Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls => Topic started by: MT Treasurer on August 09, 2016, 04:01:35 PM



Title: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: MT Treasurer on August 09, 2016, 04:01:35 PM
Iowa: Clinton 41 - Trump 37  (Clinton +4)
Ohio: Clinton 43 - Trump 38 (Clinton +5)
Pennsylvania:  Clinton 48 - Trump 37 (Clinton +11)

Iowa: Clinton 35 - Trump 35 - Johnson 12 - Stein 6 (TIE)
Ohio: Clinton 39 - Trump 35 - Johnson 12 - Stein 4 (Clinton +4)
Pennsylvania: Clinton 45 - Trump 36 - Johnson 9 - Stein 3 (Clinton +9)
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/polls-clinton-ahead-trump-midwest-battlegrounds-n626541


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +9 in PA
Post by: Ebsy on August 09, 2016, 04:02:07 PM
Dominating!


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Devout Centrist on August 09, 2016, 04:02:14 PM
Ayy lmao


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Green Line on August 09, 2016, 04:02:21 PM
The election is over.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: heatcharger on August 09, 2016, 04:02:34 PM
Likely D PA. This election is over... for now.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Yank2133 on August 09, 2016, 04:02:56 PM
Welp.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: dspNY on August 09, 2016, 04:03:22 PM
Clinton starting to blow Trump out in Pennsylvania. Ohio and Iowa are also nice but I wish she were closer to 50


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Ronnie on August 09, 2016, 04:03:45 PM
Hmm, it seems like IA and OH might sharply trend R this year.  Interesting.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Trapsy on August 09, 2016, 04:05:01 PM
I can't keep count but looks like Hillz will win PA by 10+ points.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Ebsy on August 09, 2016, 04:05:18 PM
Hmm, it seems like IA and OH might sharply trend R this year.  Interesting.
It will probably mostly have to do with shifts in the white high school educated vote.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: amdcpus on August 09, 2016, 04:05:40 PM
When the 2016 presidential race is expanded to four candidates - including Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and the Green Party's Jill Stein - Clinton and Trump are tied at 35 percent each in Iowa, with Johnson at 12 percent and Stein at 6 percent. (Last month in the state, Clinton and Trump were tied in the four-way horserace at 37 percent.)

In Ohio, Clinton gets the support of 39 percent of registered voters, Trump gets 35 percent, Johnson gets 12 percent and Stein gets 4 percent. (It was Clinton 38 percent, Trump 35 percent last month.)

And in Pennsylvania, it's Clinton at 45 percent, Trump at 36 percent, Johnson at 9 percent and Stein at 3 percent. (The numbers are nearly identical to what they were before the conventions last month.)


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Mehmentum on August 09, 2016, 04:07:17 PM
Hmm, it seems like IA and OH might sharply trend R this year.  Interesting.
I think this isn't so much a trend as inelasticity.  Notice that even her PA number is about her average lead.  Clinton is maxing out in a lot of the swing states, and much of the movement we're seeing is in more Republican states.  If she's really up like 5 points in Georgia, making it close in AZ, MO, etc.  Then the national margin makes sense.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4 in IA, +5 in OH, +11 in PA
Post by: Fargobison on August 09, 2016, 04:11:10 PM
RIP Trump


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Wiz in Wis on August 09, 2016, 04:17:38 PM
I find it really hard to believe that Johnson/Stein are pulling between 15-20% in November.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: amdcpus on August 09, 2016, 04:22:39 PM
I find it really hard to believe that Johnson/Stein are pulling between 15-20% in November.

I cannot fathom 6% of Iowans voting for that batsh**t crazy lunatic.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Wiz in Wis on August 09, 2016, 04:24:59 PM
I find it really hard to believe that Johnson/Stein are pulling between 15-20% in November.

I cannot fathom 6% of Iowans voting for that batsh**t crazy lunatic.

I mean, Nader got just over 2% in 2000... have a hard time thinking Stein would triple that.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: OwlRhetoric on August 09, 2016, 04:25:09 PM
Third party numbers are crazy high for swing states. I have to believe they'll come down at some point.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: john cage bubblegum on August 09, 2016, 04:25:24 PM
OH and PA results are about what you'd expect, but Iowa does surprise me, even though it has been among Trump's best swing states.  

Beside the fact that Trump's demeanor just doesn't seem like it fits with the state, Iowa has been pretty consistent since 1992 in voting approximately 1-2 points more Dem than the nation.  Is it really about to vote 4-6 points more R than the country?


