Title: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 06, 2016, 08:07:19 PM Blank map. () I am showing a color and shade only for States in which someone gets a majority or leads by 10%; electoral breakdown for states in which neither condition is met, in D-R-I order. D will be one color; Maine and Nebraska districts will not be so separated. White is for a tie at the top. To show how this works I will show a Democrat winning Maine 52-28-20 but losing the Second district, an Independent winning New Hampshire each with more than 40%, a Republican winning Vermont, a 46-46-8 tie in California, a Republican winning Nevada 38-33-29, a Democrat winning 40-37-33 in Arizona, a Libertarian winning New Mexico 42-35-23. Illustrative to show the color scheme and nothing else. White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Solely for showing the color scheme () Clinton (D) Trump (R) unnamed conservative independent (I) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 06, 2016, 08:31:13 PM Backtracking.
Gravis, Utah. Georgia, PPP. Florida, ARG. Michigan, Glengariff. () White is for ties. Even leads in the twenties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 07, 2016, 11:20:18 AM New. Quinnipiac, Connecticut:
Hillary Clinton (D): 41% Donald Trump (R): 36% Gary Johnson (L): 6% Jill Stein (G): 3% () White is for ties. Even leads in the twenties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 08, 2016, 07:48:22 AM More backtracking:
North Carolina, PPP: Donald Trump (R): 43% Hillary Clinton (D): 41% Gary Johnson (L): 3% Jill Stein (G): 2% Oklahoma, -Cole Hargrave Snodgrass & Associates Trump 48% Clinton 28% Johnson 6% Undecided 18% New Mexico http://nmpoliticalreport.com/44100/clinton-leads-in-nm-in-three-way-race/ Clinton: 41% Trump: 33% Johnson: 14% This is a three-way poll, and it shows how far behind Donald Trump will be in New Mexico. Virginia, Gravis Marketing: Clinton 44 Trump 38 Johnson 6 http://gravismarketing.com/polling-and-market-research/virginia-election-poll052016/ () White is for ties. Even leads in the twenties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Margin-based plan which I will use hereon for visual clarity. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. Absolute majorities: the color is all that I will show. Anyone with 50% or more of the raw vote wins anyway. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Solely to illustrate what a tie and a Libertarian lead, and decisive leads for either Clinton or Trump will look like I will show the unlikely scenario of a tie in North Dakota between Clinton and Trump (with Johnson getting 16) and a Libertarian lead in South Dakota in which Clinton is in second place with 44L, 32D, 22R . In this case the second-place candidate is identified by party and raw number. Also preposterously suggesting that Hillary Clinton will get 52% of the vote in Nebraska and that Trump will get more 52% of the vote in Minnesota... the map below is an illustration and not a prediction of reality... Margin-based plan. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: Sprouts Farmers Market ✘ on June 08, 2016, 09:38:46 AM Are we already ignoring the FL PPP poll?
Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 08, 2016, 10:35:12 AM Are we already ignoring the FL PPP poll? No. Pennsylvania, PPP http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/06/pennsylvania-close-sanders-supporter-unity-would-make-it-not-close.html http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_PA_60816.pdf Clinton 41 Trump 40 Johnson 6 Stein 3 Democrats lead a generic ballot question for President 45/41 Only 72% of Sanders supporters support Clinton. If Clinton got half of them, her lead over Trump head to head would be 47-40. Hillary Clinton (D): 47% Donald Trump (R): 35% Gary Johnson (L): 7% Undecided: 12% Clinton is leading 67-17 in Chicago and 47-35 in suburban Cook County. Trump, however, is ahead 42-38 in the suburban collar counties and leads by ten points, 45-35, among Downstate voters http://www.rebootillinois.com/2016/06/10/featured-articles/richmiller/capitol-fax-poll-voters-blame-michael-madigan-for-budget-mess/59655/ Margin-based plan which I will use hereon for visual clarity. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. Absolute majorities: the color is all that I will show. Anyone with 50% or more of the raw vote wins anyway. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 12, 2016, 12:52:59 AM Utah, SurveyUSA Clinton: 35 Trump: 35 Johnson: 13 https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/315450242/Salt-Lake-Tribune-President-Poll Margin-based plan which I will use hereon for visual clarity. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. Absolute majorities: the color is all that I will show. Anyone with 50% or more of the raw vote wins anyway. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 12, 2016, 07:58:22 AM Johnson strength map as of now:
Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 under 3: 30 () (Hope you're okay with me using your thread for this, pbrower. If you aren't, just tell me. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 12, 2016, 11:08:50 AM Johnson strength map as of now: Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 under 3: 30 () (Hope you're okay with me using your thread for this, pbrower. If you aren't, just tell me. I strongly approve. Ironically I may have to close the thread in which I show the binary choice between Clinton and Trump. Support for the Libertarian ticket is NOT academic. The two Libertarian nominees for President and Vice-President have two of the greatest strengths that I have seen in any Third-Party candidacy in my lifetime (which does not include the racist Thurmond campaign of 1948) -- two nominees with elective records in offices whence Presidents come from. There's much discontent with both Parties, and I can imagine many Republicans seeing Johnson and Weld as closer to their political orthodoxy than is The Donald. This is not a racist ticket that might win some states in a region yet get practically no support elsewhere. So for people who can stomach neither Donald Trump nor Hillary Clinton -- here is the first Third Party nominee since Robert LaFollette in 1924 to win any electoral votes without being a racist secession from a major Party. But even if Johnson/Weld does not win any electoral votes, the Libertarians can draw enough votes away from the Republican ticket to swing some states. (To a lesser extent, so could Jill Stein. Let us remember that in 2008 such happened in Missouri and North Carolina. The right-wing Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr won enough votes to keep John McCain from winning North Carolina, and the left-wing Green Party nominee Ralph Nader won enough votes in Missouri to keep Barack Obama from winning Missouri. McCain and Barr nominees won more votes than Obama and Nader in North Carolina, and Obama and Nader won more votes than McCain and Barr in Missouri. It mattered little that year. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 12, 2016, 04:57:56 PM Margin-based plan which I will use hereon for visual clarity. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. Absolute majorities: the color is all that I will show. Anyone with 50% or more of the raw vote wins anyway.
Change in the display: removing the letter indicating which party nominee has the lead. The color should make that obvious. I am also replacing the comma with a slash. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 12, 2016, 09:41:37 PM States that I most want to see polled now for this map:
Ohio Iowa Colorado Arizona New Hampshire Nevada Wisconsin Minnesota Nebraska Missouri PPP gives us a poll of Virginia this week. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 13, 2016, 05:22:23 PM Margin-based plan which I will use hereon for visual clarity. Partisan lead, then Johnson number. This should be easier to read. Colors based upon absolute totals for the leader. Absolute majorities: the color is all that I will show. Anyone with 50% or more of the raw vote wins anyway.
California, University of Southern California; Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-california-exit-poll-20160613-snap-story.html Clinton: 61 Trump: 31 If Hillary Clinton is this far ahead in California, the Johnson vote in California will be of at most arcane interest. Virginia, PPP 48-45 without third parties 42-39 with third parties (I believe Gary Johnson is at 9%) This was reported on the Rachel Maddow show and PPP says they will put out the PDF of the full poll tomorrow () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 13, 2016, 08:27:46 PM Johnson strength map including the California poll - we can assume he's in the "2-3" category here: Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 15, 2016, 11:02:29 PM Virginia update because I am using it elsewhere:
Johnson strength map including the California poll - we can assume he's in the "2-3" category here: Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 16, 2016, 06:16:08 AM Johnson strength map including the Virginia PPP poll and Illinois poll - he's at 6% in both, meaning no change.
Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 17, 2016, 01:54:20 PM Two westerly states. No suggestion of how many would vote for Gary Johnson, but I would expect substantial numbers in both states.
