Bubba was unpopular in Colorado IIRC.
Yep. The halcyon days of the CO GOP. Of course, no other polls validate this result.
I'll make a couple of comments here as to the four Rasmussen polls received today:
The Ohio and NH polls essentially match "fairly" recent iterations by other companies - thus, I see no reason to believe they're not true. Giuliani tied with Hillary in OH, Hillary with a slight lead in NH. Thompson performs better in Ohio and worse in NH. Romney is the opposite (may have something to do with constant advertising). Ohio and New Hampshire are not places where the polling tends to go faulty (2006 NH excepted) - that adds another layer of believability.
The Florida iteration comes close to matching Q - and that would in turn show a slight Clinton lead over Giuliani (and larger leads over the others). Of course, Florida polling has more problems than answers - and this poll's internals looks pretty strange to me for a couple of reasons (not listed here). And the usual Florida polling Dem lean would likely push that result towards a tie (Giuliani only). Anyway, I'll simply wait for M-D here - if it validates this, then this is probably correct - if not, then no.
And if you think this Florida commentary is confusing, just wait until we get to general election polling from New Mexico and Wisconsin.