Talk Elections

Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion => 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results => Topic started by: nclib on December 21, 2008, 11:11:57 PM



Title: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on December 21, 2008, 11:11:57 PM
For Obama unless otherwise noted

WDC: 92.5%-6.5%
Baltimore: 87.2%-11.7%
Chicago 85.4%-13.7%
San Fran: 84.2%-13.7%
St. Louis: 83.5%-15.5%
Philly: 83%-16.3%
NYC: 79.3%-20%
Boston: 78.6%-19.3%
Denver: 75.5%-23%
Arlington, VA: 71.7%-27.1%
Va. Beach: McCain, 49.8%-49.1%

Anyone have any more?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on December 21, 2008, 11:16:51 PM
Minneapolis was around 81% Obama, but I can't give exact numbers yet.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Ronnie on December 21, 2008, 11:23:34 PM
Minneapolis was around 81% Obama, but I can't give exact numbers yet.

You're right:

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/president/


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 22, 2008, 02:01:05 AM
What population are we requiring for "big city"?

Seattle: 84.7%-13.9%
Portland: 80.3%-17.0%


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: platypeanArchcow on December 22, 2008, 03:36:54 AM
Los Angeles: 76.3%-21.8%
Long Beach: 69.5%-28.4%

What do Republicans do in Long Beach?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: phk on December 22, 2008, 04:08:20 AM
Los Angeles: 76.3%-21.8%
Long Beach: 69.5%-28.4%

What do Republicans do in Long Beach?

What was San Diego?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on December 22, 2008, 05:24:16 AM
Los Angeles: 76.3%-21.8%
Long Beach: 69.5%-28.4%

What do Republicans do in Long Beach?

What was San Diego?
Can't find the info anywhere. You might have to wait until the Supplement to the Statement of Vote which has results for all cities in California.
Quote
The Statement of Vote is completed
39 days after each statewide election and the Supplement to the
Statement of Vote is completed 159 days after each statewide election


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Verily on December 22, 2008, 03:23:07 PM
Anyone have the breakdown from Duval County? Jacksonville proper might have actually voted for Obama, given where the small non-Jacksonville areas of Duval are (very white, very wealthy beach communities, likely 75%+ McCain). In which case we would have to start a quest to discover the biggest city to vote for McCain.

Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: ag on December 22, 2008, 08:21:17 PM
The Duval data by precinct are on their webpage. Unfortunately, I couldn't find the most recent description of which precincts serve what. So, assuming there wasn't recently any change in precincts and assuming no precincts serve both parts of Jacksonville and parts of the micro suburbs, I just subtracted the results for the precincts that have recently participated in local elections in these suburbs. So, with those two assumptions in mind, we get the following:

City of Jacksonville

McCain Palin 200,675 votes (50.18%)
Obama/Biden 195,900 votes (48.99%)

McCain did win Jacksonville :)



Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: justfollowingtheelections on December 22, 2008, 08:22:51 PM
Can anyone find numbers for cities in Texas?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: ag on December 22, 2008, 08:35:23 PM
Can anyone find numbers for cities in Texas?

That's hard: municipal and county governments are not too closely related. One would have to comb precinct-by-precinct data in many counties. Still, given that both Harris County (bulk of Houston) and Dallas county (bulk of Dallas) voted for Obama (the latter by a good margin), he must have won those. Fort Worth is harder to figure out. Travis county (Austin) is, of course, Obama, as are Bexar (San Antonio) and El Paso. Getting the actual numbers would require hard work :)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: justfollowingtheelections on December 23, 2008, 03:40:51 PM
No, that's good enough.  Thanks


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 23, 2008, 04:52:33 PM
I'm starting a spreadsheet with the exact results of every city of 100,000 or more.  It would be helpful if raw numbers could be posted.  California can wait for the SOVC.  I basically need cities that aren't counties of their own.  I just need a raw count for Obama, McCain, and "Other" (including write-ins in states that count all write-ins)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon on December 23, 2008, 05:08:24 PM
Memphis, TN
Note: There are 12 precinct splits where county vs. city results cannot be separated.  In these cases I multiplied the percentage of city residents in the precinct by the votes cast there.

