Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 08:19:43 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Trump approval ratings thread, 1.4  (Read 179032 times)
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« on: August 15, 2018, 08:18:06 PM »

Rass tweeting out daily #'s of Trump supposed black JA which they say is 36%, amazingly Trump only manages a 49% approval rating overall with numbers like that. I'm starting to think we may have another Research 2000 situation.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2018, 09:41:33 PM »

He always seems to float back to 44-45% after any rough patch, essentially what he got in 2016. I think he's had very little attrition since the election maybe losing a little of his initial support and gaining a tiny amount.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2018, 10:34:53 AM »

Rass has Trump JA at 50% but they also tweeted out his JA with blacks is at 35%, I think they might be another Research 2000.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2018, 12:11:49 PM »

Rass has Trump JA at 50% but they also tweeted out his JA with blacks is at 35%, I think they might be another Research 2000.

Rasmussen has shown a very high approval of Trump by blacks for a while now. Other polls don't have him nearly as high, but they do show marked improvement among blacks since 2016.

Black people just love it when Republicans call them n*****s. Didn’t you get the memo? Also love it when Republicans hate them kneeling. They have a masochistic voting habit

Here's the thing: a quarter of blacks or more identify as conservatives, and most identify as moderate, not liberal. Whether they vote for Republicans is another matter (which I'm thinking about starting a thread on). It's not insane to think a third of blacks might approve of Trump.

If a third of blacks approved of Trump then his JA would consistently be above 50%. The Rass polls makes no sense because if his JA with blacks is 35% then how is he only at 50%. They are either seriously undersampling black voters which skews their whole result or making numbers up for headlines.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2018, 03:05:41 PM »

His overall would not only be 50% if his JA with blacks were 40%. Why is nobody pointing this out? This is like if a Dem suddenly had 40% of white evangelical support, they'd be heading for a landslide.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2018, 04:24:27 PM »
« Edited: November 10, 2018, 04:28:59 PM by henster »

FOX seems to have exit polls for all 50 states, they along with AP did their own exits and the JA seem different than the ones on CNN. Lower in WI/MN/NV. In WI it's 43/56, in MN 41/58, in NV 45/54. The Fox results seem to jive more with the election results in those states, no R in MN really got more than 42%, Heller/Laxalt got around 45%, Vukmir got around 45%.

https://www.foxnews.com/midterms-2018/voter-analysis
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2018, 03:30:28 PM »

Although there was no exit poll of Iowa by Edison Research, we do have a exit poll from Public Policy Polling, a dem leaning firm but still some data is better then nothing. It found Trump approval at 49%, disapproval 48% with a partisan split of 37R/35D/28I.  The numbers in the cross-tabs seem to check out so the 49% approve, 48% disapprove number is likely true.

https://www.scribd.com/document/392695469/Exit-Poll-Iowa-Voters-11-6-11-7-2018



FOX/AP exit poll which is different from Edison had him at 46/54.

https://www.foxnews.com/midterms-2018/voter-analysis?filter=IA&type=G

Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2019, 04:35:02 PM »

Zogby, Jan. 18-20, 893 likely voters (change from Nov.)

Approve 41 (-5)
Disapprove 56 (+4)

Strongly approve 23
Strongly disapprove 46

This is a BFD.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2019, 01:39:35 AM »



Someone must have confused Groundhog Day with April Fool's Day.

This bosh has no undecided and one sum at 101%.

Trump is at 46/48 approval in this poll.  That seems rather high for Iowa.


...and it is released on the day in which the poll ends (which I didn't notice at first)/

I would accept 46-48 for Iowa without those problems. (and there are two 101% sums -- not one!)

Emerson only called landlines in '16 and somehow ended up being the more accurate pollsters, along with Gravis they've always astounded me how weird they are but end up producing decent results.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2019, 05:01:57 PM »

I’m pretty sure Rasmussen is just making up numbers at this point. Where do they get the $$ to run a polls of ‘likely voters’ every day when even Gallup can’t do that anymore? We already know Trump paid people off to rig online polls for him in 2016. The way he always has a graphic to tweet out of their polls raises a lot of red flag, he’s paying them off to produce fake polls for them.
 
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,024


« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2019, 08:13:29 PM »

Whenever there was a major indictment it didn't really move his numbers all that much, Russia was barely even an issue in the midterms. The investigation was always more of a inside the beltway thing that cable news hyped up, I think his JA is pretty much baked in at -10 or so atp.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.