Talk Elections

Election Archive => 2018 Gubernatorial Election Polls => Topic started by: MT Treasurer on October 10, 2018, 12:26:02 PM



Title: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: MT Treasurer on October 10, 2018, 12:26:02 PM
47% Walker (R, inc.)
46% Evers (D)
5% Anderson (L)


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: libertpaulian on October 10, 2018, 12:26:43 PM
Oh, great.   Just what we need.  A victory lap by hofoid...


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Zaybay on October 10, 2018, 12:27:06 PM
Oh, great.   Just what we need.  A victory lap by hofoid...


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Gass3268 on October 10, 2018, 12:28:55 PM





Baldwin's massive lead in the Senate race gives me confidence that Evers will pull out a narrow win here. Gonna be close!


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Person Man on October 10, 2018, 12:29:57 PM
I believe this as I believe Corday is up by 6.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Scottholes 2.0 on October 10, 2018, 12:31:23 PM
Why the heck would they sample 4 percent more Republicans? Ugh, now we have to hear Hofoid's mouth until Election Day. My state can't possibly be this stupid in this current political climate! I hope Walker's attack ads really aren't working and this is just an outlier.

Also, WI isn't really known for ticketsplitting..........why is Baldwin still leading Vukmir by a landslide?


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Xing on October 10, 2018, 12:32:54 PM
Hopefully Wisconsin Democrats realize that this race is, at the very least, not over yet, and the turnout/enthusiasm among Democrats will increase between now and November.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Politician on October 10, 2018, 12:33:07 PM
Given that Marquette has consistently found better numbers for Walker then other posters, I still believe this is Lean D, but obviously closer to tossup then Likely.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Gass3268 on October 10, 2018, 12:33:53 PM
Why the heck would they sample 4 percent more Republicans? Ugh, now we have to hear Hofoid's mouth until Election Day. My state can't possibly be this stupid in this current political climate! I hope Walker's attack ads really aren't working and this is just an outlier.

Also, WI isn't really known for ticketsplitting..........why is Baldwin still leading Vukmir by a landslide?

Marquette does zero weighting for partisanship. Lets' the voters tell them what party they support.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Bakersfield Uber Alles on October 10, 2018, 12:33:54 PM


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Technocracy Timmy on October 10, 2018, 12:34:18 PM
Everyone take cover from hofoid’s massive load.

()


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Ebsy on October 10, 2018, 12:34:43 PM
I wonder if this will be the year that Marquette becomes totally discredited. We shall see what their final poll says.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: 2016 on October 10, 2018, 12:41:19 PM
Speaking about Turnout:

IMO Scott Walker has "the single best Turnout Machine" of any sitting Republican Governor running for Re-Election. If a Governor in the Midwest pulls out a win it's gonna be him.

Democrats in my view vastly underestimating the Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, Walker Machine just like in 2016 and they paid for it.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Skye on October 10, 2018, 12:41:56 PM
A tossup remains a tossup.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Wisconsin SC Race 2019 on October 10, 2018, 12:42:17 PM
Can't argue against the Gold Standard. Let the unskewing begin..


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Politician on October 10, 2018, 12:43:15 PM
Can't argue against the Gold Standard. Let the unskewing begin..
()


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Scottholes 2.0 on October 10, 2018, 12:43:32 PM
Why has MU been the only poll showing Walker leading? He was leading by 4 in their June poll. If MU is indeed the most reliable, then the other polls have been wrong. I am so done with polls now....


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Wisconsin SC Race 2019 on October 10, 2018, 12:45:03 PM
Speaking about Turnout:

IMO Scott Walker has "the single best Turnout Machine" of any sitting Republican Governor running for Re-Election. If a Governor in the Midwest pulls out a win it's gonna be him.

Democrats in my view vastly underestimating the Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, Walker Machine just like in 2016 and they paid for it.
Right? The utter complacency of National Dems spitting on the Rust Belt with Phoenix New Money Housewives Pro-income Inequality Identity Politics is now culminating in a loss of a once progressive state.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Podgy the Bear on October 10, 2018, 12:45:50 PM
Would Anderson really get 5% of the vote?  I doubt it.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Devout Centrist on October 10, 2018, 12:47:13 PM
Can't argue against the Gold Standard. Let the unskewing begin..
Marquette had Clinton+6 in the 2nd November 2016. Let's all remember. Second of all, this may be good news for the Dems, but the legislature won't flip if all the gains are concentrated in Milwaukee and Dane counties. This means that if Walker loses and wins a revenge 2022 matchup, we'll be back to a GOP trifecta in no time. Stay watchful, Wisconsin Dems. Don't get complacent and keep fighting.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: BudgieForce on October 10, 2018, 12:47:43 PM
We all thought Nelson would carry Gillum across the finish line, but maybe its Baldwin carrying Evers across the finish line instead.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: KingSweden on October 10, 2018, 12:48:53 PM


Also...