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Senator Cris on August 09, 2016, 04:27:26 PM
I just hope Clinton wins PA by 4-5 so that Toomey can get re-elected.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Xing on August 09, 2016, 04:32:21 PM
Weird that Iowa is that close (in the 4-way), but I do remember Iowa trending toward Obama in the fall. Pennsylvania is looking long gone for Trump, which would be the end of his hopes of victory. Ohio's looks like it'll be to the right of the nation, but right now, it's looking pretty good for Hillary.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: psychprofessor on August 09, 2016, 04:46:45 PM
I think Virginia is the new bellweather - it has the mix of demographics that fit with the nation as a whole and will probably be close to the national popular vote.



Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Maxwell on August 09, 2016, 04:50:36 PM
rofl lmao Pennslyvania.

BUT TRUMP'S GONNA FLIP IT


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: psychprofessor on August 09, 2016, 05:02:52 PM
Luzerne county and the Reagan Democrats will flip PA for Trump.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Maxwell on August 09, 2016, 05:15:42 PM
Zombie Reagan Democrats will rise from the grave and vote in droves for Trump, who has destroyed Reagan style conservatism, because... greatness?


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: ProudModerate2 on August 09, 2016, 05:20:40 PM
Very nice !
My main fear is IA. Hope Hillary can hold this state.
Things look good right now for Clinton in OH, but this state may swing towards R as election day nears (probably be a true toss-up state).


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: psychprofessor on August 09, 2016, 05:24:01 PM
Very nice !
My main fear is IA. Hope Hillary can hold this state.
Things look good right now for Clinton in OH, but this state may swing towards R as election day nears (probably be a true toss-up state).

My thinking is any true "tossup" on election day will go for Hillary based on her field operations and ground game. Trump has nothing in any of these states.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: CapoteMonster on August 09, 2016, 05:58:51 PM
I think this poll has a bit of a conservative sample considering that Obama's approvals aren't above 50% in any of these states.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: indietraveler on August 09, 2016, 06:03:12 PM
All these polls with PA solidly backing Clinton...so much for being a "swing state."

Interested to see more polls from my home state. With Grassley still safe, but not up by his usual margin, makes me think that anything within the margin of error for Clinton/Trump goes to Clinton.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: NOVA Green on August 09, 2016, 06:07:26 PM
Very nice !
My main fear is IA. Hope Hillary can hold this state.
Things look good right now for Clinton in OH, but this state may swing towards R as election day nears (probably be a true toss-up state).

It would be interesting to see regional breakdowns within OH, particularly Metro Cinci and Columbus. I think there is some room for Hillary to expand among White suburban women in both regions, to help offset an expected Trump Male bump in Eastern OH (Youngstown, Canton, etc...) and possibly Toledo as well.

Hopefully we'll get a Columbus Dispatch poll before too long to see what it's looking like in the "five or six states of Ohio".


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: IceSpear on August 09, 2016, 06:22:44 PM
Zombie Reagan Democrats will rise from the grave and vote in droves for Trump, who has destroyed Reagan style conservatism, because... greatness?

Also, Eastern PA does not exist!

Looks like the muh Iowa whites theory may have some ground to stand on after all, lol.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: OneJ on August 09, 2016, 06:44:52 PM
I come home after a long first day of the 10th Grade (which was surprisingly better than expected) and find all of these polls with Hillary leading over Trump is very encouraging TBH.




Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Likely Voter on August 09, 2016, 06:46:39 PM
Maybe betting the farm on PA as his tipping point isn't a good move for Trump.   Although it isn't exactly clear what other path is easier.  It could be that Obama was a bad fit for the state (clinging to their god and guns) and Clinton is reversing the recent trend.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Dr. Arch on August 09, 2016, 07:05:18 PM
When PA is as consistently D as Michigan, you know it's gone.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: NOVA Green on August 09, 2016, 07:05:25 PM
Maybe betting the farm on PA as his tipping point isn't a good move for Trump.   Although it isn't exactly clear what other path is easier.  It could be that Obama was a bad fit for the state (clinging to their god and guns) and Clinton is reversing the recent trend.

Not to mention that she does have some "home state roots", decimated Obama in the primaries based on running on a "jobs and economy" platform versus an "anti-war" platform in a state with a high percentage of military veterans ("Deer Hunter" Country) with an aging blue-collar population in most regions of the state outside of metro Philly where the economic recovery of the '90s under Bill Clinton was real after 12 years of economic collapse. Additionally, she topped it off the night before the '08 Dem primary with the famous shot of doing a boilermaker in a bowling alley with a burly union worker somewhere outside of Pittsburgh.

