Talk Elections

Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion => Congressional Elections => Topic started by: nini2287 on November 10, 2006, 01:48:29 AM



Title: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: nini2287 on November 10, 2006, 01:48:29 AM
I say NH Democrat, slightly over IA Dem and PA Dem (if Gerlach had lost, then I might vote PA Dem)


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Deano963 on November 10, 2006, 02:14:31 AM
I would broaden it out a bit and say it was the year of the Northeastern Democrat. I wasn't so much localized in a certain state or states as it was in a region - the NE.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on November 10, 2006, 02:23:56 AM
Well, it was definitely not the year of the moderate Republican - they basically don't exist any more in Congress.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Gustaf on November 10, 2006, 02:42:06 AM
New Hampshire, easily. Just four years ago  this was a Republican one party state, 100% Republican Congress delegation, Republican presidential vote, Republican Governor and heavily Republican State Legislature. Look at it now. A very dramatic transformation, especially the legislature this time. They lost what, 80 seats? And both House Reps too. If any state experienced a true wave this year, it was NH.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Ben. on November 10, 2006, 02:59:21 AM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Eraserhead on November 10, 2006, 03:22:52 AM
YOU FORGOT NEW YORK!!!!!!!!

It was the year of the New York Democrat.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Gustaf on November 10, 2006, 03:26:03 AM
YOU FORGOT NEW YORK!!!!!!!!

It was the year of the New York Democrat.

Not really. New York held up better than expected for the GOP. I actually consider it to be a bit of a victory for them, considering the premises.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Eraserhead on November 10, 2006, 03:38:25 AM
YOU FORGOT NEW YORK!!!!!!!!

It was the year of the New York Democrat.

Not really. New York held up better than expected for the GOP. I actually consider it to be a bit of a victory for them, considering the premises.

Oh come on...a new Gov., Gillibrand beat Sweeney, new Attorney General etc, etc.

Even John Hall beat Sue Kelly. Repeat...John Hall beat Sue Kelly.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: nini2287 on November 10, 2006, 03:47:53 AM
YOU FORGOT NEW YORK!!!!!!!!

It was the year of the New York Democrat.

Not really. New York held up better than expected for the GOP. I actually consider it to be a bit of a victory for them, considering the premises.

That's why I didn't put it on there.  If they had picked up a couple more house seats, then yes.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Eraserhead on November 10, 2006, 03:50:24 AM
YOU FORGOT NEW YORK!!!!!!!!

It was the year of the New York Democrat.

Not really. New York held up better than expected for the GOP. I actually consider it to be a bit of a victory for them, considering the premises.

That's why I didn't put it on there.  If they had picked up a couple more house seats, then yes.

JOHN HALL BEAT SUE FRIGGIN' KELLY. lol that alone should have got it on there.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Keystone Phil on November 10, 2006, 08:12:16 AM
Whether it was basically handed to them or not, it is definetley the year of the Ohio Democrat.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Conan on November 10, 2006, 11:41:07 AM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Filuwaúrdjan on November 10, 2006, 12:02:36 PM
The Year of the Pissed Off Blue Collar worker o/c


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: opebo on November 10, 2006, 12:25:41 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Conan on November 10, 2006, 12:38:50 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: nini2287 on November 10, 2006, 01:06:23 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.

What about Carney, Altmire, McCaskill, Webb and Casey?


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Conan on November 10, 2006, 01:10:43 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.

What about Carney, Altmire, McCaskill, Webb and Casey?
Moderate, Moderate, Liberal, Liberal, Moderate.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: nclib on November 10, 2006, 06:36:21 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.

So are you saying the only new conservative Dems elected were Donnelly, Ellsworth, Hill, and Shuler? I don't know that much about three of them, but Hill seemed to have had a moderate record in Congress.

Anyway, I voted New Hampshire.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on November 10, 2006, 06:40:44 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.

What about Carney, Altmire, McCaskill, Webb and Casey?

So you're claiming that a lot of Democcrats are conservatives. Then who needs the Republican party? Gotcha.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Jake on November 10, 2006, 06:43:14 PM
Lampson is a moderate, Carney will have to vote like one to be re-elected, Ellsworth and Shuler are Blue-Dogs, Donnelly is moderate, Hill is moderate, Altmire is moderate. Casey will be a pro-life vote in the Senate. Add to that the Blue-Dogs and moderates already in the House Caucus, and yes, the Democratic majority is built on 30-40 odd moderate to conservative Democrats from mainly Bush/swing states.


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: TheresNoMoney on November 10, 2006, 06:46:39 PM
The Year of the New Hampshire Democrat!!

A complete tidal wave of epic proportions!!!


Title: Re: 2006 is the Year of the...
Post by: Conan on November 10, 2006, 06:50:43 PM
Year of the "Blue Dog" the Dem's majority in the house is built on them :)
That's a myth. Only 4 conservatives were elected dems this year. The rest were liberal.

Correct conan!  Most of the gains were in the Northeast and Middle West, not the South.
The conservatives came from Indiana and North Carolina.

So are you saying the only new conservative Dems elected were Donnelly, Ellsworth, Hill, and Shuler? I don't know that much about three of them, but Hill seemed to have had a moderate record in Congress.

Anyway, I voted New Hampshire.
No, I compiled a list here: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=48771.msg1041665#msg1041665
Hill turns out to be moderate.