Total Votes: 265667
Obama: 202619 (76.3%)
McCain: 61302 (23.1%)
Barr 446 (0.2%)
Nader 416 (0.2%)
Baldwin 349 (0.1%)
McKinney 160 (0.1%)
Moore 85 (0%)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 23, 2008, 05:26:23 PM
Thanks Don!  Added to my list.  If you happen to see it any time, I'm also looking for Nashville, Knoxville, Chattanooga and Clarksville.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 23, 2008, 05:46:20 PM
I'll just post the full "in search of" list here:

(*) indicates splitting, and I haven't tried to find an un-split total.

Alabama
Birmingham
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery

Alaska
Anchorage

Arizona
Chandler
Gilbert
Glendale
Mesa
Peoria
Phoenix
Scottsdale
Tempe
Tucson

Arkansas
Little Rock

California (note: S2SOVC will be out in a couple of months)
Anaheim
Bakersfield
Berkeley
Burbank
Chula Vista
Concord
Corona
Costa Mesa
Daly City
Downey
El Monte
Elk Grove
Escondido
Fairfield
Fontana
Fremont
Fresno
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Glendale
Hayward
Huntington Beach
Inglewood
Irvine
Lancaster
Long Beach
Los Angeles
Modesto
Moreno Valley
Norwalk
Oakland
Oceanside
Ontario
Orange
Oxnard
Palmdale
Pasadena
Pomona
Rancho Cucamonga
Richmond
Riverside
Roseville
Sacramento
Salinas
San Bernardino
San Buenaventura
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
Santa Ana
Santa Clara
Santa Clarita
Santa Rosa
Simi Valley
Stockton
Sunnyvale
Thousand Oaks
Torrance
Vallejo
Victorville
Visalia
West Covina

Colorado
Arvada
Aurora
Colorado Springs*
Denver
Fort Collins
Lakewood
Pueblo
Thornton
Westminster

Connecticut
Bridgeport
Hartford
New Haven
Stamford
Waterbury

District of Columbia
Washington

Florida
Cape Coral
Clearwater
Coral Springs
Fort Lauderdale
Gainesville
Hialeah
Hollywood
Jacksonville
Miami
Miramar
Orlando
Palm Bay
Pembroke Pines
Pompano Beach
Port St. Lucie
St. Petersburg
Tallahassee
Tampa

Georgia
Athens
Atlanta
Augusta
Columbus
Savannah

Hawai'i
Honolulu (CDP!)

Idaho
Boise

Illinois
Aurora
Chicago
Elgin
Joliet
Naperville
Peoria
Rockford
Springfield

Indiana
Evansville
Fort Wayne
Indianapolis
South Bend

Iowa
Cedar Rapids
Des Moines

Kansas
Kansas City
Olathe
Overland Park
Topeka
Wichita

Kentucky
Lexington
Louisville

Louisiana
Baton Rouge
Lafayette
New Orleans
Shreveport

Maryland
Baltimore

Massachusetts
Boston
Cambridge
Lowell
Springfield
Worcester


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 23, 2008, 05:47:04 PM
Michigan
Ann Arbor
Detroit
Flint
Grand Rapids
Lansing
Sterling Heights
Warren

Minnesota
Minneapolis
St. Paul

Mississippi
Jackson

Missouri
Independence
Kansas City
Springfield
St. Louis

Montana
Billings*

Nebraska
Lincoln
Omaha

Nevada
Henderson
Las Vegas
North Las Vegas
Reno

New Hampshire
Manchester

New Jersey
Elizabeth
Jersey City
Newark
Paterson

New Mexico
Albuquerque

New York
Buffalo
New York City
Rochester
Syracuse
Yonkers

North Carolina
Cary
Charlotte
Durham
Fayetteville
Greensboro
High Point
Raleigh
Winston-Salem

