JLT's House Predictin' Thread 2010 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:23:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  JLT's House Predictin' Thread 2010 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: JLT's House Predictin' Thread 2010  (Read 22393 times)
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« on: January 01, 2010, 06:17:44 PM »

Excellent stuff, really.  I disagree on some things, but that's expected.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2010, 09:28:44 AM »

Most of my changes will probably mirror yours, fyi... Tongue
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2010, 06:12:37 PM »

I agree with your changes. (two of them were as I saw anyways.  Tongue)

The one thing I would say is that every competitive Arizona Dem seat needs to be bumped up a notch.  What Obama is doing is simply going to be a disaster for them, I suspect.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2010, 09:51:33 PM »

CT-05 (Chris Murphy) - moved to Democratic Watch List from Likely Democratic - Caligiuri won the nomination and is broke.

I can see that.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

In agreement, especially as now the national Republicans are at least acknowledging his existence.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Mirrors my last change, so yep.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What matters just as much is that Boswell has always been a weak incumbent and when weak incumbents get into bad national situations....  Of course, I've had Boswell at Lean D for months.  Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Don't know whether I agree.  Yoder is definitely favored (Lean R), but I don't see Likely R, yet at least.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Raczkowski has raised some money (Peters has a ton), but you have to admit the birther stuff don't look too good.  Given D+2 (even in Michigan, where 2008 was likely a tad off), I'm not there yet.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I've been there for a while too...  Wink

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

When MAS117 is involved in a political stunt....

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Albuquerque is a very strange area.  Anything can and will always happen there, regardless of what national numbers say "should happen".  I put it in Lean D the moment Barela raised a few centavos for this reason.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yep.  Still don't understand what he was doing voting for cap-n-trade in this CD.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yep.  Plus McIntrye doesn't have much cash on hand himself.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

If Kissell can't raise money, this should definitely be in pure tossup, imo, at least.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Should never have been taken off - these are the types of CDs that can mysteriously disappear if a wave comes about, for no reason at all.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Pomeroy is another classic weak incumbent.  But I see no evidence this is anything but tossup right now.  Maybe Republican-leaning, sure.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yep.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Actually, it makes me wonder whether I should have it in Lean D.  Same with TX-23, btw.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

My gut tells me that Dahlkemper is in trouble.  My gut has been wrong before, of course.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I noticed it!  Smiley

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Interestingly, SUSA poll mirrors turnout from both polls in 2006, with both 2008 polls showing a completely different turnout altogether.  Just something to keep in mind.

It should be in Lean R anyway because GOP has united behind Hurt.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not there yet.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2010, 06:38:44 PM »

Fair enough.

I have this gut feeling now that we have reached an inflection point, and there is maybe now a 60% chance that there will be a wave, and the GOP will take back the House, and then some. The economic news is just terrible, the Dems are demoralized, with the Left mad at Obama, Obama has really mishandled the immigration issue (this business of not wanting to make the border more secure in order to have leverage to legalize millions of folks, cannot possible sit well with a majority of the voters), and the Dems borrowing another 26  billion to keep public employees employed (ya they say it is paid for, but they ain't cutting food stamps, so that will go by the wayside, just like the slash in doctor reimbursements), insurance premiums are ratcheting up, and emergency rooms are more clogged than ever, since so many docs will not take medicaid patients anymore, because they lose money on them. Can the news get any more terrible?

It looks to me like we may well be heading into a perfect storm, and the boat is not going to make it back to port.

I wrote this a few weeks ago.

As an overview, my thoughts are that the GOP chances of taking the House are presently somewhere between a 1 in 3 chance (33%) to a 2 in 5 (40%) chance.  An argument can be made for a 50-50 chance, but I'm not making it yet.

I didn't note this earlier, but the GOP chance of taking the Senate is probably at 1 in 10 right now.

Quite frankly, I think the evidence is now there to put GOP chances of taking the House at 50-50.  Can't agree on the 60% yet.  Still probably at 10% in the Senate, though.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2010, 09:02:54 PM »

Sam, as I say I am extrapolating based on a gut feeling, and a sense that I have that folks are beginning to panic a bit, and/or get really mad, above and beyond the usual suspects of the GOP base. I of course could be totally full of sh**t. But, well, just relying on polls and money all the time gets boring - at least for me. So when a divining  rod magically comes into my hands, I "enjoy" playing with it a bit. It is also hard in this environment for pollsters to predict turnout models - very hard. And finally I am impressed with the high GOP primary turnouts of late, and the low Dem ones. So I am giving myself "permission" to rely on my instincts here a bit. Don't you like to give yourself permission to do stuff, Sam?

Of course.  Fwiw, I don't think your conclusion is out of the mainstream of possibilities at all.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 8 queries.