... gold? sky blue? sounds like some aren't a fan of pink. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on October 22, 2012, 05:12:51 PM
We could also use a symbol and logo, although that's less important than the platform, of course.

Well, Wolfentoad and Spamage made logos already, but will we use either one of their's? I like Spamage's a lot (although I think we need a more bright, positive color than black).

Yeah, we have quite a bit of work to do before the next election cycle. Platform, color, logo, etc..

I may try my hand at making one for the vote as well if I can find the time in the next few days.

As for our color... gold? sky blue? sounds like some aren't a fan of pink. :P

How about a bright green?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 22, 2012, 05:15:53 PM
We could also use a symbol and logo, although that's less important than the platform, of course.

Well, Wolfentoad and Spamage made logos already, but will we use either one of their's? I like Spamage's a lot (although I think we need a more bright, positive color than black).

Yeah, we have quite a bit of work to do before the next election cycle. Platform, color, logo, etc..

I may try my hand at making one for the vote as well if I can find the time in the next few days.

As for our color... gold? sky blue? sounds like some aren't a fan of pink. :P

How about a bright green?

That could also work. I like that idea.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: AndrewTX on October 23, 2012, 11:35:27 AM
This might be the perfect party for me, especially coming off of our large Co-President re-election win!

I figure we needed a party to join in order to continue our dominance in the White House, so I created one for us based on our love and respect for every man, woman and child. I was hoping this would catch your eye sooner, but I'm sure you have a lot of other people wanting your love an attention..

I wanted to spread my love with everyone, but now I just want to share my love with you.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 23, 2012, 01:27:41 PM
This might be the perfect party for me, especially coming off of our large Co-President re-election win!

I figure we needed a party to join in order to continue our dominance in the White House, so I created one for us based on our love and respect for every man, woman and child. I was hoping this would catch your eye sooner, but I'm sure you have a lot of other people wanting your love an attention..

I wanted to spread my love with everyone, but now I just want to share my love with you.

Tonight, I'm all yours. When you get to my house, you'll find a rubber band on the door handle. Just come on in..


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: AndrewTX on October 23, 2012, 04:16:53 PM
This might be the perfect party for me, especially coming off of our large Co-President re-election win!

I figure we needed a party to join in order to continue our dominance in the White House, so I created one for us based on our love and respect for every man, woman and child. I was hoping this would catch your eye sooner, but I'm sure you have a lot of other people wanting your love an attention..

I wanted to spread my love with everyone, but now I just want to share my love with you.

Tonight, I'm all yours. When you get to my house, you'll find a rubber band on the door handle. Just come on in..

<3


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 24, 2012, 07:48:27 PM
I really wish Duke would run! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 24, 2012, 08:04:26 PM
Run for what?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on October 24, 2012, 08:10:16 PM
The Senate vacancy. You and Spamage would both be good candidates.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on October 24, 2012, 08:10:38 PM

The vacant Senate seat(s), obviously.  Come now Duke, it's really time you returned to where you belong.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 24, 2012, 08:15:47 PM

The vacant Senate seat(s), obviously.  Come now Duke, it's really time you returned to where you belong.

But the senate has been in such fine shape since I left! We only have a few vacancies every cycle instead of the occasion one! ;)



Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on October 24, 2012, 08:30:10 PM
I would also like Duke and Spamage to run for the seats. We need to increase our influence on national governance, and these two would be strong, active Senators.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Simfan34 on October 24, 2012, 08:31:44 PM

The vacant Senate seat(s), obviously.  Come now Duke, it's really time you returned to where you belong.

But the senate has been in such fine shape since I left! We only have a few vacancies every cycle instead of the occasion one! ;)



I agree, to be honest.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 24, 2012, 08:51:51 PM
We can run 2 candidates for the 2 seats. Doesn't matter if we don't win both - I just want our candidates to be good people who will be active and contribute to discussion in the senate. We have too many people resigning and disappearing in it right now :P



Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Spamage on October 24, 2012, 09:13:26 PM
I've announced :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on October 25, 2012, 09:45:30 AM
Wish we would've discussed this earlier, but now that you all have declared, good luck! Run spirited campaigns!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on November 08, 2012, 08:25:40 PM
I would like to take a moment to ask for The People's Party's endorsement in the upcoming Mideast Assembly election, thank you and Dave bless :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: sentinel on November 08, 2012, 09:02:27 PM
I would like to ask for the endorsement of the People's Party for the upcoming special election for assembly in the Northeast. I think you may find that our platform's have strong common ground including bolstering infrastructure in our regions and nation.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on November 08, 2012, 11:51:23 PM
Yeah, we should probably start holding some endorsement votes.

We still gotta come up with a platform!!! Grr


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 08, 2012, 11:52:39 PM
Yes. I apologize, but it has been awful for me to connect to this forum since late last week, so I have avoided it. I hope traffic dies down now that the election is over!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Northeast Rep Snowball on November 09, 2012, 06:39:55 AM
The current candidates are Me, Sirnick and Alexmanu


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Spamage on November 09, 2012, 12:26:28 PM
Oh my goodness, I made the logo I made earlier pink but now I accidentally deleted it..........

:P :(


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: John_Engle on November 09, 2012, 05:30:57 PM
Im in and Let's Go!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 11, 2012, 09:04:24 PM

And this is why this party was created


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Goldwater on November 12, 2012, 12:51:24 AM
The current candidates are Me, Sirnick and Alexmanu

Manu is running in the normal election. It's just you and Nick!

Why is everybody forgetting about Poirot?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Poirot on November 12, 2012, 12:58:20 AM
I wasn't running at that time.

Now that I am running and if The People's Party are holding an endorsement vote, I am asking to be considered for endorsement in the NE Assembly special election race.

I am an independent candidate. This is my second time running in a special election for assembly. I have a campaign thread if the people are interested in following my campaign.

Vote for the Mo. Vote Poirot.

Thank you kindly.  


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Goldwater on November 12, 2012, 01:00:40 AM
The current candidates are Me, Sirnick and Alexmanu

Manu is running in the normal election. It's just you and Nick!

Why is everybody forgetting about Poirot?

Maybe because this was before Poirot announced his run? ;)

Oops, I guess I should pay attention to the date of posts. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 12, 2012, 10:57:56 AM
I want to take a moment to recognize a fallen hero today, Governor John Engle of South Carolina, the latest victim of our friend Inks. John brought an aura of joy to this game - I know I was a happier boy when he was around - and a since of humanity. Not only did he provide The People with food and words, but he tolerated guys and lesbins in a way only a Person can. I wish John the best, and urge all People to never let his spirit die. Fight for every Person, no matter how great or small, and keep hope alive. Brighter days are ahead of us.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on November 15, 2012, 04:53:34 PM
I could have sworn I announced regional chairs, but apparently I didn't...

Simfan is the Northeast Chair.
Benconstine is the Mideast Chair.
Spamage is the Pacific Chair.
Midwest - Vacant
IDS is currently going to be Duke since I didn't have anyone apply. But please apply if you're interested, and you'll likely get the job! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 16, 2012, 02:16:58 PM
It's okay. We've all been slacking recently. The post election slack off I like to call it :p


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on November 24, 2012, 01:24:20 AM
I thought about waiting, but I'd rather do this now to ensure a smooth transition so that the party is fully prepared for the December At-Large Senate Elections.

I will be stepping down as Vice Chairman of the party. I strongly urge everyone to back Nix to take my place. I'm sure he'll do an excellent job.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on November 24, 2012, 09:31:56 AM
I thought about waiting, but I'd rather do this now to ensure a smooth transition so that the party is fully prepared for the December At-Large Senate Elections.

I will be stepping down as Vice Chairman of the party. I strongly urge everyone to back Nix to take my place. I'm sure he'll do an excellent job.

Sorry to hear this.  Hopefully you'll still be available in some capacity to further The People's will.  And I strongly support your recommendation :) 


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 24, 2012, 03:09:54 PM
I am sorry to see Tmth step down at his post, as he has always been a stellar recruiter and advocate for The People.

But the good thing about this party is our members - many who are active, engaged and well respected throughout Atlasia. I do support Nix running for this role if he still has the burning desire to do so, and I am excited to see him implement his party on The Party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Simfan34 on November 24, 2012, 07:33:15 PM
Gov. Tmth has served this party well, very well, and I am sad to see him go, but I believe that Sen. Nix would be an excellent replacement.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Bylaw Ratification Vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 24, 2012, 07:49:32 PM
Okay, please declare your intentions to run for Vice Chairman of The People's Party to replace Tmth within the next 24 hours, and we shall vote on it.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair candidate declaration period)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 26, 2012, 05:28:35 PM
Let's vote, even though this is a mere formality.

Vice Chair election:

[ ]Nix
[ ]Write in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Cincinnatus on November 26, 2012, 06:15:20 PM
[1] Nix


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Talleyrand on November 26, 2012, 06:27:17 PM
[1] Nix


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Simfan34 on November 26, 2012, 06:41:28 PM
Nix.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 26, 2012, 06:54:41 PM
1. Nix
2. The People


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 27, 2012, 04:08:45 PM
Nix is going to have a blast running this joint while I'm away. I can post a bit today so I can certify that he's the winner later. But after tonight it's a blitz for PR, Con Law, Federal Income Tax law and Criminal law. My life... always full of pleasantries.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 27, 2012, 04:30:15 PM
Nix


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: AndrewTX on November 27, 2012, 05:28:14 PM
1. Nix


Nix is going to have a blast running this joint while I'm away. I can post a bit today so I can certify that he's the winner later. But after tonight it's a blitz for PR, Con Law, Federal Income Tax law and Criminal law. My life... always full of pleasantries.