Ohio
Akron
Cincinnati
Cleveland
Columbus
Dayton
Toledo

Oklahoma
Norman
Oklahoma City
Tulsa

Oregon
Eugene
Portland
Salem

Pennsylvania
Allentown
Erie
Philadelphia
Pittsburgh

Rhode Island
Providence

South Carolina
Charleston
Columbia

South Dakota
Sioux Falls

Tennessee
Chattanooga
Clarksville
Knoxville
Memphis
Nashville

Texas
Abilene
Amarillo
Arlington
Austin
Beaumont
Brownsville
Carrollton
Corpus Christi
Dallas
Denton
El Paso
Fort Worth
Garland
Grand Prairie
Houston
Irving
Killeen
Laredo
Lubbock
McAllen
McKinney
Mesquite
Midland
Pasadena
Plano
San Antonio
Waco
Wichita Falls

Utah
Provo
Salt Lake City
West Jordan
West Valley City

Virginia
Alexandria
Arlington
Chesapeake
Hampton
Newport News
Norfolk
Portsmouth
Richmond
Virginia Beach

Washington
Bellevue
Seattle
Spokane
Tacoma
Vancouver

Wisconsin
Green Bay
Madison
Milwaukee


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: JohnnyLongtorso on December 26, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
It's the largest city in Delaware...

Wilmington:

Obama - 27,266 (88.0%)
McCain - 3,492 (11.3%)
Other - 227 (0.7%)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on December 29, 2008, 12:25:06 AM
Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.

Has Phoenix been confirmed for Obama?

Of the top 100 cities, the only other ones that could potentially go for McCain (with varying degrees of likelihood) are: Phoenix suburbs, Colo. Springs, OKC and Tulsa, suburbs of Dallas (and also the city of Corpus Christi) Tex, Wichita, Kan., some in Orange (also Bakersfield and/or Chula Vista) CA, Anchorage, suburbs of Vegas (though prob. not), Fort Wayne, Ind., It's also worth checking out the south Fla. ones due to concentration of Cubans.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 29, 2008, 01:32:21 AM
If someone can figure out what the heck precincts are within the city of Phoenix, I'll gladly do it.

Edit: Maricopa County basically redirected me to the local political parties, wtf?  Useless.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Verily on December 29, 2008, 07:50:10 PM
I have Paterson, NJ courtesy of The Record. I think they combined "Others" in their report, though. I'll have it in a moment.

Paterson, NJ
Obama: 36,417 (89.78%)
McCain: 3,972 (9.79%)
"Others": 174 (0.43%)

Says all you need to know about Passaic County, really.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Verily on December 29, 2008, 07:56:25 PM
Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.

Has Phoenix been confirmed for Obama?

It voted decisively for Kerry, and Maricopa County swung slightly towards Obama, so I don't think it's worth checking.

Quote
Of the top 100 cities, the only other ones that could potentially go for McCain (with varying degrees of likelihood) are: Phoenix suburbs, Colo. Springs, OKC and Tulsa, suburbs of Dallas (and also the city of Corpus Christi) Tex, Wichita, Kan., some in Orange (also Bakersfield and/or Chula Vista) CA, Anchorage, suburbs of Vegas (though prob. not), Fort Wayne, Ind., It's also worth checking out the south Fla. ones due to concentration of Cubans.

Hialeah is the only really big heavily Cuban city (other than Miami, of course). But I think it's fairly Democratic nonetheless. Would have to check, of course.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: phk on December 29, 2008, 08:14:31 PM
Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.

Has Phoenix been confirmed for Obama?

It voted decisively for Kerry, and Maricopa County swung slightly towards Obama, so I don't think it's worth checking.

Quote
Of the top 100 cities, the only other ones that could potentially go for McCain (with varying degrees of likelihood) are: Phoenix suburbs, Colo. Springs, OKC and Tulsa, suburbs of Dallas (and also the city of Corpus Christi) Tex, Wichita, Kan., some in Orange (also Bakersfield and/or Chula Vista) CA, Anchorage, suburbs of Vegas (though prob. not), Fort Wayne, Ind., It's also worth checking out the south Fla. ones due to concentration of Cubans.

Hialeah is the only really big heavily Cuban city (other than Miami, of course). But I think it's fairly Democratic nonetheless. Would have to check, of course.

Hialeah might be the only city in Miami-Dade that McCain won.

