Why was Kerry doing so bad in the polls before the first debate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 06:55:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why was Kerry doing so bad in the polls before the first debate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Kerry doing so bad in the polls before the first debate  (Read 876 times)
twenty42
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 861
United States


« on: September 11, 2017, 10:13:06 AM »

Kerry was leading until the RNC Convention.

Bush was leading bigly after the Convention but the debates damaged Bush and narrowed his lead because he did terribly.

The 2004 RNC lasted from August 30th to September 2nd, here's the aggregate polling before the Convetion:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2004/aug/aug29.html

Kerry was leading with 270 electoral votes, and here's the aggregate polling after the Convention:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2004/sep/sep03.html

Bush 270 Kerry 252
Didn't know Tennessee was on the radar of competitive states in 2004. Was it because of the common polling error in Tennessee of overestimating the D vote? Or was Kerry definitely favored there at one point during the campaign?

TN, AR, and MO were still precarious before the 2004 election took place. Bill Clinton had carried them twice and Bush only won the states by slight margins in 2000, so pundits were unsure how the states would behave relative to the NPV. The final results confirmed TN and AR as solid R states, while MO remained competitive until 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.