Arizona (private poll) -- Trump 42, Clinton 39. Washington, PPP -- Clinton 49, Trump 37. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) [/quote] Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 18, 2016, 01:22:51 PM States that I would love to see polled:
Three-way (I see this Presidential race as three-way now): Iowa Ohio Wisconsin Minnesota Oregon Colorado Nevada Nebraska Kansas New Hampshire Montana Missouri Arizona Indiana Not that I trust any polls from these two states: Alaska Texas Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 19, 2016, 09:16:34 PM Johnson strength map Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 20, 2016, 05:09:12 AM Johnson strength map Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () I like this. I'm going with it. Thank you. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 21, 2016, 05:36:13 AM Quinnipiac FLOP (FLorida-Ohio-Pennsylvania):
Florida: Clinton 42%, Trump 36%, Johnson 7%, Stein 3% Ohio: Clinton 38%, Trump 36%, Johnson 8%, Stein 3% Pennsylvania: Clinton 39%, Trump 36%, Johnson 9%, Stein 4% https://www.qu.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2359 Survey conducted by Dan Jones & Associates June 8-17, 2016. 614 registered Utah voters. Margin of error +/- 3.95% 36% Trump 27% Clinton 10% Johnson 2% Stein http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/9909-poll-donald-trump-has-a-nine-point-lead-on-hillary-clinton-in-utah () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 21, 2016, 05:40:24 AM Johnson strength map Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Stein: CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, OH 3, PA 4, UT 2 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 21, 2016, 06:12:03 AM Stein: CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, OH 3, PA 4 Stein strength map (why not?) () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: 5280 on June 21, 2016, 01:04:19 PM Using yellow for the Green Party?
Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 22, 2016, 10:25:04 AM Using yellow for the Green Party? Switched to lavender. I notice that the color scheme can change some. This might be good for primaries and election coverage. Just testing here: () 1 - red 2 - blue 3 - green 4- yellow 5- orange 6 - purple (more reddish) 7- tan/brown 8- lavender (about neutral between blue and red) 9 - purple (more bluish) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: Dr. Arch on June 22, 2016, 11:39:47 AM Using yellow for the Green Party? Switched to lavender. I notice that the color scheme can change some. This might be good for primaries and election coverage. Just testing here: () 1 - red 2 - blue 3 - green 4- yellow 5- orange 6 - purple (more reddish) 7- tan/brown 8- lavender (about neutral between blue and red) 9 - purple (more bluish) LOL Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: / on June 22, 2016, 12:32:10 PM Yeah, I would make Stein green and Johnson yellow. I know yellow doesn't show up that well in text, but you can use gold instead.
Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 22, 2016, 02:28:21 PM New poll for Arizona:
Conducted 6/20, MOE +/- 3.01% Clinton 46.5% Trump 42.2% Third party candidate 5.8% http://email.connectstrategic.com/t/j-2A45CA0283AA87B8 1. I think that the third-party nominees are going to get nearly 10% of the vote in Arizona, and that will more hurt Trump than Clinton. 2. Decimals, which are suspect. 3. Not defined as "Registered Voters" or "Likely Voters". But who knows what a "likely voter" will be in November? 4. Arizona going to Hillary Clinton would indicate that she has also won Colorado and Nevada. 5. I've seen some other polls that violate the conventional wisdom about some other states, most notably Utah and Kansas -- all to the benefit of Hillary Clinton. 6. Since 1948, the strongest performance for a Democratic nominee for President in raw vote percentage was LBJ, who barely lost Arizona (50.45-49.45%) to Favorite Son Barry Goldwater. Bill Clinton won in 1996, but with Ross Perot picking off far more R than D votes. Bill Clinton got 46.52% of the vote. Barack Obama got just under 45% of the popular vote in Arizona, which is historically good for a Democrat in Arizona. But should there be a Trump collapse, then Arizona does go D. 7. Do you fully trust this poll? I don't. Arizona will be an interesting state to poll this year. So will be Kansas. Texas, by a pollster of which I have never heard: 37% Donald Trump (R) 30% Hillary Clinton (D) 3% Gary Johnson (L) http://www.lelandbeatty.com/uploads/1/4/2/1/14214393/txg16beattypollresultsfinalresults.pdf I would expect a libertarian to do very well in Texas. North Carolina by a pollster that we know very well (PPP): Head to Head: Trump - 48% Clinton - 46% 4 Person Race: Clinton - 43% Trump - 43% Johnson - 4% Stein - 2% Undecided - 7% http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/06/presidential-race-knotted-in-nc-senate-race-close.html () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 22, 2016, 06:07:19 PM Johnson strength map now with crappy Texas poll Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on June 23, 2016, 12:57:11 PM Johnson strength map now with North Carolina poll Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 25, 2016, 09:18:58 PM Maine, U-New Hampshire... It's complicated.