 And spending time with me.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 29, 2012, 12:51:59 AM
By a vote of 7-0, The People have declared Nix their vice chairman! This is a great day for The Party. Let us all rejoice.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Zanas on November 29, 2012, 05:30:01 AM
I would like to congratulate Nix for his nomination. This is a TPP VP I can see myself working with as a Labourite.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Franzl on November 29, 2012, 05:41:13 AM
A glorious victory for the People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 29, 2012, 07:18:24 PM
Praise be The People. Through Them we are all saved. Congratulations to Nix. Forward, I say, forward!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 29, 2012, 07:34:41 PM
As an outsider, Nix was an excellent choice. Good luck to you on your quest!

The quest has already been achieved. If you would embrace The People maybe you would have the sense to join Us. I am proud to have Nix by my side and excited for the future!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 30, 2012, 01:52:38 AM
With simfan declining to run for reelection, it seems we need to run a candidate to maintain our awesome majority in the senate :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Franzl on November 30, 2012, 09:46:48 AM
I might be willing to stand again if truly would be the People's will... Just can't promise a very high level of activity.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on November 30, 2012, 03:17:32 PM
I might be willing to stand again if truly would be the People's will... Just can't promise a very high level of activity.

Depends on your definition of "a high level of activity."

Obviously, The People's mission is to have active, engaged office holders. If you can be active and engaged, go for it. If you fear a BK situation where you'll disappear for a while, then don't feel pressured to do it.

With Simfan not running and Spammage apparently leaving the party (when did this happen, and why?), we either should endorse someone or run a candidate. I feel like we should run someone if we have an interest. If we can unite behind whoever we run, we should be able to get one in.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Franzl on November 30, 2012, 04:40:16 PM
I might be willing to stand again if truly would be the People's will... Just can't promise a very high level of activity.

Depends on your definition of "a high level of activity."

Obviously, The People's mission is to have active, engaged office holders. If you can be active and engaged, go for it. If you fear a BK situation where you'll disappear for a while, then don't feel pressured to do it.

With Simfan not running and Spammage apparently leaving the party (when did this happen, and why?), we either should endorse someone or run a candidate. I feel like we should run someone if we have an interest. If we can unite behind whoever we run, we should be able to get one in.

No not BK level activity. Just that for about a 4 week period, I have exams and may take a bit longer to do things in that period in January-February.

The People require representation and if they are in need, I can't abandon them.

I guess I will run.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on November 30, 2012, 05:05:21 PM
I would like to request The People's Party's endorsement in the December At-Large Senate election.  I may be a Liberal, but during my time in the Assembly I have always fought for The People.  If elected to the Senate, I promise that I will be an active and energetic advocate for The People!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Talleyrand on November 30, 2012, 05:29:46 PM
With simfan declining to run for reelection, it seems we need to run a candidate to maintain our awesome majority in the senate :P

Andrew? Cincinnatus? TXDem? Or, if no one is interested, we could just recruit one of the current candidates...

Is Duke interested in running?

Also, I'd like to encourage TPP to endorse my colleague Mr. X's bid for the Senate. He is a true moderate and has worked tirelessly for The People in the Assembly. Also, I'm glad Senator Franzl is running, and proud to endorse him.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Barnes on December 01, 2012, 09:19:36 PM
I would humbly like to request the endorsement of The People for my senate candidacy. :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Spamage on December 02, 2012, 02:05:58 AM
I too must kindly ask for your endorsement :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Lincoln Republican on December 02, 2012, 11:15:16 PM
The People shall prevail.

The People shall endure.

The People shall overcome tyranny and injustice.

Down with the establishment.

Power to The People.



Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Simfan34 on December 02, 2012, 11:20:09 PM
The People shall prevail.

The People shall endure.

The People shall overcome tyranny and injustice.

Down with the establishment.

Power to The People.



I went to the registration thread and was quite disappointed to not see a corresponding post there...


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 03, 2012, 02:20:21 PM
Winfield is in The Caucus but an independent otherwise. I wish he'd join The Party.

So franzl is running again, and obviously he will get The People's endorsement. We need to vote on our other endorsements soon.

As I've been tied up with law exams, are all the candidates finalized? Nix? :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on December 05, 2012, 05:01:34 PM
I am open to support from the People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: HagridOfTheDeep on December 05, 2012, 05:59:47 PM
I'd like to drop in and also ask for an endorsement.

I know my ideology isn't perfectly aligned with all of your members, but I think I've been a pretty strong proponent of The People while in office. I firmly stand for centre-right positions, so The People know what they're getting from me. I don't weasel my way around the details to try and win support, so The People can rest assured that I'm guided by a strong conviction to do what I believe is right. I've tried to play devil's advocate in the senate to make sure The People don't get swept along by the tide of a bill that could actually hurt them.

I participate in debate, I outline my positions, I try to find common ground, and I think I'm a pretty big asset. I hope you'll consider throwing me a bone. :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on December 05, 2012, 06:18:15 PM
First, I want to thank Senator Nix for giving me this opportunity to make my case to you all :)  We may not always agree, but one thing that I think we do have in common is a strong belief in pragmatism.  I will never deny that if elected I will be a strong voice for the center-left, just as I have been in the Assembly (although I will also remain a tireless advocate for The People :) ).  However, I also believe that the path to prosperity is one of principled pragmatism.  I recognize that none of us has a monopoly on good ideas.  That's why I've worked closely during my time in the Mideast Assembly with members of the Federalist, Labor, Whig, and TPP to help negotiate compromises that combined the best ideas of each side.  

As a result, we were able to pass immigration reform, education reform, fairer labor laws, and much more.  However, my proudest accomplishment is that I worked closely with Governor Tmthforu94 to develop a budget compromise that allowed the region to not only pass its first budget in history, but a balanced budget with a significant stimulus.  Additionally, and I hope Governor Tmthforu94 and my fellow Assemblymen would agree, I have never felt during my time in the Assembly that there was ever a problem with partisanship in the Mideast government since the September elections.  I've always felt we've accomplished so much because everyone sees each other as good people who may sometimes disagree about the best way to help The People!

Which brings me to why I am running and back to my original point about pragmatism.  The breakdown of the working relationship between President Napoleon and the Senate has formed a dark cloud over Atlasia.  A major part of the problem simply seems to be that the President and certain Senators have increasingly begun treating each other like an enemy.  This has to change; for the sake of The People and our great nation, it must change and soon.  As for my activity-level, I think my record in the Assembly speaks for itself :)  I'm running because I hope to bring some of the Mideast's spirit of compromise and civility to the federal government.  If The People do me the honor of electing me to the Senate, I will work to establish a strong working relationship with President Napoleon, Vice-President Nathan, and each member of the Senate.  It would be an honor to receive the endorsement of The People's Party and I hope I can count on your support!  Thank you for your time and Dave bless Atlasia :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 05, 2012, 06:47:35 PM
I encourage our party to endorse Mr. X, Snowstalker, Barnes, and Hagrid. Spamage is also a good choice.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 05, 2012, 08:58:35 PM
I'm backing Hagrid and Mr. X for sure. They've made the most compelling cases, and Hagrid has a strong record in the senate already. I wasn't even aware spammage left us until a few days ago. I like what he's done in the pacific but I may want to see what he does there for a bit longer.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Snowstalker Mk. II on December 05, 2012, 09:55:01 PM

To elaborate, I have proudly worked with The People's Party, especically the fine senators Nix and Oakvale, to implement policies which most benefit The People of Atlasia. I have also been vocal in my opposition to Napoleon, who TPP rightly sees as an enemy of The People (in fact, I was the runner-up in October).


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Simfan34 on December 05, 2012, 10:33:33 PM
I would like to endorse all incumbents, and Hagrid.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Kitteh on December 05, 2012, 10:41:35 PM
I believe that my colleague Mr. X has a strong case for your party's endorsement given that he is in coalition with your party in the MidEast assembly (as part of the Mideast People's Liberal Labor Caucus).


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 05, 2012, 11:00:28 PM
I believe that my colleague Mr. X has a strong case for your party's endorsement given that he is in coalition with your party in the MidEast assembly (as part of the Mideast People's Liberal Labor Caucus).

This is also a good point, and combined with his non-ideological, pragmatic record, which has produced great results for the Mideast Region (including the Immigration Reform Act and establishment of a balanced budget, among others), Mr. X should be a shoo-in for TPP nomination in the upcoming elections. While the Mideast Assembly will lose a great advocate of The People, Atlasia would gain one as a whole with his election.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 05, 2012, 11:02:56 PM
Mr. X has always been a friend to The Party. I'm sure he will do just fine in our endorsement voting.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: MyRescueKittehRocks on December 06, 2012, 12:32:15 AM
TPP,

Thank you Nix for the invite to speak to another of Atlasia's political parties.
Many of you know me as a right leaning firebrand. In some cases that is true. I do have principled positions and will not abandon them. Yet I will seek the highest good of Atlasians of all stripes. My bill against human trafficking is my biggest example of this. I do seek an honest brokerage amongst all parties and isn't that the core desire of the People? Working to achieve the maximum of the Atlasian dream.

Also I believe the People are more than just a party but a coalition of various disaffecteds who don't totally fit in as a Federalist (like myself) or with the Liberals or Labor. You hold the hinge of the election. Yes I will call you out if I feel something doesn't feel right but I'll stand as a friend if needbe.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Spamage on December 06, 2012, 12:44:11 AM
People of the People's Party-

   I have come before you today to issue a speech in what I hope will lead to my endorsement. Even though my party registration is changed I must state fully and sincerely my beliefs are the same as when I was a member here. I thank you all for this wonderful opportunity to allow me to speak here as well.
   
   I hope to gain your endorsement for several reasons. My campaign has been largely based on bipartisan ideas and if elected I will work with members of every party, not just those of my own. I understand the need for bipartisanship our nation faces and I must truly state I would be honored to work with you guys once again.
   
   Your party is primarily based on creating a government that doesn't interfere with the People and their beliefs. I understand this, we need the People represented if we are to be a healthy democracy. That's how it works period. Governments oppressing the people's will in the past have led to failure and I believe truly Atlasia cannot survive without the active support from its citizens. That why, if elected, I will use my office to listen to the People's complaints, opinions, and ideas. An open forum environment could lead to a lot of innovations benefiting every Atlasian.
   