Speaking about Turnout:

IMO Scott Walker has "the single best Turnout Machine" of any sitting Republican Governor running for Re-Election. If a Governor in the Midwest pulls out a win it's gonna be him.

Democrats in my view vastly underestimating the Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, Walker Machine just like in 2016 and they paid for it.
Right? The utter complacency of National Dems spitting on the Rust Belt with Phoenix New Money Housewives Pro-income Inequality Identity Politics is now culminating in a loss of a once progressive state.

I’ve read this post twice and have no idea what on earth this is supposed to mean


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: DaWN on October 10, 2018, 12:49:26 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Wisconsin SC Race 2019 on October 10, 2018, 12:49:49 PM
Can't argue against the Gold Standard. Let the unskewing begin..
Marquette had Clinton+6 in the 2nd November 2016. Let's all remember. Second of all, this may be good news for the Dems, but the legislature won't flip if all the gains are concentrated in Milwaukee and Dane counties. This means that if Walker loses and wins a revenge 2022 matchup, we'll be back to a GOP trifecta in no time. Stay watchful, Wisconsin Dems. Don't get complacent and keep fighting.
Yep, take what I said and multiply it by 100 now.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Xing on October 10, 2018, 12:50:11 PM


Also...

Speaking about Turnout:

IMO Scott Walker has "the single best Turnout Machine" of any sitting Republican Governor running for Re-Election. If a Governor in the Midwest pulls out a win it's gonna be him.

Democrats in my view vastly underestimating the Reince Priebus, Paul Ryan, Walker Machine just like in 2016 and they paid for it.
Right? The utter complacency of National Dems spitting on the Rust Belt with Phoenix New Money Housewives Pro-income Inequality Identity Politics is now culminating in a loss of a once progressive state.

I’ve read this post twice and have no idea what on earth this is supposed to mean

Something something complacent Dems in disarray.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: KingSweden on October 10, 2018, 12:50:48 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?

The hot takes are hofoid’s life force


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: MT Treasurer on October 10, 2018, 12:51:29 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?

People letting their personal feelings get in the way of their predictions/analysis.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Wisconsin SC Race 2019 on October 10, 2018, 12:52:52 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?

The hot takes are hofoid’s life force
The only hot takes here are everyone rushing to discredit the partisan composition. Is it hard to believe that timid GOPers are coming home in Wisconsin?


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Virginiá on October 10, 2018, 12:53:26 PM
Can't argue against the Gold Standard. Let the unskewing begin..
Marquette had Clinton+6 in the 2nd November 2016. Let's all remember. Second of all, this may be good news for the Dems, but the legislature won't flip if all the gains are concentrated in Milwaukee and Dane counties. This means that if Walker loses and wins a revenge 2022 matchup, we'll be back to a GOP trifecta in no time. Stay watchful, Wisconsin Dems. Don't get complacent and keep fighting.

lolol

trolls gonna troll


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: RogueBeaver on October 10, 2018, 12:58:31 PM


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: KingSweden on October 10, 2018, 01:04:47 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?

The hot takes are hofoid’s life force
The only hot takes here are everyone rushing to discredit the partisan composition. Is it hard to believe that timid GOPers are coming home in Wisconsin?

I thought it was a Tossup before and that it is a Tossup now


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: BudgieForce on October 10, 2018, 01:08:32 PM
It kind of seems like last month was an outlier and this is more in line with Marquettes previous results.



Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Gass3268 on October 10, 2018, 01:13:59 PM
Democrats are still more enthused to vote:



Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Gass3268 on October 10, 2018, 01:16:47 PM
Last poll will come out on 10/31 in 3 weeks (6 days before the election).


