Atlas Forum

Election Archive => 2016 Senatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: Ebsy on June 13, 2016, 11:35:34 am



Title: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Ebsy on June 13, 2016, 11:35:34 am
https://www.scribd.com/doc/315390860/MoveOn-WI-Senate-Survey-Results

Fiengold: 51
Johnson: 41


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Dom. Pol. Councilor Dwarven Dragon on June 13, 2016, 11:41:37 am
Internal poll ---> Trash


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Ebsy on June 13, 2016, 11:44:39 am
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: MT Treasurer on June 13, 2016, 12:01:11 pm
At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: publicunofficial on June 13, 2016, 12:03:23 pm
At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.

"If Republicans want to hold the majority, they need to win more seats than the Democrats"


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: MT Treasurer on June 13, 2016, 12:04:47 pm
At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.

"If Republicans want to hold the majority, they need to win more seats than the Democrats"

My point is that there is only one path for them right now. Also, put me on ignore if my posts bother you so much.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Chief Justice windjammer on June 13, 2016, 12:09:24 pm
At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Xing on June 13, 2016, 12:15:09 pm
Buh-bye, Ron. Won't miss you.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Former GM 1184AZ on June 13, 2016, 12:20:14 pm
Interesting exact same numbers as the Wisconsin Public Radio/St. Norbert poll in April.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on June 13, 2016, 12:52:49 pm
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Dom. Pol. Councilor Dwarven Dragon on June 13, 2016, 12:59:40 pm
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash

It's a fact that internal polls are carefully manipulated to please the cilent.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on June 13, 2016, 02:54:34 pm
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash

It's a fact that internal polls are carefully manipulated to please the cilent.

And we all know that's how PPP earned its reputation as one of the best pollsters: by making up numbers to please Democrats.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Heisenberg on June 13, 2016, 02:57:58 pm
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash

It's a fact that internal polls are carefully manipulated to please the cilent.

And we all know that's how PPP earned its reputation as one of the best pollsters: by making up numbers to please Democrats.
This set of polls was the result of moveon.org hiring PPP, right? Normally I think PPP is excellent, accurate, and unbiased, but here, a partisan organization hired them to produce biased results.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Virginiá on June 13, 2016, 03:08:33 pm
What is the basis for calling this trash? I don't have a position on this either way, but I'd like to know the justification behind it. It can't just be "internal polls like this are biased", because it should go without saying that such an argument is not a logical justification.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Joe Republic on June 13, 2016, 03:25:51 pm
Internal poll ---> Trash
Wulfic post ---> Trash

It's a fact that internal polls are carefully manipulated to please the cilent.

And it's a fact that Wulfric posts are carefully manipulated to please nobody.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: publicunofficial on June 13, 2016, 03:36:41 pm
At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.

"If Republicans want to hold the majority, they need to win more seats than the Democrats"

My point is that there is only one path for them right now. Also, put me on ignore if my posts bother you so much.

You act like I haven't had you on ignore for like a year now.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: TJ in Oregon on June 13, 2016, 07:48:34 pm
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Chief Justice windjammer on June 13, 2016, 08:05:44 pm
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Dom. Pol. Councilor Dwarven Dragon on June 13, 2016, 08:09:48 pm
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.

Every poll out there shows  Toomey running ahead of Trump, and McGinty is a terrible candidate. PA is likely R.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: publicunofficial on June 13, 2016, 11:08:30 pm
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.

Every poll out there shows  Toomey running ahead of Trump, and McGinty is a terrible candidate. PA is likely R.

I hate all your posts.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Dom. Pol. Councilor Dwarven Dragon on June 13, 2016, 11:15:42 pm
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.

Every poll out there shows  Toomey running ahead of Trump, and McGinty is a terrible candidate. PA is likely R.

I hate all your posts.

Ah, it's the old "I actually don't have a counterargument, so I'll just bash the other party to disguise my inability to argue the point.".

Toomey won re-election the moment democrats decided to nominate a political neophyte due to old grudges. She only won the primary because "Obama endorsed me!" gets you lots of "free" votes in a democrats-only contest. It doesn't work that way in the general.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: MT Treasurer on June 13, 2016, 11:18:54 pm
Lol, someone needs to look after "AngryGreatness". Looks like he's having a meltdown.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: publicunofficial on June 13, 2016, 11:42:46 pm
Lol, someone needs to look after "AngryGreatness". Looks like he's having a meltdown.

