2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:28:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Recruitment/Fundraising/Ratings Megathread  (Read 234629 times)
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,615
United Kingdom


« on: October 30, 2017, 03:24:03 AM »

The lack of Republican enthusiasm just one year on from winning the White House is astonishing
Logged
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,615
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2017, 08:07:57 PM »

A year is a long time in politics
Logged
Statilius the Epicurean
Thersites
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,615
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2017, 04:21:50 PM »

The problem is given gerrymandering Democrats probably need to be winning by double digits or at least very high single digits. If Democrats win the popular vote by say 7.5% they probably fall short of winning the House.

There's a point with gerrymandering where the dam breaks and losses end up worse than they would be otherwise. This is an entirely illustrative example, but if you gerrymander every district to be R+5-10 and there's an across the board swing of D+12 then you get wiped out despite getting say 44% of the popular vote.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.