Its just that the non-Cuban Hispanics are increasing in number and are way more Democratic than the Cubans.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on December 30, 2008, 04:36:31 AM
Maricopa map with precincts and cities (http://156.42.40.10/mapping/Reviewerlite/map.asp?XMin=534763.020527802&XMax=741452.369962302&YMin=820740.554679188&YMax=968040.903897936&service=REViewerLite&Image=http%3A%2F%2F156.42.40.10%2Foutput%2FREViewerLite_regis02578458847573.png&Legend=http%3A%2F%2F156.42.40.10%2Foutput%2FREViewerLite_regis02578458847574.png&address=&zip=&size=regular&legendtype=Checkboxes&mstreets=on&streets=on&canals=off&qtrsec=off&pct=on&cities=on&county=on&action=zoomout&ActiveLayer=15&click.x=369&click.y=210)
List of Miami-Dade precincts by municipality (http://www.miamidade.gov/elections/library/dis_pre_mun/pct-dist.pdf) and results by precinct (http://www.miamidade.gov/elections/results/ele110408/110408-d.pdf).


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 30, 2008, 05:08:52 AM
Maricopa map with precincts and cities (http://156.42.40.10/mapping/Reviewerlite/map.asp?XMin=534763.020527802&XMax=741452.369962302&YMin=820740.554679188&YMax=968040.903897936&service=REViewerLite&Image=http%3A%2F%2F156.42.40.10%2Foutput%2FREViewerLite_regis02578458847573.png&Legend=http%3A%2F%2F156.42.40.10%2Foutput%2FREViewerLite_regis02578458847574.png&address=&zip=&size=regular&legendtype=Checkboxes&mstreets=on&streets=on&canals=off&qtrsec=off&pct=on&cities=on&county=on&action=zoomout&ActiveLayer=15&click.x=369&click.y=210)

That's ridiculous even by my standards

List of Miami-Dade precincts by municipality (http://www.miamidade.gov/elections/library/dis_pre_mun/pct-dist.pdf) and results by precinct (http://www.miamidade.gov/elections/results/ele110408/110408-d.pdf).

So is that.  They must have a canvass format.  I think Dave is working on Florida.  Hopefully I can use his results and that first document.

Too lazy to upload now, but here's what I have:

(* = Some splitting)

1. New York: 79-20 Obama
3. Chicago: 85-14 Obama
6. Philadelphia: 83-16 Obama
13. San Francisco: 84-14 Obama
18. Memphis: 76-23 Obama
20. Baltimore: 87-12 Obama
21. Boston: 79-19 Obama
24. Seattle: 85-14 Obama
26. Denver: 75-23 Obama
27. Washington, DC: 92-7 Obama
28. Las Vegas: 59-39 Obama
30. Portland, OR: 80-17 Obama
38. Mesa: 59-39 McCain
41. Virginia Beach: 49-49 McCain
47. Colorado Springs*: 56-42 McCain
52. St. Louis, MO: 84-16 Obama
72. Henderson, NV: 51-47 Obama
78. New Orleans: 79-19 Obama
79. Norfolk: 71-28 Obama
85. Chesapeake, VA: 50-49 Obama
94. North Las Vegas: 69-29 Obama
98. Arlington, VA: 72-27 Obama
101. Boise: 54-44 Obama
104. Spokane: 53-44 Obama
105. Richmond: 79-20 Obama
112. Tacoma: 67-31 Obama
126. Newport News: 64-35 Obama
127. Jackson, MS: 81-18 Obama
131. Providence: 83-15 Obama
143. Vancouver, WA*: 58-40 Obama
151. Salem, OR: 57-40 Obama
152. Sioux Falls: 50-48 Obama
155. Springfield, MA: 77-22 Obama
156. Eugene, OR: 72-25 Obama
159. Paterson, NJ: 90-10 Obama
161. Hampton, VA: 69-30 Obama
173. Alexandria, VA: 72-27 Obama
200. Bellevue, WA: 64-35 Obama
207. Provo, UT: 73-23 McCain
229. Manchester, NH: 55-44 Obama
248. Lowell, MA: 65-33 Obama
253. Portsmouth, VA: 69-30 Obama
254. Billings, MT*: 50-47 McCain
257. Cambridge, MA: 88-10 Obama
258. Berkeley, CA: 92-5 Obama


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on December 30, 2008, 05:26:35 AM
I've just done Hialeah for self-amusement purposes, actually.