Hillary Clinton is up 7 overall in the state but nearly tied in the Second Congressional District. Democratic presumptive presidential nominee Hillary Clinton led Republican Donald Trump in a new Maine poll from the Portland Press Herald, but both are deeply unpopular and Trump is within striking distance in the state’s northern half. The poll doesn’t tell us much new about the 2016 race for the White House in Maine: Public sentiment, as measured by the new poll, barely moved since another March poll, but while the Democrat should be favored, Trump can’t be counted out to win at least one of the state’s four Electoral College votes. Maine allocates two Electoral College votes to the overall winner and one each for the candidate who receives the most votes in each congressional district. A candidate who loses Maine’s overall vote could walk away with one Electoral College vote if he or she garnered a majority in one of the two congressional districts although that has never happened. In the more rural and conservative 2nd Congressional District, it appears Trump has an opening this year. Statewide, Clinton received 42 percent of support to Trump’s 35 percent in the poll of more than 609 Mainers. Another 19 percent said they’d vote for another candidate and 4 percent were undecided. Statewide: Clinton 42 Trump 35 Other 19 Undecided 4 http://stateandcapitol.bangordailynews.com/2016/06/25/poll-clinton-leads-trump-in-maine-but-race-tied-in-2nd-district/ Arkansas, Hendrix College/Talk Business A new survey among frequent Arkansas general election voters finds Republican presumptive Presidential nominee Donald Trump with an 11-point lead over Democratic presumptive Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The latest poll from Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College was conducted on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 among 751 Arkansas voters and has a margin of error of +/- 3.6%. Survey respondents were asked: Q: If the 2016 election were held today and your choices were Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump, and Libertarian Gary Johnson, for whom would you vote? 36% Hillary Clinton 47% Donald Trump 8% Gary Johnson 9% Don’t Know Additionally, survey respondents were asked if their Presidential selections were based on support for a candidate or in opposition to a candidate. http://talkbusiness.net/2016/06/tbp-hendrix-poll-trump-holds-lead-over-clinton-in-arkansas/ Weak in contrast to how Arkansas rejected Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME:D7.??;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 26, 2016, 11:18:53 AM Maine, U-New Hampshire... It's complicated.