   I am fairly moderate and have somewhat unusual political beliefs as a mild communitarian. You're party is similar to me in some ways and that's why I am asking for your support. If we are to make changes, either more conservative or liberal, they should be done in a timely fashion yet must not be too slow nor too fast. We do in fact need honest and open discussions about our future with the involvement of the public.
   
   In my last campaign, under the banner of this party, it was no secret I was greatly dismayed with the results. However, in my period of melancholy I reflected on how the votes would've gone had they not been invalidated. The voters which were indeed invalidated were supporters of Senator Simfan and after reviewing that I came to believe and accept the fact that had I gone further I would have suppressed the People's true feeling, something which should not be taken lightly, ever. That is why I ended the early stages of the legal battle and came to accept Simfan's victory and eventually became a supporter of him.     
   
   I understand many of you will not vote for me and I am fine with that. Democracy is best when there is a healthy competition and it is through that that many great leaders have emerged. I hope you consider me however, and that we may one day work together in order to make Atlasia an even better place. I hope that you get a chance to look at the work I've done in the once dead Pacific Region as well as my platform. I believe with my experience and your guys' support we can work across party lines, build bridges, and come up with solutions that not half, but the whole country will support. Liberal or conservative, communitarian or libertarian.
   
   In conclusion I would like to reaffirm that I hope you take a look at both my candidacy ,tenure as the Pacific Governor, as well as former membership to this party as reasons to potentially support me in the upcoming endorsement vote. I would be truly honored to have your endorsement and it would mean the world to me. Thank you for reading, it's been my pleasure to be here-


                                  Gov. Spamage


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Franzl on December 07, 2012, 10:22:42 AM
[Yes ] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[Yes ] - Hagrid (Fed)
[Yes ] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[ ] - Spamage (Fed)
[ ] - Goldwater (Fed)
[Yes ] - Mr. X (Lib)
[Yes ] - Barnes (Lab)
[No ] - JCL (Fed)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 07, 2012, 10:28:32 AM
[Yes] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[Yes] - Hagrid (Fed)
[ ] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[Yes] - Spamage (Fed)
[ ] - Goldwater (Fed)
[Yes] - Mr. X (Lib)
[Yes] - Barnes (Lab)
[No] - JCL (Fed)
[ ] - Write-in:                


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Barnes on December 07, 2012, 01:12:01 PM
I am extremely sorry for not making a statement before y'all, but school unfortunately got in the way. I would still be honored to have The People's support.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 07, 2012, 08:19:14 PM
Thank you for capitalizing The People, Barnes


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Cincinnatus on December 07, 2012, 08:28:02 PM

[NO] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[NO] - Hagrid (Fed)
[NO] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[YES] - Spamage (Fed)
[ ] - Goldwater (Fed)
[YES] - Mr. X (Lib)
[NO] - Barnes (Lab)
[NO] - JCL (Fed)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 07, 2012, 10:12:14 PM
I have made my triumphant return to this game after having a fifth of bourbon and a bunch of hugs. I enedorse my friends, incuding the Duke/Cinci tcket forever and ever amen.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 07, 2012, 11:11:55 PM
[YES] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[YES] - Hagrid (Fed)
[NO] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[YES] - Spamage (Fed)
[YES] - Mr. X (Lib)
[YES] - Barnes (Lab)

I would have endorsed Goldwater, but he dropped out. As for JCL (who also dropped out), I appreciate his steadfastness and dedication to his controversial beliefs, but they are more than one step too far for me, although I don't think he's a bad person.

I have nothing against Kalwejt- I just haven't seen his campaign around too much and he didn't seek our endorsement. As for JCL, I appreciate his steadfastness and dedication to his controversial beliefs, but they are more than one step too far for me, although I don't think he's a bad person.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Goldwater on December 07, 2012, 11:20:13 PM
[YES] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[YES] - Hagrid (Fed)
[NO] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[YES] - Spamage (Fed)
[YES] - Mr. X (Lib)
[YES] - Barnes (Lab)
[NO] - JCL (Fed)


I would have endorsed Goldwater, but he dropped out. I also have nothing against Kalwejt- I just haven't seen his campaign around too much and he didn't seek our endorsement. As for JCL, I appreciate his steadfastness and dedication to his controversial beliefs, but they are more than one step too far for me to endorse, although I don't think he's a bad person.


FTR, JCL also dropped out.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 08, 2012, 10:31:59 PM
OK, I am back for the immediate future, as exams and my heavy drinking have ended, well the drinking has until tomorrow. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vice Chair election voting open)
Post by: Simfan34 on December 09, 2012, 10:48:04 PM
[YES] - Snowstalker (Lab)
[YES] - Hagrid (Fed)
[YES] - Kalwejt (Oth)
[NO] - Spamage (Fed)
[YES] - Mr. X (Lib)
[     ] - Barnes (Lab)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on December 10, 2012, 02:07:04 AM
Hi guys,


Have you made an endorsement for the gubernatorial race yet.  If not, I would love to have it!  :)


Here's a link to my site:  https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=166128.0


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on December 11, 2012, 10:59:39 AM
I want to thank The People for giving me the TPP's endorsement.  It is an honor to have the support of this great party and win or lose, I promise that I will continue to be a tireless advocate for The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Barnes on December 11, 2012, 09:46:32 PM
The People have been extremely kind in giving me their support, and I thank them all greatly for it. :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Spamage on December 11, 2012, 09:55:50 PM
I am truly honored to have been endorsed by you guys and greatly appreciate the kindness that has been given to me. Together the Government and the People will get stuff done! :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 11, 2012, 10:00:16 PM
Congrats to all those The People voted to support. Go forth and serve Us well.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement voting)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 14, 2012, 12:51:18 PM
Alright folks. We've been a bit overshadowed this election by the goings on in the other two parties, but it's important that we unite behind our man franzl for the good of The People and Their party. I ask all of you to lend him your vote and participate in this democratic process. Who we elect this weekend will be Our representatives, so make it count!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Vote franzl early and often!)
Post by: Franzl on December 14, 2012, 12:56:20 PM
We've got a very uphill battle in this election. I ask members of this party to unify for The People. We stand no chance if we don't stick together.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 17, 2012, 12:37:26 AM
Congratulations to Senator Franzl, as well as Hagrid, Mr. X, Barnes and Spammage! It was a hard fought election, and I am proud of The Party and The People for their elections. And for those that fell short, I hope you all continue to serve Atlasia, because if you had interest enough in running for office then Atlasia has interest in you!

Now go forth and serve to the best of your ability for The People!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Franzl on December 17, 2012, 01:45:25 AM
I'm so grateful that all the hard work that went into this amazing comeback has paid off and that The People will still have a voice in Nyman in the new year.

It just goes to show you that one must never give up and lose faith in The People or those working so hardly for Their interests.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Northeast Rep Snowball on December 19, 2012, 07:33:28 AM
Endorsement for Assembly

Incumbents - cinnci + me and Alexmanu, thank you for your time.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on December 19, 2012, 01:45:19 PM
Endorsement for Assembly

Incumbents - cinnci + me and Alexmanu, thank you for your time.

Don't be a dick. It doesn't pay, as I learned during my two weeks in the Senate.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 19, 2012, 03:49:20 PM
Snowball's disrespect towards The People is duly noted.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Northeast Rep Snowball on December 19, 2012, 04:14:54 PM
Sorry, I had little time when I posted, but felt greatly that while TPP is not the largest party, the power it has over the People and its motivation is necessary for the election. I apologize for any offense that caused. 





Title: Re: The People's Party (Congratulations to Franzl and the rest!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 19, 2012, 10:12:58 PM
Well, if you're serious about your apology, we will consider it and your endorsement request.


Title: Re: The People's Party (platform discussion!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 19, 2012, 10:16:42 PM
Also, for Party members, I am going to attempt to publish our platform tonight to begin discussion. I want to have it passed as soon as we can.


Title: Re: The People's Party (platform discussion!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 19, 2012, 11:14:15 PM
This is the most thorough platform of any party out there. Please read over it and lend me your opinions where you'd like to see changes.

The People's Platform

Economics:
The economy's main engine is The People, and through Them government is derived and given its powers. Therefore, it is the government's job as an entity to protect the interests of The People through sound regulations to prevent rampant abuse by those who wish harm on the economy. If men were angels we would not need government, but we are not so we must have one for The People and by ThePeople that  encourages free trade among nations and maximize economies of scale worldwide.

It is The People's job to ensure equality. We must have a progressive tax system, one that is fair and allows the government to offer services best offered by the government; public roads, bridges, airports, general welfare and the like. But taxes must never exceed 50% on the top bracket, as such a policy would be a disservice to the good of The People. The People recognize life has its bumps in the road. As such, welfare must be a means if assistance while on hard times, not a way of life.

The People recognize large corporations are a necessity in this country. Therefore, we favor a low corporate tax which will encourage domestic job creation and keep our People at work here, not in a line for unemployment. The Party also recognizes the role of certainty in an economy. We must be in touch with our business community, giving employers certainty in taxes and other issues that lead to layoffs and a loss in investor confidence.

The People recognize a portion of our county derives their income from capital gains and dividends. For the social well being of all People, The Party favors a flat 15% on middle and low income Atlasians, while we ask the wealthiest 3% to pay 20% of their income.

Finally, The People recognize the individual. It is why we are who we are. We recognize the hardships and protections The People need from those who hire them, and we favor a policy of honesty between both the employer and employee. While we hold regional "right to work" laws as regional issues, we encourage strongly regions change policies like this. They are archaic and are a tremendous disservice to the employee and discourage loyalty, honesty, and security.

Foreign Policy:
The People are realists. We recognize that there is evil in this world. But dealing with evil does not always begin with bombs and bullets. Diplomacy must be our first line of defense, and we must keep lines of communication open not only with our allies, but with our enemies. The People recognize its position in the world, and it must be a world leader and lead by example. If diplomacy does fail, and a nation does not follow up on its promises or openly defies the international community, force must not be shied away from. The People urge pragmatism, not strict foreign policy ideology.

