Title: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Xing on September 21, 2016, 12:48:02 PM https://twitter.com/MULawPoll/status/778647023847411715
LV: Feingold 47 Johnson 41 RV: Feingold 46 Johnson 40 With Libertarian candidate: Feingold 44 Johnson 39 Anderson 7 Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Frozen Sky Ever Why on September 21, 2016, 12:59:08 PM Who are the clowns who are backing Feingold but refuse to support Hillary against the fascist?
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Pandaguineapig on September 21, 2016, 01:01:24 PM #feelthejohnson
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Gass3268 on September 21, 2016, 01:03:43 PM This is actually a rebound for Feingold. His favorables are at +17 compared to -2 for Johnson.
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: MasterJedi on September 21, 2016, 01:06:59 PM Feingold has this in the bag, coupled with the fact that Johnson is an awful person he doesn't even need to try that hard.
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on September 21, 2016, 01:09:33 PM Feingold below 45% in the three way. UGH. He should be well over 50%.
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Phony Moderate on September 21, 2016, 01:11:12 PM Who are the clowns who are backing Feingold but refuse to support Hillary against the fascist? In a similar case - Bernie got a higher percentage than Obama in Vermont in 2012. Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Xing on September 21, 2016, 01:15:23 PM Feingold below 45% in the three way. UGH. He should be well over 50%. Feingold was never going to win by 15% in a polarized state like Wisconsin. He'll probably win by mid-high single digits, in the end. Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Heisenberg on September 21, 2016, 01:42:57 PM What's so bad about Johnson? I guess I have to concede that this should be triaged along with IL and NH, but I don't see what's so bad about Johnson and what's all of a sudden so great about Feingold after he was ousted 6 years ago.
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: MasterJedi on September 21, 2016, 01:48:34 PM What's so bad about Johnson? I guess I have to concede that this should be triaged along with IL and NH, but I don't see what's so bad about Johnson and what's all of a sudden so great about Feingold after he was ousted 6 years ago. He's missed something like 40% of the votes in his time as a Senator so far. If anyone is a good specimen of "you didn't build that" it's Johnson. Married a rich girl who's dad gave him a company to run that almost exclusively sold to his father in law and he succeeded at it, didn't do much else but makes it sound like he's a self made businessman. Also thinks SS is a legal Ponzi scheme and wants to get rid of it. Numerous other things too. Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Antonio the Sixth on September 21, 2016, 02:54:01 PM Way closer than it has any right to be.
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Young Conservative on September 21, 2016, 06:44:39 PM Way closer than i hoped for! lets go Johnson! #savethesenate
Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Heisenberg on September 21, 2016, 06:47:32 PM Way closer than i hoped for! lets go Johnson! #savethesenate Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: Vosem on September 21, 2016, 07:14:36 PM Who are the clowns who are backing Feingold but refuse to support Hillary against the fascist? This is a race where I can easily imagine that most of the presidential third-party voters are supporting Feingold. I'd be very, very surprised if he didn't clearly run ahead of Hillary. Has everything to do with Feingold's strengths, not Hillary's weaknesses. Title: Re: WI - Marquette: Feingold +6 Post by: henster on September 21, 2016, 07:25:17 PM Sometimes I dream of the scenario where Feingold doesn't lose in 2010 and beats Hillary to be the nominee 2016.
|