Obama won two precincts there (oh yah, and they have two precincts with 0 registered voters, and one with 3 registered voters and 0 votes cast).

62,024 valid votes
McCain 63.75
Obama 35.82


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on December 30, 2008, 12:07:47 PM
I've just done Hialeah for self-amusement purposes, actually.

Obama won two precincts there (oh yah, and they have two precincts with 0 registered voters, and one with 3 registered voters and 0 votes cast).

62,024 valid votes
McCain 63.75
Obama 35.82

Any chance you can post the Obama/McCain/Other so I can add it? :)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on December 30, 2008, 12:19:18 PM
I've just done Hialeah for self-amusement purposes, actually.

Obama won two precincts there (oh yah, and they have two precincts with 0 registered voters, and one with 3 registered voters and 0 votes cast).

62,024 valid votes
McCain 63.75
Obama 35.82

Any chance you can post the Obama/McCain/Other so I can add it? :)
You mean the raw vote?

22,220 / 39,538 / (62,024 minus previous figures equals 266. Which seems a tad low. Maybe there's a summing error somewhere. Will get back to you.).

Nope, it's correct.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Husker on January 01, 2009, 09:49:19 PM
I'll work on getting Omaha, NE. Lincoln, NE was 53-44 Obama.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on January 01, 2009, 10:00:18 PM
I'll work on getting Omaha, NE. Lincoln, NE was 53-44 Obama.

Any chance you can get the raw vote numbers on that, Obama/McCain/Other?  Then I can add it.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on March 03, 2009, 05:53:29 PM
bump - anyone have new data?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: bgwah on March 10, 2009, 07:36:24 PM
Here are Indiana results... I guess Gary has supposedly fallen under 100,000 since the last census, though it would still be interesting...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13067328/2008-INDIANA-Precinct-Level-Vote-for-President-Partial


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on April 19, 2009, 10:22:01 PM
It would be interesting to find out the most densely populated municipalities to vote for McCain as most of the cities here that voted for McCain, have large land areas.

According to the Calif. supplement, these are the most densely populated municipalities in Calif. to vote for McCain

Quote
City (county)            McCain margin    density

Garden Grove (Orange)   4.312%      9,238.7
Westminster (Orange)   13.986%      8,952.0
Huntington Beach (Orange)      7.339%      7,478.3
El Cajon (San Diego)      5.209%      6,554.0
Lake Forest (Orange)      9.203%      6,360.3

The only city listed in this thread that has a higher density than any on the above list, is Hialeah, Fla. with 11,309.4 people/sq. mi.

I've just done Hialeah for self-amusement purposes, actually.

62,024 valid votes
McCain 63.75
Obama 35.82

Any other possibilities? (I've checked that Mesa, Virginia Beach, Colorado Springs, Provo, UT, Billings, MT also have lower densities)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on April 20, 2009, 12:08:00 AM
I believe there's a town in Idaho that is freakishly dense because of how it's plotted, but damned if I can remember its name.  Minuscule place.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: memphis on April 20, 2009, 09:14:49 AM
Let's not forget Kiryas Joel. Wikipedia has their density at 18,246 people/sq mi.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: bgwah on April 20, 2009, 03:58:12 PM
I believe there's a town in Idaho that is freakishly dense because of how it's plotted, but damned if I can remember its name.  Minuscule place.

Huetter


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: DariusNJ on June 21, 2009, 05:19:28 PM
Detroit voted 96.9% for Obama. Don't have the raw data though, sorry.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on July 15, 2009, 12:15:33 PM
Here is the info I have on large cities.  Mainly stumped on Phoenix AZ

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13474955/2008-VOTE-FOR-PRESIDENT-Top-50-Cities


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Badger on July 15, 2009, 12:30:50 PM
Here is the info I have on large cities.  Mainly stumped on Phoenix AZ

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13474955/2008-VOTE-FOR-PRESIDENT-Top-50-Cities

Very cool.

Welcome to the Forum!


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on July 15, 2009, 04:44:52 PM
Here is the info I have on large cities.  Mainly stumped on Phoenix AZ

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13474955/2008-VOTE-FOR-PRESIDENT-Top-50-Cities

Phoenix should be possible from the precinct map up on the Maricopa County website (or at least, that used to be up on the Maricopa COunty website), just take days and days of work.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: DariusNJ on July 15, 2009, 06:22:24 PM
Wow, it looks like Obama won Fort Worth! That surprised me.