Domestic Policy:
Freedom of speech, religion, right to organize, love, privacy, due process and the press must be respected as constitutional rights to all People. In regards to privacy, The People favor federal protection for abortion to keep it safe, legal and hopefully, rare. It is a woman's decision and hers alone, and The People respect this fundamental right. The People also favor freedom of love. It is not the government's business who you love or what you do in privacy. Therefore, we favor marriage and adoption rights for all couples, straight or same sex. The government is to protect individuals from oppression. Drug policy is best left to the regions unless the social welfare of the individual is threatened. Then it is up to the federal government to set a nationwide policy.

Finally, it is the job of The People to protect this country from enemies both foreign and abroad. The destruction of our environment is an enemy to all People, our children and our way of life. We must promote policies that encourage businesses and individuals to get on board with a healthier way of life that will benefit generations to come.

Forum Life:
The People recognize insidiously participate in both the federal and regional governments, with regional governments being the greatest asset to the country. They allow for new members to grow, participate and become all they wish to be. They also happen to be closest to The People. As such, we oppose any attempts to do away with regional senate elections. We favor allowing regional governments to administer their own regional senate elections rather than the federal government to draw more attention to all regional elections. The legislators and executives are the closest representatives to The People in this country.

In order to further promote regional activity, The People favor the creation of regional sub-forums so these legislative bodies will not feel like second class citizens who are confined to one or two threads to discuss their entire body of work. It will also encourage new members to stick around and grow in these regional legislatures rather than rushing to the federal level.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Bacon King on December 20, 2012, 04:39:00 AM
I wish to join this fine establishment.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Franzl on December 20, 2012, 04:55:47 AM
Bacon King is a true man of The People.

It is an amazing honor to welcome him to their party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 20, 2012, 06:30:25 AM
Bacon King is a true man of The People.

It is an amazing honor to welcome him to their party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Northeast Rep Snowball on December 20, 2012, 07:14:35 AM
Bacon King is a true man of The People.

It is an amazing honor to welcome him to their party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 20, 2012, 12:45:11 PM
It is an honor and a privilege to welcome Bacon King to The Party. Today is, as always, a great day for The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Cincinnatus on December 20, 2012, 02:59:50 PM
I wish to join this fine establishment.

Bacon Kingman for The People.  It took you long enough :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 20, 2012, 03:23:12 PM
It was written on an iPad, so yeah, I expect there are typos and the like.

But anyone is free to make suggestions and additions to it. This is by no means a final product.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 03:23:41 PM
Bumping this. I'd like to hear more from members if they wish to add or critique. Please ignore my grammatical errors. This was written on an iPad. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Simfan34 on December 21, 2012, 06:10:16 PM
I endorse The People's Platform unreservedly.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 21, 2012, 06:42:51 PM
I endorse The People's Platform unreservedly.

As do I.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 06:45:45 PM
I'm considering adding a bit to the forum life section with some game reforms we may like to see. I'm also going to wait for Nix's proposals before we call it to a vote. Also, I need to proofread it when I use my actual laptop.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Franzl on December 21, 2012, 06:52:21 PM
I'm considering an amendment to the constitution to basically make the VP an 11th senator. What do The People think about this?


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 06:58:38 PM
Well, the VP is a useless position but probably a necessary one. I remember when I was in the senate 15 years ago, we had a lot of bills trying to reform the position or give it some type of responsibility which always failed. I guess in the case that a president cannot serve, the VP needs to exist. Dare we forget when BK took over for Lief back in the day?

Those are just my thoughts on the matter. We can certain favor reforms.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Northeast Rep Snowball on December 21, 2012, 07:23:10 PM
Well, the VP is a useless position but probably a necessary one. I remember when I was in the senate 15 years ago, we had a lot of bills trying to reform the position or give it some type of responsibility which always failed. I guess in the case that a president cannot serve, the VP needs to exist. Dare we forget when BK took over for Lief back in the day?

Those are just my thoughts on the matter. We can certain favor reforms.
I agree, but a VP candidate is slightly biased, but your are going to be bored if this fails, so I see your side too.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 07:25:59 PM
Well my position on the matter hasn't changed since I was in the senate - long before Marokai and I came in this union we call a ticket. It's well documented in the archives of the senate. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 21, 2012, 07:43:46 PM
Why don't we call for the elimination and redistribution of the Midwest Region among the other regions of Atlasia? I don't see why a place which prides itself on its dysfunction, doesn't hold elections, and has a grand total of one voter during a constitutional amendment vote should still remain a sovereign region, but that might just be my opinion.

We could then have two classes of regional Senators, a set of four elected alongside the President, and another set of four elected alongside the At-Large Senators.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 07:53:24 PM
Haha. The Duke Plan a few years ago included reorganizing into 4 regions and eliminating the Midwest. But our Midwest friends like Kal and ilikeverin crucified me.

That region has a strong tradition of loonyism.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on December 21, 2012, 08:02:15 PM
I'm not sure reducing the overall number of Senators is really a good way to go, either.

(But ignore me! I'm not a member of TPP, just chiming in!)


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 21, 2012, 08:10:24 PM
I'm not sure reducing the overall number of Senators is really a good way to go, either.

(But ignore me! I'm not a member of TPP, just chiming in!)

We could then have two classes of regional Senators, a set of four elected alongside the President, and another set of four elected alongside the At-Large Senators.

That would increase the overall number of Senators to 13.

(Off-topic- Wouldn't it be interesting to fun to the "Senior Senator from the Mideast" or the "Junior Senator from the Southeast", etc?)


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 08:12:23 PM
You're ignored, Marokai. ;)

I like 10 as a number too if not more, although I still favor giving regions control over electing their own senators. We debated this idea too a while ago and it got nowhere.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 09:37:15 PM
I like it - it encompasses what our party stands for in a shorter manner than my long winded diatribe.

I can add it to the first page too so anyone who wants to access it easily can do so.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Kitteh on December 21, 2012, 11:12:10 PM
I'm not sure reducing the overall number of Senators is really a good way to go, either.

(But ignore me! I'm not a member of TPP, just chiming in!)

We could then have two classes of regional Senators, a set of four elected alongside the President, and another set of four elected alongside the At-Large Senators.

That would increase the overall number of Senators to 13.

(Off-topic- Wouldn't it be interesting to fun to the "Senior Senator from the Mideast" or the "Junior Senator from the Southeast", etc?)

Ignore me too, but wouldn't abolishing at-large senators mean a huge disparity in voting power? Cause the bigger regions in Atlasia have more than twice the population as some of the smaller ones?


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 11:17:46 PM
I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 21, 2012, 11:21:50 PM
I'm not sure reducing the overall number of Senators is really a good way to go, either.

(But ignore me! I'm not a member of TPP, just chiming in!)

We could then have two classes of regional Senators, a set of four elected alongside the President, and another set of four elected alongside the At-Large Senators.

That would increase the overall number of Senators to 13.

(Off-topic- Wouldn't it be interesting to fun to the "Senior Senator from the Mideast" or the "Junior Senator from the Southeast", etc?)

Ignore me too, but wouldn't abolishing at-large senators mean a huge disparity in voting power? Cause the bigger regions in Atlasia have more than twice the population as some of the smaller ones?

I never advocated abolishing the at-large Senate. I just suggested making two classes of regional Senators and eliminating the Midwest Region. So basically 5 at-large, and 8 regional, with two per region. Just a thought. ;)

I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P

I agree about regional Senate elections, but how exactly could the regions take charge of the presidential election?


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: tmthforu94 on December 21, 2012, 11:23:50 PM
I never advocated abolishing the at-large Senate. I just suggested making two classes of regional Senators and eliminating the Mideast Region.
Over my dead body.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 11:26:07 PM
I never advocated abolishing the at-large Senate. I just suggested making two classes of regional Senators and eliminating the Mideast Region.
Over my dead body.

I think he meant Midwest.... hopefully :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on December 21, 2012, 11:27:22 PM
I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P

I agree about regional Senate elections, but how exactly could the regions take charge of the presidential election?

Simple! Presidential voting booths would be split up on a regional basis, and would vote on their own, and the winner of the Presidential election would be determined by having a majority of the regions, as general voting blocs, voting for them. Like a sort of pseudo-electoral-college system.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 21, 2012, 11:27:38 PM
I'm not sure reducing the overall number of Senators is really a good way to go, either.

(But ignore me! I'm not a member of TPP, just chiming in!)

We could then have two classes of regional Senators, a set of four elected alongside the President, and another set of four elected alongside the At-Large Senators.

That would increase the overall number of Senators to 13.

(Off-topic- Wouldn't it be interesting to fun to the "Senior Senator from the Mideast" or the "Junior Senator from the Southeast", etc?)

Ignore me too, but wouldn't abolishing at-large senators mean a huge disparity in voting power? Cause the bigger regions in Atlasia have more than twice the population as some of the smaller ones?

I never advocated abolishing the at-large Senate. I just suggested making two classes of regional Senators and eliminating the Mideast Region. So basically 5 at-large, and 8 regional, with two per region. Just a thought. ;)

I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P

I agree about regional Senate elections, but how exactly could the regions take charge of the presidential election?

There was talk about allowing the regional governors administer the presidential race via regional threads instead of having one thread for the entire election. Ultimately it seemed like it would be too complicated to keep count and it would hurt turnout, but it still may be something we can revisit in the future.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 21, 2012, 11:28:42 PM
I never advocated abolishing the at-large Senate. I just suggested making two classes of regional Senators and eliminating the Mideast Region.
Over my dead body.
The Midwest Region, I meant, sorry.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 24, 2012, 12:28:27 PM
BTW, when and where will we have a TPP convention?


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Oakvale on December 24, 2012, 01:01:01 PM
I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P

I agree about regional Senate elections, but how exactly could the regions take charge of the presidential election?

