Likely 2016 House Pickups for Democrats? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:59:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Likely 2016 House Pickups for Democrats? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Likely 2016 House Pickups for Democrats?  (Read 3860 times)
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« on: April 25, 2015, 09:32:22 AM »

I'm not calling any race where Democrats haven't found a candidate yet a "automatic pick-up".  They're notably having recruitment issues for the New York seats like NY-24, NY-01, NY-21, and NY-19.

Right now I'm guessing that IA-01, NV-04, TX-23, FL-26, and possibly MI-07 flip for Democrats, while Republicans take the open FL-18 and knock off Ashford in NE-02.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 05:33:00 PM »
« Edited: April 25, 2015, 05:39:36 PM by publicunofficial »

MI-07? I live there. Tim Walberg is a third-rate political hack in a district that should be tailor-made for a Gerald Ford but that now has a Republican representative better suited for the Texas Panhandle than for south-central Michigan.

Tim Walberg simply does what Koch fronts tell him to do. It is only a matter of time.

I would generally agree with Walberg description, but he was able to win legislative seat for 16 years, and 4 out of 6 races for Congress (losing once in primary, where votes were heavily split, and 1 in general in extremely good Democratic year). So, either he is not so dumb, or - district is really conservative enough....

Walberg is really not an impressive politician, more of a lucky one. He barely survived 2006 before loosing to Mark Schauer in 2008, then the 2010 wave swept him back in. In 2012 he got a decent 55-45 win over his opponent, which looks impressive until you find out that Walberg's opponent was a nobody 9/11 truther who had no funding from the Democratic Party. And then in 2014, another wave saves him in a close 53-41 race.

This year, however, he faces Gretchen Driskell, a very good challenger. She's experienced with tough races, can fundraise, and has somewhat of a "rising star" quality to her. IIRC, Sabato, Cook, and Rothenberg all have MI-07 rated as a Toss-Up this year.



Other races I would consider "sleeper" races that might become really competitive are UT-04; where Doug Owens seems likely to rematch Mia Love, CA-21; where former State Sen. Michael Rubio may be exploring a bid against David Valadao, and CA-25; which I predict Hillary will carry in 2016.
Logged
publicunofficial
angryGreatness
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,010
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2015, 07:28:13 PM »

MI-07? I live there. Tim Walberg is a third-rate political hack in a district that should be tailor-made for a Gerald Ford but that now has a Republican representative better suited for the Texas Panhandle than for south-central Michigan.

Tim Walberg simply does what Koch fronts tell him to do. It is only a matter of time.

I would generally agree with Walberg description, but he was able to win legislative seat for 16 years, and 4 out of 6 races for Congress (losing once in primary, where votes were heavily split, and 1 in general in extremely good Democratic year). So, either he is not so dumb, or - district is really conservative enough....

Walberg is really not an impressive politician, more of a lucky one. He barely survived 2006 before loosing to Mark Schauer in 2008, then the 2010 wave swept him back in. In 2012 he got a decent 55-45 win over his opponent, which looks impressive until you find out that Walberg's opponent was a nobody 9/11 truther who had no funding from the Democratic Party. And then in 2014, another wave saves him in a close 53-41 race.

This year, however, he faces Gretchen Driskell, a very good challenger. She's experienced with tough races, can fundraise, and has somewhat of a "rising star" quality to her. IIRC, Sabato, Cook, and Rothenberg all have MI-07 rated as a Toss-Up this year.



Other races I would consider "sleeper" races that might become really competitive are UT-04; where Doug Owens seems likely to rematch Mia Love, CA-21; where former State Sen. Michael Rubio may be exploring a bid against David Valadao, and CA-25; which I predict Hillary will carry in 2016.

Source for the bolded part?


http://www.sltrib.com/home/1913878-155/a-love-owens-rematch-democrat-says-it

Not entirely sure where the news about Valadao was.

According to The Nooner and other sources, there are rumors that Rubio will run in 2016. Rubio has opened a committee with the FEC, but hasn't raised any money.

Rubio currently works as a lobbyist for Chevron, a job he took so he could spend more time caring for his disabled newborn daughter.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 10 queries.