So out of curiosity, is the idea that you'd share in the banning decisions with Muon, or would you stick to something like the role that I had back in the day, where I used my modadmin powers to keep the spammer / sock attacks at bay, but left banning decisions to Nym?
I thought I might ban Nym/muon2 and all Moderators who challenge my oppressive rule while also installing puppet Moderators
(that Dave approves of) to carry out my orders.
No but really, I hadn't thought about it. I've been using up a lot of my forum time trying to iron out bugs / making adjustments to my project. I guess dealing with socks/spammers, and dealing with other temporary decisions. So long as muon2 is actually here to deal with stuff, we have a system we can follow. It wouldn't be right to have muon2 doing one thing and me another, because then ban decisions would begin to resemble judge-shopping
One thing I do intend to be active on is making sure Reaganfan and Greedo-like users don't park their butts in town hall/debate/"breaking news"/election night threads and begin turning it into a steaming pile of dung with the only content being people arguing with them. I won't have a problem with issuing 24 hour mod reviews if they can't respect other user's wishes to have a thread that they can actually enjoy.