Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2016 Senatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: mds32 on June 20, 2016, 11:40:22 AM



Title: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: mds32 on June 20, 2016, 11:40:22 AM
NH Senate
Hassan (D) 49%
Ayotte (R) 45%


http://www.wmur.com/politics/new-poll-for-antigun-violence-group-shows-gun-issue-hurting-ayotte/40135144


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Xing on June 20, 2016, 12:09:27 PM
inb4 TNV reminds us that the horrible Climbing Maggie is a shoo-in.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Heisenberg on June 20, 2016, 12:12:31 PM
inb4 TNV reminds us that the horrible Climbing Maggie is a shoo-in.
What's wrong with him saying that? That's just the truth.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: publicunofficial on June 20, 2016, 12:16:03 PM
inb4 TNV reminds us that the horrible Climbing Maggie is a shoo-in.
What's wrong with him saying that? That's just the truth.

Stop enabaling him.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Ronnie on June 20, 2016, 12:42:48 PM
Can someone inform me what the "climbing" in "Climbing Maggie" refers to?


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Xing on June 20, 2016, 12:53:42 PM
Can someone inform me what the "climbing" in "Climbing Maggie" refers to?

Because she has the audacity to actually pursue higher political office, instead of knowing her place. Women these days... ;)


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: HAnnA MArin County on June 20, 2016, 12:55:50 PM
Why has TNVolunteer not responded yet?!


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: RINO Tom on June 20, 2016, 01:43:14 PM
inb4 TNV reminds us that the horrible Climbing Maggie is a shoo-in.
What's wrong with him saying that? That's just the truth.

Stop enabaling him.

Heisenberg has become his fanboy/lackey.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: mds32 on June 20, 2016, 01:47:48 PM

Probably because he has


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Green Line on June 21, 2016, 12:11:22 AM
Moving this to Likely D.. No one will escape the RMS TRUMPtanic, sadly, and there isn't enough room in the lifeboats thanks to Khristie.

Of course, it reverts to tossup once Trump is dumped at the convention.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Ebsy on June 21, 2016, 12:13:22 AM
So, um, didn't bother to poll the horserace with Trump/Clinton?


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: mds32 on June 21, 2016, 06:39:26 AM
Moving this to Likely D.. No one will escape the RMS TRUMPtanic, sadly, and there isn't enough room in the lifeboats thanks to Khristie.

Of course, it reverts to tossup once Trump is dumped at the convention.

>implying that Ayotte will lose because of Trump
>implying that there is any way Climbing Maggie can lose this race
>implying that NH is still a competitive swing state

Any kind of actual analysis you want to give here instead of berating?


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Heisenberg on June 21, 2016, 12:52:02 PM
Any kind of actual analysis you want to give here instead of berating?

My #analysis is that this race is not winnable for Republicans, sorry.
Simple. New Hampshire is trending D hard and fast, Hassan is very popular, and Ayotte is to the right of the state.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Green Line on June 21, 2016, 12:54:55 PM
Any kind of actual analysis you want to give here instead of berating?

My #analysis is that this race is not winnable for Republicans, sorry.
Simple. New Hampshire is trending D hard and fast, Hassan is very popular, and Ayotte is to the right of the state.

NH will stop trending D once we dump Trump.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Green Line on June 21, 2016, 01:05:10 PM
Any kind of actual analysis you want to give here instead of berating?

My #analysis is that this race is not winnable for Republicans, sorry.
Simple. New Hampshire is trending D hard and fast, Hassan is very popular, and Ayotte is to the right of the state.

True, and most people understand this. I'd say Kathy Szeliga in MD has a better chance of winning than Ayotte at this point, and I'm dead serious.

NH will stop trending D once we dump Trump.

NH's Democratic trend has nothing to do with Trump. No Republican would have won the state this year.

Wow, Heisenburg, hop of TN's D!  Rubio would be leading in New Hampshire right now.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Classic Conservative on June 21, 2016, 02:16:03 PM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Heisenberg on June 21, 2016, 02:47:02 PM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president
Simple: Obama campaigned in NH way more in 2008 than in 2012, Romney did more campaigning there than McCain, and he was a better fit. After swinging so hard to the left from 2004 to 2008, it was bound to go a bit to the right in 2012. But I think it will swing WAY to the left this year.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: IceSpear on June 21, 2016, 07:10:33 PM
Where's the angry women crosstab?


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: publicunofficial on June 22, 2016, 08:04:34 PM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president
Simple: Obama campaigned in NH way more in 2008 than in 2012, Romney did more campaigning there than McCain, and he was a better fit. After swinging so hard to the left from 2004 to 2008, it was bound to go a bit to the right in 2012. But I think it will swing WAY to the left this year.

(Psst: TnVol, you forgot to log out of your sock when you replied to this comment)


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Xing on June 22, 2016, 11:44:26 PM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president
Simple: Obama campaigned in NH way more in 2008 than in 2012, Romney did more campaigning there than McCain, and he was a better fit. After swinging so hard to the left from 2004 to 2008, it was bound to go a bit to the right in 2012. But I think it will swing WAY to the left this year.

(Psst: TnVol, you forgot to log out of your sock when you replied to this comment)

LOL! Busted!


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Heisenberg on June 23, 2016, 12:00:04 AM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president
Simple: Obama campaigned in NH way more in 2008 than in 2012, Romney did more campaigning there than McCain, and he was a better fit. After swinging so hard to the left from 2004 to 2008, it was bound to go a bit to the right in 2012. But I think it will swing WAY to the left this year.

(Psst: TnVol, you forgot to log out of your sock when you replied to this comment)

LOL! Busted!
Hahaha, LOL. I'm sorry for answering TN volunteer's question for him, I was just coming up with my theory. It seems like I continue to be the only one who agrees with him about New Hampshire's stronger-than-reported Democratic lean.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: publicunofficial on June 23, 2016, 12:29:56 AM
Question to TNVolunteer have you ever been to NH and do you personally know anybody from NH? And if NH is swinging far to the left fast then why did every single county in NH swing towards the GOP in the 2012 Presidential Election. http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/results/president
Simple: Obama campaigned in NH way more in 2008 than in 2012, Romney did more campaigning there than McCain, and he was a better fit. After swinging so hard to the left from 2004 to 2008, it was bound to go a bit to the right in 2012. But I think it will swing WAY to the left this year.

(Psst: TnVol, you forgot to log out of your sock when you replied to this comment)

LOL! Busted!
Hahaha, LOL. I'm sorry for answering TN volunteer's question for him, I was just coming up with my theory. It seems like I continue to be the only one who agrees with him about New Hampshire's stronger-than-reported Democratic lean.

You're the only one who agrees with him about most things.


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Xing on June 23, 2016, 05:47:16 PM
Well, I'll still be looking forward to "both" of your reactions to Sexy Maggie winning, even if you're expecting it. ;)


Title: Re: NH-Global Strategies (D) Hassan 49% Ayotte 45%
Post by: Shameless Lefty Hack on June 23, 2016, 06:22:28 PM
>be me
>Oh, a New Hampshire thread! This one will be different!
>reads 2 posts
>TNVol
>cries.