Oklahoma City voted for McCain by a pretty large margin. I thought the city would lean slightly Obama.

I think McCain's best city in the top 50 was Mesa, correct me if I'm wrong.



Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on July 15, 2009, 08:04:35 PM
Didn't he squeek out a win in Jacksonville?  But I think his largest margin was in Mesa?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: DariusNJ on July 15, 2009, 08:55:01 PM
Didn't he squeek out a win in Jacksonville?  But I think his largest margin was in Mesa?

Yeah, I meant largest margin.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on July 16, 2009, 08:02:12 PM
Largest cities for McCain      Obama %   McCain %

13   Jacksonville   FL   49.3%   49.8%
31   Oklahoma City   OK   42.6%   57.4%
38   Mesa   AZ   37.9%   60.1%
42   Virginia Beach   VA   49.1%   49.8%
46   Tulsa   OK   44.3%   55.7%
48   Colorado Springs   CO   42.2%   56.4%
50   Arlington   TX   47.2%   52.0%
51   Wichita   KS   46.4%   51.3%
57   Bakersfield   CA   42.9%   55.6%
64   Corpus Christi   TX   47.3%   51.8%
67   Anchorage   AK   40.9%   56.8%
70    Plano  TX               39.7%  59.1%
74  Glendale AZ   43.3%  55.0%
76   Chandler   AZ   45.1%   53.3%
79   Scottsdale   AZ   42.1%   56.6%
87   Lubbock   TX   33.1%   66.1%
90   Garland   TX   46.4%   52.6%
94    Gilbert  AZ           35.8%  62.8%
95   Hialeah   FL   35.8%   63.7%


Obama's best in cities over 100,000

            obama      mccain
Detroit   MI   96.9%   2.6%
Miami Gardens   FL   93.3%   6.2%
Inglewood   CA   92.8%   6.0%
Berkeley   CA   92.5%   4.9%
Washington   DC   92.5%   6.5%
Newark   NJ   92.5%   7.1%
Hartford   CT   91.7%   7.8%
Oakland   CA   91.2%   7.0%
Paterson   NJ   90.0%   9.7%
Flint   MI   88.0%   11.0%
Cambridge   MA   87.8%   10.1%
New Haven   CT   87.8%   11.4%
Baltimore   MD   87.2%   11.7%

majority race:            

black   Detroit, Washington, DC Baltimore, Newark, NJ, Flint, MI, Miami Gardens, FL      
hisp   Paterson (NJ), Inglewood (CA)         
white   Berkeley (CA), Cambridge (MA)         
none   Oakland, Hartford, New Haven (CT)

McCain cities all white except

hisp: Corpus Christi and Hialeah
none: Arlington and Garland, TX


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on July 24, 2009, 05:04:07 PM
Where does the Scottsdale figure up there come from?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on July 24, 2009, 06:37:42 PM
Where does the Scottsdale figure up there come from?

This link (below) that Lephead posted. I don't know what his original source is.

Here is the info I have on large cities.  Mainly stumped on Phoenix AZ

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13474955/2008-VOTE-FOR-PRESIDENT-Top-50-Cities


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on July 31, 2009, 03:13:02 PM
To NCLIB :
"This link (below) that Lephead posted. I don't know what his original source is."

There are so many sources it defies comprehension.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on August 01, 2009, 03:35:35 AM
Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.

Has Phoenix been confirmed for Obama?

It voted decisively for Kerry, and Maricopa County swung slightly towards Obama, so I don't think it's worth checking.

Certainly for Obama. Not so sure about Kerry.