I think you're right that she does have street cred in many parts of PA that Obama did not, and she has added to that because of the repugnance many swing voters in the Philly 'burbs feel towards the current Republican candidate.

Trump can do a McCain and go "all in" for PA, but yeah not sure what other options are out there unless he can get the race down to 3-4% in national polling (Assuming equal distribution in swing states).



Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Eraserhead on August 09, 2016, 07:33:38 PM
Those are some impressive numbers for Johnson and Stein in Iowa.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Statilius the Epicurean on August 09, 2016, 10:13:00 PM
Iowa Democrats are super white and very liberal, so Stein's numbers there aren't surprising.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Devils30 on August 10, 2016, 09:46:01 AM
I think Hilary may be underestimated in Iowa. This poll has her up 31% with white college grads and down only 7% with white non college. I know Iowa has a lot of non college whites but these numbers should add up to more like an 8-9% Hillary lead not 4%.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Reginald on August 10, 2016, 11:18:06 AM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: MT Treasurer on August 10, 2016, 11:19:52 AM
I think Hilary may be underestimated in Iowa. This poll has her up 31% with white college grads and down only 7% with white non college. I know Iowa has a lot of non college whites but these numbers should add up to more like an 8-9% Hillary lead not 4%.

Sigh.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: dspNY on August 10, 2016, 11:25:46 AM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Gass3268 on August 10, 2016, 11:36:44 AM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9

Are you using exit-polls or voter files?


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: dspNY on August 10, 2016, 11:43:20 AM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9

Are you using exit-polls or voter files?

New York Times exit polls from 2012


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Gass3268 on August 10, 2016, 11:47:41 AM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9

Are you using exit-polls or voter files?

New York Times exit polls from 2012

You should look into some of the work Nate Cohen has done as he's found that based on voter files, the exit polls in 2012 oversampled minorities compared to who actually voted. Going based on voter files is probably a better way to go.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Speed of Sound on August 10, 2016, 12:13:00 PM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9

Are you using exit-polls or voter files?

New York Times exit polls from 2012

You should look into some of the work Nate Cohen has done as he's found that based on voter files, the exit polls in 2012 oversampled minorities compared to who actually voted. Going based on voter files is probably a better way to go.
For reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/upshot/there-are-more-white-voters-than-people-think-thats-good-news-for-trump.html


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Devout Centrist on August 10, 2016, 12:14:09 PM
I think Hilary may be underestimated in Iowa. This poll has her up 31% with white college grads and down only 7% with white non college. I know Iowa has a lot of non college whites but these numbers should add up to more like an 8-9% Hillary lead not 4%.

Sigh.
The unskewers are everywhere.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Gass3268 on August 10, 2016, 12:15:27 PM
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/ (http://maristpoll.marist.edu/810-clinton-trump-competitive-in-iowa-ohio-clinton-leads-trump-in-pennsylvania/)

More info, crosstabs, etc.

Once again, a much less diverse electorate in OH and PA than what we saw in 2012

OH was 79% white, 15% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 84-12
PA was 79% white, 13% African American in 2012 and this poll has it 82-9

Are you using exit-polls or voter files?

New York Times exit polls from 2012

You should look into some of the work Nate Cohen has done as he's found that based on voter files, the exit polls in 2012 oversampled minorities compared to who actually voted. Going based on voter files is probably a better way to go.
For reference: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/10/upshot/there-are-more-white-voters-than-people-think-thats-good-news-for-trump.html

Should be noted that this was before Trump tanked with white college educated voters (particularly women).


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Devils30 on August 10, 2016, 12:34:44 PM
If Wisconsin is near 15 then Iowa will be closer to 10 than 5. I stand by my post.


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: dspNY on August 10, 2016, 12:40:20 PM
If Wisconsin is near 15 then Iowa will be closer to 10 than 5. I stand by my post.

Agreed. Iowa is only 4-5 points right of Wisconsin and sometimes only 2-3


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Sir Mohamed on August 10, 2016, 01:01:46 PM
()


Title: Re: IA/OH/PA-NBC/WSJ/Marist: Clinton +4/tied in IA, +5/+4 in OH, +11/+9 in PA
Post by: Erich Maria Remarque on August 10, 2016, 05:33:27 PM
Maybe betting the farm on PA as his tipping point isn't a good move for Trump.   Although it isn't exactly clear what other path is easier.  It could be that Obama was a bad fit for the state (clinging to their god and guns) and Clinton is reversing the recent trend.
There is no point to talk about any path, while Trump is down 8 points nationally ::)