Atlas Forum

Election Archive => 2016 Gubernatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: heatcharger on October 24, 2016, 05:44:28 pm



Title: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: heatcharger on October 24, 2016, 05:44:28 pm
Link (http://www.wcax.com/story/33465251/wcax-poll-shows-phil-scott-pulling-ahead).

Scott 47%
Minter 40%
Lee (LU) 4%

Poll was conducted October 20-22. 603 'LV'.

This pollster has a C+ rating on 538.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX: Scott +7
Post by: Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon on October 24, 2016, 05:48:19 pm
DOMINATING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: heatcharger on October 24, 2016, 05:52:51 pm
VT is more competitive than NH. Called it.

Lol if you were to believe this poll you'd be wrong because the most recent NH poll had CVO up 6, while Scott is up 7.

I'm not saying this poll will be inaccurate, but I highly doubt it in the end. I'm sure 65%+ of the undecideds are Clinton, Stein, or Sanders voters.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: ‼realJohnEwards‼ on October 24, 2016, 06:15:53 pm
:(


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Figueira on October 24, 2016, 06:35:50 pm
Still a tossup, but I wouldn't be shocked to see Scott winning. Probably not by 7 points though.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Pandaguineapig on October 24, 2016, 07:03:41 pm
This race is a toss up, in a poor state with a small population personality can often be more important than policy, especially in state elections


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Figueira on October 24, 2016, 07:30:32 pm
Vermont isn't poor at all except in comparison to the rest of New England.

It's a nice break from the "Vermont is a bunch of elitist latte liberals" stereotype I guess.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Pandaguineapig on October 24, 2016, 07:44:29 pm
This race is a toss up, in a poor state with a small population personality can often be more important than policy, especially in state elections

Vermont isn't poor at all except in comparison to the rest of New England.  But it will be crazy if Clinton wins by 10 and the Democrats still lose 3+ net governors (MT, WV, VT, and IN and MO could go either way).
I meant compared to the national average, it's no ways as poor as Mississippi or Arkansas if that's what you thought I meant


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Ebsy on October 24, 2016, 11:38:02 pm
Wulfric knows how to pick a loser.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Nat. Sec. Council Member Dwarven Dragon on October 24, 2016, 11:46:14 pm
Wulfric knows how to pick a loser.

Not saying you're right or wrong, just making sure this can't be deleted later.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: RINO Tom on October 25, 2016, 12:07:57 am
Who the hell thinks of people from VT as elitist?  LOL.  Bunch of hippies, rural populists and lumberjacks. :P


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Eraserhead on October 25, 2016, 03:55:11 am
Bernie is campaigning with Minter now. We'll see.


Title: Re: VT-WCAX/Braun Research: Scott +7
Post by: Mangez des pommes ! on October 25, 2016, 01:34:16 pm
Ugh.