|
Title: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: OneJ on October 06, 2016, 07:48:31 PM https://www.savethechildrenactionnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/SCAN-NH-General-Election-public-100616.pdf
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Southern Delegate matthew27 on October 06, 2016, 07:52:09 PM Now that is more like it! ;)
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Person Man on October 06, 2016, 07:57:47 PM Now that is more like it! ;) Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: PresidentSamTilden on October 06, 2016, 08:02:55 PM Clinton +5 in NH confirmed
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Xing on October 06, 2016, 08:05:42 PM This looks much more plausible.
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Seriously? on October 06, 2016, 08:16:59 PM LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today?
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck on October 06, 2016, 10:39:49 PM LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today? Seriously, Seriously? Do you not see that your Thousand Year Alt-Reich is never coming to fruition in this country? You best move to Hungary or something to get a bit of your desired fascist run before Hillary drones your Neo-Nazi government. Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Fmr President & Senator Polnut on October 06, 2016, 10:58:16 PM LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today? So... you've gone from raising a legitimate issue of D-leaning polls maybe being too favorable to the laughable idea of a "plant" to "offset" a poll that was in the field at the same time and where they had no idea of the Suffolk outcome? Or was it never even in the field? A lot of people say that it might not have been? Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: cinyc on October 06, 2016, 11:05:40 PM Why is Save The Children spending money on polls instead of helping Karembe(?) and the other kids from their ads? I get that it's their political action fund, but shouldn't their money be spent for, you know, saving the children?
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Heisenberg on October 06, 2016, 11:10:34 PM Clinton +8 really makes sense in a state this Democratic. But I'm surprised she's not up by more since she has the momentum.
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: ProudModerate2 on October 07, 2016, 01:24:59 AM This looks much more plausible. Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Antonio the Sixth on October 07, 2016, 12:23:48 PM They didn't poll the Senate race? ???
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: Seriously? on October 07, 2016, 10:55:08 PM LMAO. From James Carville's hackish polling group for "Save the Children." Could it be anymore of an obvious D-plant poll to offset Suffolk today? So... you've gone from raising a legitimate issue of D-leaning polls maybe being too favorable to the laughable idea of a "plant" to "offset" a poll that was in the field at the same time and where they had no idea of the Suffolk outcome? Or was it never even in the field? A lot of people say that it might not have been? Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: HAnnA MArin County on October 07, 2016, 10:58:45 PM Why hasn't TNVolunteer responded yet?
Title: Re: GQR: NH-Clinton +8 Post by: ‼realJohnEwards‼ on October 08, 2016, 10:24:49 AM Why hasn't TNVolunteer responded yet? Clinton +8 really makes sense in a state this Democratic. But I'm surprised she's not up by more since she has the momentum. |