The Republican 3rd and Democratic 4th district combined voted for Bush by ~14k IIRC (for Obama by a narrow margin). This includes the bulk of the city of Phoenix. It also includes the southern half of Glendale (in the fourth. Certainly less Democratic than the average of the 4th, but pretty sure it went for Kerry. The northern half of Glendale is in the 2nd and quite Republican), a lot of unincorporated land north of Phoenix in the third (heavily Republican) and some smaller corners of unincorporated land southwest of Phoenix (solidly Democratic) and the very small city of Guadalupe southeast of Phoenix (almost 80% Democratic in both 2004 and 2008. Higher turnout in 2008, though.) In balance, the part of Phoenix included in the two districts definitely voted for Bush. There are some small parts of Phoenix in the 5th and 7th districts, and these I think both voted for Kerry, but getting me to believe they're enough to flip the city will take convincing.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on August 01, 2009, 04:19:57 PM
Aside from Phoenix, the largest city in each state voted Democratic except:

AK (Anchorage)
FL (Jacksonville, deceptive b/c land area)
KS (Wichita)
OK (Oklahoma City)
VA (Virginia Beach, deceptive b/c land area)
WY (Cheyenne)

The only states where the largest city was less Democratic than the state were: FL, VA (see above) and HI (Honolulu, which was still quite Democratic)


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on August 02, 2009, 01:24:00 AM
"Where does the Scottsdale figure up there come from?"

The upside of maricopa county was that there were municipal elections in some cities in November.  That information could be matched to precinct.  the downside was that Phoenix  and Glendale did not have a municipal election.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on August 02, 2009, 03:17:53 AM
Do you still have a list of what precincts are Scottsdale?


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on August 02, 2009, 09:02:20 PM
I posted the maricopa chart with known city precincts here :

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18034053/2008-MARICOPA-AZ-Precinct-by-City

PRES is the total number of votes cast for Presidential candidates.
CITY is the total number of votes cast in the municipal election.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on August 03, 2009, 02:21:49 PM
Thanks, that's great.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: RBH on August 04, 2009, 12:07:38 PM
Obama's 20 worst precincts in Philadelphia:
Ward 39 Division 14   : 25%
Ward 26 Division 3: 31%
Ward 63 Division 17   : 32%
Ward 57 Division 13   : 34%
Ward 66 Division 29   : 36%
Ward 26 Division 2: 37%
Ward 26 Division 15   : 37%
Ward 39 Division 41: 37%
Ward 56 Division 22   : 37%
Ward 39 Division 36   : 37%
Ward 26 Division 5: 37%
Ward 58 Division 4: 38%
Ward 65 Division 1: 38%
Ward 66 Division 25   : 38%
Ward 57 Division 22   : 39%
Ward 58 Division 21   : 39%
Ward 26 Division 6: 39%
Ward 48 Division 22   : 40%
Ward 26 Division 12   : 40%
Ward 26 Division 1: 40%

()


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Alcon on August 04, 2009, 07:53:40 PM
Damn, only 25%?  What are some of those precincts, in basic terms?

Cool stuff.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: RBH on August 07, 2009, 12:46:07 PM
The 39th Ward is in South Philly. W39D14 is south of I-76 and east of Broad Street, including Wachovia, CB Park, and Lincoln Financial.

The Vote total was 202-69 McCain with 8 Nader votes and 1 Barr vote.

26-3 is a neighborhood in South Philly. 63-17 is in NE Philly. 57-13 is also in NE Philly. 66-29 is on the border with Bucks County


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on August 08, 2009, 01:04:04 PM
I added some more cities to my chart, mostly from Florida and Texas.  They are listed at the end of p.2.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: ajc0918 on August 13, 2009, 12:33:31 AM
Great thread. Cool stuff.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on August 13, 2009, 10:03:51 AM
I added some more cities to my chart, mostly from Florida and Texas.  They are listed at the end of p.2.

Good work. I noticed that you have The Woodlands, Montgomery Co., Texas as almost 3-1 Obama. Haven't looked at any data there (other than the county totals), but I was under the impression that it was a very conservative area. Can you make sure it is not transposed. Thanks.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on August 13, 2009, 11:09:31 AM
NCLIB : Good work. I noticed that you have The Woodlands, Montgomery Co., Texas as almost 3-1 Obama.  Can you make sure it is not transposed. Thanks.

