Challenge: Describe a Dukakis 88/Bush 92 voter (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 03:06:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Challenge: Describe a Dukakis 88/Bush 92 voter (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Challenge: Describe a Dukakis 88/Bush 92 voter  (Read 11862 times)
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« on: December 30, 2014, 10:23:34 PM »


Nikolas Stephonapolis, 1921-1996: A Greek-American veteran of World War II was the owner of Nik's Diner in Wooster, MA. A lifelong Republican he voted for Michael Dukukis who visited his diner while campaigning on several occasions for governor and voted for him out of ethnic pride in 88, the only time in his life he voted for a Democrat for President.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2014, 10:39:54 PM »

There are people changing beliefs/party loyalties all the time. I think most of these voters would fit in that group.

I would imagine a 1968 Wallace/1972 McGovern voter would be much more of a challenge.

Maybe some yellow dog Democrats in the South who were willing to bolt the national party (after all, Wallace was still a Democrat...) but just couldn't bring themselves to vote Republican?

Admittedly, there wouldn't be too many...given how badly McGovern lost the South.

Maybe some guy who grew up in a southern family and voted for Wallace, before going to Vietnam, returning and becoming an anti-war hippie as a result.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2014, 11:10:16 PM »

Those Alabama counties were in all likelihood not the result of voters changing their choice but new black voters who had not yet gotten used to being able to vote.
This was 33 years after the Voting Rights Act. Junk explanation.

You mean 3 years, and I don't think it's outside the realm of explanation that it might have taken some time for a lot of black voters to all get registered. There still could have been hidden informal suppression efforts going on the local level that went unreported at first. After all, in general it was the same white southerners still running voter registration.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2014, 01:22:55 PM »

A Rural, Mid-Western Farmer that had been effected by the Farm Crisis.

Iowa was a state where Dukakis '88, did better than Clinton '92.

Perot probably got the bulk of those votes though.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2014, 06:29:56 PM »

What I think is interesting in the other direction is a Ford 76/Carter 80 voter. I know of someone who voted for Ford because they were scarred that Carter was a theocrat but then voted for Carter because they were terrified of Reagan. I bet that for more people it was the other way around and probably a lot of the baby boomer evangelicals were Carter 76/Reagen 80.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2014, 09:11:40 PM »


Did he admit it? Wouldn't surprise me that there would be bad blood between them.
Logged
Libertarian Socialist Dem
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 345
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2014, 09:13:20 PM »

Oh wow, he did

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x3031168
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.