Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2018 Senatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: heatcharger on April 27, 2018, 11:39:30 AM



Title: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: heatcharger on April 27, 2018, 11:39:30 AM
Link (https://www.docdroid.net/BWaK9w1/bfs-poll-memo-internal.pdf).

Bredesen 51%
Blackburn 41%

Positive/negative ratings:

Bredesen: 44/16
Blackburn: 33/30

Looks like an internal for the Bredesen campaign.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Tender Branson on April 27, 2018, 11:44:01 AM
I'd be surprised if Bredesen is not elected in November.

He fits the state well, had some 70% approval ratings when he left as Governor and still has almost a 100% name recognition in the state. Plus, the climate for a Democrat is solid this year.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: _ on April 27, 2018, 11:45:01 AM
This is as I expected for TN, but it's still a D internal :P

Tossup still, go Bredesen


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Holy Unifying Centrist on April 27, 2018, 11:46:40 AM
Race is probably more like Bredesen+3 or +6, but yikes lol


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: America's Sweetheart ❤/𝕿𝖍𝖊 𝕭𝖔𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖗𝖎𝖔𝖗 on April 27, 2018, 11:47:42 AM
If Bredesen is still leading the polls a few months from now, then we can talk.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: junior chįmp on April 27, 2018, 11:59:39 AM
in b4 Atlas says this is good news for Blackburn

Inb4 Limo says but but this poll was before Drumpf brought peace to Korea


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Pollster on April 27, 2018, 12:01:21 PM
On a side note, can we stop with all the Tennessee and Florida polls and get some polls out of ND, MT and IN or is that too much to ask

Not that I disagree with you, but for what it's worth - laws in ND and IN make polling incredibly expensive, to the point that public pollsters typically don't wade into them without a client.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on April 27, 2018, 12:05:07 PM
WISH THAT I WAS ON OLD ROCKY TOP!!!


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Mr. Smith on April 27, 2018, 12:07:41 PM
If Bredesen is still leading the polls a few months from now, then we can talk.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Young Conservative on April 27, 2018, 12:09:21 PM


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: ON Progressive on April 27, 2018, 12:19:53 PM


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Holy Unifying Centrist on April 27, 2018, 12:22:00 PM
On a side note, can we stop with all the Tennessee and Florida polls and get some polls out of ND, MT and IN or is that too much to ask

Polls in ND are fine, but polls in MT/IN now suck because I don't think the republican candidates in MT and especially IN are well known.

FL & TN polls are good because in both races, people actually know the guys running.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on April 27, 2018, 12:23:59 PM
On a side note, can we stop with all the Tennessee and Florida polls and get some polls out of ND, MT and IN or is that too much to ask

Polls in ND are fine, but polls in MT/IN now suck because I don't think the republican candidates in MT and especially IN are well known.

FL & TN polls are good because in both races, people actually know the guys running.

I doubt any more out of IN or WV until the primaries are finished.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Xing on April 27, 2018, 12:24:58 PM

This, but I don't think it's a safe assumption that he's going to get Bayh'd. Bayh jumped into the race much later, it was a far worse year for Democrats, and the fact that he was running for the very seat he abandoned in 2010 made him look like a coward.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: UWS on April 27, 2018, 12:38:13 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on April 27, 2018, 12:40:47 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Phil Bredesen may very well lose, but he is not a coward and DC lackey like Bayh, not equal.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: #gravelgang #lessiglad on April 27, 2018, 12:43:52 PM
On a side note, can we stop with all the Tennessee and Florida polls and get some polls out of ND, MT and IN or is that too much to ask

Not that I disagree with you, but for what it's worth - laws in ND and IN make polling incredibly expensive, to the point that public pollsters typically don't wade into them without a client.

Such as? Genuinely curious here. I assume it's Indiana's fairly strict no-call / robodial prohibition, but I'm not sure honestly.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: MAINEiac4434 on April 27, 2018, 12:56:31 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Phil Bredesen may very well lose, but he is not a coward and DC lackey like Bayh, not equal.
Yup. And this is a better year for Democrats.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: UWS on April 27, 2018, 01:08:21 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Phil Bredesen may very well lose, but he is not a coward and DC lackey like Bayh, not equal.

I mean they both led in polls in red states for months and Bayh went on to lose by 10 points, which means Bredesen’s current advantage doesn’t guarantee him victory.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: MT Treasurer on April 27, 2018, 01:22:10 PM

This, but Tossup out of caution.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: adrac on April 27, 2018, 01:33:42 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 >> Evan Bayh 2016

Ftfy


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Doimper on April 27, 2018, 01:34:55 PM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: ProgressiveCanadian on April 27, 2018, 01:37:02 PM
Lean D.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on April 27, 2018, 01:55:01 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Phil Bredesen may very well lose, but he is not a coward and DC lackey like Bayh, not equal.

