|
Title: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: BoAtlantis on October 15, 2016, 09:51:09 PM https://www.scribd.com/document/327638478/Current-Colorado-Polling-10-13-16#from_embed
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/15/exclusive-breitbartgravis-poll-clinton-opens-lead-over-trump-44-39-in-colorado-gains-5-points-in-a-week/ It was conducted from 10/12 to 10/13. EDIT: Thanks Dwarven for pointing it out. I skimmed through and missed it. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: ApatheticAustrian on October 15, 2016, 09:51:53 PM this is going to make breitbart heads explode.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on October 15, 2016, 09:57:40 PM ^^ Scroll Down in the Document - the presidential race is question 14:
Clinton 44% Trump 39% Johnson 6% Stein 2% Undecided 9% Also, Q23 is interesting: Do you support Donald Trump's position that he will release his tax returns as soon as his IRS audit is complete? Yes or Not Important - 54% No - 44% Favorables: Clinton 42/57 Trump 35/63 Johnson 18/52 Stein 10/46 Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: heatcharger on October 15, 2016, 10:00:56 PM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: BundouYMB on October 15, 2016, 10:03:35 PM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Maxwell on October 15, 2016, 10:05:17 PM 41% of Coloradans aren't conservative.
+ with Gravis, always take the internal rule of +5 in the other direction, and you get a double digit Clinton lead. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: BoAtlantis on October 15, 2016, 10:05:46 PM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. If they were, Nate Silver would exclude them from his aggregate. He adjusted it to +6. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: ProudModerate2 on October 15, 2016, 10:14:12 PM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. If they were, Nate Silver would exclude them from his aggregate. He adjusted it to +6. A Clinton +5 (or 538 adjusted +6) for Colorado is healthy. I'm happy. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Xing on October 15, 2016, 10:18:07 PM Their last poll (post-debate) showed a tie, so this isn't a bad poll for Hillary at all.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck on October 15, 2016, 10:23:32 PM Useless. It's commissioned by a propaganda outfit.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Ebsy on October 16, 2016, 12:55:58 AM Total collapse for Trump.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Person Man on October 16, 2016, 06:41:38 AM I think he could probably win and probably lose here now.
Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: GeorgiaModerate on October 16, 2016, 07:11:00 AM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. They do conduct polls. I've answered one. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: Person Man on October 16, 2016, 07:33:51 AM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. They do conduct polls. I've answered one. I answered a Rasmussen one once..that doesn't make them good. Title: Re: CO-Gravis Marketing: Clinton +5 Post by: GeorgiaModerate on October 16, 2016, 10:06:29 AM I'd still like some sort of proof that Gravis isn't a fake pollster. They do conduct polls. I've answered one. I answered a Rasmussen one once..that doesn't make them good. He just asked about fake. I would never claim Gravis was good. :) |