Boobies coming to the Supremes? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 11:11:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Boobies coming to the Supremes? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Boobies coming to the Supremes?  (Read 1384 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,700
United States


WWW
« on: February 23, 2019, 05:44:42 PM »
« edited: February 23, 2019, 05:48:15 PM by Frodo »

FF ruling.  

Seriously though, you cannot regard women's breasts as 'sexual organs' the way you would a penis or a vagina, unless you apply the same standard to men's breasts. 
Logged
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,700
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2019, 10:32:36 PM »

I see I have to explain myself:

Up until the 1930s, men's bare chests (in public spaces) were seen by polite society as being as obscene as women's bare chests are today.  Men were arrested and/or cited for not abiding by societal norms.  I am sure many of you have seen old-time photos of men wearing these rather strange bathing suits that cover much of their chest, like so:





It took protests and civil disobedience to finally change the law on it, and eventually society followed suit.  

I see no reason why the same should not also apply to women wishing to partake of the freedoms that men currently enjoy.  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.