Population Growth Patterns in Metro Areas, 2000-16 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:45:19 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Population Growth Patterns in Metro Areas, 2000-16 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Population Growth Patterns in Metro Areas, 2000-16  (Read 11618 times)
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« on: June 02, 2017, 08:39:28 PM »

Nashville? That's were my fiancée is from.

Nashville suffers from the lack of granularity issue in the south, particularly since a lot of of the population lives in the consolidated Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County.  I'll put it on my to do list, though.

I can imagine quite a few Southern cities would be tough to do for this reason
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2017, 10:25:12 PM »

What's up with the wild population swings in Union Township, Madison County?
It has two prisons (London Correctional Institution and Madison Correctional Institution) which has a an address of London, but appears to be located in the township (Madison Township wraps around London, and the prisons are west and northwest of the city).

In 2010, 89% of the township population was male, and 78% was incarcerated.

Thanks.  It's almost always the prisons that cause wild population swings.

Nashville? That's were my fiancée is from.

Nashville suffers from the lack of granularity issue in the south, particularly since a lot of of the population lives in the consolidated Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County.  I'll put it on my to do list, though.

I can imagine quite a few Southern cities would be tough to do for this reason

Correct.  Many people in the South live in unincorporated parts of their counties, and Census doesn't do yearly population estimates for CDPs (though I can get about 5-years' CDP data from the 5-year ACS).  

It's a little less of a problem on the West Coast, but still a problem.  Eventually, I'll get around to doing maps of the Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas and Houston metros, though.  The shapes of Texas' cities are bizarre, thanks to their annexation laws.

WA has pushed many CDPs to incorporate or be annexed in the last decade, which will probably help
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2017, 12:42:22 PM »

Greater St. Louis:



That's the last of the top 25 metros.

Really emphasizes how dire STL has been recently
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 11 queries.