Hillary Clinton is up 7 overall in the state but nearly tied in the Second Congressional District. Democratic presumptive presidential nominee Hillary Clinton led Republican Donald Trump in a new Maine poll from the Portland Press Herald, but both are deeply unpopular and Trump is within striking distance in the state’s northern half. The poll doesn’t tell us much new about the 2016 race for the White House in Maine: Public sentiment, as measured by the new poll, barely moved since another March poll, but while the Democrat should be favored, Trump can’t be counted out to win at least one of the state’s four Electoral College votes. Maine allocates two Electoral College votes to the overall winner and one each for the candidate who receives the most votes in each congressional district. A candidate who loses Maine’s overall vote could walk away with one Electoral College vote if he or she garnered a majority in one of the two congressional districts although that has never happened. In the more rural and conservative 2nd Congressional District, it appears Trump has an opening this year. Statewide, Clinton received 42 percent of support to Trump’s 35 percent in the poll of more than 609 Mainers. Another 19 percent said they’d vote for another candidate and 4 percent were undecided. Statewide: Clinton 42 Trump 35 Other 19 Undecided 4 http://stateandcapitol.bangordailynews.com/2016/06/25/poll-clinton-leads-trump-in-maine-but-race-tied-in-2nd-district/ Arkansas, Hendrix College/Talk Business A new survey among frequent Arkansas general election voters finds Republican presumptive Presidential nominee Donald Trump with an 11-point lead over Democratic presumptive Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. The latest poll from Talk Business & Politics-Hendrix College was conducted on Tuesday, June 21, 2016 among 751 Arkansas voters and has a margin of error of +/- 3.6%. Survey respondents were asked: Q: If the 2016 election were held today and your choices were Democrat Hillary Clinton, Republican Donald Trump, and Libertarian Gary Johnson, for whom would you vote? 36% Hillary Clinton 47% Donald Trump 8% Gary Johnson 9% Don’t Know Additionally, survey respondents were asked if their Presidential selections were based on support for a candidate or in opposition to a candidate. http://talkbusiness.net/2016/06/tbp-hendrix-poll-trump-holds-lead-over-clinton-in-arkansas/ Weak in contrast to the rejection that Arkansas showed for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. Unless something changes, I'll use this plan 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 26, 2016, 11:41:10 AM Colorado, Florida, North Carolina, Wisconsin, CBS/YouGov. Gold mine.
() Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) [/quote] Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 26, 2016, 12:40:19 PM Stein: CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, OH 3, PA 4 Add or replace: CO 1 FL 1 NC 1 WI 2 Stein strength map (why not?) () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 27, 2016, 12:57:55 PM Texas, UT-Austin
Trump 39 Clinton 32 Johnson 7 Other 14 Don't know 8 https://texaspolitics.utexas.edu/blog/university-texas-texas-politics-project-poll-shows-trump-leading-clinton-amidst-signs-disunity Not that I trust any Texas poll due to the built-in difficulties of polling the state. The 8% lead is very weak. In recent years Texas suburbs have been very strongly Republican. What distinguishes these suburbs from older suburbs of Boston, Philadelphia, New York, Cleveland, Detroit, Chicago, and even San Francisco is that Texas suburbs are newer and have yet to have the great costs of maintenance that one associates with older infrastructure. Demolition of tract houses with their replacement by apartment complexes, a commonplace act with 70-year-old tract houses at their useful lives (those are post-WWII houses associated with returning war veterans, and those houses are now obsolete if not in poor shape) implies needs for the improvement of highways and sewers and expansion of waste-treatment facilities. Texas suburbs do not yet have those problems, so right-wing pols can still flourish there. See also Georgia and Arizona. Donald Trump is the worst cultural match for President that the Republicans have offered or will offer Texas since at least Gerald Ford in 1976. Ford lost that year to Jimmy Carter. In the event of a collapse of the Trump campaign that allows Texas to go Democratic, Hillary Clinton will have about 450 electoral votes. http://www.politico.com/states/new-jersey/story/2016/06/poll-clinton-has-huge-lead-over-trump-in-nj-103338 http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2016/160629/ Clinton 52 Trump 31 Clinton 44 Trump 32 Johnson 9 Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Pennsylvania 246 New Hampshire 250 Iowa 256 Nevada 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 313 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on June 29, 2016, 10:56:52 AM ()
