Atlas Forum

Atlas Fantasy Elections => Atlas Fantasy Government => Topic started by: Peter on June 30, 2008, 01:28:04 pm



Title: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Peter on June 30, 2008, 01:28:04 pm
With the passage of the Supreme Court Bar Act (http://www.uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=77665.0), the Senate has formally constituted the Supreme Court Bar.

As the sitting AG, I am happy to be of service to the Court in helping to draft regulations for the Bar if they so wish, and I shall be preparing a list of citizens who I will nominate to the Bar, as the Act allows. Should the Justices wish to contact me regarding this subject, please feel free to do so.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Torie on July 01, 2008, 03:37:50 pm
Has Atlasia ever had a criminal case?  If not, it would seem this newly created Bar will be like the Maytag Man.

I might add, that if I were representing a defendant, my first bit of advice would be to deregister, and re-register. :)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on July 01, 2008, 03:41:13 pm
Has Atlasia ever had a criminal case?  If not, it would seem this newly created Bar will be like the Maytag Man.

I might add, that if I were representing a defendant, my first bit of advice would be to deregister, and re-register. :)


Yes...it has.  And the Bar bill was created in response to it (aka Atlasia v. Keystone Phil aka Jessica Wallerstein)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Torie on July 01, 2008, 08:55:38 pm
Has Atlasia ever had a criminal case?  If not, it would seem this newly created Bar will be like the Maytag Man.

I might add, that if I were representing a defendant, my first bit of advice would be to deregister, and re-register. :)


Yes...it has.  And the Bar bill was created in response to it (aka Atlasia v. Keystone Phil aka Jessica Wallerstein)

That is interesting. Did anyone go to "jail?" :)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Хahar 🤔 on July 01, 2008, 08:56:06 pm
Has Atlasia ever had a criminal case?  If not, it would seem this newly created Bar will be like the Maytag Man.

I might add, that if I were representing a defendant, my first bit of advice would be to deregister, and re-register. :)


Yes...it has.  And the Bar bill was created in response to it (aka Atlasia v. Keystone Phil aka Jessica Wallerstein)

That is interesting. Did anyone go to "jail?" :)

No jail here. Only bans on voting/holding office.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Јas on July 02, 2008, 03:13:50 am
Has Atlasia ever had a criminal case?  If not, it would seem this newly created Bar will be like the Maytag Man.

I might add, that if I were representing a defendant, my first bit of advice would be to deregister, and re-register. :)


Yes...it has.  And the Bar bill was created in response to it (aka Atlasia v. Keystone Phil aka Jessica Wallerstein)

That is interesting. Did anyone go to "jail?" :)

He got off on appeal due an apparent fault with the manner in which evidence was attained.
The people, in their infinite wisdom, then decided that they'd make Phil President...and well, I best not speak any more on that subject.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Peter on July 02, 2008, 05:39:25 pm
Whist I await the Supreme Court issuing regulations for the Bar and its associated paraphernalia (and again, I extend an open invitation for the Court to contact me if they need assistance), I hereby nominate the following people to the Supreme Court Bar:

Lewis Trondheim
Jas
Sam Spade
Brandon H
Ebowed
Colin Wixted
Torie

Should the Court wish me to present evidence in favour of their admittance, then I will be happy to do so.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Torie on July 17, 2008, 03:24:47 pm
Peter, in whose court is the ball at this juncture to do what? 


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Peter on July 17, 2008, 04:30:13 pm
AFAIK, all the balls are in the Court's court. They can either:
1. Make some regulations, or ask with help to make regulations.
2. Admit, or not, the nominations I had made.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on July 17, 2008, 05:04:49 pm
AFAIK, all the balls are in the Court's court. They can either:
1. Make some regulations, or ask with help to make regulations.
2. Admit, or not, the nominations I had made.

Peter - I'll PM the other court members about their admittance.  Naturally, as a Justice, I would prefer not to see myself on this list until, if and when, I return to being a private citizen (regardless of what that actually means).

Discussions about regulations I suspect will probably have to wait a while.  I don't exactly speak for the Court here, but I speak for myself - this weekend and next week will be quite busy for me - and we will need to circulate and release the opinions for the two cases presently in front of us. 