Simple! Presidential voting booths would be split up on a regional basis, and would vote on their own, and the winner of the Presidential election would be determined by having a majority of the regions, as general voting blocs, voting for them. Like a sort of pseudo-electoral-college system.

I think there could be problems with that system given the population disparity in the various regions, but I think some form of electoral college system would be a good idea in theory - it'd be interesting to see Presidential candidates campaigning in regions.

On the more general point, I think enhancing the power and influence of the regions is almost always a good thing, so I'd be interested in exploring this.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 24, 2012, 04:16:58 PM
BTW, when and where will we have a TPP convention?

A week before the February general election.

I think we should ultimately keep the at-large and regional seats for compromise sake. I just advocated the regions be in charge of their own senate elections as opposed to them going in the federal voting booth. I'd like to see the regions take charge of the presidential election too, but that may be too much for The People to handle at once :P

I agree about regional Senate elections, but how exactly could the regions take charge of the presidential election?

Simple! Presidential voting booths would be split up on a regional basis, and would vote on their own, and the winner of the Presidential election would be determined by having a majority of the regions, as general voting blocs, voting for them. Like a sort of pseudo-electoral-college system.

I think there could be problems with that system given the population disparity in the various regions, but I think some form of electoral college system would be a good idea in theory - it'd be interesting to see Presidential candidates campaigning in regions.

On the more general point, I think enhancing the power and influence of the regions is almost always a good thing, so I'd be interested in exploring this.

It's certainly a discussion we should have going forward whether we do what Marokai mentioned or simply allow them to administer the voting booths for their regional senators. Opponents will say it will hurt turnout, but I think in the long run it will be good for regional activity even if we do see a dip in turnout on the first election. It will give governors a responsibility to open the booth and close it on time, you know.. :P



Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on December 24, 2012, 04:19:35 PM
It will give governors a responsibility to open the booth and close it on time, you know.. :P

An issue I'm desperately trying to get sorted out in the Midwest before any change actually happens. :P

But at this point, I think it's safe to reveal Duke and I believe in crafting a regionally based Presidential election system, and it's currently a component of rather large Presidential platform we're still working out before prettying up for formal presentation.


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on December 24, 2012, 04:23:20 PM
Here are some host cities I would suggest for our party's convention-
-Austin, Texas
-St. Louis, Missouri
-Virginia Beach, Virginia
-Honolulu, Hawaii
-Newport Beach, California

And I look forward to reading your final proposal on a regionally based Presidential Election System!


Title: Re: The People's Party (thorough Platform posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 24, 2012, 07:11:33 PM
TPP and Atlasia,

I wanted to take time to wish all of you a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukkah, and Happy Kwanza on this Christmas Eve. I am fortunate to work with a great group of people in this Party and in Atlasia, and on this Christmas Eve, I am confident our best days as a country are ahead of us. To The People, as we go into 2013, let's make this Party a vessel for reform and discussion, and set forth the vision of the new game we all sought to create when we dismantled the parties of old.

Thank you all for joining me on this journey, for it is you, The People, that make it all worth it.

Have a wonderful holiday,

Duke


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 01, 2013, 02:41:24 PM
As I'm sure no one noticed, I have returned from NY and am ready for the new year!

We need to pick a convention city for the upcoming elections.


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Wisconsin+17 on January 01, 2013, 03:16:57 PM
Quote
Why don't we call for the elimination and redistribution of the Midwest Region among the other regions of Atlasia? I don't see why a place which prides itself on its dysfunction, doesn't hold elections, and has a grand total of one voter during a constitutional amendment vote should still remain a sovereign region, but that might just be my opinion.

We could call it "Texas".


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Ban my account ffs! on January 01, 2013, 04:12:35 PM
Happy New Year to the People's Party


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 01, 2013, 04:57:22 PM
I second Buffalo. I'm also all for aborting the Mideast.


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 01, 2013, 04:59:57 PM
I second Newport Beach, CA. After spending 5 days in NYC, the warm weather will be a welcome sight for us all.

And Simfan, don't you mean the Midwest?


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 01, 2013, 05:21:50 PM
I nominate Richmond, VA


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 01, 2013, 05:53:36 PM
I second Buffalo. I'm also all for aborting the Mideast.

Third :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 01, 2013, 06:03:43 PM
I second Newport Beach, CA. After spending 5 days in NYC, the warm weather will be a welcome sight for us all.

And Simfan, don't you mean the Midwest?

Yes, the Midwest in all its weirdness.


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 01, 2013, 06:45:06 PM

Seconded. I don't mind Buffalo either though.


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Franzl on January 02, 2013, 04:07:52 AM
May I suggest a nice beer garden in Bavaria for our convention?


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 02, 2013, 02:03:11 PM
May I suggest a nice beer garden in Bavaria for our convention?

I think The People would be open to that idea...

So far our choices are:

1. Buffalo, NY
2. Richmond, VA
3. Newport Beach, CA


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 02, 2013, 05:00:44 PM
It looks like the Labor Party will be holding their convention in Oakland, California, so I don't think we should go to Newport Beach, but Richmond and Buffalo are good choices.


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 02, 2013, 08:17:06 PM
OK, so we have our cities.

Party members have 48 hours to vote for the convention city.

The People's Party host city for the Feburary 2013 Convention; rank them:

[ ]Richmond, VA
[ ]Buffalo, NY
[ ]Newport Beach, CA


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 02, 2013, 08:19:04 PM
[1]Richmond, VA
[2]Buffalo, NY
[3]Newport Beach, CA


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 02, 2013, 08:20:43 PM
The People should hold their election night party in the Bavarian beer garden.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 02, 2013, 08:25:29 PM
The People should hold their election night party in the Bavarian beer garden.

Rest assured, wherever we go, there will be plenty of booze.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 02, 2013, 09:55:12 PM
[1] Buffalo, NY
[2] Richmond, VA
[4] Write-in: East St. Louis, IL
[5] Newport Beach, CA


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on January 02, 2013, 10:37:30 PM
If I may step in, I obviously support Buffalo.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 02, 2013, 10:47:00 PM
[1] Buffalo
[2] Write-in: Franzl's magic garden
[3] Richmond


If only you belonged to The People :(


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 03, 2013, 07:37:20 AM
I don't support Buffalo...

1. Franzl's garden
2. Richmond
3. Write in: New Haven, CT


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 03, 2013, 07:56:45 AM
1. Franzls magic garden
2. Buffalo
3. Richmond


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 03, 2013, 12:32:49 PM
1. Franzl's magic garden
2. Richmond
3. Buffalo

And welcome to The Party, Polnut! Pleasure to have you here.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY on January 03, 2013, 01:21:40 PM
[1] Buffalo
[2] Write-in: Franzl's magic garden
[3] Richmond


If only you belonged to The People :(

I'malready married, Nixy!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 03, 2013, 01:57:04 PM
[1] Buffalo
[2] Write-in: Franzl's magic garden
[3] Richmond


If only you belonged to The People :(

I'malready married, Nixy!

It's never too late to divorce yourself from the burdens of life and join The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 04, 2013, 12:51:58 AM
Less then 24 hours till voting ends!


Title: Re: The People's Party (A Christmas Message)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 04, 2013, 12:54:18 AM
[1]Richmond, VA
[3]Buffalo, NY
[2]Newport Beach, CA


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Kitteh on January 04, 2013, 01:04:48 AM
Sorry to interrupt, but I would like to request your party's endorsement in the Mideast governor's race. I'll make a longer speech if/when you guys have a formal endorsement vote. Thanks :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 04, 2013, 01:08:42 AM
Well, I'm kind of playing copycat here, but I would be very humbled to have the endorsement of The People in the upcoming Mideast Gubernatorial election. :) I'll have some nice things to say once y'all get to the voting.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 06, 2013, 07:04:37 PM
Does anyone know now to count IRV? By my count, Buffalo and franzl's garden is tied for first. But I'm not the best at doing IRV.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 06, 2013, 07:12:02 PM
1st count:

Richmond: 2
Buffalo: 3
Franzl's garden: 3

2nd count:

Buffalo: 5
Franzl's garden: 3


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 06, 2013, 07:13:19 PM
Would The People at least be interested in having our election night party in the magical garden?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 06, 2013, 07:19:07 PM
Our only requests are lots of beer, bourbon and boobs. So yes, I think that's a fine plan. Congrats to buffalo! Our convention will commence a 2 weeks before the February election!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 06, 2013, 07:33:55 PM
Would The People at least be interested in having our election night party in the magical garden?

I heartily approve. And hooray, Buffalo!

If I have to go to f'ing Buffalo, I will need stuff on tap ... at all times.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 06, 2013, 07:38:46 PM
Would The People at least be interested in having our election night party in the magical garden?

I heartily approve. And hooray, Buffalo!

If I have to go to f'ing Buffalo, I will need stuff on tap ... at all times.

It is the will of The People. It will be a good time, as They know best.

But does this garden have bourbon of tap? It would be one of the most wonderful things if so.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 06, 2013, 09:04:30 PM
I'm very excited for our convention... and our election night party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Lincoln Republican on January 06, 2013, 09:55:09 PM
I would like to respectfully ask for the endorsement of The People's Party for the Winfield/Simfan ticket.



Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 07, 2013, 04:57:06 AM
I would like to respectfully ask for the endorsement of The People's Party for the Winfield/Simfan ticket.



Why would The People do such a thing?


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 07, 2013, 09:07:00 AM
I would like to respectfully ask for the endorsement of The People's Party for the Winfield/Simfan ticket.



Why would The People do such a thing?

Now now, everyone has their day in court with Us. Mr. Winfield is a member of The Caucus, despite his refusal in the past to join The Party.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 07, 2013, 09:23:02 AM
I would like to respectfully ask for the endorsement of The People's Party for the Winfield/Simfan ticket.



Why would The People do such a thing?

Now now, everyone has their day in court with Us. Mr. Winfield is a member of The Caucus, despite his refusal in the past to join The Party.

