Atlas Forum

Election Archive => 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls => Topic started by: heatcharger on October 18, 2016, 08:32:16 am



Title: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: heatcharger on October 18, 2016, 08:32:16 am
Link (http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2016/161018/).

Clinton - 49%
Trump - 35%
Johnson - 6%


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Gass3268 on October 18, 2016, 08:37:12 am
Remember when people thought Trump could be competitive-ish here?


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ‼realJohnEwards‼ on October 18, 2016, 08:37:40 am
*yawn*


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Neolibs Are The New McCarthyists on October 18, 2016, 08:37:44 am
Remember when people thought Trump could be competitive-ish here?

Pat Buchanan said Trump would win NJ because of NAFTA.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 08:40:56 am
Trump is very popular in new jersey... i see lots of trump signs, but the urban areas will vote big for clinton which will offset.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ‼realJohnEwards‼ on October 18, 2016, 08:42:44 am
Trump is very popular in new jersey... i see lots of trump signs, but the urban areas will vote big for clinton which will offset.
Yeah... I do see a lot of TP signs, especially in rural areas. But yardsigns are still a pretty bad predictor for who will win (see:2012)


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 08:43:35 am
ONLY 14?!

JUNK POLL!  Clinton wins by at least 20.  


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 08:46:52 am
Trump is very popular in new jersey... i see lots of trump signs, but the urban areas will vote big for clinton which will offset.
Yeah... I do see a lot of TP signs, especially in rural areas. But yardsigns are still a pretty bad predictor for who will win (see:2012)

yup i agree... i think trump will do good in the normal areas of jersey. I live in union county.. but my town is very republican so it is not surprising. I'm curious if somerset county will turn red.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Fusionmunster on October 18, 2016, 09:00:53 am
Trump is very popular in new jersey... i see lots of trump signs, but the urban areas will vote big for clinton which will offset.

I saw plenty of McCain and Romney signs, and i'm seeing lots of Scott Garrett signs. Doesnt mean all that much. Trump is not very popular here, he's just a better fit than Romney and McCain apparently.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 09:05:41 am
Trump is very popular in new jersey... i see lots of trump signs, but the urban areas will vote big for clinton which will offset.

I saw plenty of McCain and Romney signs, and i'm seeing lots of Scott Garrett signs. Doesnt mean all that much. Trump is not very popular here, he's just a better fit than Romney and McCain apparently.

Yes, because they like his attitude and being tough kinda like the jersey personality.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 09:27:38 am
All that we've learned about the predictive nature of demographics and you people are going on about yard signs and that Joisey attitude... jesus...


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ProudModerate2 on October 18, 2016, 09:34:03 am
Safe/Solid D.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ReapSow on October 18, 2016, 09:41:03 am
(
Img
)


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Flake on October 18, 2016, 10:02:05 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 10:06:18 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)

Wow, great!  Putting my money on 88-11 Hillary!


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 10:12:09 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)

But that area is very democratic anyways, it will be a clinton in the end, trump would of made it competitive if he didn't keep messing up but o well.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 10:20:47 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)

But that area is very democratic anyways, it will be a clinton in the end, trump would of made it competitive if he didn't keep messing up but o well.

Oh deary me... you've a lot to learn.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 10:22:24 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)

But that area is very democratic anyways, it will be a clinton in the end, trump would of made it competitive if he didn't keep messing up but o well.

Oh deary me... you've a lot to learn.

When people think they are always right about things they will say people have to learn but it is true :). You probably think Missouri & NC will flip to democrats too... lol


Title: NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University: Clinton Leading in New Jersey
Post by: Dave Leip on October 18, 2016, 10:23:31 am
New Poll: New Jersey President by Fairleigh Dickinson University on 2016-10-16 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=3420161016081)

Summary: D: 48%, R: 37%, U: 6%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://publicmind.fdu.edu/2016/161018/final.pdf)


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Sorenroy on October 18, 2016, 10:31:19 am
When people think they are always right about things they will say people have to learn but it is true :). You probably think Missouri & NC will flip to democrats too... lol

I don't think many people on Atlas think Missouri will flip, but seven of the ten most recent polls out of NC show Clinton ahead (one tied, two Trump). Also, of the eight forcasting groups that the NYT has on their website (here (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html)), 6/8 say that Clinton leads in NC (two say it's a pure tossup).


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 10:32:38 am
I've seen a single Trump sign (in Blackwood) and like eight Hillary signs (if we're going to be basing this discussion on yard signs)

But that area is very democratic anyways, it will be a clinton in the end, trump would of made it competitive if he didn't keep messing up but o well.

Oh deary me... you've a lot to learn.

When people think they are always right about things they will say people have to learn but it is true :). You probably think Missouri & NC will flip to democrats too... lol

NJ is not competitive when it is Clinton vs. Trump.  Period.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ag on October 18, 2016, 10:37:15 am
yup i agree... i think trump will do good in the normal areas of jersey.

As a former resident of Jersey City I strenuously object to the description of the horrid suburban desert further out there as "normal areas" of anything. I mean, if you said "deplorable areas of Jersey", I would have understood.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Fusionmunster on October 18, 2016, 10:39:50 am
yup i agree... i think trump will do good in the normal areas of jersey.

As a former resident of Jersey City I strenuously object to the description of the horrid suburban desert further out there as "normal areas" of anything.

Hey, that horrid suburban desert is my home jerk.






Only kinda kidding.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: ag on October 18, 2016, 10:42:41 am
yup i agree... i think trump will do good in the normal areas of jersey.

As a former resident of Jersey City I strenuously object to the description of the horrid suburban desert further out there as "normal areas" of anything.

Hey, that horrid suburban desert is my home jerk.






Only kinda kidding.

My condolences :)


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: HokeyDood on October 18, 2016, 11:11:43 am
NJ is a wonderful state that would never approach a decent result for the Ornery Orange Orator.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Eraserhead on October 18, 2016, 02:00:07 pm
Link (http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2016/161018/).

Clinton - 49%
Trump - 35%
Johnson - 6%

Stein is at 4%.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Eraserhead on October 18, 2016, 02:14:01 pm
Link (http://view2.fdu.edu/publicmind/2016/161018/).

Clinton - 49%
Trump - 35%
Johnson - 6%

Stein is at 4%.


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: voter1993 on October 18, 2016, 06:13:08 pm
Yes the minorities r packed in essex and hudson counties so the voting for clinton will be big there. Also the last poll showed her up 21 so this is great


Title: Re: NJ-Fairleigh Dickinson: Clinton +14
Post by: Fusionmunster on October 18, 2016, 06:17:42 pm
Yes the minorities r packed in essex and hudson counties so the voting for clinton will be big there. Also the last poll showed her up 21 so this is great

Their last poll was also in June.