However, if you or Brandon H want to draft something, I'll be happy to look at it or circulate it (or you can send it to BM to circulate).


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Brandon H on July 18, 2008, 01:07:54 pm
I support the nominations submitted by Peter. If Peter intentionally left himself off since he was the AG at the time, then I should probably be removed from that list and Peter should be added. If Peter left himself off simply because he did not want on and it had nothing to do with him being the AG then leave myself on.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on July 18, 2008, 01:20:55 pm
These persons have been unanimously approved to the Supreme Court Bar.

Lewis Trondheim
Jas
Ebowed
Colin Wixted
Torie

I am simply awaiting the BrandonH/Peter discussion to finish out before I address his nomination.  Naturally, I took myself off the approval list.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: minionofmidas - supplemental forum account on July 18, 2008, 03:07:20 pm
So I can have a drink here now? Good.

Double Tsipouro please.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Peter on July 18, 2008, 03:25:53 pm
I deliberately left myself off because I do not like nominating myself. In principle, I have no problem with a serving Attorney General being a member of the Bar, in fact I would encourage it, and I prevail upon Brandon to keep his name in consideration.

I agree with Sam that because of the obvious conflict of interest, serving Justices should not be members of the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: minionofmidas - supplemental forum account on July 18, 2008, 03:32:22 pm
Quote from: THE LAW
8. The Attorney General may nominate persons he deems fit for membership of the Supreme Court Bar to the Supreme Court. Individual citizens may nominate themselves for membership of the Supreme Court Bar, but shall require the sponsorship of an existing member of the Bar.

So I can't nominate Peter myself, which otherwise I would be doing now. I ask Brandon to nominate Peter, or Peter to nominate himself, in which case I will be honored to be allowed to sponsor him.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Brandon H on July 18, 2008, 05:38:20 pm
I will accept the nomination.

I nominate Peter to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on July 19, 2008, 02:39:17 pm
This person has been unanimously approved to the Supreme Court Bar.

BrandonH

We will discuss Peter soon enough.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Peter on July 20, 2008, 02:29:23 pm
I would heartily endorse the nomination of Ernest to the bar also.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Brandon H on July 21, 2008, 11:08:45 pm
I fully support the nomination of Ernest.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on August 06, 2008, 11:00:25 am
These persons have been unanimously approved to the Supreme Court Bar.

Peter
Ernest


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on August 06, 2008, 11:01:25 am
Supreme Court Bar (as of 08.06.2008)

Lewis Trondheim
Jas
Ebowed
Colin Wixted
Torie
Brandon H
Peter
Ernest


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on August 06, 2008, 10:46:40 pm
I'd suggest, although I feel it is improper for me to nominate, someone nominate TCash to the bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Torie on August 06, 2008, 11:00:11 pm
What are TCash's qualifications? Is he in residence?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on August 06, 2008, 11:01:32 pm
What are TCash's qualifications? Is he in residence?

He's a former member of the court and has posted a few amicus briefs.  Other than that, I'm not sure what other qualifications he holds. 


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Brandon H on August 07, 2008, 09:23:04 am
I was thinking of nominating TCash as well. Besides serving as a former member of the Court, one only needs to look at his performance in the recent Court case.

I nominate TCash to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: TCash101 on August 07, 2008, 04:35:44 pm
Thanks, guys! Just for the record, here I've been Chief Justice of the Court, governor on several occasions, and Vice President for a bit.

In real life, I'm a teacher of English and Government. In the past, I've taught AP US and Comparative Politics; currently I'm teaching a course for all freshmen at our school on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, based on the "We the People" curriculum done by The Center for Civic Education.

I'm sure others know a lot more about criminal law than I do, but I'd gladly help how I can and would be honored to serve on the Bar with the fine folks who have already been nominated.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Torie on August 07, 2008, 06:46:04 pm
I didn't realize who you were Cash, because I am getting senile. Of course you are qualified!  :)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 28, 2009, 03:05:47 pm
Given the amount of criminal trials we've had recently, I've been reminding myself to bump up this thread.

