Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 02:46:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Indictment-O-Rama, Act 3: Cohen Up the River  (Read 78068 times)
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« on: December 08, 2018, 01:13:05 AM »

Individual-1 is in deep number two.
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2019, 11:00:51 PM »

LOL, and he wants Dems to "compromise" and pay for his wall?
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2019, 03:08:48 PM »

The report is going to leak if Barr doesn't release it soon.
It would be wonderful if there was an Edward Snowden type working at the DOJ right now.  He/she could leak those Mueller documents...
Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2019, 10:15:59 AM »

BREAKING: SCOTUS upholds the "separate sovereigns" standard of double jeopardy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/17/supreme-court-double-jeopardy-ruling-trump-associates/3268701002/

Quote
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court upheld Monday the ability of federal and state governments to prosecute defendants twice for the same crime – a form of double jeopardy that could come into play if President Donald Trump pardons former associates caught up in the Russian election-meddling scandal.

The case, which was heard in early December, had appeared to be an opportunity for challengers to block second prosecutions. But, during oral argument, it became clear that a majority of justices were wary of letting criminals go free, possibly including some of those previously sentenced.

Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote the 7-2 opinion, joined by three conservative and three liberal colleagues. Associate Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Neil Gorsuch dissented.

The case had gained attention largely because of the possibility that Trump could pardon one or more of his former associates convicted in federal court by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Logged
libertpaulian
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,611
United States


« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2019, 09:31:22 PM »
« Edited: September 06, 2019, 09:35:27 PM by libertpaulian »

BREAKING!


Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.