I have nothing against Mr. Winfield, but when we have two great men of The People on another ticket, one of which is a founding member of the party.. we need to support them :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 07, 2013, 09:26:15 AM
I would like to respectfully ask for the endorsement of The People's Party for the Winfield/Simfan ticket.



Why would The People do such a thing?

Now now, everyone has their day in court with Us. Mr. Winfield is a member of The Caucus, despite his refusal in the past to join The Party.

I have nothing against Mr. Winfield, but when we have two great men of The People on another ticket, one of which is a founding member of the party.. we need to support them :)

Of course. I never promised Mr. Winfield anything, but he is entitled to be included on our ballot for an endorsement for second or third preference. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 07, 2013, 10:13:16 AM
I've made reservations for us at Kloster Andechs in Upper Bavaria for Election Night. To give The People a general idea where we will be celebrating. I've been here several times in "real life", and it can only be recommended:

()

()

And the beer selection (obviously, these selections will also be offered on tap!):

()

I'll see what I can do about getting bourbon on tap as well. I'm confident they'll find a way to organize it for us.

Oh, and the boobs that Duke requested:

()




Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 07, 2013, 08:59:22 PM
Thank you, Franzl. She will do - do very nicely.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 09, 2013, 10:59:01 AM
Thank you, Franzl. She will do - do very nicely.

She's there for The People, Duke.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 09, 2013, 12:12:32 PM
Ehh I'm not feeling it.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 09, 2013, 01:54:23 PM
I have founded the Cultural Marxist caucus within The People's Party. We need to finally get serious about working for The People and cultural marxism is a great way to do it.



Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 15, 2013, 08:10:08 PM
We need to vote on the Mideast Governor and assemblyman race before it begins. I am going to open the ballot tonight. Please rank the governors candidates 1-2, and simply check the box of the assembly candidates of those who you wish to endorse. TexasDem automatically receives our endorsement, as he is one of The People.

It is as follows:

Mideast Governor
[ ]Tmthforu (Fed)
[ ]drj101(Lab)
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain

Miodeast Assembly
[ ]Idaho Blue Dog Dem (Federalist-KY)
[ ]Inks.LWC (Federalist-MI)
[ ]ZuWo (Federalist-KY)
[ ]JCL (Federalist-IN)
[ ]Oldiesfreak1854 (Federalist-MI)
[ ]Gass3268 (Labor-WI)
[ ]A Person (Labor-IL)
[ ]Drj101 (Labor-VA)
[ ]Clinton1996 (Liberal-VA)
[X]TexasDem (TPP-MO) - ENDORSED
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 15, 2013, 08:23:54 PM
Mideast Governor
[1]Tmthforu (Fed)
[2]drj101(Lab)
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain

Miodeast Assembly
[X]Idaho Blue Dog Dem (Federalist-KY)
[ ]Inks.LWC (Federalist-MI)
[ ]ZuWo (Federalist-KY)
[ ]JCL (Federalist-IN)
[ ]Oldiesfreak1854 (Federalist-MI)
[X]Gass3268 (Labor-WI)
[ ]A Person (Labor-IL)
[X]Drj101 (Labor-VA)
[X]Clinton1996 (Liberal-VA)
[X]TexasDem (TPP-MO) - ENDORSED
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain


Title: Re: The People's Party (Convention City vote)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 15, 2013, 09:46:00 PM
Mideast Governor
[1]Tmthforu (Fed)
[2]drj101(Lab)
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain

Mideast Assembly
[ ]Idaho Blue Dog Dem (Federalist-KY)
[X]Inks.LWC (Federalist-MI)
[X]ZuWo (Federalist-KY)
[ ]JCL (Federalist-IN)
[ ]Oldiesfreak1854 (Federalist-MI)
[X]Gass3268 (Labor-WI)
[ ]A Person (Labor-IL)
[X]Drj101 (Labor-VA)
[X]Clinton1996 (Liberal-VA)
[X]TexasDem (TPP-MO) - ENDORSED
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain

I didn't endorse ID because he hasn't campaigned yet, and JCL, Oldies, and A Person because of political disagreements, though I don't doubt their genuineness.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: tmthforu94 on January 15, 2013, 09:49:23 PM
Cutting it close, eh. ;)

Thank you to TexasDem, Ben, and anyone else who chose to endorse me. :) I feel my record as a bi-partisan moderate in this game makes me the most qualified to win this endorsement. If any need swayed, I suppose I could give a longer spiel. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 15, 2013, 09:58:59 PM
The People know you better than you could imagine. As for our timing, we planned it so our endorsement will be front page news just as the polls open. No speech necessary. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 15, 2013, 11:05:34 PM
Mideast Governor
[ ]Tmthforu (Fed)
[ ]drj101(Lab)
[ ]No endorsement
[X]Abstain

Mideast Assembly
[ ]Idaho Blue Dog Dem (Federalist-KY)
[ ]Inks.LWC (Federalist-MI)
[X]ZuWo (Federalist-KY)
[ ]JCL (Federalist-IN)
[ ]Oldiesfreak1854 (Federalist-MI)
[ ]Gass3268 (Labor-WI)
[ ]A Person (Labor-IL)
[ ]Drj101 (Labor-VA)
[ ]Clinton1996 (Liberal-VA)
[X]TexasDem (TPP-MO) - ENDORSED
[ ]No endorsement
[ ]Abstain


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 16, 2013, 02:55:44 AM
I offer no endorsement but to our own candidate, TexasDem.

I'll vote as a private citizen and all our party members should do the same and follow their own conscience


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 16, 2013, 09:42:59 AM
Which begs the question, and something I have pondered before, is whether The Party should make public endorsements at all anymore. As a member of The Party, one secures the nomination of The People automatically, and after that person is preferenced, our Members are free to do as The People command.

But these things are informal nowadays anyway, as fusion ticket voting is no longer around. How often do party members in other parties follow their party's endorsements? The ones that are not mindless zombie voters anyway. Not very often I don't believe.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 18, 2013, 07:21:44 PM
Endorsement Voting - Mideast

Governor:
Tmth (2) ENDORSED
Drji101 (1)

Assembly:
TexasDem (all) ENDORSED
ZuWo (3) ENDORSED
Drj101 (3) ENDORSED
Gas3268(3) ENDORSED
Clinton1996 (2) ENDORSED

Congrats to all those who received The People's endorsement.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 19, 2013, 06:47:20 PM
FTR, it's ridiculous that we've been endorsing 5 people for the same Assembly election.  We did the same thing last At-Large :\


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Franzl on January 19, 2013, 06:48:19 PM
I think The People know themselves who They want to support.

I suggest that we stop holding endorsement votes.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 19, 2013, 08:33:31 PM
I favor at least cutting back to 1-2 endorsements max. It's not like any of Us following a guide when voting anyway. Doing away with them completely would be fine as well, especially since fusion voting is no longer around. Id hope most in The Party would be smart enough to know to support Our candidates candidates without needing an endorsement post. ;) 


Title: Re: The People's Party (Mideast Endorsement vote)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 24, 2013, 01:48:42 PM
I think limiting it to 1 per office outside of our own candidates would be a good compromise. Voting does give us something to do, you're correct. :P

But anyway, I am getting excited for The People's Convention. With Franzl's imported German ladies, things will get interesting. Remember, what happens at The Convention stays at The Convention.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 25, 2013, 04:21:54 PM
One of the things we need to do is update our Wiki, or actually make one. I used to have access to the Wiki years ago, but Dave apparently revoked my access or something.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 25, 2013, 04:53:52 PM
I will help out. I got access a few weeks ago. :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 25, 2013, 05:03:52 PM
I am having trouble finding a decent hotel to stay in the Buffalo area. Any help, lads?


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 25, 2013, 06:08:22 PM
We actually have one, though, it's just thrown together.

https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/The_People%27s_Party (https://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/The_People%27s_Party)



Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 25, 2013, 07:35:53 PM
"It has by laws" - I like that.

And Simfan, I'll be staying at the beer hall. They have rooms, and it's closer to Franzl's magic garden where we will of course hold our after parties.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Oakvale on January 25, 2013, 08:17:00 PM
This is exceedingly minor, but have we given any thought to a logo?

My instinct would be for something simple, bold and utilitarian, like this rough mock-up I made in Paint -

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 25, 2013, 08:35:11 PM
Yes. I like simple. The Party needs no flashy logo.

I also expect we should make a color official at the convention since it is unofficially pink at the moment. :P

I am also going to introduce an amended bylaw that limits our endorsements to one candidate per office outside of our official candidates.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 25, 2013, 10:19:00 PM
Is this too minimalistic? I just did this on Photoshop quickly. And are we wanting to go with purple as our color? :P

I modeled it after Oakvale's. I like the idea that TPP be modeled like an element, as it is The People who are the essential element of Atlasia, like oxygen is the essential element to life on earth. That's pretty deep stuff, am I right?

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention is coming)
Post by: Franzl on January 26, 2013, 04:34:24 AM
"It has by laws" - I like that.

And Simfan, I'll be staying at the beer hall. They have rooms, and it's closer to Franzl's magic garden where we will of course hold our after parties.

Excellent choice :)



Title: Re: The People's Party (Logo mockups!)
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on January 26, 2013, 03:03:54 PM
()

Also, your brackets are mismatched. -_-


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Adam Griffin on January 26, 2013, 04:03:21 PM
Purple? What happened to lovely pink? Now I'm going to have to get a new can of body paint for Duke. >:(


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 26, 2013, 04:49:00 PM
Purple? What happened to lovely pink? Now I'm going to have to get a new can of body paint for Duke. >:(

The pink was merely our media given color. If we ultimately decide on pink, then so be it, but The People have the right to choose their own color to represent Their party.

Since Oakvale used purple, I figure I would roll with it. I like it. But the final say is up to The People, of course.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on January 28, 2013, 08:32:44 PM
Greetings fellow People


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 28, 2013, 08:35:14 PM

Greetings and welcome back! I'm so excited to meet a longtime citizen such as yourself, being a newer member.