Now doing so.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on November 28, 2009, 03:18:42 pm
I'm submitting an application pending my resignation becoming effective.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Purple State on November 29, 2009, 03:41:54 pm
I would like to apply to be sworn in to the Supreme Court Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 29, 2009, 03:59:16 pm
I checked through the RowanBrandon trial thread, and it appears like Al is now a member of the Supreme Court Bar (and I approve).

I approve of Purple State's admittance.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Franzl on November 29, 2009, 03:59:52 pm
I would also like to apply, considering I've argued a considerable number of cases already in Atlasian court.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: opebo on November 29, 2009, 04:17:09 pm
I approve of Purple State's admittance.

Me too and Franzl as well.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 29, 2009, 05:06:09 pm
Likewise on Franzl


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on November 29, 2009, 07:48:08 pm
I've apparantly been admitted to the Mideastern regional bar, but request admittence to the Atlasian Bar as well.

Incidentally, is there any real need for a bar membership beyond maybe being a registered voter or pro se representation? The latter does not require a license to practice law in the real world, so why would it require one in Atlasia?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: MaxQue on November 30, 2009, 01:25:12 am
I've apparantly been admitted to the Mideastern regional bar, but request admittence to the Atlasian Bar as well.

Incidentally, is there any real need for a bar membership beyond maybe being a registered voter or pro se representation? The latter does not require a license to practice law in the real world, so why would it require one in Atlasia?

In United States, no, but in some countries, you must be a member of the Bar, like in Canada (except if you represent yourself).


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: opebo on November 30, 2009, 04:22:07 am
I've apparantly been admitted to the Mideastern regional bar, but request admittence to the Atlasian Bar as well.

Incidentally, is there any real need for a bar membership beyond maybe being a registered voter or pro se representation? The latter does not require a license to practice law in the real world, so why would it require one in Atlasia?

I like having the Bar because it allows we on the court to keep  out the outright jackasses who want to just grandstand and muck up the process.  (I think we've only ever refused maybe one person).

You, Badger, are welcome as far as I'm concerned, if J. Spade concurs.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 30, 2009, 11:30:25 am
I'm fine with Badger too.  He's made a number of cogent arguments in the past, imo.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 30, 2009, 12:17:32 pm
btw, all names have been added to the Wiki, because as far as I know, only majority approval is needed.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on November 30, 2009, 12:17:53 pm
I thank the Court, and see the point raised by Justice Opebo for having such a bar registry to work as a 'troll filter'.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 30, 2009, 12:18:37 pm
I also want to formally approve TCash101, even though he hasn't been around for a while.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Purple State on November 30, 2009, 10:43:07 pm
I want to thank the justices for their approval.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on December 11, 2009, 09:35:29 pm
I wish to be a member of the Supreme Court Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 12, 2009, 10:48:21 am
I don't know - we're going to have to think about this.  :P


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: opebo on December 12, 2009, 02:16:10 pm
I don't know - we're going to have to think about this.  :P

Haha, welcome bullmoose..


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Alexander Hamilton on December 12, 2009, 02:17:51 pm
pick me


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 12, 2009, 11:17:58 pm
pick me

no thanks.

bullmoose is in, unfortunately.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on December 13, 2009, 09:05:01 pm
bullmoose is in, unfortunately.

Unfortunately?  Geez.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 13, 2009, 10:27:22 pm
bullmoose is in, unfortunately.

Unfortunately?  Geez.

This is a tough court now, bro...  :P


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bullmoose88 on December 14, 2009, 12:20:51 am
bullmoose is in, unfortunately.

Unfortunately?  Geez.

This is a tough court now, bro...  :P

No love for me there already?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Barnes on March 06, 2010, 05:45:09 pm
I'd like to apply to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on March 06, 2010, 08:11:03 pm
I'd like to apply to the Bar.

How many drinks have you had already?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Barnes on March 06, 2010, 08:11:37 pm
I'd like to apply to the Bar.

How many drinks have you had already?

As many as you want me to have had. ;)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on March 06, 2010, 08:27:45 pm
I'd like to apply to the Bar.

