Trend Map is more revelant for 2016 Presidential Election:2004/2012 or 2008/2012 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 02:59:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Trend Map is more revelant for 2016 Presidential Election:2004/2012 or 2008/2012 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trend Map is more revelant for 2016 Presidential Election:2004/2012 or 2008/2012  (Read 1739 times)
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,102
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
« on: February 22, 2014, 11:56:05 PM »

Scott Walker would win Hawaii?

Riiiiiiiiiight.........

......it's a trend map. "rolls eyes"

Trend map or not, Hawaii could not be won by a R.
You obviously don't know what we are talking about here, so bye.
(unless you want to know Smiley )

Sure, fill me in. I must be missing the picture. Tongue

Trends are how much a state swings compared to the national swing. It has nothing to do with which candidate will win which state. Illinois trended republican in 2012 but Obama still won it handily is an example...

2004/2012 would be more accurate for the OP's question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.