I mean they both led in polls in red states for months and Bayh went on to lose by 10 points, which means Bredesen’s current advantage doesn’t guarantee him victory.

Fair enough


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Politician on April 27, 2018, 02:19:06 PM


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Dr Oz Lost Party! on April 27, 2018, 02:54:01 PM


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: brand_allen on April 27, 2018, 03:16:41 PM
The link notes that Bredesen is carrying Independents by 20 points, and picking off about one in five Republicans.

If a Democrat is going to win in the 2018 version of Tennessee, that's how they do it.

(Side note: I was a little astounded to see that he carried 42% of the Republican vote in his 2006 victory, per CNN exit polling. Then again, he carried 69% of the overall vote that year).


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Badger on April 27, 2018, 04:29:41 PM
The link notes that Bredesen is carrying Independents by 20 points, and picking off about one in five Republicans.

If a Democrat is going to win in the 2018 version of Tennessee, that's how they do it.

(Side note: I was a little astounded to see that he carried 42% of the Republican vote in his 2006 victory, per CNN exit polling. Then again, he carried 69% of the overall vote that year).

Governor's races, especially 12 years ago, were far less partisan than Congressional races. The former have to do primarily with the nuts and bolts of governing and somewhat less divisive issues of State Taxation and spending, at least somewhat less emphasis on social issues. Federal taxing and spending + social issues are front-and-center in federal races.

Not to mention, again, even Governor's races have become far more partisan in the last 12 years.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Don Vito Corleone on April 27, 2018, 11:14:00 PM
Race is probably more like Bredesen+3 or +6, but yikes lol


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: IceSpear on April 28, 2018, 12:36:55 AM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

The Ohio Senate race was competitive in April 2016, lol. Hell, it was competitive as late as August!

Bredesen would probably win if the election were held today, but it won't be. There's nowhere for him to go but down. Will he go down enough for Blackburn to win? That's basically what people are arguing about.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: President Johnson on April 28, 2018, 06:16:31 AM
LOL, I change my rating from Toss-up to Lean Democratic. Of course, it's early and it may change, but Bredesen is a very strong candidate while Blackburn isn't for a general election.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Co-Chair Bagel23 on April 28, 2018, 11:34:23 AM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

The Ohio Senate race was competitive in April 2016, lol. Hell, it was competitive as late as August!

Bredesen would probably win if the election were held today, but it won't be. There's nowhere for him to go but down. Will he go down enough for Blackburn to win? That's basically what people are arguing about.

Was not competitive in August, it was pretty obvious Portman ran away with it by mid to late June.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: UWS on April 28, 2018, 11:52:13 AM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

The Ohio Senate race was competitive in April 2016, lol. Hell, it was competitive as late as August!

Bredesen would probably win if the election were held today, but it won't be. There's nowhere for him to go but down. Will he go down enough for Blackburn to win? That's basically what people are arguing about.

Was not competitive in August, it was pretty obvious Portman ran away with it by mid to late June.

The same for Todd Young in Indiana in the summer of 2016.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Landslide Lyndon on April 28, 2018, 03:32:10 PM
You know who might be the Evan Bayh/Ted Strickland of 2018?
Dino Rossi.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Badger on April 28, 2018, 05:19:57 PM
You know who might be the Evan Bayh/Ted Strickland of 2018?
Dino Rossi.

Actually, I think Dino Rossi will be the dino Rossi of 2018


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: junior chįmp on April 28, 2018, 09:05:43 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Some Republicans aren't turning out without boogeyman Obama and Clinton on the ballot


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: IceSpear on April 29, 2018, 12:55:18 AM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

The Ohio Senate race was competitive in April 2016, lol. Hell, it was competitive as late as August!

Bredesen would probably win if the election were held today, but it won't be. There's nowhere for him to go but down. Will he go down enough for Blackburn to win? That's basically what people are arguing about.

Was not competitive in August, it was pretty obvious Portman ran away with it by mid to late June.