How many drinks have you had already?

As many as you want me to have had. ;)

That's a good enough response - you're in.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: AndrewTX on April 05, 2010, 10:02:35 am
As I like doing things, I'd like to apply if I can..


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Junkie on April 05, 2010, 07:59:16 pm
Would respectfully request to join the Supreme Court Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on April 06, 2010, 04:02:17 pm
Both AndrewCT and Junkie have been accepted to the Bar.  Drinks later.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 15, 2010, 02:23:10 am
I would like to formally request to be admitted into the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Baconomics 🐖 on November 15, 2010, 10:41:28 am
Can I be admitted into the bar? This ID here that I bought from a guy that someone in my freshman dorm knew says I'm 21 and it looks enough like me and you'll notice I've slipped a $5 under the ID when I handed it to you to help make up your mind to let me in and also if you're taking drink orders I'll have a gin and tonic but hold the tonic.

;)


Ahem. I formally request admittance.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 15, 2010, 06:57:44 pm
I'd like to formally request that I be admitted into the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on November 17, 2010, 04:55:55 pm
While I'm waiting, can I at least order a Long Island Iced Tea? ;)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on November 17, 2010, 05:46:59 pm
While I'm waiting, can I at least order a Long Island Iced Tea? ;)

Lets see some ID, kid. Hmmm.... your profile says you're 21. OK, good enough for me. :)

(http://sylviagarza.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/long-island-iced-tea1.jpg)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 30, 2010, 10:41:39 am
Bacon King is in.  We are still discussing benconstine.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on November 30, 2010, 02:41:35 pm
benconstine's request to join the Bar has been denied.

That is all.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on November 30, 2010, 05:52:32 pm
benconstine's request to join the Bar has been denied.

That is all.

I'm going to kindly assume the Court had the courtesy and professionalism to PM Ben with its reasons for denial and steps deemed necessary for later admission, similar to RL. Otherwise such a terse "because we said so" decision would seem a grossly arbitrary misuse of the Court's statutorily granted discretion.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Queen Mum Inks.LWC on December 01, 2010, 12:47:23 pm
What about my request?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 01, 2010, 02:36:34 pm
benconstine's request to join the Bar has been denied.

That is all.

I'm going to kindly assume the Court had the courtesy and professionalism to PM Ben with its reasons for denial and steps deemed necessary for later admission, similar to RL. Otherwise such a terse "because we said so" decision would seem a grossly arbitrary misuse of the Court's statutorily granted discretion.

All questions that have been asked have been answered by me.  Basically, we decided there had to be some minimum standards for admittance to the Bar in terms of demonstrated intellectual acuity and legal understanding.  Maybe we'll write something down in the future.  And certainly, ben can resubmit an application if he wants (or a continuing application, I guess).


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 01, 2010, 02:36:57 pm
What about my request?

I didn't see it.  Will be PMed.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Jbrase on December 01, 2010, 05:02:09 pm
I formally request that I be admitted into the Bar. Por favor y gracias.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Sam Spade on December 02, 2010, 12:50:27 pm
Inks.LWC is admitted.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Tsunderella on December 02, 2010, 05:56:38 pm
Do you allow women?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: opebo on December 04, 2010, 05:07:58 am
Do you allow women?

I will bring this to the attention of my fellow Justices and we'll get back to you on that.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Swedish Austerity Cheese on December 22, 2010, 10:00:58 am
Bump

I would like to most humbly formally request to be admitted into the bar. :)



Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on December 22, 2010, 10:22:15 am
Bump

I would like to most humbly formally request to be admitted into the bar. :)



As member in good standing of the Atlasian Bar, I wish to sponsor this fine candidate and vouch for his character, integrity and intelligence.

He is a law student in Sweden. Do you know how hard that is? The teach law classes---in SWEDISH!! :o


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Franzl on December 22, 2010, 10:48:56 am
I also wish to sponsor this fine candidate!


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Ebowed on December 23, 2010, 06:39:20 am
Do you allow women?

Yes.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on December 23, 2010, 09:17:13 am

It took you guys 3 weeks to decide this?