[/quote] Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Pennsylvania 246 New Hampshire 250 Iowa 256 Nevada 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 313 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 [/quote] Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 07, 2016, 04:04:47 AM California, Field Poll:
() http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article88085407.html When Gary Johnson is added to the binary choice, he picks up as more people (2%) leaning toward Clinton (8%) as toward Trump (2%) in the binary choice. This is unusual, but possible, and it could be unique to California. Silicon Valley? ...The closest analogue to California in a three-way race is 1996, when Hillary's husband won 51% of the California vote, Bob Dole got 38%, and Ross Perot got 7%. That was consistent with Bill Clinton getting just over 49% of the popular vote, Dole got just under 41% of the vote, and Perot got slightly over 8% of the vote nationwide. Bill Clinton got 379 electoral votes in 1996, the largest number of electoral votes that any Democrat has won since 1964 Oregon Clinton 46 Trump 32 Undecided 22 This is actually a state where Johnson and Stein combined can cleave off about 10% https://icitizen.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/OR-Weighted-Tabs-Public-1.pdf Vermont: Hillary Clinton (D): 39% Donald Trump (R): 24% Gary Johnson (L): 10% Other: 12% http://vtdigger.org/2016/07/07/poll-clinton-has-15-point-edge-over-trump-in-vermont/ Vermont's Favorite Son won't be on the November ballot. Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Pennsylvania 246 New Hampshire 250 Iowa 256 Nevada 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 313 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 11, 2016, 04:35:08 PM http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/monmouth-university-24854
Nevada Clinton 45 Trump 41 Johnson 5 Undecided 4 None 4 Donald Trump is not going to win Nevada. CO -- Harper 45% Clinton 38% Trump 14% Someone else 4% Not sure http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2596243 Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Note my re-ordering of the states. Nevada 232 Pennsylvania 238 New Hampshire 258 Iowa 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 303 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 12, 2016, 03:47:56 PM Stein: CO 1 CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, OH 3, PA 4, WI 2 Add or replace: IA 1 Stein strength map (why not?) () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: TomC on July 12, 2016, 10:19:56 PM Your EV totals count Fl as 19 not 29
ETA: but Ohio as 28 instead of 18 so the total works Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 13, 2016, 08:35:54 AM Quinnipiac, FL. OH, PA:
4-way: Florida Trump 41% Clinton 36% Johnson 7% Stein 4% Ohio Trump 37% Clinton 36% Johnson 7% Stein 6% Pennsylvania Trump 40% Clinton 34% Johnson 9% Stein 3% Marist, IA, OH, PA https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/753273220200030208 http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-or-even-midwest-battlegrounds-n608651 OH Clinton 39 Trump 39 Clinton 38 Trump 35 Johnson 9 Stein 3 IA Clinton 42 Trump 39 Clinton 37 Trump 37 Johnson 7 Stein 4 PA Clinton 45 Trump 36 Clinton 43 Trump 35 Johnson 8 Stein 2 Averaging Marist and Quinnipiac in Ohio and Pennsylvania and an extant poll in Iowa. July 5-10, MOE +/-3.4% Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Note my re-ordering of the states. Nevada 232 Pennsylvania 238 New Hampshire 258 Iowa 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 303 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 13, 2016, 08:10:35 PM Stein: CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, OH 3, PA 4 Add or replace: VA 4 Stein strength map (why not?) () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 13, 2016, 09:48:40 PM Quinnipiac, FL. OH, PA: 4-way: Florida Trump 41% Clinton 36% Johnson 7% Stein 4% Ohio Trump 37% Clinton 36% Johnson 7% Stein 6% Pennsylvania Trump 40% Clinton 34% Johnson 9% Stein 3% Marist, IA, OH, PA https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/753273220200030208 http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-or-even-midwest-battlegrounds-n608651 OH Clinton 39 Trump 39 Clinton 38 Trump 35 Johnson 9 Stein 3 IA Clinton 42 Trump 39 Clinton 37 Trump 37 Johnson 7 Stein 4 PA Clinton 45 Trump 36 Clinton 43 Trump 35 Johnson 8 Stein 2 Averaging Marist and Quinnipiac in Ohio and Pennsylvania and an extant poll in Iowa with a Gravis poll. . July 5-10, MOE +/-3.4% Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Note my re-ordering of the states. Nevada 232 Pennsylvania 238 New Hampshire 258 Iowa 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 303 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 13, 2016, 09:52:56 PM Third party trial heats (FoX News):
