What map style of the 2016 election do you prefer? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 03, 2024, 02:28:39 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Election Archive

2016 U.S. Presidential Election

What map style of the 2016 election do you prefer? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

See maps below for corresponding choice numbers

#1 1 - xkcd		6 (13.3%)
#2 2 - Counties		26 (57.8%)
#3 3 - NYT map (1)		0 (0%)
#4 4 - NYT map (2)		10 (22.2%)
#5 5 (other - specify)		3 (6.7%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 45

Author

Topic: What map style of the 2016 election do you prefer? (Read 1848 times)

Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon

Posts: 18,916

Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

What map style of the 2016 election do you prefer?

« on: January 09, 2018, 03:40:19 PM »

I came across this Vox article and it got me thinking. Which do you prefer?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/1/8/16865532/2016-presidential-election-map-xkcd
https://twitter.com/AlanMCole/status/950415038506037254

1 - xkcd map. This is the one that the article was primarily about:

2 - Counties. Personally, I prefer this, admittedly for for its pleasant aesthetics

3 - NYT (1)

4 - NYT (2)

5 - Other (please specify in a post)

Logged

Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon

Posts: 18,916

Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

Re: What map style of the 2016 election do you prefer?

« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2018, 08:57:44 PM »

Quote from: Crumpets on January 11, 2018, 07:31:58 PM

Personally my favorite style of map is the Upshot/Nate Cohn version of the XKCD map. But alas, it only exists on a statewide level (I think these might actually be from 2014 Senate elections):

snip

omg those look nice! Where did you find them?

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.