|
Title: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Tender Branson on October 22, 2015, 04:11:37 PM Done Oct. 15-19:
36% Edwards (D) 19% Vitter (R) 17% Angelle (R) 14% Dardenne (R) 2% Others 12% Undecided http://de.scribd.com/doc/286105391/LA-Gov-Market-Research-Insight-Oct-2015 Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on October 22, 2015, 04:12:46 PM Looking good.
Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: MT Treasurer on October 22, 2015, 04:30:40 PM 19% Vitter (R) 17% Angelle (R) 14% Dardenne (R) Glorious poll! I hope either Angelle or Dardenne makes the runoff... Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Brewer on October 22, 2015, 04:37:50 PM Come on Vitter! Hold that second place title buddy!
Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: / on October 23, 2015, 05:46:31 AM Oh dear, Vitter really needs to make up ground in order to make sure that Edwards wins the runoff.
It's hilarious how a two-term United States Senator who actually survived a sex scandal is such an indisputably horrible campaigner. Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: ElectionsGuy on October 23, 2015, 03:52:30 PM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge.
Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Kingpoleon on October 24, 2015, 10:08:09 AM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge. Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Brewer on October 24, 2015, 01:51:08 PM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge. How is he corrupt? Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: 136or142 on October 24, 2015, 01:56:18 PM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge. I suspect you are thinking this Edwards is the corrupt former governor Edwin Edwards. This is John Bel Edwards, this state house minority leader. From what I've read he is generally regarded as not only being not corrupt, but actually being highly ethical. On the other hand, maybe you're using the logic of Sir Humphry from "Yes Minister": "can you really trust a person that seems to be squeaky clean?" Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: 136or142 on October 24, 2015, 02:00:17 PM Oh dear, Vitter really needs to make up ground in order to make sure that Edwards wins the runoff. It's hilarious how a two-term United States Senator who actually survived a sex scandal is such an indisputably horrible campaigner. He only survived the scandal because in 2010 more voters were angry with Obama than they were with him. He got through without a primary opponent (or at least without a major primary opponent, I don't know if anybody ran against him) because he said that 'he had asked God (and his wife) for forgiveness" and he was happy to report that both had forgiven him and, at that time, most Republicans believed him. Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Miles on October 24, 2015, 02:14:02 PM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge. I suspect you are thinking this Edwards is the corrupt former governor Edwin Edwards. This is John Bel Edwards, this state house minority leader. From what I've read he is generally regarded as not only being not corrupt, but actually being highly ethical. On the other hand, maybe you're using the logic of Sir Humphry from "Yes Minister": "can you really trust a person that seems to be squeaky clean?" Thats why Vitter's only argument against him is the usual Edwards = Obama. Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: ElectionsGuy on October 24, 2015, 02:23:57 PM Fascinating! The difference between Angelle getting the second spot and Vitter is huge. I suspect you are thinking this Edwards is the corrupt former governor Edwin Edwards. This is John Bel Edwards, this state house minority leader. From what I've read he is generally regarded as not only being not corrupt, but actually being highly ethical. On the other hand, maybe you're using the logic of Sir Humphry from "Yes Minister": "can you really trust a person that seems to be squeaky clean?" Thats why Vitter's only argument against him is the usual Edwards = Obama. How does that even work for a GOVERNOR race? No wonder he's failing badly. Title: Re: LA-Market Research Insight: Edwards ahead, close race for 2nd Post by: Miles on October 24, 2015, 02:28:08 PM ^ Yeah, thats why he's stumbling so badly these last few weeks, the spying scandal being a perfect example. I don't understand it. Edwards was the first candidate to announce for this race - it not like he made a surprise entry into it or anything. They had all that time to vet Edwards but Vitter's opposition research people must suck.
|