Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: LimoLiberal on December 15, 2017, 06:03:28 PM



Title: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: LimoLiberal on December 15, 2017, 06:03:28 PM
https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/2017/12/15/new-poll-has-bill-schuette-up-3-points-over-gretchen-whitmer-2018-governors-race/956521001/



Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: IceSpear on December 15, 2017, 06:06:24 PM
He leads 38-35? Wow! Likely R clearly (Safe R if it rains!)


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: heatcharger on December 15, 2017, 06:09:36 PM
Quote
Of those polled, 12% had a favorable view of Whitmer while 6% had an unfavorable view, and 64% did not recognize her name. Whitmer's name recognition has worsened since August, when 57% said they did not recognize her name.

Schuette had a 22% favorable rating and 20% unfavorable, while 24% said they did not recognize his name. Schuette's name recognition was unchanged from August.

Quote
In other results, 61% gave President Donald Trump a negative job approval rating, while 37% gave him a positive one. In August, Trump's unfavorable-favorable numbers were 56% to 36%.

Everything is fine.

Also my inner 12 year-old will never not laugh at this pollster’s name.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Mike Thick on December 15, 2017, 06:16:59 PM
How does Whitmer only have 36% name recognition after being in the race for almost a year? :P


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: UncleSam on December 15, 2017, 06:20:34 PM
I mean her name approval getting worse is hardly a good sign lol

This will end up being a tougher contest for Dems than it ought to be, imo. In such a favorable national environment Mi should be going blue at the statewide level, but the Detroit population just keeps declining and Western Michigan keeps growing, while no one really knows any of the Democrats statewide.

Still think this is tilts D, but Dems are going to have to invest a lot more to beat Schuette with Whitmer than they ought to have to.

Wouldn't at all be surprised if Whitmer manages to throw this on a night where Evers squeaks by Walker and Graham beats Putnam in FL.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: IceSpear on December 15, 2017, 06:27:38 PM
How does Whitmer only have 36% name recognition after being in the race for almost a year? :P

Because only Atlas posters pay attention to races a year+ in advance. :P

You really can't draw any conclusions from a poll a year before the election where both candidates are under 40%.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Dr. Arch on December 19, 2017, 06:37:47 PM
61% disapproval. Ayyy lmao


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: TheSaint250 on December 19, 2017, 06:42:12 PM
Whitmer is not at risk of losing at this point


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Holmes on December 19, 2017, 06:52:25 PM
Mmm, a Michigan poll with 27% undecided but the sitting president is at 61% disapproval. I can see where this will go.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: America Needs a 13-6 Progressive SCOTUS on December 19, 2017, 06:55:38 PM
Safe D


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: henster on December 20, 2017, 09:35:15 PM
Mark Hackel or Mike Duggan would've been great candidates for Dems, the current field is underwhelming.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: ShadowRocket on December 22, 2017, 07:08:25 PM
I mean her name approval getting worse is hardly a good sign lol

This will end up being a tougher contest for Dems than it ought to be, imo. In such a favorable national environment Mi should be going blue at the statewide level, but the Detroit population just keeps declining and Western Michigan keeps growing, while no one really knows any of the Democrats statewide.

Still think this is tilts D, but Dems are going to have to invest a lot more to beat Schuette with Whitmer than they ought to have to.

Wouldn't at all be surprised if Whitmer manages to throw this on a night where Evers squeaks by Walker and Graham beats Putnam in FL.

I think Whitmer should be able to pull it off at the end of the day due to a favorable national environment and Snyder fatigue on the local level, but I think it'll be a closer race than many are probably expecting ATM and victory shouldn't be taken for granted.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: #gravelgang #lessiglad on December 22, 2017, 10:51:48 PM
I mean her name approval getting worse is hardly a good sign lol

This will end up being a tougher contest for Dems than it ought to be, imo. In such a favorable national environment Mi should be going blue at the statewide level, but the Detroit population just keeps declining and Western Michigan keeps growing, while no one really knows any of the Democrats statewide.

Still think this is tilts D, but Dems are going to have to invest a lot more to beat Schuette with Whitmer than they ought to have to.

Wouldn't at all be surprised if Whitmer manages to throw this on a night where Evers squeaks by Walker and Graham beats Putnam in FL.

I think Whitmer should be able to pull it off at the end of the day due to a favorable national environment and Snyder fatigue on the local level, but I think it'll be a closer race than many are probably expecting ATM and victory shouldn't be taken for granted.

Whitmer is a remarkably underwhelming candidate. Michigan's Martha Coakley.

Mark Hackel or Mike Duggan would've been great candidates for Dems, the current field is underwhelming.

I don't think it's too late for him to jump in. I don't know Michigan's ballot access laws that well, but I'd have to believe that MI Dems are wanting another option. Mayor Mike has an excellent record on paper (even if Detroit's recovery is uneven) and if anyone could overcome such a late start, it's Mike Duggan.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Mr. Smith on December 22, 2017, 11:42:40 PM
Mark Hackel or Mike Duggan would've been great candidates for Dems, the current field is underwhelming.

The current field wasn't great in 2014 either, and then it turned out to be a wave...and yet an practical unknown kept Governor Snyder to 3 points or so.



Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Bojack Horseman on December 22, 2017, 11:57:30 PM
This is shaping up to be like the 2002 race where Granholm won narrowly over the incumbent LG despite a decent national environment for the Dems.

I’ll predict an underwhelming win for Whitmer. She just needs a surfboard to ride the blue wave this year to beat Scheutte.

()


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 on December 23, 2017, 12:41:12 AM
Why is this race Safe D?


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: henster on December 23, 2017, 12:56:34 AM
Hackel has the most upside, he'd easily carry Macomb and the election. Seems to have a ton of appeal with WWC voters too. Duggan would boost turnout in Detroit and do well in the suburbs. Whitmer is a ?? all she's done is win her safe district, never had a competitive election. I think its odd so many are lining up behind her.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Mr. Smith on December 23, 2017, 01:08:39 AM
Hackel has the most upside, he'd easily carry Macomb and the election. Seems to have a ton of appeal with WWC voters too. Duggan would boost turnout in Detroit and do well in the suburbs. Whitmer is a ?? all she's done is win her safe district, never had a competitive election. I think its odd so many are lining up behind her.

So, she's a Katie McGutless then?


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: henster on December 23, 2017, 01:14:09 AM
Hackel has the most upside, he'd easily carry Macomb and the election. Seems to have a ton of appeal with WWC voters too. Duggan would boost turnout in Detroit and do well in the suburbs. Whitmer is a ?? all she's done is win her safe district, never had a competitive election. I think its odd so many are lining up behind her.

So, she's a Katie McGutless then?

McGinty was even worse as she'd never won an election before. Whitmer is not a complete novice but winning a stafe district is a lot harder than winning statewide.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on December 23, 2017, 05:19:32 PM
Its EPIC and Stabenow will help Whitmer win.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: ShadowRocket on December 23, 2017, 05:49:39 PM
I mean her name approval getting worse is hardly a good sign lol

This will end up being a tougher contest for Dems than it ought to be, imo. In such a favorable national environment Mi should be going blue at the statewide level, but the Detroit population just keeps declining and Western Michigan keeps growing, while no one really knows any of the Democrats statewide.

Still think this is tilts D, but Dems are going to have to invest a lot more to beat Schuette with Whitmer than they ought to have to.

Wouldn't at all be surprised if Whitmer manages to throw this on a night where Evers squeaks by Walker and Graham beats Putnam in FL.

I think Whitmer should be able to pull it off at the end of the day due to a favorable national environment and Snyder fatigue on the local level, but I think it'll be a closer race than many are probably expecting ATM and victory shouldn't be taken for granted.

Whitmer is a remarkably underwhelming candidate. Michigan's Martha Coakley.

Mark Hackel or Mike Duggan would've been great candidates for Dems, the current field is underwhelming.

I don't think it's too late for him to jump in. I don't know Michigan's ballot access laws that well, but I'd have to believe that MI Dems are wanting another option. Mayor Mike has an excellent record on paper (even if Detroit's recovery is uneven) and if anyone could overcome such a late start, it's Mike Duggan.

Yeah, I agree that Duggan would be a better bet. Honestly, it surprises that we haven't gotten at least one other major candidate besides Whitmer.  I'm still shocked that Kildee opted out.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Bojack Horseman on December 25, 2017, 09:48:25 PM
I don’t know why Hackel is passing on this race. The others in the race are Abdul El-Sayed who would get killed just because of his name, and two random dudes named Shri Thanedar and Bill Cobbs. I think we’re stuck with Whitmer for better or for worse.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 on December 25, 2017, 10:02:21 PM
Its EPIC and Stabenow will help Whitmer win.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: IceSpear on December 26, 2017, 02:54:39 PM

I think Whitmer will win, but this is a bad argument. "Peters will help Schauer win!"


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Mr. Smith on December 26, 2017, 03:15:29 PM

I think Whitmer will win, but this is a bad argument. "Peters will help Schauer win!"

Considering how unknown and underfunded he was, and how close the result turned out to be...yeah that's actually a sound argument. No, he didn't win, but that race also had no business being a nail-biter either.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Suburbia on December 26, 2017, 04:39:03 PM
Bill Schuette will win. Tossup/Tilt D, but Schuette will win by 5 points.

He will be a one-term governor though.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on December 26, 2017, 07:20:12 PM
Kildee would win by low double digits.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: IceSpear on December 27, 2017, 01:01:05 PM

I think Whitmer will win, but this is a bad argument. "Peters will help Schauer win!"

Considering how unknown and underfunded he was, and how close the result turned out to be...yeah that's actually a sound argument. No, he didn't win, but that race also had no business being a nail-biter either.

Okay, how about Beebe helping Blanche win?


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: krazen1211 on January 02, 2018, 12:02:32 AM
Michigan polls greatly underestimate the GOP. Schuette will win.


Title: Re: MI-EPICMRA: Schuette +3
Post by: Holy Unifying Centrist on January 02, 2018, 08:42:02 PM
Michigan polls greatly underestimate the GOP. Schuette will win.

just like polls underestimated roy moore

oh wait doug jones + 1.7