Uh, no. The polling average in June ranged from Strickland +0.5 to Portman +0.5, lol.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/senate/oh/ohio_senate_portman_vs_strickland-5386.html


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Obama-Biden Democrat on April 29, 2018, 04:59:18 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Some Republicans aren't turning out without boogeyman Obama and Clinton on the ballot

Democrats discovered that the much vaunted Obama coalition did not turn out in midterms. Trump supporters will learn the same lesson in 2018. Trump cultists will not turn out if their orange god is not on the ballot.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Torrain on April 29, 2018, 05:25:33 PM
Lean R -> Tossup.
Polling consistently has Bredesen ahead, but the risk remains that TN voters will come home to the GOP and Strickland/Bayh/Thompson Bredesen.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: brand_allen on April 29, 2018, 07:26:53 PM
Lean R -> Tossup.
Polling consistently has Bredesen ahead, but the risk remains that TN voters will come home to the GOP and Strickland/Bayh/Thompson Bredesen.

Seems like a reasonable rating change. Across five polls conducted since March, Bredesen averages a  47-41% advantage, and leads Blackburn in all five polls by margins ranging from one to ten points.

Axios/Survey Monkey, 4/2-23, D+1
Mason-Dixon, 4/17-19, D+3
Garin-Hart-Yang (D-Bredesen), 4/9-11, D+10
Middle TN State Univ., 3/22-29, D+10
PPP, 3/15-16, D+5


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Mr. Smith on April 30, 2018, 12:58:03 AM
It's not Bayh...it's Bob Kerrey whom the comparison should be drawn.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Perlen vor den Schweinen on April 30, 2018, 09:03:49 AM
It's not Bayh...it's Bob Kerrey whom the comparison should be drawn.


Even then, the big issue with Kerrey was that he had been out of Nebraska after leaving the Senate and parachuted back in only after Nelson retired. Bayh similarly came back to Indiana only to swoop up an opportunity in the Senate race. Bredesen has been in Tennessee since he left office, so that will not be an issue to attack him on.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Dr Oz Lost Party! on April 30, 2018, 09:06:31 AM
The same people who are comparing Bredesen to Bayh and Feingold compared Conor Lamb to Jon Ossoff just a few weeks ago.

Anyways, Bredesen isn't a Washington insider, and as we are seeing, he's separating himself from the Democratic party. Completely different people, completely different strategies.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Sir Mohamed on April 30, 2018, 09:15:15 AM
Still toss-up with a slight Dem tilt. But definitely a good sign that he's above 50%, but I need to see more polls over a few months.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Suburban Republican on April 30, 2018, 06:09:36 PM
This race is eerily reminiscent of Todd Young vs. Evan Bayh...


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Dr Oz Lost Party! on April 30, 2018, 09:52:42 PM
This race is eerily reminiscent of Todd Young vs. Evan Bayh...

Like PA-18 was "eerily reminiscent" of GA-06?


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: KingSweden on April 30, 2018, 11:02:54 PM
Still toss-up with a slight Dem tilt. But definitely a good sign that he's above 50%, but I need to see more polls over a few months.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Badger on May 01, 2018, 12:41:26 PM
Phil Bredesen 2018 = Evan Bayh 2016

Low IQ Republicans aren't turning out without boogeyman Obama and Clinton on the ballot

Democrats discovered that the much vaunted Obama coalition did not turn out in midterms. Trump supporters will learn the same lesson in 2018. Trump cultists will not turn out if their orange god is not on the ballot.


Actually, I think a big part of Trumps Coalition, which remember only got him to 46.5% of the vote, were number of folks who voted for Obama at least once, usually twice, but we're disillusioned by the continuing disintegration of the country's industrial job base and the role foreign trade has to play in it. Trump's running as a populist fighting for manufacturing jobs 1 a number of those voters over as we saw in places like Trumbull County Ohio and Oakland County Michigan. However, his governing as a billionaire plutocrat has chased away most of such voters who were willing to give him a shot.

Such voters were concentrated in the industrial Midwest and to some degree in the Northeast, so I'm not sure how much that'll play in Tennessee. But to what degree it does, those voters are likely to show up for the orange god-king in 2020 either.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Don Vito Corleone on November 22, 2018, 02:14:42 PM
Who'd have thought an April poll might be inaccurate?


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: IceSpear on November 23, 2018, 05:04:52 PM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

Narrator: It was not competitive.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: ElectionsGuy on November 23, 2018, 10:09:00 PM

Phil Bredesen lost by MORE than Evan Bayh.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Doimper on November 24, 2018, 08:02:57 AM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

Narrator: It was not competitive.

It was when I made that post.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: IceSpear on November 24, 2018, 04:19:22 PM
But IceSpear told me that this race wasn't competitive! :(

Narrator: It was not competitive.

It was when I made that post.

I never denied that Bredesen could've won an April election though.


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Politician on November 24, 2018, 04:22:44 PM
TN-Fart Research


Title: Re: TN-Hart Research (D): Bredesen +10, above 50%
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on November 26, 2018, 03:49:17 PM
Bredesen is the Ted Strickland of this campaign