Title: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: Flake on May 22, 2014, 08:22:26 PM New Poll: Massachusetts Governor by MassInc on 2014-05-18 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/GOVERNOR/2014/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=2520140518198)
Summary: D: 39%, R: 30%, U: 26% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2014/WBUR_MAGov_052214.pdf) Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: tmthforu94 on May 22, 2014, 11:36:08 PM I would hardly call a 9% lead with so many undecideds "safe".
Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: morgieb on May 23, 2014, 06:09:53 PM 26% undecideds? Colour me skeptical.
Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: Miles on May 23, 2014, 06:22:36 PM I would hardly call a 9% lead with so many undecideds "safe". Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: Niemeyerite on May 23, 2014, 09:14:25 PM I would hardly call a 9% lead with so many undecideds "safe". Undecideds most likely skew democrat, though. Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: ElectionsGuy on May 24, 2014, 04:36:06 PM While Coakley will more than likely win, wouldn't it be mildly amusing if she blew it again? That would, however she would REALLY have to do something bad to blow it this time. For some reason this is still what I would call Likely D. Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: World politics is up Schmitt creek on May 27, 2014, 09:59:27 PM I would hardly call a 9% lead with so many undecideds "safe". This. Having said which, from what I've seen 'on the ground' (as it were), people do seem a lot more sold on the idea of Coakley as our governor now than they ever did on the idea of her as our senator four and a half years ago. Having said that, I'm pretty sure she could still blow it. Title: Re: MA: MassInc: Coakley Safe Post by: Napoleon on May 27, 2014, 10:08:23 PM I would hardly call a 9% lead with so many undecideds "safe". Undecideds most likely skew democrat, though. But Coakley has the name recognition. Obviously a problem when a high profile prototype Democrat musters 39% in Massaeffingchusetts. Also I've seen polls showing Coakley ahead by more than nine points before...well how did that turn out guys? |