On another note, we have our first Midwestern member.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on January 28, 2013, 08:38:58 PM
Hot damn, trailblazing my way back to Atlasia. Take that lesser parties/regions. I can tell by your name that we'll get along just fine.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 28, 2013, 08:47:41 PM
Hot damn, trailblazing my way back to Atlasia. Take that lesser parties/regions. I can tell by your name that we'll get along just fine.

:) I think we will too.

Also, regarding the three logos before us, I prefer Oakvale's by far. I don't think we should go for something too extravagant, but A Person and Duke's creations are too austere for my taste.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 28, 2013, 09:20:58 PM
This is a great day for The Party. Fezzy has been an advocate for freedom since he joined this wretched place so many years ago. Now that are united once again, the sun will rise in Atlasia. Long live The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Franzl on January 29, 2013, 02:55:35 AM
Hot damn, trailblazing my way back to Atlasia. Take that lesser parties/regions. I can tell by your name that we'll get along just fine.

I'm sure you'll be a true hero of The People, Fezzy. Proud to have you.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on January 29, 2013, 06:45:20 AM
I support Oakvale's suggestion...


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 30, 2013, 12:35:26 AM
Suggestion of making an official logo or his logo itself? Either way, we can vote on a bunch of them at the upcoming convention.


Title: Re: The People's Party {Logo mockups!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 01:05:38 AM
Quick rundown of some of the things we need to do during the convention:

1. Decide on a logo
2. Decide on an official color, even if we want to go with pink, we need to make it official
3. Amend the bylaws to limit the number of endorsements we hand out per office
4. Speeches - open the floor to those seeking our endorsement and then for our own candidates who are running
5. Official endorsements

If The People so wish to do anything else, obviously, they will be free to do as much. As with all things, this is merely a blueprint. The People cannot be held in check by a rigid agenda.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos posted)
Post by: Oakvale on January 31, 2013, 04:01:32 PM
I will continue to advocate for a regal purple. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 04:36:22 PM
I will continue to advocate for a regal purple. :P

That's fine. I prefer regal purple to pink. I also had a request for green and a different logo, which I promised to work on. :P

The Convention will begin February 8, 2013, and run through February 17, 2013. That should give us plenty of time to accomplish what we need to accomplish. The Presidential and class B senate elections begin the 15th and run till the 17th.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 05:03:37 PM
For TexanDem (Tallyrand):

()

Critiquing is obviously welcomed. I was unsure about the overall colors of our name. I originally had it one color, and I do think I like it better that way. :P

Also, here is another remake of TPP logo with regal purple and the words in the letter, if we like that style.

()



Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 05:08:18 PM
Or if we like gold letters, just let me know and I will make as many copies as I need:

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 31, 2013, 05:23:24 PM
For TexanDem (Tallyrand):

()

Critiquing is obviously welcomed. I was unsure about the overall colors of our name. I originally had it one color, and I do think I like it better that way. :P

This is excellent! I agree it would probably be better in one color though.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on January 31, 2013, 05:23:54 PM
I love the purple logo.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 05:26:39 PM
Talley, green or blue? Originally, I was unsure which color to go along with. Although if we adopt that logo, I expect our official color will be green and not regal purpose.



Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 05:29:11 PM
()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 31, 2013, 05:34:43 PM
Yeah, green was my first preference, Duke. I completely support that logo. :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 05:51:33 PM
Yeah, green was my first preference, Duke. I completely support that logo. :)

Good. At least we are narrowing down our choices. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Simfan34 on January 31, 2013, 06:07:12 PM
That logo is too obvious.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: bore on January 31, 2013, 06:23:12 PM
Speaking as a non Person looking in, can I ask why have you nicked the UK conservatives logo?


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 31, 2013, 06:24:44 PM
Speaking as a non Person looking in, can I ask why have you nicked the UK conservatives logo?

It's awesome, but if it's too obvious, I guess it's probably not the best choice, though I'm still a fan of the whole concept of a tree representing The People.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 06:38:54 PM
OK, well, find a new tree we can use. Right now, we seem to have People who want to use the purple simplistic look and one who likes the tree concept. I have not endorsed either, and I will not until we vote, but I am here to use any Photoshopping skills I have to make these requests a reality.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 07:07:30 PM
()

I also found another tree. This one includes purple text, since we seem to be on a purple kick. Maybe it satisfies the masses? Maybe not. :P

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on January 31, 2013, 07:15:58 PM
I like both, although it could add a nice kick if our party name was superimposed on the middle of image for the first one.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Cincinnatus on January 31, 2013, 08:27:16 PM
()

I also found another tree. This one includes purple text, since we seem to be on a purple kick. Maybe it satisfies the masses? Maybe not. :P


Why not take oakvale's logo, stretch it as a banner, and put it under the damn tree.. Jesus..


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 08:31:39 PM
Don't get smart with me, man. I am going to superimpose that sh*t once I get out of class. I can do the banner jazz too, but aesthetically it would look silly. But being The Party of The People, we will all vote on all of these logos.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Adam Griffin on January 31, 2013, 08:37:25 PM
My rather lazy associates at Monsanto have provided this genetic abomination for consideration.

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 08:39:43 PM
The question is, do we want a purple tree? I can do both. I will do both.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on January 31, 2013, 09:54:17 PM
OK. So I can't really stretch Oakvale's banner because it looks ridiculous. If he wants, he can make a banner and I can impose it on a tree if we want to see what it looks like. Here is what I came up with:

()

()

()



Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on February 01, 2013, 06:59:47 AM
Out of those #2, the other one is verging on the motto for a 60s Batman villain


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on February 01, 2013, 09:54:06 AM
I like that last purple and green one. That or oakvale's with gold lettering. Or green might be cool too I guess.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 12:27:09 AM
I like that last purple and green one. That or oakvale's with gold lettering. Or green might be cool too I guess.

This is the closest I could get to Oakvale's with gold letters, it's a bit more blown up than his is, and I don't know what font he used:

()

And here are the tree logos, without being so bold. The purple is the same purple in Oakvale's logo since we like regal purple :P

()

and green:

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Simfan34 on February 03, 2013, 12:59:11 AM
STOP THE BEVELING.

Oh, you did. The last one is very nice.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Oakvale on February 03, 2013, 01:10:01 AM
I like the last one a lot.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on February 03, 2013, 02:35:51 AM
()

...and our color is green


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Simfan34 on February 03, 2013, 02:45:26 AM
Neh


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on February 03, 2013, 12:47:10 PM
Trees, eh? I still think you should go with purple and gold.
()()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Oakvale on February 03, 2013, 01:04:44 PM
I move we adopt Duke's last logo as our official party symbol, and the colour purple as our official party colour.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on February 03, 2013, 01:07:19 PM
I move we adopt Duke's last logo as our official party symbol, and the colour purple as our official party colour.

I agree on point one, but I would prefer green as our official party color simply to contrast with the orange-red/blue/maroon colors of the other three major parties. However, purple would be acceptable as long as we got that logo in. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 01:34:16 PM
I plan to have us vote on the logos and color at The Convention unless we have a unanimous agreement beforehand. If we have differing opinions, we can settle at the ballot box. Either way, The Will of The People will prevail.

I was just posting these now since I tend to be obsessive over a good logo and wanted to get as many out as possible so we'll have plenty of choices when we gather in Buffalo.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on February 03, 2013, 01:39:02 PM
I would also prefer green - lime green, specifically - as our party color.

That would be excellent! Look at the contrast-

The People's Party
Labor Party
Liberal Party
Federalist Party

The People's Party
Labor Party
Liberal Party
Federalist Party


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Oakvale on February 03, 2013, 01:55:26 PM
Green is fine by me - anything but the rather ghastly pink we've been using. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 02:28:10 PM
The pink will go down as a fond memory of mine. While I never really liked it, it took us so many places.

Lime green would be nice. I like that it is unique to the other parties, sort of like our party is unique of Atlasia. But, we can still vote next week on them in case regal purple has a silent majority out there. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on February 03, 2013, 02:38:45 PM
I support the third option too.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on February 03, 2013, 02:47:14 PM
I just stole the Seahawks colors for mine hehe


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 02:55:10 PM
I just stole the Seahawks colors for mine hehe

I noticed. You're is pretty sick. Kind of like the Seahaws unis.

Also, I updated the front page with our member numbers, office holders, leaders, etc., sort of as a minor housekeeping. If anyone was curious about how we were doing as a party, check it out. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Franzl on February 03, 2013, 03:29:53 PM
I want to welcome a Person to The Party. He and I have had our differences, but I'm confident he has the potential to become a great servant of The People, and I'm happy he has joined our cause.

Herzlich willkommen bei uns!


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on February 03, 2013, 03:34:33 PM
I extend warm greetings to A Person upon his joining of The Party as well. Despite his occasional craziness, he is truly one of The People and has joined us just in time for The Convention. Dave Bless.

:)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 03:37:38 PM
Yes, welcome. It is always nice when The People gain another follower to their cause. A Person is a significant new member. Not only does his name fit in with The Party, he is also the 15th member of The Party! Welcome!


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Marokai Backbeat on February 03, 2013, 03:42:48 PM
I would be overjoyed if you guys picked Green as your color; I could then refer to Marokai/Duke as a Red-Green ticket. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 03, 2013, 03:45:12 PM
I would be overjoyed if you guys picked Green as your color; I could then refer to Marokai/Duke as a Red-Green ticket. :P

Don't worry, my prince, it looks like The People's winds are blowing in that direction. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on February 04, 2013, 01:48:06 AM
I extend warm greetings to A Person upon his joining of The Party as well. Despite his occasional craziness, he is truly one of The People and has joined us just in time for The Convention. Dave Bless.

:)

Occasional? I must work harder!

Thanks for the welcome, everyone!


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention to-dos, more logos posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 04, 2013, 05:26:27 PM
OK. Below is the tentative schedule for The Convention. We will have a lot of downtime between voting, so anything is free to discuss.


