Emerson: UT (McMullin +4), NH (Clinton +8), PA (Clinton +4), MO (Trump +8) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:27:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Emerson: UT (McMullin +4), NH (Clinton +8), PA (Clinton +4), MO (Trump +8) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Emerson: UT (McMullin +4), NH (Clinton +8), PA (Clinton +4), MO (Trump +8)  (Read 6032 times)
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
« on: October 19, 2016, 02:04:58 PM »
http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_98fe8b3559f64960a573ecad7dc22ec9.pdf

NH
Clinton 44
Trump 36
Johnson 10
Stein 6

PA
Clinton 45
Trump 41
Johnson 4
Stein 4

MO
Clinton 39
Trump 47
Johnson 5
Stein 2

UT
Clinton 24
Trump 27
Johnson 5
McMullin 31
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2016, 02:21:09 PM »
http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_1991b4a7afe8464ba2afee10485c5d20.xlsx?dn=ECP_UT_10.18.xlsx
Just for fun, I looked at the crosstabs.

Clinton has 84% of Dems.
Trump has 44% of GOP.
McMullin gets 35% of GOP.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2016, 02:31:26 PM »
Quote from: Assemblyman Gass3268 on October 19, 2016, 02:25:40 PM
I'd vote for McMuffin in Utah, just to see Trump lose the state.

If you were an actual Utah voter that wanted Clinton to win though, letting McMullin win, and in the event she's short of 270, lets the House vote for President, and they'll probably vote Trump.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.