Virginia Clinton 39 Trump 34 Johnson 10 Stein 4 Colorado Clinton 37 Trump 28!!!!!! Johnson 13 Stein 6 WI -- Marquette University Law School: July 7 - July 10 Registered Voters Clinton 43% (+1 since June) Trump 37% (+2 since June) Likely Voters Clinton 45% (-1 since June) Trump 41% (+4 since June) 4 Way Race Registered Clinton 40% Trump 33% Johnson 10% Stein 4% 4 Way Race Likely Voters Clinton 43% Trump 37% Johnson 8% Stein 2% ...Marquette University Law School has begun to recognize that the 2012 Presidential election is now a three-way race. Registered gives Hillary Clinton a 7% lead; likely gives a 6% lead. Rounding to the nearer even number. Kansas, SurveyUSA. If you didn't like the Zogby poll, then all you needed do was wait. http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=7a998d53-af1c-4a34-996c-6de020dea785&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter Trump 47 Clinton 36 Johnson 8 Undecided 9 MO - PPP Missouri, PPP: Trump 46 - Clinton 36 - Johnson 7 - Stein 1 Trump 49 - Clinton 37 (Parties mentioned) Obama approval 39% Preference between Obama and Trump -- 42% Obama, 50% Trump http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_Missouri_71516.pdf Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () White is for ties. Even leads in the thirties of 1% or more will be shown in the color of the winner. I am averaging for North Carolina. I do not accept the St. Leo University poll that shows Hillary Clinton up 15 on Donald Trump in Florida. Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Nevada 232 Pennsylvania 238 New Hampshire 258 Iowa 262 Colorado 271 ME-02 272 Virginia 285 Ohio 303 Florida 332 North Carolina 347 Arizona 359 NE-02 360 Missouri 370 Indiana 381 Georgia 396 Kansas 402 NE-01 403 South Carolina 412 Texas 450 With the wild fluctuations in polling this estimate is now pointless. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 15, 2016, 09:54:35 AM Florida -- Greenberg-Quinlan-Rasler
Clinton 45 Trump 40 Johnson 6 Other 2 Undecided 7 Missouri, PPP: Trump 46 - Clinton 36 - Johnson 7 - Stein 1 Trump 49 - Clinton 37 (Parties mentioned) Obama approval 39% Preference between Obama and Trump -- 42% Obama, 50% Trump http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_Missouri_71516.pdf Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on July 17, 2016, 06:53:34 AM Fixed IA on strength map
() Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 17, 2016, 05:26:18 PM Florida -- Greenberg-Quinlan-Rasler
Clinton 45 Trump 40 Johnson 6 Other 2 Undecided 7 Missouri, PPP: Trump 46 - Clinton 36 - Johnson 7 - Stein 1 Trump 49 - Clinton 37 (Parties mentioned) Obama approval 39% Preference between Obama and Trump -- 42% Obama, 50% Trump http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_Missouri_71516.pdf Illinois: The Illinois Poll Statewide poll of 1200 likely Illinois voters conducted Victory Research July 14-16, 2016. Margin of error 2.83% 312-388-1782 www.illinoispolitics.webs.net@ilpollster Clinton 50.9 Trump 34.3 Johnson 6.8 Stein 3.6 Stein Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 18, 2016, 05:51:39 PM Worthless, Michigan.
Clinton - 34 Trump - 29 Johnson - 3 Stein - 2 Undecided - 23 http://mrgmi.com/2016/07/michigan-poll-trump-trails-clinton-by-five-percent-heading-into-gop-convention/ Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 18, 2016, 10:08:37 PM "Idaho Voters Favor Trump over Clinton "
601 LV Trump (R): 44% Clinton (D): 23% Johnson (L): 5% Stein (G): 3% Undecided/Someone Else: 21% http://idahopoliticsweekly.com/politics/1145-poll-idaho-voters-favor-trump-over-clinton Kansas, Fort Hays State: 487 LV, July 11-21: 44% Trump 27% Clinton 7% Johnson 6% Others 16% Undecided PDF Link http://cjonline.com/news/2016-07-24/poll-huelskamp-marshall-tied-trump-leads-clinton-kansas Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: LLR on July 21, 2016, 11:52:06 AM That was a poll of only the 4th CD of Utah...
Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 21, 2016, 06:15:07 PM That was a poll of only the 4th CD of Utah... Error recognized, troublesome post deleted. Thank you. Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 21, 2016, 06:19:55 PM Ohio, Suffolk.
44-44 Clinton/Trump New Hampshire, U-New Hampshire, WMUR-TV (ABC 9) 43-39-5-1 Clinton/Trump/Johnson/Stein 2-way Hillary Clinton (D): 39% Donald Trump (R): 37% 4-way Hillary Clinton (D): 37% Donald Trump (R): 37% Johnson 10% Stein 5% Clinton absolutely crushes Trump among NH women (47%-26%). He leads 48%-31% among men, a gender gap of 38 points! B-b-b-but I thought a Trump/Pence ticket could appeal to White NH women?! https://cola.unh.edu/sites/cola.unh.edu/files/research_publications/gsp2016_summer_presrace072116.pdf Considering that the Republicans are monopolizing the coverage this week, this is very good for Hillary Clinton. 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Even with these leads (Q does not push voters)... Donald Trump is more likely to be close to his ceiling in most of these states. Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 21, 2016, 06:32:53 PM Stein: CT 3, FL 3, NC 2, NH 5, OH 1, PA 4, VA 4 Add or replace: GA 3, MA 3 Stein strength map (why not?) -- same intensity of color as for Johnson () Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 24, 2016, 08:04:39 AM Alabama, two-way race. Johnson irrelevant if Trump is over 50%.
Donald Trump 57% Hillary Clinton 33% http://wkrg.com/2016/07/21/trump-wins-alabama-but-some-supporters-may-not-like-him/ Georgia, WSB-TV (ABC-2, Atlanta), rk Communications: http://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/trump-hillary-poll/411369450 Trump - 46 Clinton - 44 Johnson - 5 Stein - 3 Georgia is a legitimate swing state this year. Missouri may not be: Missouri, SurveyUSA, KSDK-TV (NBC-5, St. Louis) () We get few polls of Massachusetts, which will definitely not be a swing state: 49% Clinton 31% Trump 4% Johnson 3% Stein http://consumerenergyalliance.org/2016/06/energy-costs-infrastructure-important-bay-staters Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 MA: D14,4;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 29, 2016, 01:18:53 PM Missouri may not be:
Missouri, SurveyUSA, KSDK-TV (NBC-5, St. Louis) () But Mason-Dixon has a poll of Missouri and suggests this: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/trump-clinton-in-virtual-tie-in-missouri/article_ecbca03a-ea36-5bef-bf8c-fcb817cc7c31.html http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/e/a9/ea922fa3-95f2-55e3-a1df-5ce1ab4e2a2f/579a6a9a2b00d.pdf.pdf Clinton 41 Trump 40 Johnson 9 Stein 1 Poll was conducted from July 23-24. 625 LV, Mason-Dixon. I will need to average these, as they come from the same week. That's Trump 43.5, Clinton 39, Johnson 9.5 Rounding to the even number for a half, that's 44-39, 10 Figuring that "likely voters" are whiter and older, such suggests that Missouri will be closer than "my" average. The PPP poll is older and it does not figure in, thank you. Back to swing status for Missouri. Johnson support: 16%+: 80 13-15: 70 10-12: 60 7-9: 50 4-6: 40 2-3: 30 0-1: 20 Poll w/ no Libertarian number: clear () Three-way race: () Small states and districts in area: CT: D5,6;4 MA: D14,4;4 ME: D7,??;4 ME-01 (est) D14,??;6 ME-02 R2,??;4 NJ D9,12;4 VT D15,10,3 Clinton (D) Trump (R) Johnson (L) [/quote] Title: Re: Clinton-Trump-Johnson Post by: pbrower2a on July 31, 2016, 12:23:16 PM This is my last post on this thread, as I am transferring this data to another thread. I am also locking this thread when I have my first completed post on the new thread of post-convention polling. I also intend to show the binary polling in the same new thread.
|