Two snide remarks against this forum's two most annoying posters does not a meltdown make.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Fuzzybigfoot on June 14, 2016, 01:01:10 am
If this works out, I'm really looking forward to the Udall-Gardner re-match in 2020!


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Dom. Pol. Councilor Dwarven Dragon on June 14, 2016, 01:23:24 am
If this works out, I'm really looking forward to the Udall-Gardner re-match in 2020!

If colorado actually votes to have a senator that quite frankly loves abortion despite rejecting him six years earlier, I will lose any and all positive feelings toward the state.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: MT Treasurer on June 14, 2016, 01:30:06 am
Lol, someone needs to look after "AngryGreatness". Looks like he's having a meltdown.

Two snide remarks against this forum's two most annoying posters does not a meltdown make.

Once again: The fact that you constantly seem to derail threads like this one by picking on other users (who are supposedly on your ignore list, even though you keep replying to them!) tells me that you're either a trash-tier troll or a typical condescending #edgy liberal red avatar. For the moment, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's the latter.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Chief Justice windjammer on June 14, 2016, 07:17:24 am
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.

Every poll out there shows  Toomey running ahead of Trump, and McGinty is a terrible candidate. PA is likely R.
The fact that he's only +1-+3 doesnt make that likely rep. I expect Trump to kill them in the end.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Nyvin on June 14, 2016, 07:29:58 am
Seems about right. Johnson is pretty much doomed unless Trump wins nationally by like 10.

At this point, Democrats are basically guaranteed to win FL, WI, IL and NH. Looks like the GOP will have to win every other competitive race (definitely possible) and win NV (possible, but difficult) if they don't want to lose the Senate. But right now, Democrats are favored to retake the Senate.
I don't think if you agree with me or not on what I will say but I now believe it is definitely possible the dems retake the senate and that trump could pull a narrow win: unlikely but it was unbelievable before.

My prediction, the democrats pick up 7 seats, I believe they are clearly favored to win the 6 seats more favourable to them, for the 7th seat (AZ, MO, IA, NC,...), I believe individually each gop candidate is favored to be reelected (that can change) but that the probably is higher than at least 1 of them is defeated than all of them reelected.

Except the Democrats aren't clearly favored to pick up 6 seats, they're clearly favored to pick up 2: WI and IL. The rest are at least somewhat ambiguous (FL, NH) or the Republican is more likely to win (OH, PA).
Portman and Toomey arent going to survive if Clinton carries their state which is likely.

Every poll out there shows  Toomey running ahead of Trump, and McGinty is a terrible candidate. PA is likely R.

There isn't anything special about Toomey at all..he's just a generic Republican.

If Clinton is winning nationally pretty much all the competitive races will go to the Democrats, and this seat is no different.

McGinty isn't terrible either....she's just another Generic Democrat (who happens to be a woman I guess).    The candidates aren't a major part of this race.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Eraserhead on June 14, 2016, 08:13:02 am
Beautiful poll!


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: Gass3268 on June 14, 2016, 08:13:31 am
If this works out, I'm really looking forward to the Udall-Gardner re-match in 2020!

If colorado actually votes to have a senator that quite frankly loves abortion despite rejecting him six years earlier, I will lose any and all positive feelings toward the state.

The War on Condoms must end.

About the poll, D+1.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: IceSpear on June 14, 2016, 03:19:43 pm
If this works out, I'm really looking forward to the Udall-Gardner re-match in 2020!

Ugh, god no!

Let's not compare Russ Feingold, an amazing Senator and campaigner who lost solely due to muh anti Obama and only old white people voting with Mark Udall, who dug his own grave shortly after shooting himself in both feet.


Title: WI: Public Policy Polling: Feingold crushing Johnson in WI
Post by: IceSpear on June 14, 2016, 03:38:54 pm
New Poll: Wisconsin Senator by Public Policy Polling on 2016-06-09 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/SENATE/2016/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=55320160609108)

Summary: D: 51%, R: 41%, U: 8%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (https://www.scribd.com/doc/315390860/MoveOn-WI-Senate-Survey-Results)


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: President Johnson on June 16, 2016, 01:44:47 pm
Johnson is done.


Title: Re: WI-PPP: Feingold +10
Post by: MasterJedi on June 20, 2016, 06:08:19 pm
Johnson is done.

Talk radio has assured the Republicans that Johnson is safe. They don't think he'll lose because they're "Democratic polls". It's so stupid, too bad we have to have either. Awful hypocrites and bad men.