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: 2016 on October 10, 2018, 01:20:18 PM
Democrats are still more enthused to vote:



Republicans cut the Enthusiasm Gap from 11 to 7....and I expect that to be narrowed even further over the coming four weeks.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Antonio the Sixth on October 10, 2018, 02:56:25 PM
oh, wonderful


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: MT Treasurer on October 10, 2018, 05:13:36 PM
Even if Walker loses, I’d say it’s pretty obvious that Republicans have a much better chance of winning WI than PA/MN in 2020, not that that’s necessarily saying much.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Scottholes 2.0 on October 10, 2018, 06:29:01 PM
It is somewhat odd that MU is the only poll that has had good numbers for Walker this cycle, though. No other poll but MU has shown Walker leading yet.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: KingSweden on October 10, 2018, 06:33:14 PM
Even if Walker loses, I’d say it’s pretty obvious that Republicans have a much better chance of winning WI than PA/MN in 2020, not that that’s necessarily saying much.

I don’t think anyone has disputed that, have they?


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Wisconsin SC Race 2019 on October 10, 2018, 06:36:39 PM
It is somewhat odd that MU is the only poll that has had good numbers for Walker this cycle, though. No other poll but MU has shown Walker leading yet.
I'd expect the Gold Standard not to imitate all the other pretenders.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Xing on October 10, 2018, 07:08:49 PM
Even if Walker loses, I’d say it’s pretty obvious that Republicans have a much better chance of winning WI than PA/MN in 2020, not that that’s necessarily saying much.

MN, sure, but PA? Why does everyone think that a state that voted 0.1% to the right of PA after voting to the left of it twice in a row can't possibly vote to the left of PA in 2020? And I really don't think that the 2018 results will have that much impact on the 2020 elections.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: IceSpear on October 10, 2018, 09:54:32 PM
I think this is a tossup, but what is it with this race and ridiculous hot takes on both sides?

People letting their personal feelings get in the way of their predictions/analysis.

This.

Toss up -> Toss up


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Pericles on October 10, 2018, 10:02:33 PM
Ugh, I don't even need to see the posts to know this thread has been a steamy stinking pile of bullsh**t #hottakes.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Vosem on October 11, 2018, 01:34:59 PM
Would Anderson really get 5% of the vote?  I doubt it.

He received 3% in the 2016 Senate race, and Gary Johnson received 4% in Wisconsin for president, so it's not like 5% would be a huge outlier (interestingly, Wisconsin was also home of a rare serious Libertarian effort in 2002 to win the governor's race; their candidate won a full 11% and carried 2 counties). 5% seems kind of high for a race between what are basically Generic Wisconsin R and Generic Wisconsin D in 2018, though; I'd imagine most everyone in the state knows which of those they prefer and the race is basically a turnout game.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers on October 11, 2018, 01:40:45 PM
Walker has a resiliency to win Governorhip elections, WI is still a purple state


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Gass3268 on October 11, 2018, 01:45:13 PM
Would Anderson really get 5% of the vote?  I doubt it.

He received 3% in the 2016 Senate race, and Gary Johnson received 4% in Wisconsin for president, so it's not like 5% would be a huge outlier (interestingly, Wisconsin was also home of a rare serious Libertarian effort in 2002 to win the governor's race; their candidate won a full 11% and carried 2 counties). 5% seems kind of high for a race between what are basically Generic Wisconsin R and Generic Wisconsin D in 2018, though; I'd imagine most everyone in the state knows which of those they prefer and the race is basically a turnout game.

The Libertarian in 2002 was Tommy Thompson's brother.


Title: Re: WI-Marquette: Walker +1
Post by: Vosem on October 11, 2018, 01:49:45 PM
Would Anderson really get 5% of the vote?  I doubt it.

He received 3% in the 2016 Senate race, and Gary Johnson received 4% in Wisconsin for president, so it's not like 5% would be a huge outlier (interestingly, Wisconsin was also home of a rare serious Libertarian effort in 2002 to win the governor's race; their candidate won a full 11% and carried 2 counties). 5% seems kind of high for a race between what are basically Generic Wisconsin R and Generic Wisconsin D in 2018, though; I'd imagine most everyone in the state knows which of those they prefer and the race is basically a turnout game.

The Libertarian in 2002 was Tommy Thompson's brother.

I know -- typically when a Libertarian does really well there's a "star candidate" vibe to them (Gary Johnson, Joe Miller, Ed Thompson and so forth are all prominent dissident GOPers; dissident Democrats don't typically run as Libertarians). But it's still noteworthy that Wisconsin is a state that's been receptive-ish to that sort of campaign in the past.