Holy Word here.
Fylde, Staining and Weeton
Con 73.0 (+11.2)
Lab 20.2 (-18.0)
Lib Dem 6.7 (+6.7)
West Lindsey, Sudbrooke
Con 69.6 (+0.7)
Lab 30.4 (+10.5)
Hartlepool, Victoria
Lab 53.1 (+1.9)
UKIP 36.0 (+6.4)
Con 10.9 (-1.0)
South Holland, Whaplode and Holbeach St John's
Con 78.0 (+21.6)
Lab 22.0 (+22.0)
Darlington, Mowden
Con 60.7 (+13.2)
Lab 26.5 (-2.6)
Lib Dem 10.3 (+10.3)
Green 2.4 (-5.4)
Darlington, Red Hall and Lingfield
Lab 44.8 (-1.6)
Con 41.4 (+13.0)
FB 8.3 (+8.3)
Green 3.6 (-9.3)
Lib Dem 2.0 (-10.3)
Eden, Penrith North
Lib Dem 45.2 (+3.5)
Con 31.2 (-1.1)
Lab 16.6 (-9.4)
Green 7.0 (+7.0)
Chiltern, Penn and Coleshill
Con 80.6
Lib Dem 19.4
Waveney, Kirkley
Lab 47.8 (+12.6)
Con 27.7 (+9.9)
Lib Dem 10.7 (+10.7)
UKIP 10.0 (-11.1)
Green 3.8 (-5.
Waveney, St Margaret's
Con 41.7 (+13.4)
Lab 35.1 (-1.0)
UKIP 10.2 (-17.
Lib Dem 7.5 (+7.5)
Green 5.6 (-2.0)
Con gain St Margaret's from Lab
The results in Waveney and Darlington are truly shocking and disappointing to say the least,
Labour have never lost the waveney seat in a long time
we are being governed by the most incompetent government since the 1970s, brexit negotiations and universal credit aren't going well,
Labour should be 20+ ahead in the polls yet, we are level pegging nationally and losing votes locally
I suppose that there are two possible explanations for this:
1) The type of voters that Corbyn energised (primarily the young) would be much less likely to turn out for a local by-election than the rest of the electorate. This should give Labour some comfort.
2) Whilst Corbyn may energise the Labour base he terrifies Tory inclined voters to such a degree that they are willing to stick with the Tories regardless of how incompetent/shambolic the government is. This interpretation does tie into the fact that Labour has been unable to gain a lead of more than a few points over the Tories despite them having their worst few weeks in several years. Speaking anecdotally I strongly disapprove of the governments competence but nevertheless I feel I will have to vote for them at the next election (whenever that may be) because I view the alternative (Corbyn, McDonnell, Abbott and co.) as being far worse. My parents and many in their social circles feel the same as I suspect do millions across the country. Now if the economy truly were to tank this may well change but as of now there is no real sign that Labour is making any progress at all with Tory voters.
However I would note that the Waveney constituency (which should be called Lowestoft but I digress) was one of Labour's worst results in England and Wales and was indeed the only seat where the Lib Dems were not seen as the primary opposition to the Tories where the Labour vote fell. Darlington too was a below average result for Labour with a small swing against them. These are clearly not areas massively enthused by 'Corbynmania' in the first place. Whilst in contrast Labour has had extremely strong local by-election results in more touristy places on the coast in this parliament e.g. Worthing, Shoreham, Weston-super-Mare, Thanet. Nevertheless there is no getting away from the fact that this weeks results were poor for Labour with a government in as much trouble as the current one is.
Arguably the failure to damage the Tory vote virtually at all in the London borough of Wandsworth (a Labour target council next year) ward of Thamesfield in last weeks by-elections should be more concerning to Labour. This is because unlike Lowestoft and Darlington this is an area where Brexit is exceedingly unpopular and the Tories have seemingly gone out of their way to chuck away votes.