|
Title: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on November 28, 2007, 03:21:35 PM New Poll: North Carolina President by Other Source on 2007-11-25 (https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2008/polls.php?action=indpoll&id=37200711140)
Summary: D: 41%, R: 45%, U: 13% Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details (http://www.jwpcivitasinstitute.org/media/poll-results/november-2007-decisionmaker-poll) Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Josh/Devilman88 on November 28, 2007, 03:35:16 PM Just to prove that NC will be a battleground state in 2008.
Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Person Man on November 28, 2007, 05:34:27 PM This will be a fun other barrier for the GoP. ^^
Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: WalterMitty on December 01, 2007, 08:30:18 PM Just to prove that NC will be a battleground state in 2008. uh. no. Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: DownWithTheLeft on December 01, 2007, 08:32:04 PM Just to prove that NC will be a battleground state in 2008. Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: War on Want on December 01, 2007, 08:33:10 PM Just to prove that NC will be a battleground state in 2008. Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Fmr. Pres. Duke on December 02, 2007, 06:32:49 PM NC will not be a tossup state! Kerry polled well in late polls in 2004 and Bush still carried it by 13% ..
although Romney could make it one ;) Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 02, 2007, 06:39:07 PM Just to prove that NC will be a battleground state in 2008. Romney's the worst - which is why he'd nominate Huckabee (or Purdue as some would say - but I disagree here - the whole water crisis hasn't helped the opinion of Purdue in FL or AL - not that AL would matter, but FL could). Title: Re: NC: Other Source: Giuliani beats Clinton by 4% Post by: Person Man on December 03, 2007, 12:49:02 PM The point isn't to make NC a swing state, but a distractor state, like Delaware and New Jersey were in 2004. If the neocons have to spend money in North Carolina and Kentucky and in senate races in Nebraska and Idaho, they will have less money to hold in places like Florida, Colorado, let alone take states like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania.
|