Talk Elections

http://20an0w2e66jla4rfm1idisr1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ABC_Press_Release-103016.pdf

PA
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Remington_Research_Pennsylvania_October_31_2016.pdf

NC
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Remington_Research_North_Carolina_October_31_2016.pdf

CO
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Remington_Research_Colorado_October_31_2016.pdf

NV
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2016/Remington_Research_Nevada_October_31_2016.pdf

Only one day of polling and most of these appear to have only shifted about a point off last week.

Lol NV

lol.....

Axiom Strategies is the largest Republican political consulting firm in the country. The firm was founded
in 2005 by Jeff Roe. Axiom Strategies is a full service political consulting firm providing general consulting, digital and direct voter contact.

The title should be Remington (R): Hillary...

The net changes are T+1 in CO, NV, OH, PA, VA, WI; T+4 in FL, C+1 in NC.

What I take from this is that even this (R) poll has Clinton still holding the 272 freiwall, albeit barely.

Ok, so even a week ago they were showing Clinton +2 in CO and +3 in PA.
Sure.

Hillary only up 1 in Colorado? Only up 4 in Virginia? A bigger Trump margin in NV than in NC? One day sample?


JUNK POLL

Hahaha with these Polls, even liberal's hero 'Nate Silver' has to increase TRUMP's chances of winning.

;)

It's Remington. Add about 3 points across the board to Clinton

I don't think this pollster even really polls, they just release numbers. Republican polls are highly suspect.

Give the re-opening of the investigation a week of regular news coverage, and the race is going to be pure tossup.

You are really thick headed aren't you?

Bahahaha these are terrible.

Hillary is likely being under polled in NV, Trump in the rest.

And you can't make a valid argument to save your life. Whether the Red Hacks like it or not, get ready for the polls over the next week.

Looking at all these people who believe in these polls makes me smile. 😀

Your citing a poll which many times has been proven to be trash.  Your the dumb one here.

Even these suggest a bare Clinton victory (assume that she loses Iowa).

I have yet to see what Republicans have to offer late.

It's you're, Red Hack. Learn how to use English properly before insulting someone else and making yourself look like a jackass.

And I do realize there is issues with this pollster, but other more reputable polls are already showing a strong trend towards Trump and the Comey investigation has yet to hit full force.

Sorry I don't give a sh**t about checking the grammar when talking to a troll like you.   
And no none are doing so right now, but please keep trying to make your points.  They are funny to read.

The fact that they've moved onto WI, MI, and NM shows that they're basically just throwing whatever they have left at anything remotely close, closing their eyes, and praying. They don't have much to offer at all nationally.

Honestly, do I need to debate you or teach you?  


Multiple polls have him ahead in Florida now, and he's within three in North Carolina and Colorado. Also appears he's maintained the lead in Iowa and Ohio, and Nevada is likely trending his way. If he wins all of them, game over dude.

But please, continue to sprout whatever falsehoods you like in incoherent English.

Let me spell it out clearly for your stupid ass.  Right now no non reputable polls show him gaining.  Only ones that you Trumpists think are real show any of this.  Please keep being a hard ass who won't listen to facts.  It really is something.

And again, I don't give a sh**t about grammar when talking to someone who will not accept facts and reason.

I'm going to let this one, and the irony contained within, speak for itself.


Yes, it is something. I didn't know CBS, Siena, and Selzer polls were that bad for recent ones. Is Monmouth also bad now too, since Nevada was tied and New Hampshire was within three before the Comey announcement even hit? Please, continue to be a Red Hack.


That's fine, but let me tell you it's a lot hard trying to argue with someone with a superiority complex that can't even spell friend.

Yet all of the polls you cited were outliers when they were published.  So no tightening as of yet.  Each of the polls you cited had problems in the methodology, or screwed up cross-tables which affected the topline.

And again, I don't care about spelling right now.  This is an internet forum, if you want to harp on spelling, you really don't have an argument as well.  If that is all you want to talk about. 

And that other thing, voice chat to text screws up at times.  Sorry about that.

Who added these crap polls?

I did. Given that they're not internals, there's no legitimate reason not to.

And this is why it's always a bad idea to try to correct the grammar of others on the interwebz.

It doesn't look like it - at least in PA and NC.

Game over barring the Trump self destruction in the next week. Let's hope that doesn't happen, but I won't count it out.

Oh, buddy, you are in for a rough election night.

Well, um, Remington is a very, very bad pollster.

This is certainly true.  If we can glean anything from these polls, it might be by looking at the trends from their previous polls.  The average across the eight states is a movement of 1.1% toward Trump.  This seems consistent with the state of the race; there's clearly been a small tightening over the last week or so, but not a huge one.

Mods please ban remington polls from being posted on the forum. Even Rassy is better than them

I thought that said Rassy at first lol

>Remington

You clearly don't understand what an outlier is. When you're getting multiple polls all showing a tightening, you can't keep dismissing them especially when you get multiple good pollsters like Selzer or CBS/YouGov all showing these results. You Red Hacks complain about StatesPoll pointing out issues with methodology, but then here you are cherry picking from multiple A-rated pollsters.


That's fine, but don't call someone an idiot when you yourself aren't exactly a symbol of virtue with regards to literacy.


Might want to follow your own advice: (http://[/quote)

No, your grammar is still wrong. The original post said:


Issues is a plural noun, so instead of what you said, it would be "there are issues".  A peice of candy is something, so you would say, "There is a peice of candy." However, three pieces of candy are not some thing, they are multiple things, so you would say, "There are three peices of candy."

Here's a link since your's didn't work (http://www.grammar.cl/Present/ThereIsThereAre.htm).

And that is why you should never ever try to correct people's grammar on the Internet.

_{(Also, "Might want to follow your own advice" isn't a complete sentence, as there isn't a subject before the verb, but that is why you never ever ever try to correct people's grammar on the Internet.)}

*You're!!!!!!!!!!!!

I dont give a finks. 

Um, I wasn't arguing with your use of "there is/are" in general. Your grammar was wrong because you used "is" instead of "are". Nor am I suggesting my grammar is perfect--I just found it amusing that yours was yet another example of people on the internet who start grammatical arguments, but who make grammatical errors themselves.

Like I posted previously, this is a Republican polling firm - heck, it states they are the largest Republican consulting firm in their write up, so the title of this thread should include an (R) next to Remington.

Keep it analytical. Your turning a lot of people off.

Yes, this is an (R) pollster and it it wise to look at a couple more from the same state around the same time to make an educated opinion about what the state of the race is.

I dont care again.