KY-SEN: Amy McGrath in (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 07:24:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  KY-SEN: Amy McGrath in (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: KY-SEN: Amy McGrath in  (Read 59861 times)
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« on: July 09, 2019, 11:51:27 AM »

If she couldn't win in a seat well to the left of the state in a historically Democratic year what makes her think she can win statewide with Trump at the top of the ticket?
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2019, 11:55:33 AM »

If she couldn't win in a seat well to the left of the state in a historically Democratic year what makes her think she can win statewide with Trump at the top of the ticket?

That money from idiot donors bruh. Just write off all your expenses/bar tabs to the campaign and life is great
She'll definitely pull donations from resistance idiots that could go to actual competitive races in North Carolina and Colorado
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2019, 11:58:51 AM »

If she couldn't win in a seat well to the left of the state in a historically Democratic year what makes her think she can win statewide with Trump at the top of the ticket?

That money from idiot donors bruh. Just write off all your expenses/bar tabs to the campaign and life is great
She'll definitely pull donations from resistance idiots that could go to actual competitive races in North Carolina and Colorado

Colorado probably won't be competitive.
The denocrat will most likely win, but I'm guessing the race will still be within 5 pts
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2019, 02:11:07 PM »

Nate Silver thinks McGrath has a shot because of approval ratings and his status as a party leader. This is his job and he still hasn't learned from past elections.
Nate Silver is great at models and numbers but is Bill Kristol level terrible as a pundit
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2019, 07:36:52 PM »

To those complaining that the Dems will waste money here, I think she will ends up with the opposite problem - barely any money at all and cannot run a legitimate campaign. The dem base is educated and cares about winning, and is not afraid to cruelly throw candidates under the bus. Their donations are political investments after all. When the NYT found candidates losing by significant margins in a single poll, they lost their shine. I am reminded of TX23, TX31, and MN08 - all MOE races in the end, but all abandoned by the activist base first and then the donors when one data point came up not in their favor.
Lol no, these are the same people who lit their money on fire for O'Rourke and Heitkamp
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2019, 08:21:00 PM »

To those complaining that the Dems will waste money here, I think she will ends up with the opposite problem - barely any money at all and cannot run a legitimate campaign. The dem base is educated and cares about winning, and is not afraid to cruelly throw candidates under the bus. Their donations are political investments after all. When the NYT found candidates losing by significant margins in a single poll, they lost their shine. I am reminded of TX23, TX31, and MN08 - all MOE races in the end, but all abandoned by the activist base first and then the donors when one data point came up not in their favor.
Lol no, these are the same people who lit their money on fire for O'Rourke and Heitkamp

ND and TN were a waste of money, but was TX? Yeah it was excessive, but O’Rourke came closer to winning than 3 of the 4 Democratic Senators that lost did. And he gave us a glimpse as to how a Democrat can win statewide sometime in the next decade when there previously wasn’t a template to use. Literally just add five points to Beto’s margins in the cities and suburbs and that’s a blue Texas. And his downballot coattails were huge in the legislature and at the county level.
Yes, but the countless millions raised went well beyond the point of diminishing returns
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2019, 08:00:53 AM »

Atlas consensus here is so dumb and tiresome. Yes, it's an uphill race, but the whole map is uphill! Because of the nature of the map, you have to make a serious effort to pick up seats in Montana, and Texas, and Kansas, all of which are going to be extraordinarily difficult. At least in this one you've got a good candidate who is fundraising well and will run a competitive election — absolute malpractice to write it off as safe R now.
The problem for Democrats is that this race won't be competitive and will siphon money from left-wing idiots that could go to actual races
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2019, 05:37:08 PM »

https://mobile.twitter.com/HolmesJosh/status/1149075028601954304

This woman really isn't ready for prime-time
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2019, 07:03:07 PM »

I mean its been pointed out that McGrath is an inferior candidate to ALG in every metric, yet left wing idiots still pumped money into her campaign
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2019, 09:55:00 PM »

there's a good chance that McConnell's margin is closer to his 2002 race at this point, probably the worst first 48 hours for a hyped senate recruit in recent memory
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.