Thank you for pointing out this transposition.  Texas lists McCain first in all its precinct reports so I entered it as it was from the precinct results.  Like you say, this is the suburban republican heartland, and it was definitely 72% for McCain.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: Lephead on August 20, 2009, 12:19:35 AM
Okay, I've slain the beast, I have attempted using precinct maps to determine Phoenix Arizona.  The surprise was that Obama's margin was not very big.
In my chart on scribd, I have entered the totals as : Obama 170934, McCain 155731
but they break down this way : precincts that are all in Phoenix or look like they'e
re mostly in Phoenix voted Obama 157104 McCain 147251; precincts that look particularly split voted : Obama 13830 McCain 8480.
The tragic part here is that only 335,000 people voted in Phoenix.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13474955/2008-VOTE-FOR-PRESIDENT-Top-Cities

Next big city (well not any more) is Birmingham Alabama.  There is an election there so the city posted a list of polling places.  I was able to match up all but 8 to the Nov 2008 results.  Trying to find out those numbers.  Current vote for Obama : 86.6%


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: minionofmidas on August 20, 2009, 11:59:54 AM
Unsurprising:

The Republican 3rd and Democratic 4th district combined voted for Bush by ~14k IIRC (for Obama by a narrow margin). This includes the bulk of the city of Phoenix. It also includes the southern half of Glendale (in the fourth. Certainly less Democratic than the average of the 4th, but pretty sure it went for Kerry. The northern half of Glendale is in the 2nd and quite Republican), a lot of unincorporated land north of Phoenix in the third (heavily Republican) and some smaller corners of unincorporated land southwest of Phoenix (solidly Democratic) and the very small city of Guadalupe southeast of Phoenix (almost 80% Democratic in both 2004 and 2008. Higher turnout in 2008, though.) In balance, the part of Phoenix included in the two districts definitely voted for Bush. There are some small parts of Phoenix in the 5th and 7th districts, and these I think both voted for Kerry, but getting me to believe they're enough to flip the city will take convincing.



Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: cannonia on August 20, 2009, 08:32:59 PM
Sacramento, CA:
Obama 120,961 (71.4%)
McCain 43,214 (25.5%)

Elk Grove, CA:
Obama 33,918 (57.2%)
McCain 23,858 (40.2%)

Elk Grove had a huge swing (and huge growth).  In 2004, it voted 24,659 to 21,293 for Bush.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: nclib on September 23, 2009, 09:51:34 PM
Anyway, the cities worth checking out are Fort Worth (#17), Oklahoma City (#31), Mesa, Ariz. (#38) and Virginia Beach (#41, confirmed for McCain). Hard to imagine that Mesa didn't vote for McCain, either, and Fort Worth is probably more likely to have done so than Oklahoma City anyway. Of course, if Jacksonville (#12) did vote for McCain, the point is moot.

Has Phoenix been confirmed for Obama?

It voted decisively for Kerry, and Maricopa County swung slightly towards Obama, so I don't think it's worth checking.

Quote
Of the top 100 cities, the only other ones that could potentially go for McCain (with varying degrees of likelihood) are: Phoenix suburbs, Colo. Springs, OKC and Tulsa, suburbs of Dallas (and also the city of Corpus Christi) Tex, Wichita, Kan., some in Orange (also Bakersfield and/or Chula Vista) CA, Anchorage, suburbs of Vegas (though prob. not), Fort Wayne, Ind., It's also worth checking out the south Fla. ones due to concentration of Cubans.

Hialeah is the only really big heavily Cuban city (other than Miami, of course). But I think it's fairly Democratic nonetheless. Would have to check, of course.

Hialeah might be the only city in Miami-Dade that McCain won.

Its just that the non-Cuban Hispanics are increasing in number and are way more Democratic than the Cubans.

According to Lephead's Florida page, cities in Miami-Dade with a pop. over 10,000 that McCain carried:
hialeah
coral gables
miami lakes
hialeah gardens
sweetwater
miami springs
key biscayne

Only Hialeah and Hialeah Gardens are majority Cuban.


Title: Re: Results of large cities
Post by: they don't love you like i love you on February 06, 2010, 05:13:35 PM
For the record Rochester, Minnesota now has over 100k people. It voted:

Obama 53.56%
McCain 44.45%
Other 1.99%

Twin Cities:

St. Paul
Obama 75.58%
McCain 22.38%
Other 2.04%

Minneapolis
Obama 81.15%
McCain 16.77%
Other 2.09%