Quote
()
February 5, 2013: The Doors will open! Members of The Party and The Caucus will have 72 hours to sign in. During this time, Party and Caucus Members may address The Convention.

February 8, 2013: We need to elect someone to preside over The Convention. Our bylaws call for a formal election, but we can elect someone by proclamation to hasten the process if need be.

February 9: Endorsement floor opens for 24 hours for candidates to declare their intentions to seek the endorsement of The People. The floor will be open for speeches by each candidate  seeking our endorsement.

February 10: we vote on these endorsements for 48 hours.

February 12: The People's Endorsements will be published. We will then begin voting on the official logo and color of The Party.

February 15-17: ELECTION

February 18: Chairman, Vice Chairman and Secretary approval vote and election of new leaders if necessary.

February 19-20: Amendments to bylaws, platform and other matters.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention Schedule posted)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on February 05, 2013, 08:48:07 PM
Since we settled on green, I made a little badge thing for people if they want one.

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention Schedule posted)
Post by: Talleyrand on February 05, 2013, 08:55:34 PM
Since we settled on green, I made a little badge thing for people if they want one.

()

Excellent! :) :) :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The Convention Schedule posted)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 18, 2013, 12:15:07 AM
I want to say a quick congratulations to all The People's candidates and all the other winners in this election. The early returns show we have not only retained our 3 senate seats, but we also have picked up a NE Assembly seat. It was a long, tough battle. I am especially  proud of all the hard work everyone in The Party did this weekend. It was truly a team effort. I will speak more at length at The Convention later. Stay tuned. The Convention will go on. We have more work to do! For The People!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congrats to the winners!)
Post by: Talleyrand on February 18, 2013, 12:17:19 AM
We need to have our party in Franzl's magic beer garden!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congrats to the winners!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on February 18, 2013, 12:20:32 AM


To the beer garden!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congrats to the winners!)
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on February 18, 2013, 12:23:15 AM
Remember to drink responsibly. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congrats to the winners!)
Post by: Franzl on February 18, 2013, 04:22:41 AM

There's only responsible drinking in my magic garden. Feel free to drop by for a pint :)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Post Convention return to this thread)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 15, 2013, 09:24:53 AM
Alright, guys. I will be in Washington till Sunday night without a laptop, so I am leaving it up to The People to decide if we need to start an endorsement vote for the special election before I return. It is Your Party, after all. PM me if anything is needed. I will have my iPhone with me at all times.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Congrats to the winners!)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on March 16, 2013, 03:48:38 AM

There's only responsible drinking in my magic garden. Feel free to drop by for a pint :)

...the hell!!!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement news)
Post by: Gass3268 on March 17, 2013, 10:30:28 PM
I humbly request the endorsement of The People's Party for the upcoming Mideast election. If anyone has any questions just shoot!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement news)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 17, 2013, 10:45:49 PM
Okay, friends. Candidates wishing to receive The People's Party's endorsement for the upcoming special senate election, Mideast assembly, and the IDS legislature election. Candidates have 48 hours to declare!


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on March 17, 2013, 10:58:45 PM
I should point out, considering my role in the Cabinet I will not be involved in internal party processes.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement news)
Post by: Gass3268 on March 17, 2013, 11:09:51 PM
Okay, friends. Candidates wishing to receive The People's Party's endorsement for the upcoming special senate election, Mideast assembly, and the IDS legislature election. Candidates have 48 hours to declare!

I don't need to redeclare right? :p


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: CLARENCE 2015! on March 17, 2013, 11:12:27 PM
Okay, friends. Candidates wishing to receive The People's Party's endorsement for the upcoming special senate election, Mideast assembly, and the IDS legislature election. Candidates have 48 hours to declare!
I humbly request the endorsement of this party for the upcoming Senate election


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: Dereich on March 18, 2013, 03:06:40 PM
I request The People's endorsement for the IDS legislature election.


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 19, 2013, 07:34:39 PM
I encourage my friends within the party to second-preference former Secretary of External Affairs Clarence.

In addition to Talleyrand, I hope that The People will support either former Game Moderator Shua or former Governor Zuwo in the Mideast Assembly election. (I would also like to see Gass and Inks win reelection.)

Well, the last two better declare here before midnight or we can't endorse them. :P


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 20, 2013, 09:07:16 AM
The declaration period has ended.

Party Members, please indicate your preference for Our Endorsement below:

Senate - Special Election
[ ] Clarence (FED)
Write in:

Mideast Assembly
[1] Talleyrand (TPP)
[ ] Gass3268 (LAB)
[ ] Write in:

IDS Legislature
[ ] Dereich (FED)
Write in:


Title: Re: The People's Party (Voting on Endorsements)
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on March 20, 2013, 02:21:58 PM
Senate - Special Election
[1] Snowguy (LAB)

Mideast Assembly
[1] Talleyrand (TPP)
[2] Gass3268 (LAB)

IDS Legislature
[1] Zanas (LAB)
[2] Hashemite (OTH)
[3] Dereich (FED)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Endorsement Declaration Period - 48 Hours)
Post by: fezzyfestoon on March 20, 2013, 05:27:27 PM
Senate - Special Election
[1] Snowguy (LAB)
[2] Clarence (FED)

Mideast Assembly
[1] Talleyrand (TPP)
[2] Gass3268 (LAB)

IDS Legislature
[1] Zanas (LAB)
[2] Hashemite (OTH)
[3] Dereich (FED)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Voting on Endorsements)
Post by: Chancellor Tanterterg on March 20, 2013, 05:41:48 PM
Senate - Special Election
[1] Clarence (FED)
[2] Snowguy (LAB)
[3] Kalwejt (LIB)

Mideast Assembly
[1] Talleyrand (TPP)
[2] Gass3268 (LAB)
[3] ZuWo (FED)
[4] Shua (LIB)
[5] Idaho Blue Dawg Dem (FED)

IDS Legislature
[1] Zanas (LAB)
[2] Hashemite (OTH)
[3] Dereich (FED)


Title: Re: The People's Party (Voting on Endorsements)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 24, 2013, 09:47:55 PM
I am pleased to announce The Party has adopted a team in the NCAA basketball tournament. We must throw out support behind The People's Team, the Florida Gulf Coast Eagles!

I believe of speak for The People when I say, GO EAGLES!

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (GO EAGLES!)
Post by: Zanas on March 25, 2013, 04:44:22 AM
You People are like the best ! I didn't even declare and you still endorsed me ! I love you. And I'll have a pint too, if that's possible. ;)


Title: Re: The People's Party (GO EAGLES!)
Post by: Franzl on March 25, 2013, 05:06:45 AM
You People are like the best ! I didn't even declare and you still endorsed me ! I love you. And I'll have a pint too, if that's possible. ;)

()


Title: Re: The People's Party (GO EAGLES!)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 25, 2013, 05:53:37 PM
I also did not close the voting booth. I guess after fezzy broke my heart by dropping out, I couldn't bare to do anything else.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on March 26, 2013, 12:04:18 AM
The People's Goodnight

Since September, The People's Party has led Atlasia through its actions, its grace and its dignity. But tonight, The People are going into The Night. The Party was founded on the basic principles that a strong community, a solid team, strong ethics, and a solid goal could take a party to places previously thought impossible. We proved that not only could a party of 16 members hold 5 senate seats, it could also hold 3 in one cycle, run a newspaper, elect a VP, and be home to some of the best senators in the game. The People were a culmination of Atlasia's best and brightest of the center-left, and it showed that when we, The People, work together, nothing can stop us but ourselves. And now, the center-left must work together to accomplish the ideals we hold so dear.

And tonight, we recognize that The Future is out there. The People must go forth into the world, mindful of our past, and hopeful of our future. Tonight, this project, known as The Party, ends. But The People will go on. We are always present, always willing to listen, and always walking with our heads up, listening to that butterfly fluttering its wings under the oak tree. The People will live on now and forever. On behalf of all of us in The People's Party, we say thank you to those who supported us throughout this endeavor. It truly represented the Power of The People.

Now it is time to leave...

X Duke


Title: Re: The People's Party (GO EAGLES!)
Post by: Talleyrand on March 26, 2013, 12:05:49 AM
X Mideast Chair Talleyrand (TexasDem)


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on March 26, 2013, 12:06:37 AM
x Polnut


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Cincinnatus on March 26, 2013, 12:07:08 AM
x Cincy


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Bacon King on March 26, 2013, 02:22:57 AM
X Bacon Kingman, The People's Attorney


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Franzl on March 26, 2013, 03:19:14 AM
X Franzl


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: SUSAN CRUSHBONE on March 26, 2013, 04:00:47 AM
x a Person


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee on March 26, 2013, 07:39:59 PM
...and you read all your letters from oceans away, and you took them to the bottom of the sea.

- "Ghosts of Cape Horn" - Gordon Lightfoot, from the end of side B of the cassette, "Gord's Gold Volume II".


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Zanas on March 28, 2013, 06:09:01 AM
Wait what ?

TPP just disbanded ? How did this happen exactly ? There were no harbinger I could see... I liked your party and your biergarten. :(


Title: Re: The People's Party (Back?)
Post by: Kitteh on June 20, 2013, 10:48:12 PM
So, with the passage of the We Need More Political Parties Amendment (if that is indeed valid, I know there was some court case surrounding it but I'm not sure what the outcome was), The People's Party is officially a major party again. There are three people still registered with TPP: AndrewPA, Franzl, and BluegrassBluevote, which is enough for it to qualify for major party status.

Is anything going to happen with this? Since Franzl has left the forum he'll eventually be de-registered, but if anyone wanted to resurrect this now would be the time.


Title: Re: The People's Party (The People's Goodnight)
Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on June 21, 2013, 09:53:08 AM
The People's Party cannot be resurrected by one man. No, it is truly a movement of Atlasia's best and brightest, and without Their return, The Party must remain dormant.

I do thank you for your interest in The Party. If you or anyone have any further questions or musings, please feel free to post them. This is, after all, still The People's Thread.