Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2016 Senatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: MT Treasurer on November 04, 2016, 10:33:14 AM



Title: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: MT Treasurer on November 04, 2016, 10:33:14 AM
Missouri
46% Roy Blunt (R, inc.)
44% Jason Kander (D)

North Carolina
48% Richard Burr (R, inc.)
45% Deborah Ross (D)

Pennsylvania
46% Katie McGinty (D)
44% Pat Toomey (R, inc.)

Nevada
47% Catherine Cortez-Masto (D)
44% Joe Heck (R)

Wisconsin
49% Russ Feingold (D)
44% Ron Johnson (R, inc.)

https://cdn.americanprogress.org/content/uploads/sites/2/2016/11/03143903/NationalMemo112-Final.pdf


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon on November 04, 2016, 10:42:21 AM
Conducted for a liberal website, so very good news for Blunt and Burr.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Virginiá on November 04, 2016, 10:44:05 AM
Have to admit, it would be sad but also pretty amusing if Ross, Kander and Bayh ended up losing their races after Tester/Schumer said they pulled tens of millions out of Florida so they could focus on more winnable races.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Ronnie on November 04, 2016, 10:45:34 AM
Conducted for a liberal website, so very good news for Blunt and Burr.

Just because PPP conducted a poll for a liberal firm doesn't mean they changed their methodology to skew left.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Phony Moderate on November 04, 2016, 11:03:22 AM
Ugh, Feingold only up 5.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: DavidB. on November 04, 2016, 11:43:47 AM
Conducted for a liberal website, so very good news for Blunt and Burr.
Stop. PPP doesn't change its methodology based on its clients.

Good polls for Blunt and especially Burr. WI was never going to be a GOP hold. McGinty will win PA, and CCM is increasing her lead in NV; together with early voting that race is now definitely going in her direction. If we keep NC and MO out of these I'm happy, so these are quite good numbers for the GOP.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Xing on November 04, 2016, 11:49:56 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: jamestroll on November 04, 2016, 11:51:46 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: DavidB. on November 04, 2016, 11:55:32 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]
You basically overreact to all MO polls ("should I just give up on Koster and Kander?") so not really your place to call others out on overreacting lol.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Xing on November 04, 2016, 11:57:21 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]

When did I say we should give up on those races? I said that these particular numbers are disappointing, but of course neither race is over.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Figueira on November 04, 2016, 12:00:12 PM
I don't have a whole lot of faith in polling this year, so I could see all these races going either way (along with NH and IN).


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Young Conservative on November 04, 2016, 03:51:53 PM
Ron Jon! Only down by 5 in a think progress poll that adores feingold? great result! TOSSUP WISEN


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Figueira on November 04, 2016, 04:03:20 PM
Ron Jon! Only down by 5 in a think progress poll that adores feingold? great result! TOSSUP WISEN

His name isn't Jon.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: The world will shine with light in our nightmare on November 04, 2016, 04:13:54 PM
I see my magick has allowed Feingold to pull away with this again.  I'll keep brewing the goods, folks.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Heisenberg on November 04, 2016, 04:35:32 PM
Ron Jon! Only down by 5 in a think progress poll that adores feingold? great result! TOSSUP WISEN

His name isn't Jon.
Ron Jon is a nickname he gave himself.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Figueira on November 04, 2016, 09:40:09 PM
Ron Jon! Only down by 5 in a think progress poll that adores feingold? great result! TOSSUP WISEN

His name isn't Jon.
Ron Jon is a nickname he gave himself.

Oh, I thought he said "Run Jon!"

Anyway, Johnson is terrible and he needs to lose, and I think he will, but narrowly. Maybe my Tommy Thompson levels.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Shadows on November 04, 2016, 09:51:57 PM
NH - Hassan +3


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on November 04, 2016, 11:54:48 PM

Great!


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Mr. Smith on November 05, 2016, 12:01:07 AM
NV and WI should be safe for the Dems. PA is closer, but McGinty looks to be in good shape. Those MO/NC numbers are a bit more disappointing, but if Clinton wins NC by enough, she could pull Ross over the top.

Yes, it is time to give up on MO and NC Senate, they are clearly unwinnable due to emails, right?

[/atlas over reacting]

No don't be silly. It Won't be because of emails, NC is likely lost because of dog whistling in that one ad Burr threw out.

And MO was always gonna be crazy, same way CO 2014 was Dem in the bag even with Udall's floundering until turnout happened.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: IceSpear on November 05, 2016, 02:20:05 AM
These all look about right, actually.


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Keep cool-idge on August 22, 2017, 02:25:55 PM
Junk polls


Title: Re: MO/NC/PA/NV/WI-PPP (D): Blunt +2, Burr +3, McGinty +2, Masto +3, Feingold +5
Post by: Mr. Smith on October 30, 2017, 12:42:15 AM
In retrospect, I wonder if Kay Hagan should've just tried again.



Blunt and Masto were mostly correct, and Burr was still within the MOE.