Everytime I think Atlasia couldn't be more of a sausage-fest.....


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Ebowed on December 23, 2010, 01:53:30 pm

It took you guys 3 weeks to decide this?

Everytime I think Atlasia couldn't be more of a sausage-fest.....

lol.  I dunno, I just figured it was a rhetorical question, since Texasgurl is a former Chief Justice.  We actually did discuss this as soon as it came up, and we were in agreement.

The answer provided above is just for the benefit of anyone else who would find the otherwise lack of one to be perplexing.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Badger on December 27, 2010, 11:03:42 am

It took you guys 3 weeks to decide this?

Everytime I think Atlasia couldn't be more of a sausage-fest.....

lol.  I dunno, I just figured it was a rhetorical question, since Texasgurl is a former Chief Justice.  We actually did discuss this as soon as it came up, and we were in agreement.

The answer provided above is just for the benefit of anyone else who would find the otherwise lack of one to be perplexing.

I knda figured as much. ;)

Didn't know about Texasgurl being a former CJ. Neat! When was that?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: President North Carolina Yankee on December 27, 2010, 12:44:31 pm

It took you guys 3 weeks to decide this?

Everytime I think Atlasia couldn't be more of a sausage-fest.....

lol.  I dunno, I just figured it was a rhetorical question, since Texasgurl is a former Chief Justice.  We actually did discuss this as soon as it came up, and we were in agreement.

The answer provided above is just for the benefit of anyone else who would find the otherwise lack of one to be perplexing.

I knda figured as much. ;)

Didn't know about Texasgurl being a former CJ. Neat! When was that?

http://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Supreme_Court (http://uselectionatlas.org/AFEWIKI/index.php/Supreme_Court)


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Jbrase on January 08, 2011, 11:58:21 pm
I formally request that I be admitted into the Bar. Por favor y gracias.
I do hope you guys have not forgotten about me :'(


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Jbrase on June 25, 2012, 01:04:53 am
While the court is back in session I just though I'd check in and see you fellas have ever decided whether or not I may be admitted to the bar ;D


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on June 25, 2012, 01:07:25 am
I'd like to repetition that I be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Ebowed on June 25, 2012, 12:47:16 pm
jbrase has been admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Simfan34 on June 25, 2012, 10:20:20 pm
I hereby petition to be raised to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Ebowed on June 25, 2012, 10:30:45 pm
Simfan has been admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: sjoyce on June 25, 2012, 10:34:01 pm
I formally petition that I be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Simfan34 on June 25, 2012, 10:39:39 pm
Simfan has been admitted to the Bar.

That was quick.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: tmthforu94 on June 26, 2012, 11:27:14 am
I would like to formally request being admitted to the bar.

Thank you.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Scott on June 26, 2012, 11:28:12 am
I also request admission to the bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Trounce-'em Theresa on June 26, 2012, 07:43:05 pm
I hereby petition to be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Ebowed on June 26, 2012, 10:50:13 pm
I would like to formally request being admitted to the bar.

Thank you.

Your application has been successful.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on July 01, 2012, 11:57:35 pm
So, about me being a bar member?


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: bgwah on July 02, 2012, 01:45:00 am
I would like to formally request being admitted to the bar.

Thank you.

Your application has been successful.

a 2-1 decision FTR.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: tmthforu94 on July 02, 2012, 03:19:06 pm
I would like to formally request being admitted to the bar.

Thank you.

Your application has been successful.

a 2-1 decision FTR.
Good to know! :) Thanks.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Scott on July 02, 2012, 03:28:37 pm
Have I been admitted?  Opebo's response was the only one I got. :P


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: sjoyce on November 22, 2012, 03:27:22 pm
I formally petition that I be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on November 22, 2012, 03:32:15 pm
I'd like to repetition that I be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Pope Michael Bolton on December 20, 2012, 03:25:33 pm
I'd like to formally petition that I be admitted to the Bar.


Title: Re: Supreme Court Bar
Post by: Kaine for Senate '18 on December 20, 2012, 03:28:25 pm
I'd like to repetition that I be admitted to the Bar.