CA-Field: Clinton +30 (or +24) (user search)

Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 30,318

Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

Re: CA-Field: Clinton +30 (or +24)

« on: July 07, 2016, 10:36:26 AM »

Quote from: TN volunteer on July 07, 2016, 03:01:09 AM

With numbers like that, it's really not hard to understand why Trump winning the popular vote is almost impossible.

I agree, it's also not hard to understand why Trump winning the EC is nearly impossible.

Logged

Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 30,318

Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

Re: CA-Field: Clinton +30 (or +24)

« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2016, 06:19:38 PM »

Quote from: IceSpear on July 08, 2016, 05:25:40 PM

Also, RCP still has California as "likely D." LOL

Muh single digit race in 2004.

Logged

Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 30,318

Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

Re: CA-Field: Clinton +30 (or +24)

« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2016, 07:29:35 PM »

Quote from: IceSpear on July 08, 2016, 07:14:29 PM

Quote from: xingkerui on July 08, 2016, 06:19:38 PM

Quote from: IceSpear on July 08, 2016, 05:25:40 PM

Also, RCP still has California as "likely D." LOL

Muh single digit race in 2004.

Which is why they also have Arkansas at likely R...oh wait, they don't!

And polls have even shown Arkansas much closer than California. Roll Eyes

Uh... California was closer than Arkansas to the PV in, uh... 2008! Yeah, that's it, California was almost as close to the PV as Arizona in 2008, and we'll ignore the home state effect because... reasons.

Logged

Pages: [1]

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 02, 2024, 01:42:29 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more