Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls => Topic started by: heatcharger on November 04, 2016, 06:07:48 PM



Title: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: heatcharger on November 04, 2016, 06:07:48 PM
Link (https://gqrr.app.box.com/s/e43t1oo48vr9kfrz5t1fhl3qbfsoz39v).

Clinton 54%
Trump 30%
Johnson 4%
Stein 3%


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: Interlocutor is just not there yet on November 04, 2016, 06:27:21 PM
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: Devout Centrist on November 04, 2016, 06:28:35 PM
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question
If it doesn't pass, I'll suck your genitals.


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: JA on November 04, 2016, 06:30:53 PM
Another CA poll without a Prop 61 question
If it doesn't pass, I'll suck your genitals.

Wut


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: Mike88 on November 04, 2016, 06:37:04 PM
What is Prop 61?


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: JA on November 04, 2016, 06:43:09 PM

It's a ballot initiative to regulate the cost of marijuana sold by your dealer. It allows you to anonymously turn in any dealer who charges over the state regulated price. Like all things in California, the cost of marijuana is way too high and the citizens have spoken, demanding action.




Nah, but seriously, this is it...

Quote
Prohibits state agencies from buying any prescription drug from a drug manufacturer at any price over the lowest price paid for the same drug by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, except as may be required by federal law.
Applies to any program where the state agency is the ultimate payer for a prescription drug, even if the state agency does not itself buy the drug.
Exempts purchases of prescription drugs under managed care programs funded through Medi-Cal.[5]

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61,_Drug_Price_Standards_(2016)


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: Interlocutor is just not there yet on November 04, 2016, 06:45:16 PM

Nah, but seriously, this is it...

Quote
Prohibits state agencies from buying any prescription drug from a drug manufacturer at any price over the lowest price paid for the same drug by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, except as may be required by federal law.
Applies to any program where the state agency is the ultimate payer for a prescription drug, even if the state agency does not itself buy the drug.
Exempts purchases of prescription drugs under managed care programs funded through Medi-Cal.[5]

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_61,_Drug_Price_Standards_(2016)

That and its one of the most expensive ballot measures this year. Big pharma's spent over $100 million in opposition to it. The mailbox and commercial breaks have been flooded with Prop 61 ads, typically against it. Bernie's been a pretty visible supporter of it here


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: Mike88 on November 04, 2016, 06:49:02 PM
So, drug companies are selling to state agencies marijuana above the market price, right?


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: ProgressiveCanadian on November 04, 2016, 07:06:57 PM
Calli <3's Bernie 66-27!


Title: CA: University of S. California: Clinton with Substantial Lead in California
Post by: ElectionAtlas on November 04, 2016, 10:17:26 PM
New Poll: California President by University of S. California on 2016-10-30 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=620161030215)

Summary: D: 54%, R: 28%, U: 7%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (https://gqrr.app.box.com/s/e43t1oo48vr9kfrz5t1fhl3qbfsoz39v)


Title: Re: CA: USC/LA Times/GQR: Clinton +24
Post by: An American Tail: Fubart Goes West on November 07, 2016, 12:38:43 AM
So, drug companies are selling to state agencies marijuana above the market price, right?

The marijuana thing was a joke. Basically it would make it so that the state has to buy drugs for the same price that Veterans Affairs pays for them.

It should theoretically lower prices, but there's fears that the drug companies will increase the price that the VA pays.