|
Title: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Miles on April 15, 2014, 12:18:27 PM Report. (http://www.mackinac.org/media/images/2014/Mitchell_Poll_Detroit_Funding.pdf)
Land (R)- 44% Peters (D)- 38% Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: free my dawg on April 15, 2014, 12:18:56 PM lol
Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Gass3268 on April 15, 2014, 12:32:36 PM Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: IceSpear on April 15, 2014, 12:33:58 PM http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2012/Mitchell_MI_0826.pdf If the election for the United States Senate was being held today and the candidates were Debbie Stabenow the Democrat and Pete Hoekstra the Republican who would you be voting for? If you are voting for or leaning towards Stabenow press 1, voting for or leaning towards Hoekstra press 2, if you’re not sure yet press 3. Stabenow 44 Hoekstra 45 Not sure yet 11 Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Tender Branson on April 15, 2014, 01:03:17 PM Poll results from Michigan-based pollsters should be ignored.
They simply can't poll their own state. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: DrScholl on April 15, 2014, 01:33:23 PM The usual suspects (not saying names) will be here soon to lecture about how this seat is Safe R.
Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: GaussLaw on April 15, 2014, 10:13:10 PM Looks like this will be a LANDslide, folks.
#UnskewedPolls #LandDomination #GOPSenateTakeover #Romneymentum :) Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: moderatevoter on April 15, 2014, 10:17:47 PM Looks like this will be a LANDslide, folks. Lol, that's a good one. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: free my dawg on April 19, 2014, 11:36:04 AM Turns out it was done for a free market think tank. (http://www.mackinac.org/media/images/2014/Mitchell_Poll_Detroit_Funding.pdf)
Let's not kid ourselves here - this is an internal disguised as a regular poll. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Citizen (The) Doctor on April 20, 2014, 04:57:47 PM It is a bit troubling to see Peters with still such low name recognition almost 6 months out.
Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on April 20, 2014, 05:08:43 PM The last Harper poll showed Peters 3 pts out, well within MOE, an R firm.
Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Torie on April 25, 2014, 11:56:20 AM Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits: WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). :P And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches.
Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Never on April 26, 2014, 01:13:32 PM Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits: WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). :P And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. Interesting perspective. I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely. The Michigan Senate race seems competitive, but I wouldn't even say Lean R unless Land manages to get above 48-50% in the polls, because Michigan is a Democratic state, and I am not sure if Land can overcome that, even though Braely appears does not appear to be a strong nominee. You probably don't have to be a great Democratic candidate to win in Michigan, but you would have to be a great Republican. Land might be good (she has won statewide), but not great, and she still needs to prove herself despite her lead in the polls. Still, she is better than Hoekstra, so this might be a race to watch closely. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: MalaspinaGold on April 26, 2014, 01:54:14 PM Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits: WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). :P And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: free my dawg on April 26, 2014, 02:31:20 PM Well, given the psephological truism, that as MI goes, so goes NH, at this rate the "projected" Pub gain in the Senate has hit double digits: WV, AR, SD, MT, LA, NC, AK, CO, MI, NH. The "only" issue remaining is if the Pubs can make it a dirty dozen (IA, VA). :P And there is MN out there too come to think of it. Who said 13 was an unlucky number? So many juicy targets - a veritable embarrassment of riches. Interesting perspective. I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely. The Michigan Senate race seems competitive, but I wouldn't even say Lean R unless Land manages to get above 48-50% in the polls, because Michigan is a Democratic state, and I am not sure if Land can overcome that, even though Braely appears does not appear to be a strong nominee. You probably don't have to be a great Democratic candidate to win in Michigan, but you would have to be a great Republican. Land might be good (she has won statewide), but not great, and she still needs to prove herself despite her lead in the polls. Still, she is better than Hoekstra, so this might be a race to watch closely. Because a light-blue state with an A-list candidate and the most competitive governor's race in the country is comparable to a popular Senator, a horrifically disorganized state party, and the next Bill Weld. Your concern trolling is admirable. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: pbrower2a on May 02, 2014, 12:38:12 PM Poll results from Michigan-based pollsters should be ignored. They simply can't poll their own state. I wish that Quinnipiac would poll Michigan. The junk pollsters would disappear. Title: Re: MI: Mitchell Research: Land leading by 6 Post by: Vosem on May 03, 2014, 01:18:58 PM I suppose that it would make sense to expect Scott Brown to win if Land can defeat Braely. I think you have a few names mixed up. Title: MI: Mitchell Research: Land Leading in Michigan Post by: ElectionAtlas on May 04, 2014, 11:52:29 AM New Poll: Michigan Senator by Mitchell Research on 2014-04-09 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2014/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=26220140409226)
Summary: D: 38%, R: 44%, U: 18% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.mackinac.org/media/images/2014/Mitchell_Poll_Detroit_Funding.pdf) |