The election was not a low-turnout election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 08:05:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  The election was not a low-turnout election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The election was not a low-turnout election  (Read 1645 times)
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
« on: October 19, 2017, 06:02:28 PM »

The Mikado, keep in mind there was a lot of lazy journalism in the immediate aftermath of the election that didn't consider the considerable mail in vote in CA and the west coast and they rushed to the presses with lines about Trump winning because of lower turnout and that he got less raw votes than Mitt Romney did.


Neither of which was true. He got a lower percentage, but Trump got 2 million more votes than Romney and Clinton came close to matching Obama 2012 (was only off by 100,000 I think), and beyond that the substantial increase in third party voting, which was ignored.


So between the premature reports that didn't include the mail in vote, and ignoring the larger third party vote, lies the formation of this narrative.

Interestingly, Trump also received slightly less votes than the aggregate U.S House Republican vote total.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.