Talk Elections

Emerson College

CA President:
Clinton (D) 53%
Bush (R) 47%

Clinton (D) 53%
Walker (R) 47%

https://strehlspresidentialelection2016.wordpress.com/

LOL Emerson, try again.

Hillary wins by 15%+

()

Keep keeping on Emerson.

Why are you referencing a blog instead of the actual poll page?

0% undecided. What a state.

That sounds like a "Loof-Lipra" poll. Just read it backward.

Clinton wins CA, like IL, 56-44.

1. General election polls, at this stage, are meaningless
2. Even though, this poll is downright retarded

Republicans will eat this up and not question it at all.

I hope Republicans spend copious amounts of money in California.

Emerson college is a joke. Last year, their final poll showed Tisei leading by 3 in MA-06, he lost by 14. And the 0% undecided in this poll is so obviously false at this point in the cycle.
 

JUNK POLL!

The CBS affiliate in San Diego has repeated the poll:

http://www.cbs8.com/story/28796548/emerson-college-poll-california-may-be-in-play-for-2016-presidential-race-harris-leads-in-us-senate-race-71-support-water-use-restrictions


Somebody does not even understand polling statistics.

The margin of error means that each candidate's number, not the margin, may be off by, in this poll, up to 3.2%. So, under the best possible scenario for republicans, the margin of error would mean that Hillary is trailing 49.8-50.2 in CA. So, it's actually just barely within the margin of error under the minimal chance that this poll is actually credible.

Emerson needs to fail their statistics majors.

()

I doubt it's statistics students who do their polls. Their errors are always in a too-republican direction, so they probably just hire some low-key republican party operatives to produce their junk.

Wow, we make fun of muh ">Gravis" and muh "PPP approvals," but that record is nothing short of completely abysmal.

lol, try fooling someone else Emerson.

As much as I'm not a Hillary fan, 0% undecided? Junk poll!

Yeah, go ahead Republicans! California can become Atlas blue, if only you spend 50-100 millions.

He's gotta plug his blog some how. :P

More like 60 - 38.

I'm sorry to tell you that our state is still certifiably insane -- and this is a rotten poll.

Hillary did beat Obama in the 2008 California primary, so she might not do as bad in CA as people think.
Check out the CA 2008 primary exit poll , she demolished Obama among Hispanics interestingly enough.

% of total   Clinton   Obama   Edwards
25      White men   33      60      5   
28      White women   53      40      6   
13      Latino men   62      37      1   
16      Latino women   69      30      0   
26      Today/In the last three days   47      49      4   


http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/CA.html

Yeah, the "Hillary can't appeal to minorities like Obama can" myth is quite adorable.

It's hard to see what Republican candidate can poach any significant part of the Obama vote in California of 2008 and 2012. The Hispanic wife of Jeb Bush can't do it, and Ted Cruz is the wrong sort of Hispanic for California,

Until the Republican nominee fully repudiates the bad economics and anti-intellectualism of Republicans in the 21st century, California is a Democratic lock for the Presidency.

I'd like to know how Hillary polled among black men and women.

That's quite the impressive gender gap for whites.

Wow, look at that Bushmentum in California! Too bad there are no undecided voters, so he still can't win. However, if he only loses California by 6, he'll probably win the popular vote by 15!

Up next: Scott Walker leads in Vermont!

The irony of Obama being strongest with white men cracks me up.

Clinton typically did much better against Obama with Hispanics than non-Hispanic whites in 2008. Obama almost certainly did better amongst blacks. It's just not included (or known) in that breakdown.

The sweet irony of you being a liberal and have a Greece avitar. How does it feel to be passed up by Turkey?