How much would Dukakis have won by if not for the media's bias? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 01:17:44 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  How much would Dukakis have won by if not for the media's bias? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How much would Dukakis have won by if not for the media's bias?  (Read 11883 times)
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« on: February 18, 2006, 12:34:41 AM »

I've agonized about this since the day of the 1988 election.

I don't feel like making a map, but I think he would have won by even more than Clinton did. He did have an 18-point lead during the summer, before the Repub Noise Machine kicked in.

Strange how the media seldom reported the fact that the furlough program was begun by a Republican, and Dukakis was the one who abolished it. These facts run completely contrary to the "official" version of things that was spread around so effectively.

I think if the media had played fair, he would have won Kentucky and Ohio surely, plus most other states that Clinton won in '92, and quite possibly even a state like South Dakota. Locally, though, I don't think he would have won my home county (Campbell, KY). (Campbell County was kind of like Bushbot Central back then.)

Dukakis. A decent guy.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2006, 12:04:58 AM »

The fact that he told Bernard Shaw that he wouldn't retaliate if a thug raped his own wife pretty much sealed his fate.

He never said this!
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2006, 11:14:54 AM »

What sense does it make to have an UNSUPERVISED furlough program for prisoners who are supposed to be serving life sentences?  If that isn't hare-brained, I don't know what is.

To repeat, it was Dukakis who got rid of the furlough program.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2006, 11:16:20 AM »

Granted, Dukakis looked about as bad as anyone possibly could have in his response to the question, but I still maintain that it was extremely unfair.

It was such an incredibly idiotic question that I could hardly even pay any attention to what his answer was.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2006, 11:38:41 AM »


At least it's not TOMMY THOMPSON logic.
Logged
Bandit3 the Worker
Populist3
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,963


Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -9.92

« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2006, 09:18:47 PM »

Can someone explain to me what the whole deal about Dukakis in a tank was about.  I've seen the pictures.  What's the big deal?

The big deal is that the media decided to make political hay out of it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.